Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: add container top interface #878

Merged

Conversation

HusterWan
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Michael Wan [email protected]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

add top interface

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #867

Ⅲ. Describe how you did it

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@allencloud
Copy link
Collaborator

Since #881 has been merged, please rebase to the latest branch and push back again. Thanks. @HusterWan

@HusterWan HusterWan force-pushed the zr/add-top-interface branch 3 times, most recently from 0438216 to 34aea35 Compare March 13, 2018 03:25
Signed-off-by: Michael Wan <[email protected]>
@HusterWan HusterWan force-pushed the zr/add-top-interface branch from 34aea35 to 7c6890c Compare March 13, 2018 07:14
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #878 into master will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #878      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.62%   14.55%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         115      116       +1     
  Lines        6940     6973      +33     
==========================================
  Hits         1015     1015              
- Misses       5839     5872      +33     
  Partials       86       86
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cli/top.go 0% <0%> (ø)
client/container.go 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d3c2f20...7c6890c. Read the comment docs.


container := args[0]

arguments := args[1:]
Copy link
Collaborator

@allencloud allencloud Mar 13, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You add Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1),
So arguments := args[1:] is meaningless.
I think inconsistency happens.
Please correct this in the following PR.

@allencloud
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@pouchrobot pouchrobot added the LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. label Mar 13, 2018
@allencloud allencloud merged commit f811a2b into AliyunContainerService:master Mar 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. size/XL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[feature required] need API /containers/(id or name)/top
4 participants