You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently support both SFDX and the old MDAPI format metadata. This does not cause any major issues but given SFDX format has been available for quite some time it may be appropriate to consider removing MDAPI support to help simplify. If we were to do this we may also want to consider improving our validation of the location of metadata files in general to match that used by the SFDX libraries.
At the moment a number of samples and unit tests use MDAPI format, we could re-work the tests as needed but the samples would likely just need to be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We currently support both SFDX and the old MDAPI format metadata. This does not cause any major issues but given SFDX format has been available for quite some time it may be appropriate to consider removing MDAPI support to help simplify. If we were to do this we may also want to consider improving our validation of the location of metadata files in general to match that used by the SFDX libraries.
At the moment a number of samples and unit tests use MDAPI format, we could re-work the tests as needed but the samples would likely just need to be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: