fix: disallow interval - timestamp #7086
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
logical-expr
alamb
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @jackwener -- this looks perfect to me
cc @tustvold
| (Date32, Interval(_)) => Some(lhs_type.clone()), | ||
| (Interval(_), Date64) => Some(rhs_type.clone()), | ||
| (Date64, Interval(_)) => Some(lhs_type.clone()), | ||
| (Timestamp(_, _) | Date32 | Date64, Interval(_)) => Some(lhs_type.clone()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't realize it was possible to do a match on a subfield of a tuple. TIL 🤯
ozankabak
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2023
Dandandan
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #7085
Closes #7084.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?