Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Utah broadband service location fabric exploration #304

Open
nathankota opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Utah broadband service location fabric exploration #304

nathankota opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
paying This issue earns $$ status: idea This issue is an idea

Comments

@nathankota
Copy link
Contributor

nathankota commented Dec 14, 2023

Benefit

A required rebuild of the Utah Residential Broadband Map provides an opportunity to reimagine the entire process around receiving, aggregating, munging, and displaying broadband provider service data throughout Utah. The FCC's CostQuest Broadband Service Location (BSL) fabric data set (FCC National Broadband Map) has become the national standard for collecting and communicating broadband service data and information, and provides a possible template for how to collect and display Utah-specific BSLs and associated provider data. However, the license restrictions associated with the use of the CostQuest fabric, and its unknown longevity, inhibit it from being a long term solution and replacement of Utah residential broadband data. Finally, the bi-annual data collection and aggregation process that has existed for more than a decade is not only untenable for UGRC in perpetuity, but is also diverging from a potentially truer representation of broadband availability in Utah, thereby requiring a fresh Utah-specific solution for broadband data into the future. Making progress on a proof of concept Utah fabric data set will help UGRC and GOEO's Broadband Center to understand, ideate (yes! I finally used this term!), and plan for a new Utah residential broadband map and data set.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Simple replication of the CostQuest BSL fabric using Utah address point data and provider/service data from our bi-annually updated layer.
  • Internal conversation about possibilities for streamlined collection of provider updates, and map display and interaction.
  • Conversation with GOEO Broadband about possible paths forward.

Notes

No response

Risks

Accept: A Utah-specific fabric becomes a non-starter for replacement of the current provider data set and methodology.

  • Innacurate/imprecise provider data.
  • Lack of cooperation by providers due to duplication of efforts between us and FCC

Issue Reference

refs #63

@jacobdadams
Copy link
Member

Also: Evaluate responses for UETN fabric challenge

@nathankota nathankota changed the title Utah broadband service location fabric POC Utah broadband service location fabric exploration Mar 25, 2024
@nathankota nathankota added carry forward This task was carried forward into the next quarter status: uncommitted This feature has not been committed to the plan labels Mar 26, 2024
@nathankota nathankota removed carry forward This task was carried forward into the next quarter status: uncommitted This feature has not been committed to the plan labels May 28, 2024
@jacobdadams
Copy link
Member

In our regular call on 19 September 24, Rebecca mentioned she'd talked with CostQuest at a conference about licensing the fabric for the State's use for building a new broadband map/dataset. This would allow providers to continue to work with the BSLs they're familiar with.

@jacobdadams jacobdadams added the paying This issue earns $$ label Sep 23, 2024
@gregbunce gregbunce added the status: idea This issue is an idea label Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
paying This issue earns $$ status: idea This issue is an idea
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants