[KYUUBI #5594][AUTHZ] BuildQuery should respect normal node's input

[AngersZhuuuu]

🔍 Description

Issue References 🔗

This pull request fixes #5594

Describe Your Solution 🔧

For case

def filter_func(iterator):
                for pdf in iterator:
                    yield pdf[pdf.id == 1]

df = spark.read.table("test_mapinpandas")
execute_result = df.mapInPandas(filter_func, df.schema).show()

The logical plan is

GlobalLimit 21
+- LocalLimit 21
   +- Project [cast(id#5 as string) AS id#11, name#6]
      +- MapInPandas filter_func(id#0, name#1), [id#5, name#6]
         +- HiveTableRelation [`default`.`test_mapinpandas`, org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.lazy.LazySimpleSerDe, Data Cols: [id#0, name#1], Partition Cols: []]

When handle MapInPandas, we didn't match its input with HiveTableRelation, cause we miss input table's columns. This pr fix this

In this pr, we remove the branch of each project such as Project, Aggregate etc, handle it together.

Types of changes 🔖

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Test Plan 🧪

Behavior Without This Pull Request ⚰️

For case

def filter_func(iterator):
                for pdf in iterator:
                    yield pdf[pdf.id == 1]

df = spark.read.table("test_mapinpandas")
execute_result = df.mapInPandas(filter_func, df.schema).show()

We miss column info of table test_mapinpandas

Behavior With This Pull Request 🎉

We got privilege object of table test_mapinpandas with it's column info.

Related Unit Tests

---

Checklists

📝 Author Self Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• This patch was not authored or co-authored using Generative Tooling

📝 Committer Pre-Merge Checklist

• Pull request title is okay.
• No license issues.
• Milestone correctly set?
• Test coverage is ok
• Assignees are selected.
• Minimum number of approvals
• No changes are requested

Be nice. Be informative.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (777b784) 61.12% compared to head (3d69997) 61.02%.

❗ Current head 3d69997 differs from pull request most recent head e085455. Consider uploading reports for the commit e085455 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
.../kyuubi/plugin/spark/authz/PrivilegesBuilder.scala	73.33%	7 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #5787      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     61.12%   61.02%   -0.10%     
  Complexity       23       23              
============================================
  Files           623      623              
  Lines         37060    37062       +2     
  Branches       5024     5021       -3     
============================================
- Hits          22652    22617      -35     
- Misses        11965    11995      +30     
- Partials       2443     2450       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[AngersZhuuuu]

I think this pr can be reviewed again since I have running this in our prod for more then two weeks. cc @yaooqinn

[AngersZhuuuu]

Added by test test("AlterTableAddColumnsCommand") cc @yaooqinn

[AngersZhuuuu]

ditto

[AngersZhuuuu]

ping @yaooqinn

[yaooqinn]

LGTM

[pan3793]

Thanks, merged to master