Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split Operator binary from Kamel CLI binary #3175

Closed
squakez opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Split Operator binary from Kamel CLI binary #3175

squakez opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/question Further information is requested status/never-stale
Milestone

Comments

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor

squakez commented Apr 6, 2022

Right now we use kamel binary as both the operator binary to be executed on the Pod and as the CLI we ship to final user. Although the size of the file is not yet too big (around 30 MB), I think we could benefit from having 2 separate binaries, the CLI to be shipped to the users and the operator to be bundled into the container image.

Reactions?

@squakez squakez added the kind/question Further information is requested label Apr 6, 2022
@oscerd
Copy link
Contributor

oscerd commented Apr 6, 2022

Frankly, at this stage, I don't see a good reason for doing it.

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Apr 6, 2022

Thanks @oscerd. Just to complete the quick description above, the idea would not to break the project in separate subprojects, but have the same release cycle and procedure. The only thing is that we will build 2 deliverables which serve different concerns.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 15 days.
If you think that’s incorrect or the issue should never stale, please simply write any comment.
Thanks for your contributions!

@tadayosi
Copy link
Member

tadayosi commented Jul 6, 2022

Removing the stale label as it still seems to be worth exploring.

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Jul 6, 2022

@tadayosi , FYI, you can also add status/never-stale in order to avoid it become stale again in the future.

@squakez squakez added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Feb 2, 2023
@squakez squakez modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 2.1.0 Jul 27, 2023
@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Jul 27, 2023

Implicitly included in the will to move part of the CLI running logic into Camel JBang. Closing.

@squakez squakez closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/question Further information is requested status/never-stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants