You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
At InfluxData we use Dictionary(Int32, Utf8) heavily for certain columns of our queries.
This particular type of data is not well represented in the DataFusion codebase, which leads to issues such as #8738
In addition to not being well covered by functional tests, we also don't have particularly good coverage performance wise, especially for some of our important cases like grouping performance. This leads to dueling speculations on better/worse ways to run such queries, such as #7647 but now good way to evaluate them
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to ensure we have adequate test coverage
Functional tests so we don't hit regressions accidentally again
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
At InfluxData we use
Dictionary(Int32, Utf8)
heavily for certain columns of our queries.This particular type of data is not well represented in the DataFusion codebase, which leads to issues such as #8738
In addition to not being well covered by functional tests, we also don't have particularly good coverage performance wise, especially for some of our important cases like grouping performance. This leads to dueling speculations on better/worse ways to run such queries, such as #7647 but now good way to evaluate them
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to ensure we have adequate test coverage
Describe alternatives you've considered
I added some functional sqllogictests in
However, those are not reading from Parquet files (as I could not figure out how to make a parquet file have the same schema I wanted)
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: