Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gpus.json #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2024
Merged

Update gpus.json #33

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2024

Conversation

88plug
Copy link
Contributor

@88plug 88plug commented Sep 14, 2024

Correct rtx4060ti memory

Screenshot from 2024-09-14 14-13-57
Screenshot from 2024-09-14 14-12-03

Correct rtx4060ti memory
Copy link
Collaborator

@chainzero chainzero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Appears there is conflicting intel on the amount of RAM on part number 2803 as some references show 8GB of RAM - which is current spec in gpu.json. But will use provided nvidia-smi provided as source of truth and based on this can be merged.

@andy108369
Copy link
Collaborator

Appears there is conflicting intel on the amount of RAM on part number 2803 as some references show 8GB of RAM - which is current spec in gpu.json. But will use provided nvidia-smi provided as source of truth and based on this can be merged.

Thanks @chainzero

FYI:
The vendor ID (e.g., 10de for NVIDIA) and product ID (e.g., 2803 in this case) can be accompanied by a unique subsystem ID, which distinguishes the specific VRAM characteristics (such as size) of the GPU.

For example, according to this reference, a 10de:2803 GPU with a subsystem ID of 16E3 corresponds to a model with 8 GB of VRAM. In contrast, 88plug's 10de:2803 GPU features a different subsystem ID, indicating distinct VRAM specifications.

Unfortunately, Akash does not support the subsystem ID's yet.

I've opened an issue to address this akash-network/support#256

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants