Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration of the Helper add-on stats #3147

Open
dae opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Integration of the Helper add-on stats #3147

dae opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@dae
Copy link
Member

dae commented Apr 17, 2024

I think that since LMSherlock and Dae are planning to integrate FSRS Helper add-on features, it makes sense to implement the stats as well.

Originally reported on https://forums.ankiweb.net/t/integration-of-the-helper-add-on-stats/43643

@L-M-Sherlock
Copy link
Contributor

L-M-Sherlock commented Sep 17, 2024

I'm considering it. The first question is, the current stats doesn't have any table. Is it acceptable to insert a table into the stats? Do you mind it may break the style of current design?

image

@Expertium
Copy link
Contributor

I'm concerned with whether it will be displayed correctly on mobile devices.

@dae
Copy link
Member Author

dae commented Sep 20, 2024

It'll require some scrolling - you can see it if you resize the desktop browser to fit 3 columns.
2024-09-20T22:01:47,990699719+10:00

@salmanuc
Copy link

salmanuc commented Nov 2, 2024

It'll require some scrolling - you can see it if you resize the desktop browser to fit 3 columns. 2024-09-20T22:01:47,990699719+10:00

This table is visually far more appealing than the one implemented now and is easier for information to be understood. Kindly use this one and if possible, place it at top of stats and without the need for horizontal scrolling, just like in the old stats screen.

@Expertium
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, the Helper add-on table looks better.

@brishtibheja
Copy link
Contributor

Is there anything else to do here @Expertium ?

@Expertium
Copy link
Contributor

Image
Knowledge acquisition rate is cool, but last time I did a survey, the opinions on implementing/not implementing it were mixed, and Dae was more than happy to not implement it. So no.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants