Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUGFIX]: Fixing dttm_sql_literal to use python_date_format #3891

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2017

Conversation

fabianmenges
Copy link
Contributor

@fabianmenges fabianmenges commented Nov 17, 2017

@mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

Travis never fired for this one, maybe pushing a new commit on top will trigger it?

@fabianmenges
Copy link
Contributor Author

should be good now

@michellethomas
Copy link
Contributor

We just noticed this issue the other day, thanks for fixing!

cc: @john-bodley @graceguo-supercat

Copy link
Member

@john-bodley john-bodley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Echoing @Michelle-Thomas’s sentiments, this LGTM, though I wonder if we should add a unit test for this given the regression.

@graceguo-supercat graceguo-supercat merged commit 0a3d2fc into apache:master Dec 8, 2017
michellethomas pushed a commit to michellethomas/panoramix that referenced this pull request May 24, 2018
wenchma pushed a commit to wenchma/incubator-superset that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2018
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.21.0 labels Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.21.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants