You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At one point there were two ongoing proposals for serializing exec plans. An Arrow proposal (ir_consumer) and Substrait. In general it is perfectly ok to have multiple representations of the exec plan. So if someone wants the ir_consumer for whatever reason we can keep ti. However, I believe the ir_consumer representation is no longer being actively maintained / expanded and so we should probably remove it to avoid confusion.
At one point there were two ongoing proposals for serializing exec plans. An Arrow proposal (ir_consumer) and Substrait. In general it is perfectly ok to have multiple representations of the exec plan. So if someone wants the ir_consumer for whatever reason we can keep ti. However, I believe the ir_consumer representation is no longer being actively maintained / expanded and so we should probably remove it to avoid confusion.
Reporter: Weston Pace / @westonpace
Assignee: Weston Pace / @westonpace
Related issues:
PRs and other links:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-16740. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: