Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

summary for circular variables #339

Closed
aloctavodia opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

summary for circular variables #339

aloctavodia opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
Enhancement Improvements to ArviZ

Comments

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Contributor

aloctavodia commented Oct 9, 2018

Summary used to have a circ_var_names argument in order to specify for which variables to compute circular statistics instead of the regular ones (#45). This argument was replaced by include_circ, this accept booleans, when True it will compute the regular statistics plus the circular statistics for all variables. I think we should revert this and have circ_var_names again, or maybe some other alternative.

The ideal behavior will be to automatically compute the proper statistics based on the variable type, but at least for the moment that information is not available for ArviZ

@canyon289 canyon289 added the Enhancement Improvements to ArviZ label Nov 19, 2018
@shivam7569
Copy link

Is this issue open for work? I would like to work on this. Thanks!

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, this is still an issue. Thanks for your offer.

@smit-s
Copy link
Contributor

smit-s commented Mar 25, 2020

@aloctavodia If this issue is still open, can I work on it please?

@aloctavodia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is still open, I think @agustinaarroyuelo was planning to work on this as part of the GSoC (but she also is proposing many other tasks).

@smit-s
Copy link
Contributor

smit-s commented Mar 26, 2020

No problem at all. I will pick up regression plot and time-series.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement Improvements to ArviZ
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants