Bump log4j from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2 #6826
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6826 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
======================================
Files 687 687
Lines 42445 42445
Branches 5793 5793
======================================
Misses 42445 42445 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
pan3793
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2024
|
Scala 2.13 test failure is irrelevant |
Thanks! I have completed. @pan3793 |
|
Thanks, merged to master |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are the changes needed?
As @pan3793 pointed out that version 2.24.1 had critical bug in #6774 (comment)
Bump bump log4j from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2
How was this patch tested?
GA.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.