You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Previously, we used the polyfill.io service to generate polyfills and detect the need for them. We will likely move to transpiling our code, and automatically polyfilling missing APIs in older browsers. Our documentation should be updated to reflect this new process.
Who needs to work on this
Developers, Technical writer
Who needs to review this
Developers, Technical writer
Done when
Our polyfilling documentation reflects our chosen method for polyfilling
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would be great to make sure we document the different parts around the transpilation (and not just the polyfilling): the tools (browserslist, Babel) as well as stuff like Babel's mapping from browser to transforms that need applying (or core-js's/es-shim's one if we end up using either) to help look things up if we get reports of stuff not working in a specific browser.
Although the documentation is rather terse, I think it meets the 'done when' for this issue ('Our polyfilling documentation reflects our chosen method for polyfilling') so I'm going to call this done.
We can revisit as our approach to polyfilling evolves.
What
Update our polyfilling doc
Why
Previously, we used the polyfill.io service to generate polyfills and detect the need for them. We will likely move to transpiling our code, and automatically polyfilling missing APIs in older browsers. Our documentation should be updated to reflect this new process.
Who needs to work on this
Developers, Technical writer
Who needs to review this
Developers, Technical writer
Done when
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: