Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
553 lines (500 loc) · 56.1 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

553 lines (500 loc) · 56.1 KB

Redwood

by Tom Preston-Werner, Peter Pistorius, Rob Cameron, David Price, and more than two hundred amazing contributors (see end of file for a full list).

Redwood is an opinionated, full-stack, serverless web application framework that will allow you to build and deploy JAMstack applications with ease. Imagine a React frontend, statically delivered by CDN, that talks via GraphQL to your backend running on AWS Lambdas around the world, all deployable with just a git push—that's Redwood. By making a lot of decisions for you, Redwood lets you get to work on what makes your application special, instead of wasting cycles choosing and re-choosing various technologies and configurations. Plus, because Redwood is a proper framework, you benefit from continued performance and feature upgrades over time and with minimum effort.

Redwood is the latest open source project initiated by Tom Preston-Werner, cofounder of GitHub (most popular code host on the planet), creator of Jekyll (one of the first and most popular static site generators), creator of Gravatar (the most popular avatar service on the planet), author of the Semantic Versioning specification (powers the Node packaging ecosystem), and inventor of TOML (an obvious, minimal configuration language used by many projects).

WARNING: RedwoodJS software has not reached a stable version 1.0 and should not be considered suitable for production use. In the "make it work; make it right; make it fast" paradigm, Redwood is in the later stages of the "make it work" phase. That said, your input can have a huge impact during this period, and we welcome your feedback and ideas! Check out the Redwood Community Forum to join in.

TUTORIAL: The best way to get to know Redwood is by going through the extensive Redwood Tutorial. Have fun!

QUICK START: You can install and run a full-stack Redwood application on your machine with only a couple commands. Check out the Quick Start guide to get started.

EXAMPLES: If you'd like to see some examples of what a Redwood application looks like, take a look at the following projects:

Technologies

We are obsessed with developer experience and eliminating as much boilerplate as possible. Where existing libraries elegantly solve our problems, we use them; where they don't, we write our own solutions. The end result is a JavaScript development experience you can fall in love with!

Here's a quick taste of the technologies a standard Redwood application will use:

Features

  • Opinionated defaults for formatting, file organization, webpack, Babel, and more.
  • Simple but powerful routing (all routes defined in one file) with dynamic (typed) parameters, constraints, and named route functions (to generate correct URLs).
  • Automatic page-based code-splitting.
  • Boilerplate-less GraphQL API construction.
  • Cells: a declarative way to fetch data from the backend API.
  • Generators for pages, layouts, cells, SDL, services, etc.
  • Scaffold generator for CRUD operations around a specific DB table.
  • Forms with easy client- and/or server-side validation and error handling.
  • Hot module replacement (HMR) for faster development.
  • Database migrations (via Prisma 2).
  • Logging using Pino including to transports
  • Signature verification and payload signing for handling incoming and outgoing Webhooks
  • Page prerendering
  • First class JAMstack-style deployment to Netlify, Vercel, Render, and Serverless.

Roadmap

We intend to ship v1 in the first quarter of 2021. To see all the features we plan on including in Redwood's first major release, you can check out our Roadmap.

A framework like Redwood has a lot of moving parts; the Roadmap is a great way to get a high-level overview of where the framework is relative to where we want it to be. And since we link to all of our GitHub project boards, it's also a great way to get involved!

The Redwood philosophy

Redwood believes that JAMstack is a huge leap forward in how we can write web applications that are easy to write, deploy, scale, and maintain.

Redwood believes that there is power in standards, and makes decisions for you about which technologies to use, how to organize your code into files, and how to name things. With a shared understanding of the Redwood conventions, a developer should be able to jump into any Redwood application and get up to speed very quickly.

Redwood believes that traditional, relational databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL are still the workhorses of today's web applications and should be first-class citizens. However, Redwood also shines with NoSQL databases like FaunaDB.

Redwood believes that, as much as possible, you should be able to operate in a serverless mindset and deploy to a generic computational grid. This helps unlock the next point...

Redwood believes that deployment and scaling should be super easy. To deploy your application, you should only need to commit and push to your Git repository. To scale from zero to thousands of users should not require your intervention. The principles of JAMstack and serverless make this possible.

Redwood believes that it should be equally useful for writing both simple, toy applications and complex, mission-critical applications. In addition, it should require very little operational work to grow your app from the former to the latter.

Redwood believes that you can use JavaScript as your primary language on both the frontend and backend. Using a single language simplifies everything from code reuse to hiring developers.

How it works

A Redwood application is split into two parts: a frontend and a backend. This is represented as two node projects within a single monorepo. We use Yarn to make it easy to operate across both projects while keeping them in a single Git repository.

The frontend project is called web and the backend project is called api. For clarity, we will refer to these in prose as "sides", i.e. the "web side" and the "api side". They are separate projects because code on the web side will end up running in the user's browser while code on the api side will run on a server somewhere. It is important that you keep this distinction clear in your mind as you develop your application. The two separate projects are intended to make this obvious. In addition, separate projects allow for different dependencies and build processes for each project.

The api side is an implementation of a GraphQL API. Your business logic is organized into "services" that represent their own internal API and can be called both from external GraphQL requests and other internal services. Redwood can automatically connect your internal services with Apollo, reducing the amount of boilerplate you have to write. Your services can interact with a database via Prisma's ORM, and Prisma's migration tooling provides first-class migrations that take the pain out of evolving your database schema.

The web side is built with React. Redwood's router makes it simple to map URL paths to React "Page" components (and automatically code-split your app on each route). Pages may contain a "Layout" component to wrap content. They also contain "Cells" and regular React components. Cells allow you to declaratively manage the lifecycle of a component that fetches and displays data. Other Redwood utility components make it trivial to implement smart forms and various common needs. An ideal development flow starts with Storybook entries and Jest tests, so Redwood closely integrates both, making it easy to do the right thing.

You'll notice that the web side is called "web" and not "frontend". This is because Redwood conceives of a world where you may have other sides like "mobile", "desktop", "cli", etc., all consuming the same GraphQL API and living in the same monorepo.

How can it be serverless if it involves a GraphQL API and database?

I'm glad you asked! Currently, Redwood can deploy your GraphQL API to a Lambda function. This is not appropriate for all use cases, but on hosting providers like Netlify, it makes deployment a breeze. As time goes on, "functions" will continue to enjoy performance improvements which will further increase the number of use cases that can take advantage of this technology.

Databases are a little trickier, especially the traditional relational ones like PostgreSQL and MySQL. Right now, you still need to set these up manually, but we are working hard with Netlify and other providers to fulfill the serverless dream here too.

Redwood is intentionally pushing the boundaries of what's possible with JAMstack. In fact, the whole reason I (Tom) started working on Redwood is because of a tweet I posted some time ago:

Prediction: within 5 years, you’ll build your next large scale, fully featured web app with #JAMstack and deploy on @Netlify. —@mojombo • 9 July 2018

I kept waiting for a high quality full-stack framework to arrive, but it didn't, so I decided to take matters into my own hands. And that's why Redwood exists.

If you are like minded, then I hope you'll join me in helping build Redwood and hasten the arrival of the future I predicted!

Why is it called Redwood?

(A history, by Tom Preston-Werner)

Where I live in Northern California there is a type of tree called a redwood. Redwoods are HUGE, the tallest in the world, some topping out at 115 meters (380 feet) in height. The eldest of the still-living redwoods sprouted from the ground an astonishing 3,200 years ago. To stand among them is transcendent. Sometimes, when I need to think or be creative, I will journey to my favorite grove of redwoods and walk among these giants, soaking myself in their silent grandeur.

In addition, Redwoods have a few properties that I thought would be aspirational for my nascent web app framework. Namely:

  • Redwoods are beautiful as saplings, and grow to be majestic. What if you could feel that way about your web app?

  • Redwood pinecones are dense and surprisingly small. Can we allow you to get more done with less code?

  • Redwood trees are resistant to fire. Surprisingly robust to disaster scenarios, just like a great web framework should be!

  • Redwoods appear complex from afar, but simple up close. Their branching structure provides order and allows for emergent complexity within a simple framework. Can a web framework do the same?

And there you have it.

Contributors

A gigantic "Thank YOU!" to everyone below who has contributed to one or more Redwood projects: Framework, Website (docs!), and Create-Redwood Template. 🚀

Core Team


Tom Preston-Werner

founder, leadership

Peter Pistorius

founder, leadership

Rob Cameron

founder, leadership

David Price

founder, leadership

Dominic Saadi

maintainer, advocate

Robert

maintainer

David Thyresson

maintainer, community

Daniel Choudhury

maintainer, community

Tobbe Lundberg

maintainer

Aldo Bucchi

maintainer

Anthony Campolo

advocate

Claire Froelich

maintainer

Kim-Adeline Miguel

community

Forrest Hayes

community

All Contributors


Anton Moiseev

Mohsen Azimi

Christopher Burns

Terris Kremer

James George

Brett Jackson

Guilherme Pacheco

noire.munich

Kasper Mikiewicz

chris-hailstorm

Jai

Lachlan Campbell

Satya Rohith

Steven Normore

Mads Rosenberg

Ted Stoychev

eurobob

Vikash

Adrian Mato

Anirudh Nimmagadda

Ben McCann

Chris Ball

Suvash Thapaliya

Thieffen Delabaere

swyx

Max Leon

Maxim Geerinck

Niket Patel

0xflotus

Anthony Powell

Aryan J

Brian Ketelsen

Dominic Chapman

Evan Moncuso

Georgy Petukhov

Gianni Moschini

Giel

Hampus Kraft

Jani Monoses

Jens Lindström

Johan Eliasson

Leonardo Elias

Logan Houp

Loren ☺️

Mark Pollmann

Matthew Leffler

Michele Gerarduzzi

Nick Gill

Nicholas Joy Christ

Olivier Lance

Phuoc Do

Rocky Meza

Sharan Kumar S

Simeon Griggs

Taylor Milliman

Zach Hammer

Przemyslaw T

Hemil Desai

Alessio Montel

Anthony Morris

Beto

Turadg Aleahmad

Paul Karayan

Nikolas

guledali

Yong Joseph Bakos

Gerd Jungbluth

James Highsmith

Troy Rosenberg

Amr Fahim

dfundingsland

Eduardo Reveles

Jeffrey Horn

matthewhembree

Robert Bolender

Shivam Chahar

Aaron Sumner

Alvin Crespo

Chris Ellis

Colin Ross

Dennis Dang

Derrick Pelletier

Jeroen van Baarsen

Matan Kushner

Matthew Rathbone

Michal Weisman

Miguel Oller

Mudassar Ali

Nate Finch

Paweł Kowalski

Punit Makwana

Scott Chacon

scott

Scott Walkinshaw

Stephan van Diepen

bpenno

Tim Trautman

Zachary McKenna

Ryan Hayes

Evan Weaver

cr1at0rs

qooqu

Android Dev Notes

Jeremy Kratz

Kris Coulson

Monica Powell

Ganesh Rane

Ryan Doyle

Matt Reetz

Punit Makwana

shzmr

esteban-url

Kurt Hutten

António Meireles

Brent Guffens

Santhosh Laguduwa

Marco Bucchi

Johnny Choudhury-Lucas

Steven Almeroth

lumenCodes

_robobunny

Kevin Poston

Davy Hausser

Mohinder Saluja

Lamanda

ryancwalsh

Nick Geerts

miku86

Krisztiaan

Jonathan Derrough

Asdethprime

Brian Solon

Chris Chapman

Joël Galeran

Mariah

Tyler Scott Williams

Vania Kucher

Viren Bhagat

William

dcgoodwin2112

Bennett Rogers

Daniel O'Neill

David Yu

Adithya Sunil

Edward Jiang

Manuel Kallenbach

Nick Schmitt

Jon Meyers

Matthew Bush

Patrick Gallagher

Himank Pathak

Morgan Spencer

Pedro Piñera Buendía

Matt Sutkowski

Justin Etheredge

Zain Fathoni

Shrill Shrestha

Brent Anderson

Vinaya Sathyanarayana

Will Minshew

Amanda Giannelli

Tawfik Yasser

Sébastien Lorber

Charlie Ray

Kim, Jang-hwan

Simon Gagnon

TagawaHirotaka

Andrew Lam

Brandon DuRette

Curtis Reimer

Kevin Brown

Nikolaj Ivancic

Nuno Pato

Renan Andrade

Sai Deepesh

bl-ue

juju

Ryan Lockard

Sven Hanssen

Mudassar Ali

SangHee Kim

Subhash Chandra

KimSeonghyeon

Zhihao Cui

Kyle Corbitt

Sean Doughty

Zak Mandhro

bozdoz

Isaac Tait

Jace

Noah Bernsohn

rene-demonsters

Sergey Sharov

Tim Pap

in-in

mlabate

Pablo Dejuan

bugsfunny

Luís Pinto

Aditya Pandey

Leigh Halliday

BlackHawkSigma

Devin MacGillivray

Francisco Jaramillo

Orta Therox

Tharshan Muthulingam

Brian Liu

allen joslin

Ryan Wang

Vashiru

Ron Dyar

Todd Pressley

Redwood projects (mostly) follow the all-contributions specification. Contributions of any kind are welcome.