You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This isn't true if I have my own Component type and I have done something like use specs::Component as SComponent;. It's also not true if I'm also using another library using similar code that wants ownership of the non-namespaced name Component.
The macro should be changed to use a fully-qualified specs::Component, so it can coexist with Components from other crates.
Or am I doing something very wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The derive macro for components seems to be assuming that the literal string "Component" in my source code is going to point to
specs::Component
.specs/specs-derive/src/lib.rs
Line 72 in d4435bd
This isn't true if I have my own
Component
type and I have done something likeuse specs::Component as SComponent;
. It's also not true if I'm also using another library using similar code that wants ownership of the non-namespaced nameComponent
.The macro should be changed to use a fully-qualified
specs::Component
, so it can coexist withComponent
s from other crates.Or am I doing something very wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: