Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR]: Provide a graph of the module structure #180

Closed
2 tasks done
StylianosGakis opened this issue Jul 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #310
Closed
2 tasks done

[FR]: Provide a graph of the module structure #180

StylianosGakis opened this issue Jul 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #310
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@StylianosGakis
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Describe the problem

Especially for someone newer to multi-modular apps, looking at all the modules on the top level of the project can be daunting.

Describe the solution

It would be awesome if an always up-to-date graph of how the modules depend on each other could be shown in the README of this repository.

Additional context

I was recently reading the article "Jetpack Compose — Before and after" from Chris Banes and in that post, the section "The app" with the figure named "Graph of Tivi’s module structure. Generated using Jake Wharton’s handy Gradle task" is exactly what I am talking about. I hope you can refer to it for some inspiration.
This would give a visualization of how everything is structured in an instant without having to look at the gradle files of all modules.

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@StylianosGakis StylianosGakis added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 17, 2022
@alexvanyo
Copy link
Contributor

@mmoczkowski is this complete?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants