Move KRM functions away from dockerhub-hosted base images #514
Labels
6-upstream/images
For upstream issues related to quay, docker, images, etc.
enhancement
New feature or request
priority/medium
Default priority for items
ready for review
Change related to the issue is ready for review
size m
Milestone
Docker hub ratelimiting continues to be a thorn in our side. Our reference manifests now only point to a few remaining images in dockerhub.
This issue is to investigate / implement a switch away from dockerhub when possible/appropriate, by re-basing our KRM functions on something other than alpine (assuming there's not some reason we need alpine).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: