You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a great aggregation fuzz tester that is run like this:
cargo test --test fuzz -- aggregate
This fuzz tester is important to cover all the various combinations of types and columns and aggregates, given DataFusion has many different specialized code paths based on types.
The fuzz tester currently covers many different types, but not all of them. This ticket covers adding support for a few more types
@alamb Is there a certain range for which float point numbers are compared equal to each other? any best practices?
For determining groups, the comparison is exact equality even for floats (this is different for aggregates like SUM / AVG where floating point roundoff needs to be accounted for)
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Part of #7065
We have a great aggregation fuzz tester that is run like this:
cargo test --test fuzz -- aggregate
This fuzz tester is important to cover all the various combinations of types and columns and aggregates, given DataFusion has many different specialized code paths based on types.
The fuzz tester currently covers many different types, but not all of them. This ticket covers adding support for a few more types
Describe the solution you'd like
Add support for the following data types:
Float32/Float64
Timestamp
(Timestamp(Seconds, ..)
,Timestamp(Milliseconds, ..)
, ...Binary
/LargeBinary
/BinaryView
Describe alternatives you've considered
I think following the model in this PR from @LeslieKid where they added time/interval/ decimal/utf8view in #13226
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: