Where clauses go on switch patterns, not cases #69
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The grammar erroneously had it that a switch _case_ would get a single `where` clause, disallowing something like: ``` case .foo(x) where x.count() == 0, .bar(x): ``` Allowing `where`-clauses per pattern is strictly more flexible.
|
One top-repo iteration failed on "Use Node.js", which is unusual. Gonna force-push to trigger a rerun. If this keeps happening, I'll probably have to look into building a parser as an artifact so that not all of the iterations build their own. |
alex-pinkus
force-pushed
the
switch-where-clause
branch
from
c2bbbc5 to
51da3d1
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The grammar erroneously had it that a switch case would get a single
whereclause, disallowing something like:Allowing
where-clauses per pattern is strictly more flexible.