-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-23901][SQL] Add masking functions #21246
Changes from 2 commits
40cffbd
b15bbf1
5def290
e9da798
3edd243
ae89d00
06b8b6c
a1f3a5b
ca9caa0
fca3af8
6fd8f2f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Contains all the Utils methods used in the masking expressions. | ||
*/ | ||
public class MaskExpressionsUtils { | ||
final static int UNMASKED_VAL = -1; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you add a description? |
||
* @param c the character to transform | ||
* @param maskedUpperChar the character to use instead of a uppercase letter | ||
* @param maskedLowerChar the character to use instead of a lowercase letter | ||
* @param maskedDigitChar the character to use instead of a digit | ||
* @param maskedOtherChar the character to use instead of a any other character | ||
* @return masking character for {@param c} | ||
*/ | ||
public static int transformChar( | ||
final int c, | ||
int maskedUpperChar, | ||
int maskedLowerChar, | ||
int maskedDigitChar, | ||
int maskedOtherChar) { | ||
switch(Character.getType(c)) { | ||
case Character.UPPERCASE_LETTER: | ||
if(maskedUpperChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedUpperChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case Character.LOWERCASE_LETTER: | ||
if(maskedLowerChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedLowerChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case Character.DECIMAL_DIGIT_NUMBER: | ||
if(maskedDigitChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedDigitChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
default: | ||
if(maskedOtherChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedOtherChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return c; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Returns the replacement char to use according to the {@param rep} specified by the user and | ||
* the {@param def} default. | ||
*/ | ||
public static int getReplacementChar(String rep, int def) { | ||
if (rep != null && rep.length() > 0) { | ||
return rep.charAt(0); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. again, Hive does this... |
||
} | ||
return def; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this implemented in Java?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because I am invoking also in the Java code generated and I wanted to avoid using the match clause (instead of the switch java operation) for performance reasons.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, thanks!