Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.10.2rc1 #42279

Closed
11 of 19 tasks
ephraimbuddy opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed
11 of 19 tasks

Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.10.2rc1 #42279

ephraimbuddy opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community

Comments

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

ephraimbuddy commented Sep 17, 2024

Body

We are kindly requesting that contributors to Apache Airflow RC 2.10.2rc1 help test the RC.

Please let us know by commenting if the issue is addressed in the latest RC.

Thanks to all who contributed to the release (probably not a complete list!):
@ephraimbuddy @jedcunningham @romsharon98 @utkarsharma2 @Lee-W @mobuchowski @sc-anssi @jscheffl @pierrejeambrun @bbovenzi @potiuk

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy added the kind:meta High-level information important to the community label Sep 17, 2024
@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

Tested the 3 fixes I contributed or merged in the 2.10.2rc1. All looks good

@pierrejeambrun
Copy link
Member

Same, tested all 3 fixes, working great.

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Sep 18, 2024

#42247
#41942
#42055
#42089

The tested PRs above work fine. Thanks!

@jmaicher
Copy link
Contributor

Tested #42220, looks good

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Airflow 2.10.2 has been released. Thank you all for testing this release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants