Only swagger generation for end-point

[vladarefiev]

Hello @apryor6 .
I am happy using this library, but sometimes I want to do something before validation, for example pass context to Marshmallow Schema, but I still want to generate swagger for this API.

I'd like to contribute to the library implementing such functionality. What is the best way to do it to your opinion?

• extend existing both accepts and responds decorators with validate: bool param.
• create new decorator @swagger just for generation swagger spec.

What do you think?

[apryor6]

Hi there! A clarifying question so that I better understand the desire - are you referring to wanting to use the Marshmallow validators and have those requirements displayed within Swagger or something else?

[vladarefiev]

Hey @apryor6
Sometimes I can't use @accepts , but I still want to display model generated from Marshmallow schema in Swagger. So, I supposed two options how to implement it, I suggested creating a new decorator like @swagger(api, input_schema, output_schema) which helps to display your Marshmallow schemas in Swagger. What do you think?

[vryazanov]

@vladarefiev @apryor6 hey guys, I'm interesting in this topic as well. The main problem to me is that I cannot pass some extra params to Schema constructor directly, for one case I want to pass partial (but I know that it'is already implemented), for another case it could be a context.
That's deffinetly not a problem with partial parameter, but there are some problems with context, since in many cases the context should be generated in runtime, not import time (like if a part of context should be some data from request or request itself).
Maybe the high-level interface could look like:

def get_context():
    return {'request': flask.request}


class Resource(...):
        @responds(schema=WidgetSchema, schema_context=get_context, api=api)
        def post(self):
            pass

and somewhere under the hood:

def get_create_schema(schema_class, schema_context):
    return schema_class(...., context=schema_context())

wdyt?
let me know if I can help somehow

[vryazanov]

let's just add schema_context:Optional[dict] parameter to respond decorator at the beginning. that will make me happy 😄

[vladarefiev]

I need context in @accepts as well

[vryazanov]

oops, sure, I meant accepts, there is no point to pass it to respond

[apryor6]

Ah okay now I follow you - thanks for the example. I think your implementation about is exactly what I would suggest. If you want to contribute an implementation with supporting tests, I would be happy to review and accept a PR.

[vryazanov]

Started implementation and realized that we can pass an instance of schema to the decorator, so it's not a problem to pass context into constructor directly. as well as many parameter. according to c32b169

[apryor6]

That’s probably the simplest approach - does it fully resolve this issue, or is there a case where you might need schema construction to happen at request time outside of what can be dynamic via the context param?

[vryazanov]

@apryor6 yes, at least it's good to automatically update the schema context with query params

class Resource(...):
        @responds(schema=WidgetSchema, api=api)
        def post(self, some_id: int):
            pass

so that some_id should go to context without any extra code.
may be before this line https://github.com/apryor6/flask_accepts/blob/master/flask_accepts/decorators/decorators.py#L119
should be something like this: schema.context.update(**kwargs)

wdyt?