-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Much less than, much greater than symbols #96
Comments
Unfortunately << and >> are already used as input symbols for angle brakets, so I'm not sure what a reasonable input symbol for these would be. |
I think a text-based symbol would be fine. |
In the areas where I do research, the expression
f << g
has the same meaning as
f = O(g) ,
where big-O notation is being used in that equation.
So in that context, ll and gg would be reasonable notations.
However, in that context << does *not* mean "much less than".
See
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/199753/how-does-one-read-aloud-vinogradovs-notation-ll-and-ll-epsilon
It could be a bad idea to implement notation with a
different meaning that is commonly used.
…On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, TMiguelT wrote:
I think a text-based symbol would be fine. mtg and mlt would be fine
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the
thread.[AAM6LO1QQ5vMNZkRPNv7ZElFZ6gteigUks5urldSgaJpZM4YNGOo.gif]
|
Thanks David, it's helpful to know the symbol has other meanings in other contexts. I agree that reusing the LaTeX symbols, ll and gg, seems like a reasonable approach. |
Hi, I would need that one too :) |
It would be nice to have ≪ and ≫ in asciimath
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: