Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DeepDAO Feature Requests and Bug Reports #309

Open
namesty opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

DeepDAO Feature Requests and Bug Reports #309

namesty opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@namesty
Copy link

namesty commented Mar 2, 2021

DeepDAO reported the following bugs:

  • Sometimes, when fetching votes, and their descriptions the process is killed. The more proposals or votes, the more likely it is to happen. Seems to be a server load issue, specially because it comes accompanied by a quota warning coming from the ethereum node.
  • Currently, vote descriptions are not working at all.

I suggest (this is also in the feature request document) that Aragon Connect's configuration allows the user to configure his own ethereum node to get around this server load issue. In parallel we should optimize our algorithms.

DeepDAO feature requests with highest priority are:

  • Return the address of the vote's proposer from the API; currently it's returning the address of the app that created the proposal.
  • Return the vote descriptions in the returned metadata JSON.
  • Return all casts associated with a proposal in a single API call.

Lower priority requests, nice-to-haves and others are described in the full document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T6aOlO5qEFkoS9bT3yOChsZ_ciy9HQCYdOj2iQ9XGdU/edit#heading=h.fbyakov351h5

@jessebmiller jessebmiller self-assigned this Mar 2, 2021
@jessebmiller
Copy link

Thanks @nestorbe I'll get these written out in Linear

@githubdoramon
Copy link
Contributor

Can you guys please add here what is the function or endpoint that is failing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants