Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tvm/contrib/rocm: improve finding of ld.lld #3664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2019
Merged

Conversation

t-vi
Copy link
Contributor

@t-vi t-vi commented Jul 30, 2019

This refines the detection of ld.lld matching the neighbouring clang
file. This is particularly helpful on Ubuntu/Debian when either the
default ld.lld is not installed or the versioned one is preferable for
consistency.

@tqchen I think you last touched the clang equivalent in #3590 .

This refines the detection of ld.lld matching the neighbouring clang
file. This is particularly helpful on Ubuntu/Debian when either the
default ld.lld is not installed or the versioned one is preferable for
consistency.

@tqchen I think you last touched the clang equivalent in apache#3590 .
@masahi
Copy link
Member

masahi commented Jul 30, 2019

yeah I'm aware of this issue but didn't bother to fix. Instead we ask people to just add a symlink :)
Thanks for taking time with our ROCm backend.

@masahi masahi merged commit 0cecd03 into apache:master Jul 30, 2019
wweic pushed a commit to wweic/tvm that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2019
This refines the detection of ld.lld matching the neighbouring clang
file. This is particularly helpful on Ubuntu/Debian when either the
default ld.lld is not installed or the versioned one is preferable for
consistency.

@tqchen I think you last touched the clang equivalent in apache#3590 .
wweic pushed a commit to neo-ai/tvm that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2019
This refines the detection of ld.lld matching the neighbouring clang
file. This is particularly helpful on Ubuntu/Debian when either the
default ld.lld is not installed or the versioned one is preferable for
consistency.

@tqchen I think you last touched the clang equivalent in apache#3590 .
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants