-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[NODE][IR] Introduce StructuralHash for the Unified IR. #5160
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This PR introduces a new way to handle structural hash for the unified IR. - Each object can now register an optional SEqualHash function, which describes how to reduce its structural equality to sequence of hash values. - Optionally, the object can choose to allow labeling of vars(e.g. function parameters) by calling DefHash - We implemented a non-recursive structural hasher that maintains its own stack to traverse te IR. This PR also improves the hash value property from the previous relay's hash utility. In particular, the graph node mode hashs a DAG differently from a tree by attaching an unique occurence index to each graph node. In all of the test cases so far, structural_hash is consistent with structural_equal. - if structrual(x, y) then structural_hash(x) == structural_hash(y) - if structural_hash(x) == structural_hash(y) then highly likely structural_equal(x, y) - hash no collison is found in our testcases. Ideally we should work on automatically generating these functions in the future.
MarisaKirisame
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
zhiics
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2020
Co-Authored-By: 雾雨魔理沙 <[email protected]>
7 tasks
trevor-m
pushed a commit
to trevor-m/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2020
* [NODE][IR] Introduce StructuralHash for the Unified IR. This PR introduces a new way to handle structural hash for the unified IR. - Each object can now register an optional SEqualHash function, which describes how to reduce its structural equality to sequence of hash values. - Optionally, the object can choose to allow labeling of vars(e.g. function parameters) by calling DefHash - We implemented a non-recursive structural hasher that maintains its own stack to traverse te IR. This PR also improves the hash value property from the previous relay's hash utility. In particular, the graph node mode hashs a DAG differently from a tree by attaching an unique occurence index to each graph node. In all of the test cases so far, structural_hash is consistent with structural_equal. - if structrual(x, y) then structural_hash(x) == structural_hash(y) - if structural_hash(x) == structural_hash(y) then highly likely structural_equal(x, y) - hash no collison is found in our testcases. Ideally we should work on automatically generating these functions in the future. * Fix cases for EnvFunc and Array dims * fix testcase * Update src/node/structural_hash.cc Co-Authored-By: 雾雨魔理沙 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: 雾雨魔理沙 <[email protected]>
zhiics
pushed a commit
to neo-ai/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2020
* [NODE][IR] Introduce StructuralHash for the Unified IR. This PR introduces a new way to handle structural hash for the unified IR. - Each object can now register an optional SEqualHash function, which describes how to reduce its structural equality to sequence of hash values. - Optionally, the object can choose to allow labeling of vars(e.g. function parameters) by calling DefHash - We implemented a non-recursive structural hasher that maintains its own stack to traverse te IR. This PR also improves the hash value property from the previous relay's hash utility. In particular, the graph node mode hashs a DAG differently from a tree by attaching an unique occurence index to each graph node. In all of the test cases so far, structural_hash is consistent with structural_equal. - if structrual(x, y) then structural_hash(x) == structural_hash(y) - if structural_hash(x) == structural_hash(y) then highly likely structural_equal(x, y) - hash no collison is found in our testcases. Ideally we should work on automatically generating these functions in the future. * Fix cases for EnvFunc and Array dims * fix testcase * Update src/node/structural_hash.cc Co-Authored-By: 雾雨魔理沙 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: 雾雨魔理沙 <[email protected]>
This was referenced May 14, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR introduces a new way to handle structural hash for the unified IR.
describes how to reduce its structural equality to sequence of hash values.
by calling DefHash
to traverse te IR.
This PR also improves the hash value property from the previous relay's hash utility.
In particular, the graph node mode hashs a DAG differently from a tree
by attaching an unique occurence index to each graph node.
In all of the test cases so far, structural_hash is consistent with structural_equal.
Ideally we should work on automatically generating these functions in the future.
The new structural equal is intented to supersede AttrsHash and relay's StructuralHash function. Follow-up should be performed to redirect the existing usages, and removes
the corresponding implementation.