-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ToDo: diffs FF51-FF52 #37
Comments
re: gmp-eme-adobe => we should keep 1850 for now, because it's only fully removed in FF53. Make Adobe Primetime CDM non-visible in Firefox - RESOLVED FIXED in Firefox 52
Stop serving Adobe CDM to Firefox 52 and higher
Remove Adobe Primetime supporting code - RESOLVED FIXED in Firefox 53 --> only removed in FF53: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/1d8062b87249 |
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/52#HTTP => maybe worth adding and enforcing this |
Flip prefs to disable login autofill on HTTP and enable the warning on insecure login fields Flip a pref to disable autofilling saved password on HTTP pages. Flip a pref to enable showing insecure password warnings in the password field autocomplete drop down. |
because it's set by the code itself and isn't in any of the pref.js-files. https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-release/source/toolkit/modules/GMPUtils.jsm#127 edit: mozilla-central already doesn't include gmp-eme-adobe in GMP_PLUGIN_IDS anymore: |
If we don't want |
re: https://wiki.mozilla.org/PKI:CT Atm there are only 2 possible values:
quote from here:
When set to 1 it also shows additional information in the Security Dialog "Technical Details": It shows one of the following messages:
based on this:
afaik on the client-side the only thing that is eventually gonna change is that the pros and cons as I see it:
obviously for |
This can be done in three different ways:
|
We can ignore |
Well, I'll definitely disable WASM in my own user.js. As for this user.js we also disable asm.js already and I think it's similar to that. I read the security page and they do a lot of things right but it remains to be seen if it is as safe and hard-to-exploit as they make it out to be.
no, it's not accessible for web-content anymore but they left the pref intact for use in addons, afaik.
|
battery API - why deprecate it when it still exists? wasm - same as above, I'll resort to telling you what I'm doing for my user.js and you decide what you want to do for this user.js. |
Did a diff with stable FF52 and 2 things changed since the Beta diff:
|
|
SKIA looks cool from iCandy point of view. |
damn son, how the hell did you notice that so fast??!! It also changed my height by 1 pixel. Thanks for pointing it out! wasm is only supported in Firefox at the moment, so we should be good with disabling it for now.
|
1409: I don't see real collisions. I'm looking at a reduced list from the most common OS Fanboy's Anti-thirdparty Fonts reference: |
@Atavic, what he means is if due to 1401 only the 3 fonts in 1404 are allowed/used, then what would happen if someone would add f.e. only one font into the whitelist, but one that is not in 1404. |
1409: The whitelist is announced to the webserver, while the other entries are locally managed in the browser. |
Well, I don't know if that's correct. For one it's never |
Hey Pantsy, thanks for pointing out the |
This collaboration on the diffs worked out really nicely. Much easier than both of us doing it on our own. |
it depends. if they change the meaning of 1 or add more values but don't change the current default - we won't notice it in the diffs. I'll do diffs for minor versions too - it only takes a minute or so anyway. Since I'm now doing the diffs by parsing the prefs.js files, I don't have to install it anymore and could even do diffs for each new Beta. |
wow, that's a pretty loaded statement. What exactly do you think I was trying to sell?
If you're referring to this, that's not trying to sell anything it's just stating an undisputed fact. My reason: If I can disable some code-parts that don't offer anything protection-wise and only show a message that I never look at anyway, and by doing so completely prevent any potential flaws in those code-parts - it's a win-win and I will do that without hesitation any day of the week, at least until that feature starts doing something meaningful. We disable a lot of things for which there's no immediate threat or vulnerability, like fe. disable some more exotic and rare media formats like raw and wave. That's why I was playing with the idea of also disabling
Proposal: ignore both remaining prefs and add |
v51.0 vs v52.0
new in v52
removed, renamed or hidden in v52
changed in v52
0201
0603b
0608
1260
2509
2511
ignore
==NEW
==REMOVED or HIDDEN
==CHANGED
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: