Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add UCloud as a production adopter #2422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2018

Conversation

allencloud
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Allen Sun [email protected]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

We have heard from @Liberxue that UCloud is using PouchContainer to guarantee the disk quota for rocketmq in production environment, then I would like to put UCloud as an enterprise adopter of PouchContainer.

I would like to invite @Liberxue to introduce more production scenario about what you used PouchContainer. Could you help to introduce the following things:

  • your demand about container solutions;
  • why you have the demand;
  • the solution PouchContainer provides;
  • how you use PouchContainer;
  • your further thoughts on PouchContainer

Thanks a lot if you are free to tell us your story.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

none

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)? (你真的觉得不需要加测试吗?)

no need

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

none

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

none

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2422 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2422      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.75%   68.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         272      272              
  Lines       18159    18159              
==========================================
- Hits        12486    12485       -1     
- Misses       4253     4256       +3     
+ Partials     1420     1418       -2
Flag Coverage Δ
#criv1alpha1test 31.51% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
#criv1alpha2test 35.7% <ø> (+0.15%) ⬆️
#integrationtest 40.08% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
#nodee2etest 32.88% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
#unittest 26.52% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
daemon/mgr/snapshot.go 89.85% <0%> (-4.35%) ⬇️
apis/server/utils.go 71.15% <0%> (-3.85%) ⬇️
cri/v1alpha2/cri_utils.go 90.62% <0%> (-0.59%) ⬇️
cri/v1alpha2/cri_wrapper.go 62.4% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
daemon/mgr/container.go 59.22% <0%> (+0.21%) ⬆️
cri/v1alpha2/cri.go 68.04% <0%> (+0.24%) ⬆️
ctrd/container.go 59.28% <0%> (+0.39%) ⬆️
pkg/streams/utils.go 91.66% <0%> (+2.38%) ⬆️

@rudyfly
Copy link
Collaborator

rudyfly commented Nov 6, 2018

LGTM

@pouchrobot pouchrobot added the LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. label Nov 6, 2018
@HusterWan HusterWan merged commit d5f4216 into AliyunContainerService:master Nov 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
areas/docs LGTM one maintainer or community participant agrees to merge the pull reuqest. size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants