[Bug] deploy deserial error using artifact sol! macro

[alexlatif]

Component

contract

What version of Alloy are you on?

0.1.0

Operating System

macOS (Apple Silicon)

Describe the bug

i cannot seem to understand where i am going wrong in trying to call deploy on a contract i have just made using the sol macro. error thrown is in deserialization during the .deploy

    sol!(
        #[sol(rpc)]
        Count,
        "test/Counter.json"
    );

    let contract_name = "foo";
    let contract =
        Count::deploy(provider).await.context(format!("Failed to deploy: {}", contract_name))?;

    info!("Deployed at: {}", format!("{}", contract.address()));

no constructor args in my contract

`trace` for full body bytes=845
Error: Failed to deploy: foo

Caused by:
    0: deserialization error: invalid number at line 1 column 23
    1: invalid number at line 1 column 23

standard middleware provider

    let provider = ProviderBuilder::new()
        .with_recommended_fillers()
        .signer(EthereumSigner::from(wallet))
        .on_http(rpc_url);

1. how can I debug this better?

2. what do i do to fix it?

[DaniPopes]

What RPC are you using?
Can you run with RUST_LOG=alloy=trace and post the full response JSON?

[alexlatif]

infura.io currently on Eth Sepolia

2024-05-13T20:02:09.209418Z DEBUG ReqwestTransport{url=https://sepolia.infura.io/v3/2PWWLK6SolIUtcFp9dGL4SnIwre}: alloy_transport_http::reqwest_transport: retrieved response body. Use `trace` for full body bytes=767
2024-05-13T20:02:09.209432Z TRACE ReqwestTransport{url=https://sepolia.infura.io/v3/2PWWLK6SolIUtcFp9dGL4SnIwre}: alloy_transport_http::reqwest_transport: response body body={"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"result":{"baseFeePerBlobGas":["0xc0","0xb2","0xab","0x98","0x9e","0x92","0xa4","0xb9","0xd0","0xea","0xfd"],"baseFeePerGas":["0x4cb8cf181","0x53075988e","0x4fb92ee18","0x45c209055","0x4e790dca2","0x58462e84e","0x5b7659f4e","0x5d66ea3aa","0x6283c6e45","0x5ecf0e1e5","0x5da59cf89"],"blobGasUsedRatio":[0.16666666666666666,0.3333333333333333,0,0.6666666666666666,0.16666666666666666,1,1,1,1,0.8333333333333334],"gasUsedRatio":[0.8288135,0.3407616666666667,0,0.9997232,0.999601,0.6444664333333333,0.5848306333333333,0.7189564,0.34952733333333336,0.4509799666666667],"oldestBlock":"0x59f94f","reward":[["0x59682f00"],["0x59682f00"],["0x0"],["0x59682f00"],["0x59682f00"],["0x3b9aca00"],["0x59682f00"],["0x59682f00"],["0x3b9aca00"],["0x59682f00"]]}}
2024-05-13T20:02:09.209510Z TRACE alloy_json_rpc::result: deserializing response ty=alloy_rpc_types::eth::fee::FeeHistory json="{\"baseFeePerBlobGas\":[\"0xc0\",\"0xb2\",\"0xab\",\"0x98\",\"0x9e\",\"0x92\",\"0xa4\",\"0xb9\",\"0xd0\",\"0xea\",\"0xfd\"],\"baseFeePerGas\":[\"0x4cb8cf181\",\"0x53075988e\",\"0x4fb92ee18\",\"0x45c209055\",\"0x4e790dca2\",\"0x58462e84e\",\"0x5b7659f4e\",\"0x5d66ea3aa\",\"0x6283c6e45\",\"0x5ecf0e1e5\",\"0x5da59cf89\"],\"blobGasUsedRatio\":[0.16666666666666666,0.3333333333333333,0,0.6666666666666666,0.16666666666666666,1,1,1,1,0.8333333333333334],\"gasUsedRatio\":[0.8288135,0.3407616666666667,0,0.9997232,0.999601,0.6444664333333333,0.5848306333333333,0.7189564,0.34952733333333336,0.4509799666666667],\"oldestBlock\":\"0x59f94f\",\"reward\":[[\"0x59682f00\"],[\"0x59682f00\"],[\"0x0\"],[\"0x59682f00\"],[\"0x59682f00\"],[\"0x3b9aca00\"],[\"0x59682f00\"],[\"0x59682f00\"],[\"0x3b9aca00\"],[\"0x59682f00\"]]}"
2024-05-13T20:02:09.210043Z TRACE alloy_json_rpc::result: failed to deserialize response err=Error("invalid number", line: 1, column: 23)

is this an RPC specific issue? if so what would you recommend?

[DaniPopes]

I cannot reproduce this, please try on latest main commit