Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

routes methods should interact with API GW directly, not through web actions #82

Open
jthomas opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@jthomas
Copy link
Member

jthomas commented Nov 9, 2017

This client library currents copies the the CLI tool in interacting with the API GW service through web action proxies, rather than interfacing with the APIGW API.

Migrating the implementation to talk directly to the APIGW is a better option. This will provide greater flexibility for the client library and stops using undocumented web actions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant