Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PR #5619/0e5d7434 backport][3.8] Fix broken references in docs/testing.rst #5739

Conversation

patchback[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@patchback patchback bot commented May 28, 2021

This is a backport of PR #5619 as merged into master (0e5d743).

What do these changes do?

This change corrects multiple unrendered intersphinx class reference in the testing.rst document.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No

Related issue number

#5518

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

* Fix broken references

* Add references to ignore

(cherry picked from commit 0e5d743)
@webknjaz webknjaz merged commit 4713e19 into 3.8 May 28, 2021
@webknjaz webknjaz deleted the patchback/backports/3.8/0e5d74348a70e4daee970954ead3e1ca6a97554d/pr-5619 branch May 28, 2021 00:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants