Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Optimize](search) Optimize implement the new query interface #23389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2023

Conversation

zzzxl1993
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

  1. Optimize term query interface [Optimize](search) Optimize implement the new query interface doris-thirdparty#113

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Member

@airborne12 airborne12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@airborne12
Copy link
Member

run buildall

@zzzxl1993
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@zzzxl1993
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@zzzxl1993
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 45.65 seconds
stream load tsv: 538 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 132 MB/s
stream load json: 21 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 107 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 31 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 26 MB/s
insert into select: 29.2 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 342K ops/s
storage size: 17161841363 Bytes

xiaokang
xiaokang previously approved these changes Aug 24, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@xiaokang xiaokang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 24, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@zzzxl1993
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 24, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 45.82 seconds
stream load tsv: 538 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 132 MB/s
stream load json: 21 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 107 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 32 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 25 MB/s
insert into select: 29.3 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 341K ops/s
storage size: 17162245966 Bytes

@zzzxl1993
Copy link
Contributor Author

run p1

Copy link
Contributor

@xiaokang xiaokang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@xiaokang xiaokang merged commit 2847c5e into apache:master Aug 25, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 25, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.0.1-merged reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants