Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement] Refactor eventmesh Rust sdk #4466

Open
3 tasks done
mxsm opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks done

[Enhancement] Refactor eventmesh Rust sdk #4466

mxsm opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale

Comments

@mxsm
Copy link
Member

mxsm commented Sep 30, 2023

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Enhancement Request

Due to recent changes in the EventMesh protobuf files, the existing Rust SDK is no longer compatible. Therefore, a refactoring of the Rust SDK is required. The refactoring will be carried out in the following steps:

  1. Refactor the gRPC portion of the Rust SDK.
  2. Refactor the HTTP portion of the Rust SDK (This work will be done after issue [Feature] Http client optimize #4481 is completed).
  3. Add the TCP protocol to the Rust SDK.

Describe the solution you'd like

The refactoring will be carried out in the following steps:

  1. [Feature] Rust SDK supports the latest gRPC protocol #4467
  2. [Feature] Rust sdk support CloudEvents #4519
  3. Refactor the HTTP portion of the Rust SDK.
  4. Add the TCP protocol to the Rust SDK.

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@mxsm mxsm added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 30, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2024

It has been 90 days since the last activity on this issue. Apache EventMesh values the voices of the community. Please don't hesitate to share your latest insights on this matter at any time, as the community is more than willing to engage in discussions regarding the development and optimization directions of this feature.

If you feel that your issue has been resolved, please feel free to close it. Should you have any additional information to share, you are welcome to reopen this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant