-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-23901][SQL] Add masking functions #21246
Closed
Closed
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
40cffbd
[SPARK-23901][SQL] Add masking functions
mgaido91 b15bbf1
fix scalastyle
mgaido91 5def290
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into SPARK-23901
mgaido91 e9da798
address review comments
mgaido91 3edd243
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into SPARK-23901
mgaido91 ae89d00
support non-ascii chars
mgaido91 06b8b6c
address comments
mgaido91 a1f3a5b
address comments
mgaido91 ca9caa0
throw exception instead of ignoring non-literals input
mgaido91 fca3af8
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:apache/spark into SPARK-23901
mgaido91 6fd8f2f
fix javastyle
mgaido91 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
80 changes: 80 additions & 0 deletions
80
...atalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MaskExpressionsUtils.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more | ||
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with | ||
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. | ||
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 | ||
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with | ||
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Contains all the Utils methods used in the masking expressions. | ||
*/ | ||
public class MaskExpressionsUtils { | ||
final static int UNMASKED_VAL = -1; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you add a description? |
||
* @param c the character to transform | ||
* @param maskedUpperChar the character to use instead of a uppercase letter | ||
* @param maskedLowerChar the character to use instead of a lowercase letter | ||
* @param maskedDigitChar the character to use instead of a digit | ||
* @param maskedOtherChar the character to use instead of a any other character | ||
* @return masking character for {@param c} | ||
*/ | ||
public static int transformChar( | ||
final int c, | ||
int maskedUpperChar, | ||
int maskedLowerChar, | ||
int maskedDigitChar, | ||
int maskedOtherChar) { | ||
switch(Character.getType(c)) { | ||
case Character.UPPERCASE_LETTER: | ||
if(maskedUpperChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedUpperChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case Character.LOWERCASE_LETTER: | ||
if(maskedLowerChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedLowerChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
case Character.DECIMAL_DIGIT_NUMBER: | ||
if(maskedDigitChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedDigitChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
|
||
default: | ||
if(maskedOtherChar != UNMASKED_VAL) { | ||
return maskedOtherChar; | ||
} | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return c; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Returns the replacement char to use according to the {@param rep} specified by the user and | ||
* the {@param def} default. | ||
*/ | ||
public static int getReplacementChar(String rep, int def) { | ||
if (rep != null && rep.length() > 0) { | ||
return rep.codePointAt(0); | ||
} | ||
return def; | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this implemented in Java?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because I am invoking also in the Java code generated and I wanted to avoid using the match clause (instead of the switch java operation) for performance reasons.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, thanks!