Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generated code is wrong with that schema #268

Open
kapouer opened this issue Jun 1, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

generated code is wrong with that schema #268

kapouer opened this issue Jun 1, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@kapouer
Copy link

kapouer commented Jun 1, 2022

EDIT: a simpler schema

{
 "type": "object",
 "properties": {
  "email": { "type": "string", "transform": ["trim"] }
 }
}

gives
SyntaxError: Unexpected token ':'.

const schema43 = scope.schema[23];const func0 = scope.func[0];const func86 = scope.func[2];return function validate29(data, {instancePath="", parentData, parentDataProperty, rootData=data}={}){let vErrors = null;let errors = 0;if(data && typeof data == "object" && !Array.isArray(data)){for(const key0 of Object.keys(data)){if(!(key0 === "email")){delete data[key0];}}if(data.email !== undefined && func0.call(data, "email")){let data0 = data.email;if(typeof data0 !== "string"){let dataType0 = typeof data0;let coerced0 = undefined;if(dataType0 == 'object' && Array.isArray(data0) && data0.length == 1){data0 = data0[0];dataType0 = typeof data0;if(typeof data0 === "string"){coerced0 = data0;}}if(!(coerced0 !== undefined)){if(dataType0 == "number" || dataType0 == "boolean"){coerced0 = "" + data0;}else if(data0 === null){coerced0 = "";}else {const err0 = {instancePath:instancePath+"/email",schemaPath:"#/properties/email/type",keyword:"type",params:{type: "string"},message:"must be string"};if(vErrors === null){vErrors = [err0];}else {vErrors.push(err0);}errors++;}}if(coerced0 !== undefined){data0 = coerced0;if(data !== undefined){data["email"] = coerced0;}}}if(typeof {"str":"data0"} == "string" && {"str":"data"} !== undefined){data0 = {"str":"func86","prefix":"func","value":{"code":{"_items":["require(\"ajv-keywords/dist/definitions/transform\").transform",".trim",""]}},"scopePath":{"_items":[".",{"str":"func"},"[",2,"]"]}}({"str":"data0"});{"str":"data"}[{"_items":["","\"email\"",""]}] = data0;}}}else {const err1 = {instancePath,schemaPath:"#/type",keyword:"type",params:{type: "object"},message:"must be object"};if(vErrors === null){vErrors = [err1];}else {vErrors.push(err1);}errors++;}validate29.errors = vErrors;return errors === 0;}
@kapouer
Copy link
Author

kapouer commented Jun 1, 2022

Removing transform fixes it...

@kapouer
Copy link
Author

kapouer commented Jun 1, 2022

It is initialized with

const Ajv = require('ajv');
const AjvKeywords = require('ajv-keywords');
const AjvFormats = require('ajv-formats');
const ajv = new Ajv({strictSchema: false});
AjvFormats(ajv);
AjvKeywords(ajv);

@felixfbecker
Copy link

felixfbecker commented Apr 24, 2023

I'm running into the same issue. The following is the generated code containing the syntax error beautified:

if (typeof {
        "str": "data4"
    } == "string" && {
        "str": "data"
    } !== undefined) {
    data4 = {
        "str": "func4",
        "prefix": "func",
        "value": {
            "code": {
                "_items": ["require(\"ajv-keywords/dist/definitions/transform\").transform", ".toLowerCase", ""]
            }
        },
        "scopePath": {
            "_items": [".", {
                "str": "func"
            }, "[", 2, "]"]
        }
    }({
        "str": "func5",
        "prefix": "func",
        "value": {
            "code": {
                "_items": ["require(\"ajv-keywords/dist/definitions/transform\").transform", ".trim", ""]
            }
        },
        "scopePath": {
            "_items": [".", {
                "str": "func"
            }, "[", 3, "]"]
        }
    }({
        "str": "data4"
    })); {
        "str": "data"  // Syntax error here: Unexpected ":", expected
    } [{
        "_items": ["", "\"email\"", ""]semicolon
    }] = data4;
}

I can't really make sense of this code – no idea what these free-floating objects are supposed to do.

The syntax error happens where an object literal is defined but because there is no const or let it gets parsed as a statement block, so the parser chokes on the :.

I'm using [email protected] and [email protected].

@tequila99
Copy link

I have some issue. Do you have any ideas for solving this?

@aorsten
Copy link

aorsten commented Aug 31, 2023

I am seeing the same issue with [email protected] and [email protected] (and also at 5.0.0). It's being used together with objection.js.

Removing keywords(ajv) fixes the issue, and the syntax error is the exact same as reported by @felixfbecker above.

@aorsten
Copy link

aorsten commented Aug 31, 2023

I have also tried returning to ajv-keywords specific peerDependency of [email protected], but that also does not work, unfortunately.

Has transform worked at all with ajv 8?

@aorsten
Copy link

aorsten commented Sep 1, 2023

I believe I have solved it on my end. The issue for me has been that I'm using ajv and ajv-keywords inside a monorepo, where multiple packages are using ajv. Basically the issue has been that the "ajv" package was installed multiple times within node_modules. I have solved it by using the overrides keyword in package.json and also installing ajv at the top level package.json of my monorepo. (Caveat: overrides only work in top-level package, not each sub-package).

So my new package.json looks something like this:

// package.json

{
  // (...)
  "dependencies": {
    "ajv": "8.8.2"
  },
  
  "overrides": {
    "some-package-i-use": {
      "ajv": "$ajv"
    },
    "ajv-formats": {
      "ajv": "$ajv"
    },
    "ajv-keywords": {
      "ajv": "$ajv"
    }
  },

I am now going to retry using the latest ajv version, which I expect will work just as well, so long as every package uses the same installation of ajv.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants