Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support latest NLTK? #5

Open
KTRosenberg opened this issue Nov 27, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Support latest NLTK? #5

KTRosenberg opened this issue Nov 27, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@KTRosenberg
Copy link

KTRosenberg commented Nov 27, 2020

Is there a chance you might support NLTK 3.5+? I see that the library supports 3.3 at latest, at least at the moment.

@gleidsonh
Copy link

Is there a chance you might support NLTK 3.5+? I see that the library supports 3.3 at latest, at least at the moment.

Don't expect it. I've been waiting for an update to the pip for a while, but it looks like it won't be anytime soon.

If the update is not that complicated, do it yourself. For example, the update I am waiting for is simple, so in the Dockerfile I change the file. It's the way I managed to use it.

@dvsrepo
Copy link
Member

dvsrepo commented Jan 6, 2021

Is there a chance you might support NLTK 3.5+? I see that the library supports 3.3 at latest, at least at the moment.

Hi @KTRosenberg, sorry for the very late response, we have updated and tested this on master.

@KTRosenberg
Copy link
Author

No problem. Thanks for the update.
On another somewhat related note, would you have any idea about a library that attaches Propbank roles to the verbs, or is that an SRL-specific feature? I am trying to get a taxonomy of verbs.

@devrimcavusoglu
Copy link

@dvsrepo Any updates on this ? Current nltk version is 3.6.5, is there any plan to update the package by supporting the latest nltk (or 3.6+) ? Is it in the roadmap ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants