Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transparent proxies? #330

Closed
sohkai opened this issue Jun 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Transparent proxies? #330

sohkai opened this issue Jun 12, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@sohkai
Copy link
Contributor

sohkai commented Jun 12, 2018

See zeppelinos/zos-lib#36.

In our case, we'd most likely set the Kernel contract to be the "manager" of a proxy, and users would have to access any "management" functionality through the Kernel (e.g. provide proxy address and calldata to the kernel).

However, this might be too much of a UX loss for a vulnerability that has a very, very low probability.

@sohkai
Copy link
Contributor Author

sohkai commented Jul 25, 2018

Deciding against this for now, given the relatively low risk of the vulnerability.

@sohkai sohkai closed this as completed Jul 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant