Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Optimise the TinyTable implementation #310

Open
jot2re opened this issue Oct 26, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Optimise the TinyTable implementation #310

jot2re opened this issue Oct 26, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
Status: Pending Issues not currently being solved. Type: Enhancement New functionality related issues.
Milestone
Clean up the Tiny...

Comments

@jot2re
Copy link
Collaborator

jot2re commented Oct 26, 2018

Currently the TinyTable implementation work over boolean objects. Because we use Java this is a huge overhead since every bit gets represented as an object. This is in particular true during communication. We need to look into possible optimisations by batching boolean values together as much as possible both in the code and during communication.
@jot2re jot2re added Type: Enhancement New functionality related issues. Status: Pending Issues not currently being solved. labels Oct 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Status: Pending Issues not currently being solved. Type: Enhancement New functionality related issues.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Clean up the TinyTables protocol suite
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jot2re