Replies: 9 comments
-
Hey, this is the MXNet Label Bot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This page tells that only onnx version 1.2.1 is supported. After downgrading onnx from 1.5.0 to 1.2.1, everything should work fine. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@braindotai Yes it resolves the export problem however some ONNX inference engines are very picky and do not accept this spatial notation in batchnorm. So it does not really solve the problem. Are there any plans to move to ONNX1.5 (opspec 12) as it finally opens up the ONNX to more complex models like e.g. object classification |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm quite note sure about that, members of MXNet might help you out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mxnet-label-bot add [ONNX, question] |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
MXNet currently supports ONNX v1.3. The documentation is updated in PR #15914 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It is fixed with #17711 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ChaiBapchya thanks Chai. shall we backport the patch to 1.x? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes. Here you go: #18846 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Description
I installed the latest ONNX version 1.5 and now trying to export a standard model (resnet18v2) from the gluoncv modelzoo is causing a validation error in onnx,onnx_cpp2py.export.checker
It is basically complaining about Unrecognized attribute: spatial for operator BatchNormalization
Environment info (Required)
Windows10, CUDA9.2, Python 3.5
mxnetcu92-mkl 1.4.0.post0
gluoncv0.5.0b20190326
onnx1.5.0
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions