[red-knot] Add MRO resolution for classes (take 2)

astral-sh · Oct 31, 2024 · 723169d · 723169d
1 parent b8acadd
commit 723169d
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 6 changed files with 788 additions and 63 deletions.
diff --git a/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/instances.md b/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/instances.md
@@ -202,11 +202,7 @@ reveal_type(A() + B())  # revealed: MyString
 # N.B. Still a subtype of `A`, even though `A` does not appear directly in the class's `__bases__`
 class C(B): ...
 
-# TODO: we currently only understand direct subclasses as subtypes of the superclass.
-# We need to iterate through the full MRO rather than just the class's bases;
-# if we do, we'll understand `C` as a subtype of `A`, and correctly understand this as being
-# `MyString` rather than `str`
-reveal_type(A() + C())  # revealed: str
+reveal_type(A() + C())  # revealed: MyString
 ```
 
 ## Reflected precedence 2