Add INFO message to site modules showing the filename in case of issues #961
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
abelsromero
force-pushed
the
branch-main/issue-323/display-source-file-in-site-modules
branch
from
799628a to
77e6b9f
Compare
This PR uses the new 'reference' parameter in Doxia Parsers to print the source filename when an issue is detected. This is compatible and extends the features in 'logHandler'. Fixes asciidoctor#323
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)
What is the goal of this pull request?
This PR uses the new 'reference' parameter in Doxia Parsers to print the source filename when an issue is detected. This is compatible and extends the features in 'logHandler'.
Fixes #323
Are there any alternative ways to implement this?
No
Are there any implications of this pull request? Anything a user must know?
No. In fact, the behavior is slightly different from
process-asciidocmojo to minimize changes.See comment #323 (comment)
Is it related to an existing issue?
Finally, please add a corresponding entry to CHANGELOG.adoc