Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend in-code comments in regards to missing properties #620

Closed
wick-ed opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Extend in-code comments in regards to missing properties #620

wick-ed opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@wick-ed
Copy link
Member

wick-ed commented Feb 27, 2015

Some pthreads specialities lead to omitting explicit property implementation. These missing properties make the code harder to read.
To counter this issue the affected classes should be annotated using the @property annotation.
This enables IDEs to pick up dynamic properties and their types.

UAC:

  • All dynamically defined properties MUST be represented by a @property annotation
@wick-ed wick-ed added this to the Release 1.0.2 "Iron Horse" milestone Feb 27, 2015
@wick-ed wick-ed self-assigned this Feb 27, 2015
@wick-ed
Copy link
Member Author

wick-ed commented Mar 3, 2015

Will also add missing PSR interface methods as comments

@wick-ed wick-ed closed this as completed Mar 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant