more-morphisms.tex

\input{preamble}

% OK, start here.
%
\begin{document}

\title{More on Morphisms}


\maketitle

\phantomsection
\label{section-phantom}

\tableofcontents

\section{Introduction}
\label{section-introduction}

\noindent
In this chapter we continue our study of properties of morphisms of schemes.
A fundamental reference is \cite{EGA}.






\section{Thickenings}
\label{section-thickenings}

\noindent
The following terminology may not be completely standard, but it is convenient.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-thickening}
Thickenings.
\begin{enumerate}
\item We say a scheme $X'$ is a {\it thickening} of a scheme $X$ if
$X$ is a closed subscheme of $X'$ and the underlying topological spaces
are equal.
\item We say a scheme $X'$ is a {\it first order thickening} of a scheme $X$ if
$X$ is a closed subscheme of $X'$ and the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals
$\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_{X'}$ defining $X$ has square zero.
\item Given two thickenings $X \subset X'$ and $Y \subset Y'$ a
{\it morphism of thickenings} is a morphism $f' : X' \to Y'$ such that
$f'(X) \subset Y$, i.e., such that $f'|_X$ factors through the closed
subscheme $Y$. In this situation we set $f = f'|_X : X \to Y$ and we say
that $(f, f') : (X \subset X') \to (Y \subset Y')$ is a morphism of
thickenings.
\item Let $S$ be a scheme. We similarly define {\it thickenings over $S$}, and
{\it morphisms of thickenings over $S$}. This means that the schemes
$X, X', Y, Y'$ above are schemes over $S$, and that the morphisms
$X \to X'$, $Y \to Y'$ and $f' : X' \to Y'$ are morphisms over $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
Finite order thickenings. Let $i_X : X \to X'$ be a thickening.
Any local section of the kernel
$\mathcal{I} = \Ker(i_X^\sharp)$ is locally nilpotent.
Let us say that $X \subset X'$ is a {\it finite order thickening}
if the ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}$ is ``globally'' nilpotent, i.e.,
if there exists an $n \geq 0$ such that $\mathcal{I}^{n + 1} = 0$.
Technically the class of finite order thickenings $X \subset X'$
is much easier to handle than the general case.
Namely, in this case we have a filtration
$$
0 \subset \mathcal{I}^n \subset \mathcal{I}^{n - 1} \subset
\ldots \subset \mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_{X'}
$$
and we see that $X'$ is filtered by closed subspaces
$$
X = X_0 \subset X_1 \subset \ldots \subset X_{n - 1} \subset X_{n + 1} = X'
$$
such that each pair $X_i \subset X_{i + 1}$ is a first order thickening
over $S$. Using simple induction arguments many results proved for first order
thickenings can be rephrased as results on finite order thickenings.

\medskip\noindent
First order thickening are described as follows (see
Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-double-structure-gives-derivation}).

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-first-order-thickening}
Let $X$ be a scheme over a base $S$. Consider a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{O}_X \to 0
$$
of sheaves on $X$ where $\mathcal{A}$ is a sheaf of
$f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S$-algebras,
$\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{O}_X$ is a surjection
of sheaves of $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S$-algebras, and $\mathcal{I}$ is its kernel.
If
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{I}$ is an ideal of square zero in $\mathcal{A}$, and
\item $\mathcal{I}$ is quasi-coherent as an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
\end{enumerate}
then $X' = (X, \mathcal{A})$ is a scheme and $X \to X'$ is a first
order thickening over $S$. Moreover, any first order thickening over
$S$ is of this form.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
It is clear that $X'$ is a locally ringed space. Let $U = \Spec(B)$
be an affine open of $X$. Set $A = \Gamma(U, \mathcal{A})$. Note that
since $H^1(U, \mathcal{I}) = 0$ (see Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{coherent-lemma-quasi-coherent-affine-cohomology-zero})
the map $A \to B$ is surjective. By assumption the kernel
$I = \mathcal{I}(U)$ is an ideal of square zero in the ring $A$.
By
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-morphism-into-affine}
there is a canonical morphism of locally ringed spaces
$$
(U, \mathcal{A}|_U) \longrightarrow \Spec(A)
$$
coming from the map $B \to \Gamma(U, \mathcal{A})$. Since this morphism
fits into the commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
(U, \mathcal{O}_X|_U) \ar[d] \ar[r] & \Spec(B) \ar[d] \\
(U, \mathcal{A}|_U) \ar[r] & \Spec(A)
}
$$
we see that it is a homeomorphism on underlying topological spaces.
Thus to see that it is an isomorphism, it suffices to check it induces
an isomorphism on the local rings.
For $u \in U$ corresponding to the prime $\mathfrak p \subset A$
we obtain a commutative diagram of short exact sequences
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
I_{\mathfrak p} \ar[r] \ar[d] &
A_{\mathfrak p} \ar[r] \ar[d] &
B_{\mathfrak p} \ar[r] \ar[d] & 0 \\
0 \ar[r] &
\mathcal{I}_u \ar[r] &
\mathcal{A}_u \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{X, u} \ar[r] & 0.
}
$$
The left and right vertical arrows are isomorphisms because
$\mathcal{I}$ and $\mathcal{O}_X$ are quasi-coherent sheaves.
Hence also the middle map is an isomorphism. Hence every point
of $X' = (X, \mathcal{A})$ has an affine neighbourhood and $X'$ is a
scheme as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}
Any thickening of an affine scheme is affine.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a special case of
Limits, Proposition \ref{limits-proposition-affine}.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Proof for a finite order thickening]
Suppose that $X \subset X'$ is a finite order thickening with $X$ affine. Then
we may use Serre's criterion to prove $X'$ is affine. More precisely, we will
use Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{coherent-lemma-quasi-compact-h1-zero-covering}. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a
quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X'}$-module. It suffices to show that
$H^1(X', \mathcal{F}) = 0$. Denote $i : X \to X'$ the given closed immersion
and denote
$\mathcal{I} = \Ker(i^\sharp : \mathcal{O}_{X'} \to i_*\mathcal{O}_X)$.
By our discussion of finite order thickenings (following
Definition \ref{definition-thickening}) there exists an $n \geq 0$
and a filtration
$$
0 = \mathcal{F}_{n + 1} \subset \mathcal{F}_n \subset
\mathcal{F}_{n - 1} \subset \ldots \subset
\mathcal{F}_0 = \mathcal{F}
$$
by quasi-coherent submodules such that $\mathcal{F}_a/\mathcal{F}_{a + 1}$ is
annihilated by $\mathcal{I}$. Namely, we can take
$\mathcal{F}_a = \mathcal{I}^a\mathcal{F}$. Then
$\mathcal{F}_a/\mathcal{F}_{a + 1} = i_*\mathcal{G}_a$ for some quasi-coherent
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{G}_a$, see Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-i-star-equivalence}. We obtain
$$
H^1(X', \mathcal{F}_a/\mathcal{F}_{a + 1}) =
H^1(X', i_*\mathcal{G}_a) = H^1(X, \mathcal{G}_a) = 0
$$
The second equality comes from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{coherent-lemma-relative-affine-cohomology}
and the last equality from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{coherent-lemma-quasi-coherent-affine-cohomology-zero}.
Thus $\mathcal{F}$ has a finite filtration whose successive quotients
have vanishing first cohomology and it follows by a simple
induction argument that $H^1(X', \mathcal{F}) = 0$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-thickening}
Let $S \subset S'$ be a thickening of schemes. Let $X' \to S'$ be a morphism
and set $X = S \times_{S'} X'$. Then $(X \subset X') \to (S \subset S')$
is a morphism of thickenings. If $S \subset S'$ is a first
(resp.\ finite order) thickening, then $X \subset X'$ is a first
(resp.\ finite order) thickening.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-thickening}
If $S \subset S'$ and $S' \subset S''$ are thickenings, then so is
$S \subset S''$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-descending-property-thickening}
The property of being a thickening is fpqc local.
Similarly for first order thickenings.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The statement means the following: Let $X \to X'$ be a morphism
of schemes and let $\{g_i : X'_i \to X'\}$
be an fpqc covering such that the base change $X_i \to X'_i$
is a thickening for all $i$. Then $X \to X'$ is a thickening.
Since the morphisms $g_i$ are jointly surjective we conclude
that $X \to X'$ is surjective. By
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-closed-immersion}
we conclude that $X \to X'$ is a closed immersion.
Thus $X \to X'$ is a thickening. We omit the proof in the
case of first order thickenings.
\end{proof}









\section{Morphisms of thickenings}
\label{section-morphisms-thickenings}

\noindent
If $(f, f') : (X \subset X') \to (Y \subset Y')$ is a morphism
of thickenings of schemes, then often properties of the morphism
$f$ are inherited by $f'$. There are several variants.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms}
Let $(f, f') : (X \subset X') \to (S \subset S')$ be a morphism
of thickenings. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is an affine morphism if and only if $f'$ is an affine morphism,
\item $f$ is a surjective morphism if and only if $f'$ is a surjective morphism,
\item $f$ is quasi-compact if and only if $f'$ quasi-compact,
\item $f$ is universally closed if and only if $f'$ is universally closed,
\item $f$ is integral if and only if $f'$ is integral,
\item $f$ is (quasi-)separated if and only if $f'$ is (quasi-)separated,
\item $f$ is universally injective if and only if $f'$ is universally injective,
\item $f$ is universally open if and only if $f'$ is universally open, and
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Observe that $S \to S'$ and $X \to X'$ are universal homeomorphisms
(see for example
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reduction-universal-homeomorphism}).
This immediately implies parts (2), (3), (4), (7), and (8).
Part (1) follows from Lemma \ref{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}
which tells us that there is a 1-to-1 correspondence between
affine opens of $S$ and $S'$ and between affine opens of $X$ and $X'$.
Part (5) follows from (1) and (4) by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-integral-universally-closed}.
Finally, note that
$$
S \times_X S = S \times_{X'} S \to S \times_{X'} S' \to S' \times_{X'} S'
$$
is a thickening (the two arrows are thickenings by
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-thickening}).
Hence applying (3) and (4) to the morphism
$(S \subset S') \to (S \times_X S \to S' \times_{X'} S')$
we obtain (6).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
Let $(f, f') : (X \subset X') \to (S \subset S')$ be a morphism
of thickenings such that $X = S \times_{S'} X'$. If $S \subset S'$
is a finite order thickening, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is a closed immersion if and only if $f'$ is a closed immersion,
\item $f$ is locally of finite type if and only if $f'$ is
locally of finite type,
\item $f$ is locally quasi-finite if and only if $f'$ is locally
quasi-finite,
\item $f$ is locally of finite type of relative dimension $d$ if and
only if $f'$ is locally of finite type of relative dimension $d$,
\item $\Omega_{X/S} = 0$ if and only if $\Omega_{X'/S'} = 0$,
\item $f$ is unramified if and only if $f'$ is unramified,
\item $f$ is proper if and only if $f'$ is proper,
\item $f$ is finite if and only if $f'$ is finite,
\item $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $f'$ is a monomorphism,
\item $f$ is an immersion if and only if $f'$ is an immersion, and
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The properties $\mathcal{P}$ listed in the lemma are all stable
under base change, hence if $f'$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so
does $f$. See
Schemes, Lemmas \ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-immersion} and
\ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-monomorphism}
and
Morphisms, Lemmas
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-type},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-relative-dimension-d},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-differentials},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-unramified},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-proper}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite}.

\medskip\noindent
The interesting direction in each case is therefore to assume
that $f$ has the property and deduce that $f'$ has it too.
By induction on the order of the thickening we may
assume that $S \subset S'$ is a first order thickening, see
discussion immediately following
Definition \ref{definition-thickening}.

\medskip\noindent
Most of the proofs will use a reduction to the affine case. Let
$U' \subset S'$ be an affine open and let $V' \subset X'$ be an affine open
lying over $U'$. Let $U' = \Spec(A')$ and denote $I \subset A'$ be the ideal
defining the closed subscheme $U' \cap S$. Say $V' = \Spec(B')$.
Then $V' \cap X = \Spec(B'/IB')$. Setting $A = A'/I$ and
$B = B'/IB'$ we get a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
IB' \ar[r] &
B' \ar[r] &
B \ar[r] & 0 \\
0 \ar[r] &
IA' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A \ar[r] \ar[u] & 0
}
$$
with exact rows and $I^2 = 0$.

\medskip\noindent
The translation of (1) into algebra: If $A \to B$ is surjective,
then $A' \to B'$ is surjective. This follows from
Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}).

\medskip\noindent
The translation of (2) into algebra: If $A \to B$ is a finite type ring
map, then $A' \to B'$ is a finite type ring map. This follows from
Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK})
applied to a map $A'[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B'$ such that
$A[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B$ is surjective.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (3).  Follows from (2) and that quasi-finiteness of a morphism
which is locally of finite type can be checked on fibres, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-at-point-characterize}.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (4). Follows from (2) and that the additional property of ``being of
relative dimension $d$'' can be checked on fibres (by definition, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-relative-dimension-d}.

\medskip\noindent
The translation of (5) into algebra: If $\Omega_{B/A} = 0$, then
$\Omega_{B'/A'} = 0$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-base-change}
we have $0 = \Omega_{B/A} = \Omega_{B'/A'}/I\Omega_{B'/A'}$.
Hence $\Omega_{B'/A'} = 0$ by
Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}).

\medskip\noindent
The translation of (6) into algebra: If $A \to B$ is unramified
map, then $A' \to B'$ is unramified. Since $A \to B$ is of finite
type we see that $A' \to B'$ is of finite type by (2) above.
Since $A \to B$ is unramified we have $\Omega_{B/A} = 0$. By
part (5) we have $\Omega_{B'/A'} = 0$. Thus $A' \to B'$ is unramified.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (7). Follows by combining (2) with
results of Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms}
and the fact that proper equals quasi-compact $+$
separated $+$ locally of finite type $+$ universally closed.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (8). Follows by combining (2) with
results of Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms}
and using the fact that finite equals integral $+$ locally
of finite type (Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-integral}).

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (9). As $f$ is a monomorphism we have $X = X \times_S X$.
We may apply the results proved so far to the morphism of thickenings
$(X \subset X') \to (X \times_S X \subset X' \times_{S'} X')$.
We conclude $X' \to X' \times_{S'} X'$ is a closed immersion by (1).
In fact, it is a first order thickening as the ideal defining the
closed immersion
$X' \to X' \times_{S'} X'$ is contained in the pullback of the ideal
$\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_{S'}$ cutting out $S$ in $S'$.
Indeed, $X = X \times_S X = (X' \times_{S'} X') \times_{S'} S$
is contained in $X'$. Hence by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-diagonal}
it suffices to show that
$\Omega_{X'/S'} = 0$ which follows from (5)
and the corresponding statement for $X/S$.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (10). If $f : X \to S$ is an immersion, then it factors as
$X \to U \to S$ where $U \to S$ is an open immersion and $X \to U$ is a
closed immersion. Let $U' \subset S'$ be the open subscheme whose
underlying topological space is the same as $U$. Then $X' \to S'$
factors through $U'$ and we conclude that $X' \to U'$ is a closed
immersion by part (1). This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma is a variant on the preceding one. Rather than assume
that the thickenings involved are finite order (which allows us to transfer
the property of being locally of finite type from $f$ to $f'$),
we instead take as given that each of $f$ and $f'$ is locally of
finite type.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-properties-that-extend-over-thickenings}
Let $(f, f') : (X \subset X') \to (Y \to Y')$ be a morphism
of thickenings. Assume $f$ and $f'$ are locally of finite type
and $X = Y \times_{Y'} X'$. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally quasi-finite if and only if $f'$ is locally quasi-finite,
\item $f$ is finite if and only if $f'$ is finite,
\item $f$ is a closed immersion if and only if $f'$ is a closed immersion,
\item $\Omega_{X/Y} = 0$ if and only if $\Omega_{X'/Y'} = 0$,
\item $f$ is unramified if and only if $f'$ is unramified,
\item $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $f'$ is a monomorphism,
\item $f$ is an immersion if and only if $f'$ is an immersion,
\item $f$ is proper if and only if $f'$ is proper, and
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The properties $\mathcal{P}$ listed in the lemma are all stable
under base change, hence if $f'$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so
does $f$. See
Schemes, Lemmas \ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-immersion} and
\ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-monomorphism}
and
Morphisms, Lemmas
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-relative-dimension-d},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-differentials},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-unramified},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-proper}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite}.
Hence in each case we need only to prove that if $f$ has
the desired property, so does $f'$.

\medskip\noindent
A morphism is locally quasi-finite if and only if it is locally
of finite type and the scheme theoretic fibres are discrete spaces, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-quasi-finite-fibres}.
Since the underlying topological space is unchanged by 
passing to a thickening, we see that $f'$ is locally quasi-finite if
(and only if) $f$ is. This proves (1).

\medskip\noindent
Case (2) follows from case (5) of Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms}
and the fact that the finite morphisms are precisely
the integral morphisms that are locally of finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-integral}).

\medskip\noindent
Case (3). This follows immediately from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-check-closed-infinitesimally}.

\medskip\noindent
Case (4) follows from the following algebra statement: Let $A$ be a ring and
let $I \subset A$ be a locally nilpotent ideal. Let $B$ be a finite type
$A$-algebra. If $\Omega_{(B/IB)/(A/I)} = 0$, then $\Omega_{B/A} = 0$.
Namely, the assumption means that $I\Omega_{B/A} = 0$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-base-change}.
On the other hand $\Omega_{B/A}$ is a finite $B$-module, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-finitely-generated}.
Hence the vanishing of $\Omega_{B/A}$ follows from Nakayama's
lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}) and the fact
that $IB$ is contained in the radical of $B$.

\medskip\noindent
Case (5) follows immediately from (4) and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-unramified-omega-zero}.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (6). As $f$ is a monomorphism we have $X = X \times_Y X$.
We may apply the results proved so far to the morphism of thickenings
$(X \subset X') \to (X \times_Y X \subset X' \times_{Y'} X')$.
We conclude $\Delta_{X'/Y'} : X' \to X' \times_{Y'} X'$
is a closed immersion by (3). In fact $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ is a bijection on
underlying sets, hence $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ is a thickening. On the other hand
$\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ is locally of finite presentation by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-diagonal-morphism-finite-type}.
In other words, $\Delta_{X'/Y'}(X')$ is cut out by
a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals
$\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_{X' \times_{Y'} X'}$ of finite type.
Since $\Omega_{X'/Y'} = 0$ by (5) we see that
the conormal sheaf of $X' \to X' \times_{Y'} X'$ is zero by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-diagonal}.
In other words, $\mathcal{J}/\mathcal{J}^2 = 0$.
This implies $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ is an isomorphism, for example
by Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-ideal-is-squared-union-connected}.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (7). If $f : X \to Y$ is an immersion, then it factors as
$X \to V \to Y$ where $V \to Y$ is an open immersion and $X \to V$ is a
closed immersion. Let $V' \subset Y'$ be the open subscheme whose
underlying topological space is the same as $V$. Then $X' \to V'$
factors through $V'$ and we conclude that $X' \to V'$ is a closed
immersion by part (3).

\medskip\noindent
Case (8) follows from Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms}
and the definition of proper morphisms as being the quasi-compact,
universally closed, and separated morphisms that are locally of finite type.
\end{proof}








\section{Picard groups of thickenings}
\label{section-picard-group-thickening}

\noindent
Some material on Picard groups of thickenings.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-picard-group-first-order-thickening}
Let $X \subset X'$ be a first order thickening
with ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}$. Then there is a canonical
exact sequence
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
H^0(X, \mathcal{I}) \ar[r] &
H^0(X', \mathcal{O}_{X'}^*) \ar[r] &
H^0(X, \mathcal{O}^*_X) \ar `r[d] `d[l] `l[llld] `d[dll] [dll] \\
& H^1(X, \mathcal{I}) \ar[r] &
\text{Pic}(X') \ar[r] &
\text{Pic}(X) \ar `r[d] `d[l] `l[llld] `d[dll] [dll] \\
& H^2(X, \mathcal{I}) \ar[r] & \ldots \ar[r] & \ldots
}
$$
of abelian groups.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is the long exact cohomology sequence associated to the
short exact sequence of sheaves of abelian groups
$$
0 \to \mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{O}_{X'}^* \to \mathcal{O}_X^* \to 0
$$
where the first map sends a local section $f$ of $\mathcal{I}$
to the invertible section $1 + f$ of $\mathcal{O}_{X'}$.
We also use the identification of the Picard group of a
ringed space with the first cohomology group of the sheaf
of invertible functions, see
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-h1-invertible}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-torsion-pic-thickening}
Let $X \subset X'$ be a thickening. Let $n$ be an integer
invertible in $\mathcal{O}_X$. Then the map
$\text{Pic}(X')[n] \to \text{Pic}(X)[n]$ is bijective.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}[Proof for a finite order thickening]
By the general principle explained following
Definition \ref{definition-thickening}
this reduces to the case of a first order thickening.
Then may use Lemma \ref{lemma-picard-group-first-order-thickening}
to see that it suffices to show that
$H^1(X, \mathcal{I})[n]$, $H^1(X, \mathcal{I})/n$, and
$H^2(X, \mathcal{I})[n]$ are zero.
This follows as multiplication by $n$ on $\mathcal{I}$
is an isomorphism as it is an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Proof in general]
Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_{X'}$ be the quasi-coherent ideal
sheaf cutting out $X$. Then we have a short exact sequence of
abelian groups
$$
0 \to (1 + \mathcal{I})^* \to \mathcal{O}_{X'}^* \to \mathcal{O}_X^* \to 0
$$
We obtain a long exact cohomology sequence as in the statement of
Lemma \ref{lemma-picard-group-first-order-thickening}
with $H^i(X, \mathcal{I})$ replaced by $H^i(X, (1 + \mathcal{I})^*)$.
Thus it suffices to show that raising to the $n$th power is an
isomorphism $(1 + \mathcal{I})^* \to (1 + \mathcal{I})^*$.
Taking sections over affine opens this follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-lift-nth-roots}.
\end{proof}







\section{First order infinitesimal neighbourhood}
\label{section-first-order-infinitesimal-neighbourhood}

\noindent
A natural construction of first order thickenings is the following.
Suppose that $i : Z \to X$ be an immersion of schemes. Choose an
open subscheme $U \subset X$ such that $i$ identifies $Z$ with a closed
subscheme $Z \subset U$. Let $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_U$ be the
quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals defining $Z$ in $U$. Then we can consider
the closed subscheme $Z' \subset U$ defined by the quasi-coherent sheaf
of ideals $\mathcal{I}^2$.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-first-order-infinitesimal-neighbourhood}
Let $i : Z \to X$ be an immersion of schemes. The
{\it first order infinitesimal neighbourhood} of $Z$ in $X$ is
the first order thickening $Z \subset Z'$ over $X$ described above.
\end{definition}

\noindent
This thickening has the following universal property (which will assuage
any fears that the construction above depends on the choice of the open
$U$).

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-first-order-infinitesimal-neighbourhood}
Let $i : Z \to X$ be an immersion of schemes. The first order infinitesimal
neighbourhood $Z'$ of $Z$ in $X$ has the following universal property:
Given any commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[d]_i & T \ar[l]^a \ar[d] \\
X & T' \ar[l]_b
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening over $X$, there exists
a unique morphism $(a', a) : (T \subset T') \to (Z \subset Z')$ of
thickenings over $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $U \subset X$ be the open used in the construction of $Z'$, i.e., an
open such that $Z$ is identified with a closed subscheme of $U$ cut out by
the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}$.
Since $|T| = |T'|$ we see that $b(T') \subset U$. Hence we can
think of $b$ as a morphism into $U$. Let $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_{T'}$
be the ideal cutting out $T$. Since $b(T) \subset Z$ by the diagram above
we see that $b^\sharp(b^{-1}\mathcal{I}) \subset \mathcal{J}$. As
$T'$ is a first order thickening of $T$ we see that $\mathcal{J}^2 = 0$
hence $b^\sharp(b^{-1}(\mathcal{I}^2)) = 0$. By
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-characterize-closed-subspace}
this implies that $b$ factors through $Z'$. Denote $a' : T' \to Z'$
this factorization and everything is clear.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-infinitesimal-neighbourhood-conormal}
Let $i : Z \to X$ be an immersion of schemes. Let $Z \subset Z'$ be
the first order infinitesimal neighbourhood of $Z$ in $X$.
Then the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r] \ar[d] & Z' \ar[d] \\
Z \ar[r] & X
}
$$
induces a map of conormal sheaves $\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'}$ by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial}.
This map is an isomorphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is clear from the construction of $Z'$ above.
\end{proof}
















\section{Formally unramified morphisms}
\label{section-formally-unramified}

\noindent
Recall that a ring map $R \to A$ is called {\it formally unramified}
(see Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-formally-unramified})
if for every commutative solid diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
A \ar[r] \ar@{-->}[rd] & B/I \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] & B \ar[u]
}
$$
where $I \subset B$ is an ideal of square zero, at most one dotted
arrow exists which makes the diagram commute. This motivates
the following analogue for morphisms of schemes.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-formally-unramified}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
We say $f$ is {\it formally unramified} if given any solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l] \\
S & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening of affine schemes over $S$
there exists at most one dotted arrow making the diagram commute.
\end{definition}

\noindent
We first prove some formal lemmas, i.e., lemmas which can be proved by
drawing the corresponding diagrams.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-unramified-not-affine}
If $f : X \to S$ is a formally unramified morphism, then given
any solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l] \\
S & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening of schemes over $S$
there exists at most one dotted arrow making the diagram commute.
In other words, in
Definition \ref{definition-formally-unramified}
the condition that $T$ be affine may be dropped.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is true because a morphism is determined by its restrictions
to affine opens.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-formally-unramified}
A composition of formally unramified morphisms is formally unramified.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is formal.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-formally-unramified}
A base change of a formally unramified morphism is formally unramified.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is formal.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-unramified-on-opens}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ be open such that
$f(U) \subset V$. If $f$ is formally unramified, so is $f|_U : U \to V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider a solid diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
U \ar[d]_{f|_U} & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l]^a \\
V & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
as in Definition \ref{definition-formally-unramified}. If $f$ is formally
ramified, then there exists at most one
$S$-morphism $a' : T' \to X$ such that $a'|_T = a$.
Hence clearly there exists at most one such morphism into $U$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-affine-formally-unramified}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $X$ and $S$ are affine.
Then $f$ is formally unramified if and only if
$\mathcal{O}_S(S) \to \mathcal{O}_X(X)$ is a formally unramified
ring map.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is immediate from the definitions
(Definition \ref{definition-formally-unramified} and
Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-formally-unramified})
by the equivalence of categories of rings and affine schemes,
see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-category-affine-schemes}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is a characterization in terms of the sheaf of differentials.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Then $f$ is formally unramified if and only if $\Omega_{X/S} = 0$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We give two proofs.

\medskip\noindent
First proof. It suffices to show that $\Omega_{X/S}$ is zero on the members of
an affine open covering of $X$. Choose an affine open $U \subset X$
with $f(U) \subset V$ where $V \subset S$ is an affine open of $S$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-on-opens}
the restriction $f_U : U \to V$ is formally unramified. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-affine}
we see that $\Omega_{X/S}|_U$ is the quasi-coherent sheaf associated to
the $\mathcal{O}_X(U)$-module $\Omega_{\mathcal{O}_X(U)/\mathcal{O}_S(V)}$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-affine-formally-unramified}
we see that $\mathcal{O}_S(V) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is a formally unramified
ring map. Hence by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-formally-unramified}
we conclude that $\Omega_{X/S}|_U = 0$ as desired.

\medskip\noindent
Second proof. We recall some of the arguments of the proof of
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-affine}.
Let $W \subset X \times_S X$ be an open such that
$\Delta : X \to X \times_S X$ induces a closed immersion into $W$.
Let $\mathcal{J} \subset \mathcal{O}_W$ be the ideal sheaf of this
closed immersion. Let $X' \subset W$ be the closed subscheme
defined by the quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{J}^2$.
Consider the two morphisms $p_1, p_2 : X' \to X$ induced by
the two projections $X \times_S X \to X$.
Note that $p_1$ and $p_2$ agree when composed with $\Delta : X \to X'$
and that $X \to X'$ is a closed immersion defined by a an ideal
whose square is zero. Moreover there is a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to \mathcal{J}/\mathcal{J}^2 \to \mathcal{O}_{X'} \to \mathcal{O}_X \to 0
$$
and $\Omega_{X/S} = \mathcal{J}/\mathcal{J}^2$. Moreover,
$\mathcal{J}/\mathcal{J}^2$ is generated by the local
sections $p_1^\sharp(f) - p_2^\sharp(f)$ for $f$ a local section of
$\mathcal{O}_X$.

\medskip\noindent
Suppose that $f : X \to S$ is formally unramified.
By assumption this means that $p_1 = p_2$ when restricted to any
affine open $T' \subset X'$. Hence $p_1 = p_2$. By what was said above
we conclude that $\Omega_{X/S} = \mathcal{J}/\mathcal{J}^2 = 0$.

\medskip\noindent
Conversely, suppose that $\Omega_{X/S} = 0$. Then $X' = X$. Take any pair
of morphisms $f'_1, f'_2 : T' \to X$ fitting as dotted arrows in
the diagram of
Definition \ref{definition-formally-unramified}.
This gives a morphism $(f'_1, f'_2) : T' \to X \times_S X$.
Since $f'_1|_T = f'_2|_T$ and $|T| =|T'|$ we see that the image of $T'$
under $(f'_1, f'_2)$ is contained in the open $W$ chosen above. Since
$(f'_1, f'_2)(T) \subset \Delta(X)$ and since $T$ is defined by an ideal
of square zero in $T'$ we see that $(f'_1, f'_2)$ factors through $X'$.
As $X' = X$ we conclude $f_1' = f'_2$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-unramified-formally-unramified}
\begin{slogan}
Unramified morphisms are the same as formally unramified morphism that
are locally of finite type.
\end{slogan}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The morphism $f$ is unramified (resp.\ G-unramified), and
\item the morphism $f$ is locally of finite type (resp.\ locally of finite
presentation) and formally unramified.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Use Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials} and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-unramified-omega-zero}.
\end{proof}









\section{Universal first order thickenings}
\label{section-universal-thickening}

\noindent
Let $h : Z \to X$ be a morphism of schemes. A {\it universal first order
thickening} of $Z$ over $X$ is a first order thickening $Z \subset Z'$
over $X$ such that given any first order thickening $T \subset T'$
over $X$ and a solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
& Z \ar[ld] & & T \ar[rd] \ar[ll]^a \\
Z' \ar[rrd] & & & & T' \ar@{..>}[llll]_{a'} \ar[lld]^b \\
 & & X
}
$$
there exists a unique dotted arrow making the diagram commute.
Note that in this situation $(a, a') : (T \subset T') \to (Z \subset Z')$
is a morphism of thickenings over $X$. Thus if a universal first order
thickening exists, then it is unique up to unique isomorphism.
In general a universal first order thickening
does not exist, but if $h$ is formally unramified then it does.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universal-thickening}
Let $h : Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes.
There exists a universal first order thickening $Z \subset Z'$ of
$Z$ over $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
During this proof we will say $Z \subset Z'$ is a universal first order
thickening of $Z$ over $X$ if it satisfies the condition of the lemma.
We will construct the universal first order thickening $Z \subset Z'$ over $X$
by glueing, starting with the affine case which is
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-universal-thickening}.
We begin with some general remarks.

\medskip\noindent
If a universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$ exists, then it is unique
up to unique isomorphism. Moreover, suppose that $V \subset Z$ and
$U \subset X$ are open subschemes such that $h(V) \subset U$. Let
$Z \subset Z'$ be a universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$.
Let $V' \subset Z'$ be the open subscheme such that $V = Z \cap V'$.
Then we claim that $V \subset V'$ is the universal first order thickening of
$V$ over $U$. Namely, suppose given any diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
V \ar[d]_h & T \ar[l]^a \ar[d] \\
U & T' \ar[l]_b
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening over $U$. By the universal
property of $Z'$ we obtain $(a, a') : (T \subset T') \to (Z \subset Z')$.
But since we have equality $|T| = |T'|$ of underlying topological spaces
we see that $a'(T') \subset V'$. Hence we may think of $(a, a')$
as a morphism of thickenings $(a, a') : (T \subset T') \to (V \subset V')$
over $U$. Uniqueness is clear also. In a completely similar manner one proves
that if $h(Z) \subset U$ and $Z \subset Z'$ is a universal first order
thickening over $U$, then $Z \subset Z'$ is a universal first order thickening
over $X$.

\medskip\noindent
Before we glue affine pieces let us show that the lemma holds if
$Z$ and $X$ are affine. Say $X = \Spec(R)$ and $Z = \Spec(S)$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-universal-thickening}
there exists a first order thickening $Z \subset Z'$ over $X$
which has the universal property of the lemma for diagrams
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[d]_h & T \ar[l]^a \ar[d] \\
X & T' \ar[l]_b
}
$$
where $T, T'$ are affine. Given a general diagram we can choose an affine
open covering $T' = \bigcup T'_i$ and we obtain morphisms
$a'_i : T'_i \to Z'$ over $X$ such that $a'_i|_{T_i} = a|_{T_i}$.
By uniqueness we see that $a'_i$ and $a'_j$ agree on any affine open
of $T'_i \cap T'_j$. Hence the morphisms $a'_i$ glue to a global morphism
$a' : T' \to Z'$ over $X$ as desired. Thus the lemma holds if $X$ and $Z$
are affine.

\medskip\noindent
Choose an affine open covering $Z = \bigcup Z_i$ such that each $Z_i$
maps into an affine open $U_i$ of $X$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-on-opens}
the morphisms $Z_i \to U_i$ are formally unramified.
Hence by the affine case we obtain universal first order thickenings
$Z_i \subset Z_i'$ over $U_i$. By the general remarks above
$Z_i \subset Z_i'$ is also a universal first order thickening of
$Z_i$ over $X$. Let $Z'_{i, j} \subset Z'_i$ be the open subscheme
such that $Z_i \cap Z_j = Z'_{i, j} \cap Z_i$. By the general remarks
we see that both $Z'_{i, j}$ and $Z'_{j, i}$ are universal first
order thickenings of $Z_i \cap Z_j$ over $X$. Thus, by
the first of our general remarks, we see that there is a canonical isomorphism
$\varphi_{ij} : Z'_{i, j} \to Z'_{j, i}$ inducing the identity on
$Z_i \cap Z_j$. We claim that these morphisms satisfy the cocycle condition of
Schemes, Section \ref{schemes-section-glueing-schemes}.
(Verification omitted. Hint: Use that $Z'_{i, j} \cap Z'_{i, k}$ is the
universal first order thickening of $Z_i \cap Z_j \cap Z_k$ which determines
it up to unique isomorphism by what was said above.)
Hence we can use the results of
Schemes, Section \ref{schemes-section-glueing-schemes}
to get a first order thickening $Z \subset Z'$ over $X$ which the property
that the open subscheme $Z'_i \subset Z'$ with $Z_i = Z'_i \cap Z$
is a universal first order thickening of $Z_i$ over $X$.

\medskip\noindent
It turns out that this implies formally that $Z'$ is a universal first order
thickening of $Z$ over $X$. Namely, we have the universal property for any
diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[d]_h & T \ar[l]^a \ar[d] \\
X & T' \ar[l]_b
}
$$
where $a(T)$ is contained in some $Z_i$. Given a general diagram we can
choose an open covering $T' = \bigcup T'_i$ such that $a(T_i) \subset Z_i$.
We obtain morphisms $a'_i : T'_i \to Z'$ over $X$ such that
$a'_i|_{T_i} = a|_{T_i}$. We see that $a'_i$ and $a'_j$ necessarily agree
on $T'_i \cap T'_j$ since both $a'_i|_{T'_i \cap T'_j}$ and
$a'_j|_{T'_i \cap T'_j}$ are solutions of the problem of mapping into the
universal first order thickening $Z'_i \cap Z'_j$ of $Z_i \cap Z_j$ over $X$.
Hence the morphisms $a'_i$ glue to a global morphism
$a' : T' \to Z'$ over $X$ as desired. This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-universal-thickening}
Let $h : Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item The {\it universal first order thickening} of $Z$ over $X$
is the thickening $Z \subset Z'$ constructed in
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening}.
\item The {\it conormal sheaf of $Z$ over $X$} is the conormal sheaf
of $Z$ in its universal first order thickening $Z'$ over $X$.
\end{enumerate}
We often denote the conormal sheaf $\mathcal{C}_{Z/X}$ in this situation.
\end{definition}

\noindent
Thus we see that there is a short exact sequence of sheaves
$$
0 \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to \mathcal{O}_{Z'} \to \mathcal{O}_Z \to 0
$$
on $Z$.
The following lemma proves that there is no conflict between this definition
and the definition in case $Z \to X$ is an immersion.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-immersion-universal-thickening}
Let $i : Z \to X$ be an immersion of schemes. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $i$ is formally unramified,
\item the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$ is the first order
infinitesimal neighbourhood of $Z$ in $X$ of
Definition \ref{definition-first-order-infinitesimal-neighbourhood}, and
\item the conormal sheaf of $i$ in the sense of
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-conormal-sheaf}
agrees with the conormal sheaf of $i$ in the sense of
Definition \ref{definition-universal-thickening}.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-open-immersion-unramified} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-closed-immersion-unramified}
an immersion is unramified, hence formally unramified by
Lemma \ref{lemma-unramified-formally-unramified}.
The other assertions follow by combining
Lemmas \ref{lemma-first-order-infinitesimal-neighbourhood} and
\ref{lemma-infinitesimal-neighbourhood-conormal}
and the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universal-thickening-unramified}
Let $Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes.
Then the universal first order thickening $Z'$ is formally
unramified over $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
There are two proofs. The first is to show that $\Omega_{Z'/X} = 0$
by working affine locally and applying
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-universal-thickening}.
Then
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials}
implies what we want.
The second is a direct argument as follows.

\medskip\noindent
Let $T \subset T'$ be a first order thickening. Let
$$
\xymatrix{
Z' \ar[d] & T \ar[l]^c \ar[d] \\
X & T' \ar[l] \ar[lu]^{a, b}
}
$$
be a commutative diagram. Consider two morphisms $a, b : T' \to Z'$
fitting into the diagram. Set $T_0 = c^{-1}(Z) \subset T$ and
$T'_a = a^{-1}(Z)$ (scheme theoretically).
Since $Z'$ is a first order thickening of $Z$, we see that $T'$
is a first order thickening of $T'_a$. Moreover, since $c = a|_T$ we see that
$T_0 = T \cap T'_a$ (scheme theoretically). As $T'$ is a first order
thickening of $T$ it follows that $T'_a$
is a first order thickening of $T_0$. Now $a|_{T'_a}$ and $b|_{T'_a}$
are morphisms of $T'_a$ into $Z'$ over $X$ which agree on $T_0$ as
morphisms into $Z$. Hence by the universal property of $Z'$ we conclude that
$a|_{T'_a} = b|_{T'_a}$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are morphism from
the first order thickening $T'$ of $T'_a$ whose restrictions to
$T'_a$ agree as morphisms into $Z$. Thus using the universal property of
$Z'$ once more we conclude that $a = b$. In other words, the defining
property of a formally unramified morphism holds for $Z' \to X$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universal-thickening-functorial}
Consider a commutative diagram of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_h \ar[d]_f & X \ar[d]^g \\
W \ar[r]^{h'} & Y
}
$$
with $h$ and $h'$ formally unramified. Let $Z \subset Z'$ be the universal
first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$. Let $W \subset W'$ be the universal
first order thickening of $W$ over $Y$. There exists a canonical morphism
$(f, f') : (Z, Z') \to (W, W')$ of thickenings over $Y$ which fits into
the following commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
& & & Z' \ar[ld] \ar[d]^{f'} \\
Z \ar[rr] \ar[d]_f \ar[rrru] & & X \ar[d] & W' \ar[ld] \\
W \ar[rrru]|!{[rr];[rruu]}\hole \ar[rr] & & Y
}
$$
In particular the morphism $(f, f')$ of thickenings induces a morphism
of conormal sheaves $f^*\mathcal{C}_{W/Y} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/X}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The first assertion is clear from the universal property of $W'$.
The induced map on conormal sheaves is the map of
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial}
applied to $(Z \subset Z') \to (W \subset W')$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universal-thickening-fibre-product}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_h \ar[d]_f & X \ar[d]^g \\
W \ar[r]^{h'} & Y
}
$$
be a fibre product diagram in the category of schemes with
$h'$ formally unramified. Then $h$ is formally unramified and if
$W \subset W'$ is the universal first order thickening of $W$ over $Y$,
then $Z = X \times_Y W \subset X \times_Y W'$ is the universal
first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$. In particular the canonical map
$f^*\mathcal{C}_{W/Y} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/X}$ of
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-functorial}
is surjective.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The morphism $h$ is formally unramified by
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-formally-unramified}.
It is clear that $X \times_Y W'$ is a first order thickening.
It is straightforward to check that it has the universal property
because $W'$ has the universal property (by mapping properties of
fibre products). See
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial-flat}
for why this implies that the map of conormal sheaves is surjective.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universal-thickening-fibre-product-flat}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_h \ar[d]_f & X \ar[d]^g \\
W \ar[r]^{h'} & Y
}
$$
be a fibre product diagram in the category of schemes with
$h'$ formally unramified and $g$ flat. In this case the corresponding
map $Z' \to W'$ of universal first order thickenings is flat, and
$f^*\mathcal{C}_{W/Y} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/X}$ is an isomorphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Flatness is preserved under base change, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat}.
Hence the first statement follows from the description of
$W'$ in Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-fibre-product}.
It is clear that $X \times_Y W'$ is a first order thickening.
It is straightforward to check that it has the universal property
because $W'$ has the universal property (by mapping properties of
fibre products). See
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial-flat}
for why this implies that the map of conormal sheaves is an isomorphism.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universal-thickening-localize}
Taking the universal first order thickenings commutes with taking opens.
More precisely, let $h : Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes.
Let $V \subset Z$, $U \subset X$ be opens such that $h(V) \subset U$.
Let $Z'$ be the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$.
Then $h|_V : V \to U$ is formally unramified and the universal first
order thickening of $V$ over $U$ is the open subscheme $V' \subset Z'$
such that $V = Z \cap V'$. In particular,
$\mathcal{C}_{Z/X}|_V = \mathcal{C}_{V/U}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The first statement is
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-on-opens}.
The compatibility of universal thickenings can be deduced from the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening},
or from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-universal-thickening-localize}
or deduced from
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-fibre-product-flat}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-differentials-universally-unramified}
Let $h : Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes over $S$.
Let $Z \subset Z'$ be the universal first order thickening of $Z$
over $X$ with structure morphism $h' : Z' \to X$. The canonical map
$$
c_{h'} : (h')^*\Omega_{X/S} \longrightarrow \Omega_{Z'/S}
$$
induces an isomorphism
$h^*\Omega_{X/S} \to \Omega_{Z'/S} \otimes \mathcal{O}_Z$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The map $c_{h'}$ is the map defined in
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-functoriality-differentials}.
If $i : Z \to Z'$ is the given closed immersion, then
$i^*c_{h'}$ is a map
$h^*\Omega_{X/S} \to \Omega_{Z'/S} \otimes \mathcal{O}_Z$.
Checking that it is an isomorphism reduces to the affine case
by localization, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-localize}
and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-restrict-open}.
In this case the result is
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-universal-thickening}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}
Let $h : Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes over $S$.
There is a canonical exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to h^*\Omega_{X/S} \to \Omega_{Z/S} \to 0.
$$
The first arrow is induced by $\text{d}_{Z'/S}$ where
$Z'$ is the universal first order neighbourhood of $Z$ over $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We know that there is a canonical exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to
\Omega_{Z'/S} \otimes \mathcal{O}_Z \to
\Omega_{Z/S} \to 0.
$$
see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-relative-immersion}.
Hence the result follows on applying
Lemma \ref{lemma-differentials-universally-unramified}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_i \ar[rd]_j & X \ar[d] \\
& Y
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of schemes where $i$ and $j$ are formally
unramified. Then there is a canonical exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to
i^*\Omega_{X/Y} \to 0
$$
where the first arrow comes from
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-functorial}
and the second from
Lemma \ref{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Denote $Z \to Z'$ the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$.
Denote $Z \to Z''$ the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $Y$.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}
here is a canonical morphism $Z' \to Z''$ so that we have a commutative
diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_{i'} \ar[rd]_{j'} & Z' \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d] \\
& Z'' \ar[r] & Y
}
$$
Apply
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-two-immersions}
to the left triangle to get an exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z''} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to
(i')^*\Omega_{Z'/Z''} \to 0
$$
As $Z''$ is formally unramified over $Y$ (see
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-unramified})
we have
$\Omega_{Z'/Z''} = \Omega_{Z/Y}$ (by combining
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials}
and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-triangle-differentials}).
Then we have $(i')^*\Omega_{Z'/Y} = i^*\Omega_{X/Y}$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-differentials-universally-unramified}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-transitivity-conormal}
Let $Z \to Y \to X$ be formally unramified morphisms of schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $Z \subset Z'$ is the universal first order thickening of $Z$
over $X$ and $Y \subset Y'$ is the universal first order thickening of $Y$
over $X$, then there is a morphism $Z' \to Y'$ and $Y \times_{Y'} Z'$ is
the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $Y$.
\item There is a canonical exact sequence
$$
i^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/X} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to 0
$$
where the maps come from
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-functorial}
and $i : Z \to Y$ is the first morphism.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The map $h : Z' \to Y'$ in (1) comes from
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-functorial}.
The assertion that $Y \times_{Y'} Z'$ is the universal first order
thickening of $Z$ over $Y$ is clear from the universal properties
of $Z'$ and $Y'$. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-transitivity-conormal}
we have an exact sequence
$$
(i')^*\mathcal{C}_{Y \times_{Y'} Z'/Z'} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y \times_{Y'} Z'} \to 0
$$
where $i' : Z \to Y \times_{Y'} Z'$ is the given morphism. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial-flat}
there exists a surjection
$h^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} \to \mathcal{C}_{Y \times_{Y'} Z'/Z'}$.
Combined with the equalities
$\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} = \mathcal{C}_{Y/X}$,
$\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} = \mathcal{C}_{Z/X}$, and
$\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y \times_{Y'} Z'} = \mathcal{C}_{Z/Y}$
this proves the lemma.
\end{proof}











\section{Formally \'etale morphisms}
\label{section-formally-etale}

\noindent
Recall that a ring map $R \to A$ is called {\it formally \'etale}
(see Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-formally-etale})
if for every commutative solid diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
A \ar[r] \ar@{-->}[rd] & B/I \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] & B \ar[u]
}
$$
where $I \subset B$ is an ideal of square zero, there exists
exactly one dotted arrow which makes the diagram commute. This motivates
the following analogue for morphisms of schemes.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-formally-etale}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
We say $f$ is {\it formally \'etale} if given any solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l] \\
S & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening of affine schemes over $S$
there exists exactly one dotted arrow making the diagram commute.
\end{definition}

\noindent
It is clear that a formally \'etale morphism is formally unramified.
Hence if $f : X \to S$ is formally \'etale, then $\Omega_{X/S}$ is zero, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-etale-not-affine}
If $f : X \to S$ is a formally \'etale morphism, then given
any solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l] \\
S & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening of schemes over $S$
there exists exactly one dotted arrow making the diagram commute.
In other words, in
Definition \ref{definition-formally-etale}
the condition that $T$ be affine may be dropped.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $T' = \bigcup T'_i$ be an affine open covering, and let
$T_i = T \cap T'_i$. Then we get morphisms $a'_i : T'_i \to X$ fitting
into the diagram. By uniqueness we see that $a'_i$ and $a'_j$ agree on
any affine open subscheme of $T'_i \cap T'_j$. Hence $a'_i$ and
$a'_j$ agree on $T'_i \cap T'_j$. Thus we see that the morphisms $a'_i$
glue to a global morphism $a' : T' \to X$. The uniqueness of
$a'$ we have seen in
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-not-affine}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-formally-etale}
A composition of formally \'etale morphisms is formally \'etale.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is formal.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-formally-etale}
A base change of a formally \'etale morphism is formally \'etale.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is formal.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-etale-on-opens}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ be open subschemes such that
$f(U) \subset V$. If $f$ is formally \'etale, so is $f|_U : U \to V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider a solid diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
U \ar[d]_{f|_U} & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l]^a \\
V & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
as in Definition \ref{definition-formally-etale}. If $f$ is formally
ramified, then there exists exactly one $S$-morphism $a' : T' \to X$
such that $a'|_T = a$. Since $|T'| = |T|$ we conclude that $a'(T') \subset U$
which gives our unique morphism from $T'$ into $U$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-characterize-formally-etale}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is formally \'etale,
\item $f$ is formally unramified and the universal first order thickening
of $X$ over $S$ is equal to $X$,
\item $f$ is formally unramified and $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$, and
\item $\Omega_{X/S} = 0$ and $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Actually, the last assertion only make sense because $\Omega_{X/S} = 0$
implies that $\mathcal{C}_{X/S}$ is defined via
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials}
and
Definition \ref{definition-universal-thickening}.
This also makes it clear that (3) and (4) are equivalent.

\medskip\noindent
Either of the assumptions (1), (2), and (3) imply that $f$ is formally
unramified. Hence we may assume $f$ is formally unramified. The equivalence
of (1), (2), and (3) follow from the universal property of the universal
first order thickening $X'$ of $X$ over $S$ and the fact that
$X = X' \Leftrightarrow \mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$ since
after all by definition $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$
is the ideal sheaf of $X$ in $X'$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-unramified-flat-formally-etale}
An unramified flat morphism is formally \'etale.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Say $X \to S$ is unramified and flat. Then $\Delta : X \to X \times_S X$
is an open immersion, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-diagonal-unramified-morphism}.
We have to show that $\mathcal{C}_{X/S}$ is zero.
Consider the two projections $p, q : X \times_S X \to X$.
As $f$ is formally unramified (see
Lemma \ref{lemma-unramified-formally-unramified}),
$q$ is formally unramified (see
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-formally-unramified}).
As $f$ is flat, $p$ is flat, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat}.
Hence $p^*\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = \mathcal{C}_q$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-fibre-product-flat}
where $\mathcal{C}_q$ denotes the conormal sheaf of the formally
unramified morphism $q : X \times_S X \to X$.
But $\Delta(X) \subset X \times_S X$ is an open subscheme
which maps isomorphically to $X$ via $q$. Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-localize}
we see that $\mathcal{C}_q|_{\Delta(X)} = \mathcal{C}_{X/X} = 0$.
In other words, the pullback of $\mathcal{C}_{X/S}$ to $X$ via
the identity morphism is zero, i.e., $\mathcal{C}_{X/S} = 0$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-affine-formally-etale}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $X$ and $S$ are affine.
Then $f$ is formally \'etale if and only if
$\mathcal{O}_S(S) \to \mathcal{O}_X(X)$ is a formally \'etale
ring map.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is immediate from the definitions
(Definition \ref{definition-formally-etale} and
Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-formally-etale})
by the equivalence of categories of rings and affine schemes,
see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-category-affine-schemes}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-formally-etale}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The morphism $f$ is \'etale, and
\item the morphism $f$ is locally of finite presentation and
formally \'etale.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $f$ is \'etale.
An \'etale morphism is locally of finite presentation, flat and unramified, see
Morphisms, Section \ref{morphisms-section-etale}.
Hence $f$ is locally of finite presentation and formally \'etale, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-unramified-flat-formally-etale}.

\medskip\noindent
Conversely, suppose that $f$ is locally of finite presentation and
formally \'etale. Being \'etale is local in the Zariski topology on
$X$ and $S$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-characterize}.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-etale-on-opens}
we can cover $X$ by affine opens $U$ which map into affine opens
$V$ such that $U \to V$ is formally \'etale (and of finite presentation, see
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-characterize}).
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-affine-formally-etale}
we see that the ring maps $\mathcal{O}(V) \to \mathcal{O}(U)$ are
formally \'etale (and of finite presentation).
We win by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-formally-etale-etale}.
(We will give another proof of this implication when we discuss
formally smooth morphisms.)
\end{proof}













\section{Infinitesimal deformations of maps}
\label{section-action-by-derivations}

\noindent
In this section we explain how a derivation can be used to
infinitesimally move a map. Throughout this section we use that
a sheaf on a thickening $X'$ of $X$ can be seen as a sheaf on $X$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-difference-derivation}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $X \subset X'$ and $Y \subset Y'$ be two first order thickenings
over $S$. Let $(a, a'), (b, b') : (X \subset X') \to (Y \subset Y')$
be two morphisms of thickenings over $S$. Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $a = b$, and
\item the two maps $a^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial})
are equal.
\end{enumerate}
Then the map $(a')^\sharp - (b')^\sharp$ factors as
$$
\mathcal{O}_{Y'} \to \mathcal{O}_Y \xrightarrow{D}
a_*\mathcal{C}_{X/X'} \to a_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}
$$
where $D$ is an $\mathcal{O}_S$-derivation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Instead of working on $Y$ we work on $X$. The advantage is that the pullback
functor $a^{-1}$ is exact. Using (1) and (2) we obtain a commutative diagram
with exact rows
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
\mathcal{C}_{X/X'} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{X'} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_X \ar[r] & 0 \\
0 \ar[r] &
a^{-1}\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} \ar[r] \ar[u] &
a^{-1}\mathcal{O}_{Y'}
\ar[r] \ar@<1ex>[u]^{(a')^\sharp} \ar@<-1ex>[u]_{(b')^\sharp} &
a^{-1}\mathcal{O}_Y \ar[r] \ar[u] & 0
}
$$
Now it is a general fact that in such a situation the difference of the
$\mathcal{O}_S$-algebra maps $(a')^\sharp$ and $(b')^\sharp$ is an
$\mathcal{O}_S$-derivation from $a^{-1}\mathcal{O}_Y$ to $\mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$.
By adjointness of the functors $a^{-1}$ and $a_*$ this is the same
thing as an $\mathcal{O}_S$-derivation from
$\mathcal{O}_Y$ into $a_*\mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$. Some details omitted.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Note that in the situation of the lemma above we may write
$D$ as
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-D}
D = \text{d}_{Y/S} \circ \theta
\end{equation}
where $\theta$ is an $\mathcal{O}_Y$-linear map
$\theta : \Omega_{Y/S} \to a_*\mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$.
Of course, then by adjunction again we may view $\theta$ as an
$\mathcal{O}_X$-linear map
$\theta : a^*\Omega_{Y/S} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-action-by-derivations}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $(a, a') : (X \subset X') \to (Y \subset Y')$
be a morphism of first order thickenings over $S$.
Let
$$
\theta : a^*\Omega_{Y/S} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}
$$
be an $\mathcal{O}_X$-linear map. Then there exists a unique morphism of pairs
$(b, b') : (X \subset X') \to (Y \subset Y')$ such that
(1) and (2) of
Lemma \ref{lemma-difference-derivation}
hold and the derivation $D$ and $\theta$ are related by
Equation (\ref{equation-D}).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We simply set $b = a$ and we define $(b')^\sharp$ to be the map
$$
(a')^\sharp + D : a^{-1}\mathcal{O}_{Y'} \to \mathcal{O}_{X'}
$$
where $D$ is as in Equation (\ref{equation-D}). We omit the verification
that $(b')^\sharp$ is a map of sheaves of $\mathcal{O}_S$-algebras and
that (1) and (2) of
Lemma \ref{lemma-difference-derivation}
hold. Equation (\ref{equation-D}) holds by construction.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-action-by-derivations}
Assumptions and notation as in Lemma \ref{lemma-action-by-derivations}.
The action of a local section $\theta$ on $a'$ is sometimes indicated by
$\theta \cdot a'$. Note that this means nothing else than the fact
that $(a')^\sharp$ and $(\theta \cdot a')^\sharp$ differ by a derivation
$D$ which is related to $\theta$ by Equation (\ref{equation-D}).
\end{remark}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-sheaf}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $X \subset X'$ and $Y \subset Y'$ be first order thickenings
over $S$. Assume given a morphism $a : X \to Y$ and a map
$A : a^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$ of
$\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. For an open subscheme $U' \subset X'$
consider morphisms $a' : U' \to Y'$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $a'$ is a morphism over $S$,
\item $a'|_U = a|_U$, and
\item the induced map
$a^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'}|_U \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}|_U$
is the restriction of $A$ to $U$.
\end{enumerate}
Here $U = X \cap U'$. Then the rule
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-sheaf}
U' \mapsto
\{a' : U' \to Y'\text{ such that (1), (2), (3) hold.}\}
\end{equation}
defines a sheaf of sets on $X'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Denote $\mathcal{F}$ the rule of the lemma.
The restriction mapping $\mathcal{F}(U') \to \mathcal{F}(V')$ for
$V' \subset U' \subset X'$
of $\mathcal{F}$ is really the restriction map $a' \mapsto a'|_{V'}$.
With this definition in place it is clear that $\mathcal{F}$ is a
sheaf since morphisms are defined locally.
\end{proof}

\noindent
In the following lemma we identify sheaves on $X$ and any thickening
of $X$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-action-sheaf}
Same notation and assumptions as in Lemma \ref{lemma-sheaf}.
There is an action of the sheaf
$$
\SheafHom_{\mathcal{O}_X}(a^*\Omega_{Y/S}, \mathcal{C}_{X/X'})
$$
on the sheaf (\ref{equation-sheaf}). Moreover, the action
is simply transitive for any open $U' \subset X'$ over which the sheaf
(\ref{equation-sheaf}) has a section.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a combination of
Lemmas \ref{lemma-difference-derivation},
\ref{lemma-action-by-derivations},
and \ref{lemma-sheaf}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-special-case}
A special case of
Lemmas \ref{lemma-difference-derivation},
\ref{lemma-action-by-derivations},
\ref{lemma-sheaf}, and
\ref{lemma-action-sheaf}
is where $Y = Y'$. In this case the map $A$ is always zero.
The sheaf of
Lemma \ref{lemma-sheaf}
is just given by the rule
$$
U' \mapsto
\{a' : U' \to Y\text{ over }S\text{ with } a'|_U = a|_U\}
$$
and we act on this by the sheaf
$\SheafHom_{\mathcal{O}_X}(a^*\Omega_{Y/S}, \mathcal{C}_{X/X'})$.
\end{remark}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-another-special-case}
Another special case of
Lemmas \ref{lemma-difference-derivation},
\ref{lemma-action-by-derivations},
\ref{lemma-sheaf}, and
\ref{lemma-action-sheaf}
is where $S$ itself is a thickening $Z \subset Z' = S$
and $Y = Z \times_{Z'} Y'$. Picture
$$
\xymatrix{
(X \subset X') \ar@{..>}[rr]_{(a, ?)} \ar[rd]_{(g, g')} & &
(Y \subset Y') \ar[ld]^{(h, h')} \\
& (Z \subset Z')
}
$$
In this case the map $A : a^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$
is determined by $a$: the map
$h^*\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to \mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'}$ is surjective (because
we assumed $Y = Z \times_{Z'} Y'$),
hence the pullback $g^*\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} = a^*h^*\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to
a^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'}$ is surjective, and the composition
$g^*\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to a^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/Y'} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$
has to be the canonical map induced by $g'$. Thus the sheaf of
Lemma \ref{lemma-sheaf}
is just given by the rule
$$
U' \mapsto
\{a' : U' \to Y'\text{ over }Z'\text{ with } a'|_U = a|_U\}
$$
and we act on this by the sheaf
$\SheafHom_{\mathcal{O}_X}(a^*\Omega_{Y/Z}, \mathcal{C}_{X/X'})$.
\end{remark}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-omega-deformation}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X \subset X'$ be a first order thickening over
$S$. Let $Y$ be a scheme over $S$. Let
$a', b' : X' \to Y$ be two morphisms over $S$ with
$a = a'|_X = b'|_X$. This gives rise to a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r] \ar[d]_a & X' \ar[d]^{(b', a')} \\
Y \ar[r]^-{\Delta_{Y/S}} & Y \times_S Y
}
$$
Since the horizontal arrows are immersions with conormal sheaves
$\mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$ and $\Omega_{Y/S}$, by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-conormal-functorial},
we obtain a map $\theta : a^*\Omega_{Y/S} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$.
Then this $\theta$ and the derivation $D$ of
Lemma \ref{lemma-difference-derivation}
are related by Equation (\ref{equation-D}).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted. Hint: The equality may be checked on affine opens where it
comes from the following computation. If $f$ is a local section of
$\mathcal{O}_Y$, then $1 \otimes f - f \otimes 1$ is a local section
of $\mathcal{C}_{Y/(Y \times_S Y)}$ corresponding to $\text{d}_{Y/S}(f)$.
It is mapped to the local section $(a')^\sharp(f) - (b')^\sharp(f) = D(f)$
of $\mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$. In other words, $\theta(\text{d}_{Y/S}(f)) = D(f)$.
\end{proof}

\noindent
For later purposes we need a result that roughly states that the
construction of
Lemma \ref{lemma-action-by-derivations}
is compatible with \'etale localization.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-sheaf-differentials-etale-localization}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
X_1 \ar[d] & X_2 \ar[l]^f \ar[d] \\
S_1 & S_2 \ar[l]
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of schemes with $X_2 \to X_1$ and $S_2 \to S_1$
\'etale. Then the map $c_f : f^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} \to \Omega_{X_2/S_2}$ of
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-functoriality-differentials}
is an isomorphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We recall that an \'etale morphism $U \to V$ is a smooth morphism
with $\Omega_{U/V} = 0$. Using this we see that
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-triangle-differentials}
implies $\Omega_{X_2/S_2} = \Omega_{X_2/S_1}$ and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-triangle-differentials-smooth}
implies that the map $f^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} \to \Omega_{X_2/S_1}$
(for the morphism $f$ seen as a morphism over $S_1$)
is an isomorphism. Hence the lemma follows.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-action-by-derivations-etale-localization}
Consider a commutative diagram of first order thickenings
$$
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
(T_2 \subset T_2') \ar[d]_{(h, h')} \ar[rr]_{(a_2, a_2')} & &
(X_2 \subset X_2') \ar[d]^{(f, f')} \\
(T_1 \subset T_1') \ar[rr]^{(a_1, a_1')} & &
(X_1 \subset X_1')
}
}
\quad
\begin{matrix}
\text{and a commutative} \\
\text{diagram of schemes}
\end{matrix}
\quad
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
X_2' \ar[r] \ar[d] & S_2 \ar[d] \\
X_1' \ar[r] & S_1
}
}
$$
with $X_2 \to X_1$ and $S_2 \to S_1$ \'etale.
For any $\mathcal{O}_{T_1}$-linear map
$\theta_1 : a_1^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} \to \mathcal{C}_{T_1/T'_1}$ let
$\theta_2$ be the composition
$$
\xymatrix{
a_2^*\Omega_{X_2/S_2} \ar@{=}[r] &
h^*a_1^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} \ar[r]^-{h^*\theta_1} &
h^*\mathcal{C}_{T_1/T'_1} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{C}_{T_2/T'_2}
}
$$
(equality sign is explained in the proof). Then the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
T_2' \ar[rr]_{\theta_2 \cdot a_2'} \ar[d] & & X'_2 \ar[d] \\
T_1' \ar[rr]^{\theta_1 \cdot a_1'} & & X'_1
}
$$
commutes where the actions $\theta_2 \cdot a_2'$ and $\theta_1 \cdot a_1'$
are as in Remark \ref{remark-action-by-derivations}.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The equality sign comes from the identification
$f^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} = \Omega_{X_2/S_2}$ of
Lemma \ref{lemma-sheaf-differentials-etale-localization}.
Namely, using this we have
$a_2^*\Omega_{X_2/S_2} = a_2^*f^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} =
h^*a_1^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1}$ because $f \circ a_2 = a_1 \circ h$.
Having said this, the commutativity of the diagram may be checked
on affine opens. Hence we may assume the schemes in the initial
big diagram are affine. Thus we obtain commutative diagrams
$$
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
(B'_2, I_2) & & (A'_2, J_2) \ar[ll]^{a_2'} \\
(B'_1, I_1) \ar[u]^{h'} & & (A'_1, J_1) \ar[ll]_{a_1'} \ar[u]_{f'}
}
}
\quad\text{and}\quad
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
A'_2 & & R_2 \ar[ll] \\
A'_1 \ar[u] & & R_1 \ar[ll] \ar[u]
}
}
$$
The notation signifies that $I_1, I_2, J_1, J_2$ are ideals of square
zero and maps of pairs are ring maps sending ideals into ideals.
Set $A_1 = A'_1/J_1$, $A_2 = A'_2/J_2$, $B_1 = B'_1/I_1$, and
$B_2 = B'_2/I_2$. We are given that
$$
A_2 \otimes_{A_1} \Omega_{A_1/R_1} \longrightarrow \Omega_{A_2/R_2}
$$
is an isomorphism. Then
$\theta_1 : B_1 \otimes_{A_1} \Omega_{A_1/R_1} \to I_1$
is $B_1$-linear. This gives an $R_1$-derivation
$D_1 = \theta_1 \circ \text{d}_{A_1/R_1} : A_1 \to I_1$.
In a similar way we see that
$\theta_2 : B_2 \otimes_{A_2} \Omega_{A_2/R_2} \to I_2$
gives rise to a $R_2$-derivation
$D_2 = \theta_2 \circ \text{d}_{A_2/R_2} : A_2 \to I_2$.
The construction of $\theta_2$ implies the following compatibility between
$\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$: for every $x \in A_1$ we have
$$
h'(D_1(x)) = D_2(f'(x))
$$
as elements of $I_2$. We may view $D_1$ as a map $A'_1 \to B'_1$
using $A'_1 \to A_1 \xrightarrow{D_1} I_1 \to B_1$ similarly
we may view $D_2$ as a map $A'_2 \to B'_2$. Then the displayed
equality holds for $x \in A'_1$.
By the construction of the action in
Lemma \ref{lemma-action-by-derivations} and
Remark \ref{remark-action-by-derivations}
we know that $\theta_1 \cdot a_1'$ corresponds to the ring map
$a_1' + D_1 : A'_1 \to B'_1$ and $\theta_2 \cdot a_2'$ corresponds
to the ring map $a_2' + D_2 : A'_2 \to B'_2$. By the displayed equality
we obtain that
$h' \circ (a_1' + D_1) = (a_2' + D_2) \circ f'$
as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-tiny-improvement}
Lemma \ref{lemma-action-by-derivations-etale-localization}
can be improved in the following way.
Suppose that we have commutative diagrams as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-action-by-derivations-etale-localization}
but we do not assume that $X_2 \to X_1$
and $S_2 \to S_1$ are \'etale. Next, suppose we have
$\theta_1 : a_1^*\Omega_{X_1/S_1} \to \mathcal{C}_{T_1/T'_1}$
and
$\theta_2 : a_2^*\Omega_{X_2/S_2} \to \mathcal{C}_{T_2/T'_2}$
such that
$$
\xymatrix{
f_*\mathcal{O}_{X_2} \ar[rr]_{f_*D_2} & &
f_*a_{2, *}\mathcal{C}_{T_2/T_2'} \\
\mathcal{O}_{X_1} \ar[rr]^{D_1} \ar[u]^{f^\sharp} & &
a_{1, *}\mathcal{C}_{T_1/T_1'} \ar[u]_{\text{induced by }(h')^\sharp}
}
$$
is commutative where $D_i$ corresponds to $\theta_i$ as in
Equation (\ref{equation-D}). Then we have the conclusion of
Lemma \ref{lemma-action-by-derivations-etale-localization}.
The importance of the condition that both $X_2 \to X_1$ and
$S_2 \to S_1$ are \'etale is that it allows us to construct a $\theta_2$
from $\theta_1$.
\end{remark}








\section{Infinitesimal deformations of schemes}
\label{section-deform}

\noindent
The following simple lemma is often a convenient tool to check whether
an infinitesimal deformation of a map is flat.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-deform}
Let $(f, f') : (X \subset X') \to (S \subset S')$ be a morphism
of first order thickenings. Assume that $f$ is flat.
Then the following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f'$ is flat and $X = S \times_{S'} X'$, and
\item the canonical map $f^*\mathcal{C}_{S/S'} \to \mathcal{C}_{X/X'}$
is an isomorphism.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
As the problem is local on $X'$ we may assume that $X, X', S, S'$
are affine schemes. Say $S' = \Spec(A')$, $X' = \Spec(B')$,
$S = \Spec(A)$, $X = \Spec(B)$ with $A = A'/I$ and $B = B'/J$
for some square zero ideals. Then we obtain the following commutative
diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
J \ar[r] &
B' \ar[r] &
B \ar[r] & 0 \\
0 \ar[r] &
I \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A \ar[r] \ar[u] & 0
}
$$
with exact rows. The canonical map of the lemma is the map
$$
I \otimes_A B = I \otimes_{A'} B' \longrightarrow J.
$$
The assumption that $f$ is flat signifies that $A \to B$ is flat.

\medskip\noindent
Assume (1). Then $A' \to B'$ is flat and $J = IB'$. Flatness implies
$\text{Tor}_1^{A'}(B', A) = 0$ (see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-flat}).
This means $I \otimes_{A'} B' \to B'$ is injective (see
Algebra, Remark \ref{algebra-remark-Tor-ring-mod-ideal}).
Hence we see that $I \otimes_A B \to J$ is an isomorphism.

\medskip\noindent
Assume (2). Then it follows that $J = IB'$, so that $X = S \times_{S'} X'$.
Moreover, we get $\text{Tor}_1^{A'}(B', A'/I) = 0$ by reversing the
implications in the previous paragraph. Hence $B'$ is flat over $A'$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-what-does-it-mean}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma is the ``nilpotent'' version of the
``crit\`ere de platitude par fibres'', see
Section \ref{section-criterion-flat-fibres}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flatness-morphism-thickenings}
Consider a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
(X \subset X') \ar[rr]_{(f, f')} \ar[rd] & & (Y \subset Y') \ar[ld] \\
& (S \subset S')
}
$$
of thickenings. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X'$ is flat over $S'$,
\item $f$ is flat,
\item $S \subset S'$ is a finite order thickening, and
\item $X = S \times_{S'} X'$ and $Y = S \times_{S'} Y'$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $f'$ is flat and $Y'$ is flat over $S'$ at all points in
the image of $f'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Immediate consequence of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-criterion-flatness-fibre-nilpotent}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Many properties of morphisms of schemes are preserved under flat
deformations.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-deform-property}
Consider a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
(X \subset X') \ar[rr]_{(f, f')} \ar[rd] & & (Y \subset Y') \ar[ld] \\
& (S \subset S')
}
$$
of thickenings. Assume $S \subset S'$ is a finite order thickening,
$X'$ flat over $S'$, $X = S \times_{S'} X'$, and
$Y = S \times_{S'} Y'$. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is flat if and only if $f'$ is flat,
\label{item-flat}
\item $f$ is an isomorphism if and only if $f'$ is an isomorphism,
\label{item-isomorphism}
\item $f$ is an open immersion if and only if $f'$ is an open immersion,
\label{item-open-immersion}
\item $f$ is quasi-compact if and only if $f'$ is quasi-compact,
\label{item-quasi-compact}
\item $f$ is universally closed if and only if $f'$ is universally closed,
\label{item-universally-closed}
\item $f$ is (quasi-)separated if and only if $f'$ is (quasi-)separated,
\label{item-separated}
\item $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $f'$ is a monomorphism,
\label{item-monomorphism}
\item $f$ is surjective if and only if $f'$ is surjective,
\label{item-surjective}
\item $f$ is universally injective if and only if $f'$ is universally injective,
\label{item-universally-injective}
\item $f$ is affine if and only if $f'$ is affine,
\label{item-affine}
\item
\label{item-finite-type}
$f$ is locally of finite type if and only if $f'$ is locally of finite type,
\item $f$ is locally quasi-finite if and only if $f'$ is locally quasi-finite,
\label{item-quasi-finite}
\item
\label{item-finite-presentation}
$f$ is locally of finite presentation if and only if $f'$ is locally of
finite presentation,
\item
\label{item-relative-dimension-d}
$f$ is locally of finite type of relative dimension $d$ if and only if
$f'$ is locally of finite type of relative dimension $d$,
\item $f$ is universally open if and only if $f'$ is universally open,
\label{item-universally-open}
\item $f$ is syntomic if and only if $f'$ is syntomic,
\label{item-syntomic}
\item $f$ is smooth if and only if $f'$ is smooth,
\label{item-smooth}
\item $f$ is unramified if and only if $f'$ is unramified,
\label{item-unramified}
\item $f$ is \'etale if and only if $f'$ is \'etale,
\label{item-etale}
\item $f$ is proper if and only if $f'$ is proper,
\label{item-proper}
\item $f$ is integral if and only if $f'$ is integral,
\label{item-integral}
\item $f$ is finite if and only if $f'$ is finite,
\label{item-finite}
\item
\label{item-finite-locally-free}
$f$ is finite locally free (of rank $d$) if and only if $f'$
is finite locally free (of rank $d$), and
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The assumptions on $X$ and $Y$ mean that $f$ is the base change of
$f'$ by $X \to X'$.
The properties $\mathcal{P}$ listed in (1) -- (23) above are all stable
under base change, hence if $f'$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so
does $f$. See
Schemes, Lemmas \ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-immersion},
\ref{schemes-lemma-quasi-compact-preserved-base-change},
\ref{schemes-lemma-separated-permanence}, and
\ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-monomorphism}
and
Morphisms, Lemmas
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-surjective},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-universally-injective},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-affine},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-type},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-presentation},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-relative-dimension-d},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-syntomic},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-smooth},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-unramified},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-etale},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-proper},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-locally-free}.

\medskip\noindent
The interesting direction in each case is therefore to assume
that $f$ has the property and deduce that $f'$ has it too.
By induction on the order of the thickening we may
assume that $S \subset S'$ is a first order thickening, see
discussion immediately following
Definition \ref{definition-thickening}.
We make a couple of general remarks which we will use without further
mention in the arguments below.
(I) Let $W' \subset S'$ be an affine open and let $U' \subset X'$
and $V' \subset Y'$ be affine opens lying over $W'$ with $f'(U') \subset V'$.
Let $W' = \Spec(R')$ and denote $I \subset R'$ be the ideal
defining the closed subscheme $W' \cap S$. Say $U' = \Spec(B')$
and $V' = \Spec(A')$. Then we get a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
IB' \ar[r] &
B' \ar[r] &
B \ar[r] & 0 \\
0 \ar[r] &
IA' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A \ar[r] \ar[u] & 0
}
$$
with exact rows. Moreover $IB' \cong I \otimes_R B$, see proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-deform}.
(II) The morphisms $X \to X'$ and $Y \to Y'$ are universal homeomorphisms.
Hence the topology of the maps $f$ and $f'$ (after any base change)
is identical. (III) If $f$ is flat, then $f'$ is flat and
$Y' \to S'$ is flat at every point in the image of $f'$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-flatness-morphism-thickenings}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-flat}). This is general remark (III).

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-isomorphism}). Assume $f$ is an isomorphism.
By (III) we see that $Y' \to S'$ is flat. Choose an
affine open $V' \subset Y'$ and set $U' = (f')^{-1}(V')$. Then
$V = Y \cap V'$ is affine which implies that
$V \cong f^{-1}(V) = U = Y \times_{Y'} U'$ is affine. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}
we see that $U'$ is affine. Thus we have a diagram as in the
general remark (I) and moreover $IA \cong I \otimes_R A$ because
$R' \to A'$ is flat. Then
$IB' \cong I \otimes_R B \cong I \otimes_R A \cong IA'$
and $A \cong B$. By the exactness of the rows
in the diagram above we see that $A' \cong B'$,
i.e., $U' \cong V'$. Thus $f'$ is an isomorphism.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-open-immersion}). Assume $f$ is an open immersion.
Then $f$ is an isomorphism of $X$ with an open subscheme $V \subset Y$.
Let $V' \subset Y'$ be the open subscheme whose underlying topological
space is $V$. Then $f'$ is a map from $X'$ to $V'$ which is an isomorphism by
(\ref{item-isomorphism}). Hence $f'$ is an open immersion.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-quasi-compact}). Immediate from remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-universally-closed}). Immediate from remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-separated}). Note that
$X \times_Y X = Y \times_{Y'} (X' \times_{Y'} X')$ so that
$X' \times_{Y'} X'$ is a thickening of $X \times_Y X$.
Hence the topology of the maps $\Delta_{X/Y}$ and $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$
matches and we win. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-monomorphism}). Assume $f$ is a monomorphism.
Consider the diagonal morphism $\Delta_{X'/Y'} : X' \to X' \times_{Y'} X'$.
The base change of $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ by $S \to S'$ is $\Delta_{X/Y}$
which is an isomorphism by assumption. By (\ref{item-isomorphism})
we conclude that $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ is an isomorphism.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-surjective}). This is clear. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-universally-injective}). Immediate from remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-affine}). Assume $f$ is affine.  Choose an
affine open $V' \subset Y'$ and set $U' = (f')^{-1}(V')$.
Then $V = Y \cap V'$ is affine which implies that
$U = Y \times_{Y'} U'$ is affine. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}
we see that $U'$ is affine. Hence $f'$ is affine. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-finite-type}). Via remark (I) comes down to proving $A' \to B'$
is of finite type if $A \to B$ is of finite type. Suppose that
$x_1, \ldots, x_n \in B'$ are elements whose images in $B$ generate $B$
as an $A$-algebra. Then $A'[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B$ is surjective
as both $A'[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B$ is surjective and
$I \otimes_R A[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to I \otimes_R B$ is surjective. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-quasi-finite}). Follows from (\ref{item-finite-type}) and that
quasi-finiteness of a morphism of finite type can be checked on fibres, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-at-point-characterize}.
See also Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-finite-presentation}). Via remark (I) comes down to proving
$A' \to B'$ is of finite presentation if $A \to B$ is of finite presentation.
We may assume that $B' = A'[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/K'$ for some ideal $K'$ by
(\ref{item-finite-type}). We get a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to K' \to A'[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B' \to 0
$$
As $B'$ is flat over $R'$ we see that $K' \otimes_{R'} R$ is the kernel of
the surjection $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B$. By assumption on $A \to B$ there
exist finitely many $f'_1, \ldots, f'_m \in K'$ whose images in
$A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ generate this kernel. Since $I$ is nilpotent we see
that $f'_1, \ldots, f'_m$ generate $K'$ by Nakayama's lemma, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-relative-dimension-d}). Follows from (\ref{item-finite-type})
and general remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-universally-open}). Immediate from general remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-syntomic}). Assume $f$ is syntomic. By
(\ref{item-finite-presentation}) $f'$ is locally of finite presentation,
by general remark (III) $f'$ is flat and the fibres of $f'$ are the fibres
of $f$. Hence $f'$ is syntomic by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-syntomic-flat-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-smooth}). Assume $f$ is smooth. By
(\ref{item-finite-presentation}) $f'$ is locally of finite presentation,
by general remark (III) $f'$ is flat, and the fibres of $f'$ are the
fibres of $f$. Hence $f'$ is smooth by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-flat-smooth-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-unramified}). Assume $f$ unramified. By
(\ref{item-finite-type}) $f'$ is locally of finite type
and the fibres of $f'$ are the fibres of $f$.
Hence $f'$ is unramified by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-unramified-etale-fibres}. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-etale}). Assume $f$ \'etale. By
(\ref{item-finite-presentation}) $f'$ is locally of finite presentation,
by general remark (III) $f'$ is flat, and the fibres of $f'$ are the fibres
of $f$. Hence $f'$ is \'etale by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-flat-etale-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-proper}). This follows from a combination of
(\ref{item-separated}), (\ref{item-finite-type}), (\ref{item-quasi-compact}),
and (\ref{item-universally-closed}).  See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-integral}). Combine (\ref{item-universally-closed}) and
(\ref{item-affine}) with
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-integral-universally-closed}. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-finite}). Combine (\ref{item-integral}),
and (\ref{item-finite-type}) with
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-integral}. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms-cartesian}
for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-finite-locally-free}). Assume $f$ finite locally free. By
(\ref{item-finite}) we see that $f'$ is finite, by general remark (III)
$f'$ is flat, and by (\ref{item-finite-presentation}) $f'$ is locally of finite
presentation. Hence $f'$ is finite locally free by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-flat}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma is the ``locally nilpotent'' version of the
``crit\`ere de platitude par fibres'', see
Section \ref{section-criterion-flat-fibres}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flatness-morphism-thickenings-fp-over-ft}
Consider a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
(X \subset X') \ar[rr]_{(f, f')} \ar[rd] & & (Y \subset Y') \ar[ld] \\
& (S \subset S')
}
$$
of thickenings. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Y' \to S'$ is locally of finite type,
\item $X' \to S'$ is flat and locally of finite presentation,
\item $f$ is flat, and
\item $X = S \times_{S'} X'$ and $Y = S \times_{S'} Y'$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $f'$ is flat and for all $y' \in Y'$ in the image of $f'$
the local ring $\mathcal{O}_{Y', y'}$ is
flat and essentially of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_{S', s'}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Immediate consequence of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-criterion-flatness-fibre-locally-nilpotent}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Many properties of morphisms of schemes are preserved under flat
deformations as in the lemma above.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-deform-property-fp-over-ft}
Consider a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
(X \subset X') \ar[rr]_{(f, f')} \ar[rd] & & (Y \subset Y') \ar[ld] \\
& (S \subset S')
}
$$
of thickenings. Assume $Y' \to S'$ locally of finite type,
$X' \to S'$ flat and locally of finite presentation,
$X = S \times_{S'} X'$, and $Y = S \times_{S'} Y'$. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is flat if and only if $f'$ is flat,
\label{item-flat-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is an isomorphism if and only if $f'$ is an isomorphism,
\label{item-isomorphism-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is an open immersion if and only if $f'$ is an open immersion,
\label{item-open-immersion-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is quasi-compact if and only if $f'$ is quasi-compact,
\label{item-quasi-compact-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is universally closed if and only if $f'$ is universally closed,
\label{item-universally-closed-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is (quasi-)separated if and only if $f'$ is (quasi-)separated,
\label{item-separated-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $f'$ is a monomorphism,
\label{item-monomorphism-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is surjective if and only if $f'$ is surjective,
\label{item-surjective-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is universally injective if and only if $f'$ is universally injective,
\label{item-universally-injective-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is affine if and only if $f'$ is affine,
\label{item-affine-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is locally quasi-finite if and only if $f'$ is locally quasi-finite,
\label{item-quasi-finite-fp-over-ft}
\item
\label{item-relative-dimension-d-fp-over-ft}
$f$ is locally of finite type of relative dimension $d$ if and only if
$f'$ is locally of finite type of relative dimension $d$,
\item $f$ is universally open if and only if $f'$ is universally open,
\label{item-universally-open-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is syntomic if and only if $f'$ is syntomic,
\label{item-syntomic-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is smooth if and only if $f'$ is smooth,
\label{item-smooth-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is unramified if and only if $f'$ is unramified,
\label{item-unramified-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is \'etale if and only if $f'$ is \'etale,
\label{item-etale-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is proper if and only if $f'$ is proper,
\label{item-proper-fp-over-ft}
\item $f$ is finite if and only if $f'$ is finite,
\label{item-finite-fp-over-ft}
\item
\label{item-finite-locally-free-fp-over-ft}
$f$ is finite locally free (of rank $d$) if and only if $f'$
is finite locally free (of rank $d$), and
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The assumptions on $X$ and $Y$ mean that $f$ is the base change of
$f'$ by $X \to X'$.
The properties $\mathcal{P}$ listed in (1) -- (20) above are all stable
under base change, hence if $f'$ has property $\mathcal{P}$, then so
does $f$. See
Schemes, Lemmas \ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-immersion},
\ref{schemes-lemma-quasi-compact-preserved-base-change},
\ref{schemes-lemma-separated-permanence}, and
\ref{schemes-lemma-base-change-monomorphism}
and
Morphisms, Lemmas
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-surjective},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-universally-injective},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-affine},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-relative-dimension-d},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-syntomic},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-smooth},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-unramified},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-etale},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-proper},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-locally-free}.

\medskip\noindent
The interesting direction in each case is therefore to assume
that $f$ has the property and deduce that $f'$ has it too.
We make a couple of general remarks which we will use without further
mention in the arguments below.
(I) Let $W' \subset S'$ be an affine open and let $U' \subset X'$
and $V' \subset Y'$ be affine opens lying over $W'$ with $f'(U') \subset V'$.
Let $W' = \Spec(R')$ and denote $I \subset R'$ be the ideal
defining the closed subscheme $W' \cap S$. Say $U' = \Spec(B')$
and $V' = \Spec(A')$. Then we get a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] &
IB' \ar[r] &
B' \ar[r] &
B \ar[r] & 0 \\
0 \ar[r] &
IA' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
A \ar[r] \ar[u] & 0
}
$$
with exact rows.
(II) The morphisms $X \to X'$ and $Y \to Y'$ are universal homeomorphisms.
Hence the topology of the maps $f$ and $f'$ (after any base change) is
identical.
(III) If $f$ is flat, then $f'$ is flat and $Y' \to S'$ is flat at every
point in the image of $f'$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-flatness-morphism-thickenings}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-flat-fp-over-ft}). This is general remark (III).

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-isomorphism-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ is an isomorphism.
Choose an affine open $V' \subset Y'$ and set $U' = (f')^{-1}(V')$.
Then $V = Y \cap V'$ is affine which implies that
$V \cong f^{-1}(V) = U = Y \times_{Y'} U'$ is affine. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}
we see that $U'$ is affine. Thus we have a diagram as in the
general remark (I). By Algebra, Lemma
\ref{algebra-lemma-isomorphism-modulo-locally-nilpotent}
we see that $A' \to B'$ is an isomorphism, i.e., $U' \cong V'$.
Thus $f'$ is an isomorphism.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-open-immersion-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ is an open immersion.
Then $f$ is an isomorphism of $X$ with an open subscheme $V \subset Y$.
Let $V' \subset Y'$ be the open subscheme whose underlying topological
space is $V$. Then $f'$ is a map from $X'$ to $V'$ which is an isomorphism by
(\ref{item-isomorphism-fp-over-ft}). Hence $f'$ is an open immersion.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-quasi-compact-fp-over-ft}). Immediate from remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-universally-closed-fp-over-ft}). Immediate from remark (II). See
also Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-separated-fp-over-ft}). Note that
$X \times_Y X = Y \times_{Y'} (X' \times_{Y'} X')$ so that
$X' \times_{Y'} X'$ is a thickening of $X \times_Y X$.
Hence the topology of the maps $\Delta_{X/Y}$ and $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$
matches and we win. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-monomorphism-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ is a monomorphism.
Consider the diagonal morphism $\Delta_{X'/Y'} : X' \to X' \times_{Y'} X'$.
Observe that $X' \times_{Y'} X' \to S'$ is locally of finite type.
The base change of $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ by $S \to S'$ is $\Delta_{X/Y}$
which is an isomorphism by assumption. By (\ref{item-isomorphism-fp-over-ft})
we conclude that $\Delta_{X'/Y'}$ is an isomorphism.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-surjective-fp-over-ft}). This is clear. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-universally-injective-fp-over-ft}).
Immediate from remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-affine-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ is affine.  Choose an
affine open $V' \subset Y'$ and set $U' = (f')^{-1}(V')$.
Then $V = Y \cap V'$ is affine which implies that
$U = Y \times_{Y'} U'$ is affine. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}
we see that $U'$ is affine. Hence $f'$ is affine. See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-quasi-finite-fp-over-ft}). Follows from the fact that $f'$
is locally of finite type
(by Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}) and that
quasi-finiteness of a morphism of finite type can be checked on fibres, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-at-point-characterize}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-relative-dimension-d-fp-over-ft}).
Follows from general remark (II) and the fact that $f'$
is locally of finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}).

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-universally-open-fp-over-ft}).
Immediate from general remark (II). See also
Lemma \ref{lemma-thicken-property-morphisms} for a more general statement.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-syntomic-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ is syntomic. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}
$f'$ is locally of finite presentation.
By general remark (III) $f'$ is flat. The fibres of $f'$ are the fibres
of $f$. Hence $f'$ is syntomic by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-syntomic-flat-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-smooth-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ is smooth. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}
$f'$ is locally of finite presentation.
By general remark (III) $f'$ is flat. The fibres of $f'$ are the
fibres of $f$. Hence $f'$ is smooth by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-flat-smooth-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-unramified-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ unramified. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}
$f'$ is locally of finite type. The fibres of $f'$ are the fibres of $f$.
Hence $f'$ is unramified by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-unramified-etale-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-etale-fp-over-ft}). Assume $f$ \'etale. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}
$f'$ is locally of finite presentation.
By general remark (III) $f'$ is flat.
The fibres of $f'$ are the fibres of $f$. Hence $f'$ is \'etale by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-flat-etale-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-proper-fp-over-ft}). This follows from a combination of
(\ref{item-separated-fp-over-ft}), the fact that $f$ is locally
of finite type (Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}),
(\ref{item-quasi-compact-fp-over-ft}),
and (\ref{item-universally-closed-fp-over-ft}).

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-finite-fp-over-ft}).
Combine (\ref{item-universally-closed-fp-over-ft}),
(\ref{item-affine-fp-over-ft}),
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-integral-universally-closed},
the fact that $f$ is locally of finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}), and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-integral}.

\medskip\noindent
Ad (\ref{item-finite-locally-free-fp-over-ft}).
Assume $f$ finite locally free. By
(\ref{item-finite-fp-over-ft}) we see that $f'$ is finite.
By general remark (III) $f'$ is flat.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}
$f'$ is locally of finite presentation. Hence $f'$ is finite locally free by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-flat}.
\end{proof}










\section{Formally smooth morphisms}
\label{section-formally-smooth}

\noindent
Michael Artin's position on differential criteria of smoothness (e.g.,
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-at-point}) is that they are
basically useless (in practice). In this section we introduce the
notion of a formally smooth morphism $X \to S$. Such a morphism is
characterized by the property that $T$-valued points of $X$ lift
to infinitesimal thickenings of $T$ provided $T$ is affine.
The main result is that a morphism which is formally smooth and
locally of finite presentation is smooth, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-smooth-formally-smooth}.
It turns out that this criterion is often easier to use than the
differential criteria mentioned above.

\medskip\noindent
Recall that a ring map $R \to A$ is called {\it formally smooth}
(see Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-formally-smooth})
if for every commutative solid diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
A \ar[r] \ar@{-->}[rd] & B/I \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] & B \ar[u]
}
$$
where $I \subset B$ is an ideal of square zero, a dotted
arrow exists which makes the diagram commute. This motivates
the following analogue for morphisms of schemes.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-formally-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
We say $f$ is {\it formally smooth} if given any solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l] \\
S & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $T \subset T'$ is a first order thickening of affine schemes over $S$
there exists a dotted arrow making the diagram commute.
\end{definition}

\noindent
In the cases of formally unramified and formally \'etale morphisms
the condition that $T'$ be affine could be dropped, see
Lemmas \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-not-affine} and
\ref{lemma-formally-etale-not-affine}.
This is no longer true in the case of formally smooth morphisms.
In fact, a slightly more natural condition would be that we should be
able to fill in the dotted arrow Zariski locally on $T'$. In fact, analyzing
the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-smooth-formally-smooth}
shows that this would be equivalent to the definition as it currently
stands.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-formally-smooth}
A composition of formally smooth morphisms is formally smooth.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-formally-smooth}
A base change of a formally smooth morphism is formally smooth.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted, but see Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-base-change-fs}
for the algebraic version.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-etale-unramified-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Then $f$ is formally \'etale if and only if
$f$ is formally smooth and formally unramified.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-smooth-on-opens}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ be open subschemes such that
$f(U) \subset V$. If $f$ is formally smooth, so is $f|_U : U \to V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider a solid diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
U \ar[d]_{f|_U} & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l]^a \\
V & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
as in Definition \ref{definition-formally-smooth}. If $f$ is formally
smooth, then there exists an $S$-morphism $a' : T' \to X$ such that
$a'|_T = a$. Since the underlying sets of $T$ and $T'$ are the same
we see that $a'$ is a morphism into $U$ (see Schemes, Section
\ref{schemes-section-open-immersion}). And it clearly is a $V$-morphism
as well. Hence the dotted arrow above as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-affine-formally-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $X$ and $S$ are affine.
Then $f$ is formally smooth if and only if
$\mathcal{O}_S(S) \to \mathcal{O}_X(X)$ is a formally smooth
ring map.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is immediate from the definitions
(Definition \ref{definition-formally-smooth} and
Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-formally-smooth})
by the equivalence of categories of rings and affine schemes,
see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-category-affine-schemes}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma is the main result of this section. It is a victory of the
functorial point of view in that it implies (combined with
Limits,
Proposition \ref{limits-proposition-characterize-locally-finite-presentation})
that we can recognize whether a morphism $f : X \to S$ is smooth in terms of
``simple'' properties of the functor $h_X : \Sch/S \to \textit{Sets}$.

\begin{lemma}[Infinitesimal lifting criterion]
\label{lemma-smooth-formally-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The morphism $f$ is smooth, and
\item the morphism $f$ is locally of finite presentation and
formally smooth.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $f : X \to S$ is locally of finite presentation and formally smooth.
Consider a pair of affine opens $\Spec(A) = U \subset X$ and
$\Spec(R) = V \subset S$
such that $f(U) \subset V$. By Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-smooth-on-opens}
we see that $U \to V$ is formally smooth. By Lemma
\ref{lemma-affine-formally-smooth} we see that $R \to A$ is formally
smooth. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-characterize}
we see that $R \to A$ is of finite presentation.
By Algebra, Proposition \ref{algebra-proposition-smooth-formally-smooth}
we see that $R \to A$ is smooth.
Hence by the definition of a smooth morphism we see that $X \to S$ is smooth.

\medskip\noindent
Conversely, assume that $f : X \to S$ is smooth. Consider a solid commutative
diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & T \ar[d]^i \ar[l]^a \\
S & T' \ar[l] \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
as in Definition \ref{definition-formally-smooth}.
We will show the dotted arrow exists thereby
proving that $f$ is formally smooth.

\medskip\noindent
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the sheaf of sets on $T'$ of Lemma \ref{lemma-sheaf}
in the special case discussed in Remark \ref{remark-special-case}.
Let
$$
\mathcal{H} =
\SheafHom_{\mathcal{O}_T}(a^*\Omega_{X/S}, \mathcal{C}_{T/T'})
$$
be the sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_T$-modules with action
$\mathcal{H} \times \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-action-sheaf}. Our goal is simply
to show that $\mathcal{F}(T) \not = \emptyset$. In other words we
are trying to show that $\mathcal{F}$ is a trivial $\mathcal{H}$-torsor
on $T$ (see Cohomology, Section \ref{cohomology-section-h1-torsors}).
There are two steps: (I) To show that $\mathcal{F}$ is a torsor
we have to show that $\mathcal{F}_t \not = \emptyset$ for all $t \in T$ (see
Cohomology, Definition \ref{cohomology-definition-torsor}).
(II) To show that $\mathcal{F}$ is the trivial torsor it suffices
to show that $H^1(T, \mathcal{H}) = 0$ (see
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-torsors-h1} --
we may use either cohomology
of $\mathcal{H}$ as an abelian sheaf or as an $\mathcal{O}_T$-module,
see Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-modules-abelian}).

\medskip\noindent
First we prove (I). To see this, for every $t \in T$ we can
choose an affine open $U \subset T$ neighbourhood of $t$
such that $a(U)$ is contained
in an affine open $\Spec(A) = W \subset X$
which maps to an affine open $\Spec(R) = V \subset S$.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-characterize}
the ring map $R \to A$ is smooth.
Hence by Algebra, Proposition \ref{algebra-proposition-smooth-formally-smooth}
the ring map $R \to A$ is formally smooth.
Lemma \ref{lemma-affine-formally-smooth}
in turn implies that $W \to V$ is formally smooth.
Hence we can lift $a|_U : U \to W$ to a $V$-morphism
$a' : U' \to W \subset X$ showing that $\mathcal{F}(U) \not = \emptyset$.

\medskip\noindent
Finally we prove (II).
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-differentials}
we see that $\Omega_{X/S}$ is of finite presentation
(it is even finite locally free by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-omega-finite-locally-free}).
Hence $a^*\Omega_{X/S}$ is of finite presentation (see
Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-pullback-finite-presentation}).
Hence the sheaf
$\mathcal{H} =
\SheafHom_{\mathcal{O}_T}(a^*\Omega_{X/S}, \mathcal{C}_{T/T'})$
is quasi-coherent by the discussion in
Schemes, Section \ref{schemes-section-quasi-coherent}.
Thus by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{coherent-lemma-quasi-coherent-affine-cohomology-zero}
we have $H^1(T, \mathcal{H}) = 0$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Locally projective quasi-coherent modules are defined in
Properties, Section \ref{properties-section-locally-projective}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-formally-smooth-sheaf-differentials}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a formally smooth morphism of schemes.
Then $\Omega_{X/Y}$ is locally projective on $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose $U \subset X$ and $V \subset Y$ affine open such that
$f(U) \subset V$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-smooth-on-opens}
$f|_U : U \to V$ is formally smooth. Hence
$\Gamma(V, \mathcal{O}_V) \to \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ is
a formally smooth ring map, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-affine-formally-smooth}.
Hence by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-formally-smooth-again}
the $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$-module
$\Omega_{\Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)/\Gamma(V, \mathcal{O}_V)}$
is projective. Hence $\Omega_{U/V}$ is locally projective, see
Properties, Section \ref{properties-section-locally-projective}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-triangle-differentials-formally-smooth}
Let $f : X \to Y$, $g : Y \to S$ be morphisms of schemes.
Assume $f$ is formally smooth. Then
$$
0 \to f^*\Omega_{Y/S} \to \Omega_{X/S} \to \Omega_{X/Y} \to 0
$$
(see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-triangle-differentials})
is short exact.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The algebraic version of this lemma is the following:
Given ring maps $A \to B \to C$ with $B \to C$ formally smooth, then
the sequence
$$
0 \to C \otimes_B \Omega_{B/A} \to \Omega_{C/A} \to \Omega_{C/B} \to 0
$$
of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-exact-sequence-differentials}
is exact. This is
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-ses-formally-smooth}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-differentials-formally-unramified-formally-smooth}
Let $h : Z \to X$ be a formally unramified morphism of schemes over $S$.
Assume that $Z$ is formally smooth over $S$. Then the
canonical exact sequence
$$
0 \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to i^*\Omega_{X/S} \to \Omega_{Z/S} \to 0
$$
of
Lemma \ref{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}
is short exact.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z \to Z'$ be the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$.
From the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}
we see that our sequence is identified with the sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to \Omega_{Z'/S} \otimes \mathcal{O}_Z \to
\Omega_{Z/S} \to 0.
$$
Since $Z \to S$ is formally smooth we can locally on $Z'$ find
a left inverse $Z' \to Z$ over $S$ to the inclusion map $Z \to Z'$.
Thus the sequence is locally split, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-relative-immersion-section}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms-formally-smooth}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_i \ar[rd]_j & X \ar[d]^f \\
& Y
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of schemes where $i$ and $j$ are formally
unramified and $f$ is formally smooth. Then the canonical exact sequence
$$
0 \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to
i^*\Omega_{X/Y} \to 0
$$
of
Lemma \ref{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms}
is exact and locally split.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Denote $Z \to Z'$ the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $X$.
Denote $Z \to Z''$ the universal first order thickening of $Z$ over $Y$.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}
here is a canonical morphism $Z' \to Z''$ so that we have a commutative
diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_{i'} \ar[rd]_{j'} & Z' \ar[r]_a \ar[d]^k & X \ar[d]^f \\
& Z'' \ar[r]^b & Y
}
$$
In the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms}
we identified the sequence above with the sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z''} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'} \to
(i')^*\Omega_{Z'/Z''} \to 0
$$
Let $U'' \subset Z''$ be an affine open. Denote $U \subset Z$ and
$U' \subset Z'$ the corresponding affine open subschemes.
As $f$ is formally smooth there exists a morphism $h : U'' \to X$
which agrees with $i$ on $U$ and such that $f \circ h$ equals $b|_{U''}$.
Since $Z'$ is the universal first order thickening we obtain a unique
morphism $g : U'' \to Z'$ such that $g = a \circ h$. The universal
property of $Z''$ implies that $k \circ g$ is the inclusion map
$U'' \to Z''$. Hence $g$ is a left inverse to $k$. Picture
$$
\xymatrix{
U \ar[d] \ar[r] & Z' \ar[d]^k \\
U'' \ar[r] \ar[ru]^g & Z''
}
$$
Thus $g$ induces a map $\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'}|_U \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/Z''}|_U$
which is a left inverse to the map
$\mathcal{C}_{Z/Z''} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/Z'}$ over $U$.
\end{proof}



































\section{Smoothness over a Noetherian base}
\label{section-smooth-Noetherian}

\noindent
It turns out that if the base is Noetherian then we can get away with
less in the formulation of formal smoothness. In some sense the following
lemmas are the beginning of deformation theory.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lifting-along-artinian-at-point}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$.
Assume that $S$ is locally Noetherian and $f$ locally of finite type.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is smooth at $x$,
\item for every solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & \Spec(B) \ar[d]^i \ar[l]^-\alpha \\
S & \Spec(B') \ar[l]_-{\beta} \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $B' \to B$ is a surjection of local rings with
$\Ker(B' \to B)$ of square zero, and $\alpha$ mapping the
closed point of $\Spec(B)$ to $x$ there exists
a dotted arrow making the diagram commute,
\item same as in (2) but with $B' \to B$ ranging over small
extensions (see Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-small-extension}),
and
\item same as in (2) but with $B' \to B$ ranging over small
extensions such that $\alpha$ induces an isomorphism
$\kappa(x) \to \kappa(\mathfrak m)$ where $\mathfrak m \subset B$
is the maximal ideal.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose an affine neighbourhood $V \subset S$ of $f(x)$ and choose an
affine neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$ such that $f(U) \subset V$.
For any ``test'' diagram as in (2) the morphism $\alpha$ will map
$\Spec(B)$ into $U$ and the morphism $\beta$ will map $\Spec(B')$
into $V$ (see Schemes, Section \ref{schemes-section-points}).
Hence the lemma reduces to the morphism $f|_U : U \to V$ of affines.
(Indeed, $V$ is Noetherian and $f|_U$ is of finite type, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-locally-Noetherian} and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-type-characterize}.)
In this affine case the lemma is identical to
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-smooth-test-artinian}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Sometimes it is useful to know that one only needs to check the
lifting criterion for small extensions ``centered'' at points
of finite type (see
Morphisms, Section \ref{morphisms-section-points-finite-type}).

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lifting-along-artinian}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that $S$ is locally Noetherian and $f$ locally of finite type.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is smooth,
\item for every solid commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]_f & \Spec(B) \ar[d]^i \ar[l]^-\alpha \\
S & \Spec(B') \ar[l]_-{\beta} \ar@{-->}[lu]
}
$$
where $B' \to B$ is a small extension of Artinian local rings
and $\beta$ of finite type (!) there exists a dotted arrow making
the diagram commute.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $f$ is smooth, then the infinitesimal lifting criterion
(Lemma \ref{lemma-smooth-formally-smooth}) says
$f$ is formally smooth and (2) holds.

\medskip\noindent
Assume (2). The set of points $x \in X$ where $f$ is not smooth
forms a closed subset $T$ of $X$. By the discussion in Morphisms,
Section \ref{morphisms-section-points-finite-type}, if $T \not = \emptyset$
there exists a point $x \in T \subset X$ such that the morphism
$$
\Spec(\kappa(x)) \to X \to S
$$
is of finite type (namely, pick any point $x$ of $T$ which is closed
in an affine open of $X$). By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-artinian-finite-type} given any
local Artinian ring $B'$ with residue field $\kappa(x)$ then any
morphism $\beta : \Spec(B') \to S$ is of finite type. Thus
we see that all the diagrams used in
Lemma \ref{lemma-lifting-along-artinian-at-point} (4) correspond
to diagrams as in the current lemma (2). Whence $X \to S$ is smooth
a $x$ a contradiction.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is a useful application.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-check-smoothness-on-infinitesimal-nbhds}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a finite type morphism of locally Noetherian schemes.
Let $Z \subset S$ be a closed subscheme with $n$th infinitesimal
neighbourhood $Z_n \subset S$. Set $X_n = Z_n \times_S X$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $X_n \to Z_n$ is smooth for all $n$, then $f$
is smooth at every point of $f^{-1}(Z)$.
\item If $X_n \to Z_n$ is \'etale for all $n$, then $f$
is \'etale at every point of $f^{-1}(Z)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $X_n \to Z_n$ is smooth for all $n$.
Let $x \in X$ be a point lying over a point of $Z$.
Given a small extension $B' \to B$ and morphisms $\alpha$, $\beta$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-lifting-along-artinian-at-point} part (3)
the maximal ideal of $B'$ is nilpotent (as $B'$ is Artinian)
and hence the morphism $\beta$ factors through $Z_n$ and $\alpha$ factors
through $X_n$ for a suitable $n$. Thus the lifting property for
$X_n \to Z_n$ kicks in to get the desired dotted arrow in the diagram.
This proves (1). Part (2) follows from (1) and the fact that a morphism
is \'etale if and only if it is smooth of relative dimension $0$.
\end{proof}






\section{Pushouts in the category of schemes}
\label{section-pushouts}

\noindent
In this section we collect some results on pushouts in the category of schemes.
See Categories, Section \ref{categories-section-pushouts} for a general
discussion of pushouts in any category.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pushout-fpqc-local}
Consider a commutative diagram of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_i \ar[d]_j & X \ar[d]^a \\
Y \ar[r]^-b & W
}
$$
and set $c = a \circ i = b \circ j$. If there exists an fpqc covering
$\{W_i \to W\}$ such that for all $i$ and $i'$ the diagrams
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \times_{c, W} W_i \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \times_{a, W} W_i \ar[d] \\
Y \times_{b, W} W_i \ar[r] & W_i
}
\quad
\xymatrix{
Z \times_{c, W} (W_i \times_W W_{i'}) \ar[r] \ar[d] &
X \times_{a, W} (W_i \times_W W_{i'}) \ar[d] \\
Y \times_{b, W} (W_i \times_W W_{i'}) \ar[r] &
(W_i \times_W W_{i'})
}
$$
are cocartesian, then so is the original diagram.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Namely, for a scheme $T$ a morphism $W \to T$ is the same thing as
a collection of morphism $W_i \to T$ which agree on overlaps, see
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-fpqc-universal-effective-epimorphisms}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Next, we discuss existence in the case where
both morphisms are closed immersions.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pushout-along-closed-immersions}
Let $i : Z \to X$ and $j : Z \to Y$ be closed immersions of schemes.
Then the pushout $Y \amalg_Z X$ exists in the category of schemes. Picture
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_i \ar[d]_j & X \ar[d]^a \\
Y \ar[r]^-b & Y \amalg_Z X
}
$$
The diagram is a fibre square, the morphisms $a : X \to W$ and
$b : Y \to W$ are closed immersions, and there is a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to \mathcal{O}_W \to a_*\mathcal{O}_X \oplus b_*\mathcal{O}_Y \to
c_*\mathcal{O}_Z \to 0
$$
where $c = a \circ i = b \circ j$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
As a topological space we set $Y \amalg_Z X$ equal to the pushout of
the diagram in the category of topological spaces (Topology, Section
\ref{topology-section-colimits}). As a set this is just the pushout
of the underlying sets. The topology is the quotient topology (details
omitted). On $Y \amalg_Z X$ we have the maps of sheaves of rings
$$
b_*\mathcal{O}_Y \longrightarrow c_*\mathcal{O}_Z
\longleftarrow a_*\mathcal{O}_X
$$
and we can define
$$
\mathcal{O}_{Y \amalg_Z X} =
b_*\mathcal{O}_Y \times_{c_*\mathcal{O}_Z} a_*\mathcal{O}_X
$$
as the fibre product
in the category of sheaves of rings. To prove that we obtain a scheme
we have to show that every point has an affine open neighbourhood.
This is clear for points not in the image of $c$.

\medskip\noindent
Let $z \in Z$. Choose an affine open $U \subset X$ such that $z \in i^{-1}U$.
Choose an affine open $V \subset Y$ such that $z \in j^{-1}V \subset i^{-1}U$.
Choose an $f \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ such that
$z \in i^{-1}D(f) \subset j^{-1}V$. Since $j(Z) \cap V$ is closed in
$V$, there exists a $g \in \Gamma(V, \mathcal{O}_V)$ whose pullback
to the scheme $j^{-1}V$ is equal to the restriction of $f$ to
$j^{-1}V \subset i^{-1}U$. Then we see that after replacing $U$
by the standard open $D(f)$ and $V$ by the standard open $D(g)$
we have $z \in i^{-1}U = j^{-1}V$. Since the construction of the first
paragraph is clearly compatible with restriction to compatible open
subschemes, to prove that it produces a scheme we may assume $X$, $Y$, and
$Z$ are affine.

\medskip\noindent
If $X = \Spec(A)$, $Y = \Spec(B)$, and $Z = \Spec(C)$ are affine, then
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-points-of-fibre-product}
shows that $Y \amalg_Z X = \Spec(B \times_C A)$ as topological spaces.
To finish the proof that $Y \times_Z X$ is a scheme, it suffices to show
that on $\Spec(B \times_C A)$ the structure sheaf is the fibre product
of the pushforwards. This follows by applying
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-diagram-localize}
to principal affine opens.

\medskip\noindent
The scheme theoretic properties of the fibre product come from the fact
that $B \times_C A \to A$ and $B \times_C A \to B$ are surjective ring maps
and that $C \cong B \otimes_{B \times_C A} A$.
We omit the verification of the universal property of the pushout.
\end{proof}

\noindent
An important case for us will be the case where one of the morphisms
is a thickening and the other is an affine morphism.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pushout-along-thickening}
Let $X \to X'$ be a thickening of schemes and let $X \to Y$ be an affine
morphism of schemes. Then there exists a pushout
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r] \ar[d]_f
&
X' \ar[d]^{f'}
\\
Y \ar[r]
&
Y \amalg_X X'
}
$$
in the category of schemes. Moreover $Y' = Y \amalg_X X'$ is a
thickening of $Y$ and
$$
\mathcal{O}_{Y'} = \mathcal{O}_Y \times_{f_*\mathcal{O}_X} f'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}
$$
as sheaves on $|Y| = |Y'|$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We first construct $Y'$ as a ringed space. Namely, as topological
space we take $Y' = Y$. Denote $f' : X' \to Y'$ the map of topological
spaces which equals $f$. As structure sheaf $\mathcal{O}_{Y'}$ we take
the right hand side of the equation of the lemma. To see that
$Y'$ is a scheme, we have to show that any point has an affine
neighbourhood. Since the formation of the fibre product of sheaves
commutes with restricting to opens, we may assume $Y$ is affine.
Then $X$ is affine (as $f$ is affine) and $X'$ is affine as well
(see Lemma \ref{lemma-thickening-affine-scheme}).
Say $Y \leftarrow X \rightarrow X'$ corresponds
to $B \rightarrow A \leftarrow A'$. Set $B' = B \times_A A'$; this
is the global sections of $\mathcal{O}_{Y'}$. As $A' \to A$ is surjective
with locally nilpotent kernel we see that $B' \to B$ is surjective
with locally nilpotent kernel. Hence $\Spec(B') = \Spec(B)$ (as
topological spaces). We claim that $Y' = \Spec(B')$. To see this
we will show for $g' \in B'$ with image $g \in B$ that
$\mathcal{O}_{Y'}(D(g)) = B'_{g'}$. Namely, by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-diagram-localize} we see that
$$
(B')_{g'} = B_g \times_{A_h} A'_{h'}
$$
where $h \in A$, $h' \in A'$ are the images of $g'$. Since
$B_g$, resp.\ $A_h$, resp.\ $A'_{h'}$ is equal to $\mathcal{O}_Y(D(g))$,
resp.\ $f_*\mathcal{O}_X(D(g))$, resp.\ $f'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}(D(g))$ the
claim follows.

\medskip\noindent
Finally, we prove the universal property of the pushout holds for
$Y'$ and the morphisms $Y \to Y'$ and $X' \to Y'$. Namely, let $S$ be
a scheme and let $b : Y \to S$ and $a' : X' \to S$ be morphisms such that
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r] \ar[d]
&
X' \ar[d]^{a'}
\\
Y \ar[r]^b
&
S
}
$$
commutes. Note that $a' = b \circ f'$ on underlying topological spaces.
Denote also $(a')^\sharp : b^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S \to f'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}$
the map which is adjoint to $(a')^\sharp :
(a')^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S = (f')^{-1} b^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S \to \mathcal{O}_{X'}$.
Then we get a map
$$
b^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S
\xrightarrow{(b^\sharp, (a')^\sharp)}
\mathcal{O}_Y \times_{f_*\mathcal{O}_X} f'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}
=
\mathcal{O}_{Y'}
$$
which defines a morphism of ringed spaces $b' : Y' \to S$ compatible
with $a'$ and $b$. Since $Y \subset Y'$ is a thickening it follows that
$b'$ is a morphism of locally ringed spaces, i.e., a morphism of schemes.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\noindent
In the following lemma we use the fibre product of categories as
defined in
Categories, Example \ref{categories-example-2-fibre-product-categories}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-equivalence-categories-schemes-over-pushout}
Let $X \to X'$ be a thickening of schemes and let $X \to Y$ be an
affine morphism of schemes. Let $Y' = Y \amalg_X X'$ be the pushout
(see Lemma \ref{lemma-pushout-along-thickening}). Base change gives
a functor
$$
F : (\Sch/Y') \longrightarrow (\Sch/Y) \times_{(\Sch/Y')} (\Sch/X')
$$
given by $V' \longmapsto (V' \times_{Y'} Y, V' \times_{Y'} X', 1)$
which has a left adjoint
$$
G : (\Sch/Y) \times_{(\Sch/Y')} (\Sch/X') \longrightarrow (\Sch/Y')
$$
which sends the triple $(V, U', \varphi)$ to the pushout
$V \amalg_{(V \times_Y X)} U'$. Finally, $F \circ G$ is isomorphic to the
identity functor.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $(V, U', \varphi)$ be an object of the fibre product category.
Set $U = U' \times_{X'} X$. Note that $U \to U'$ is a thickening.
Since $\varphi : V \times_Y X \to U' \times_{X'} X = U$ is an isomorphism
we have a morphism $U \to V$ over $X \to Y$ which identifies $U$ with
the fibre product $X \times_Y V$. In particular $U \to V$ is affine, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-affine}.
Hence we can apply Lemma \ref{lemma-pushout-along-thickening}
to get a pushout $V' = V \amalg_U U'$. Denote $V' \to Y'$ the morphism
we obtain in virtue of the fact that $V'$ is a pushout and because
we are given morphisms $V \to Y$ and $U' \to X'$ agreeing on $U$
as morphisms into $Y'$. Setting $G(V, U', \varphi) = V'$
gives the functor $G$.

\medskip\noindent
Let us prove that $G$ is a left adjoint to $F$. Let $Z$ be a scheme
over $Y'$. We have to show that
$$
\Mor(V', Z) = \Mor((V, U', \varphi), F(Z))
$$
where the morphism sets are taking in their respective categories.
Let $g' : V' \to Z$ be a morphism. Denote $\tilde g$, resp.\ $\tilde f'$
the composition of $g'$ with the morphism $V \to V'$, resp.\ $U' \to V'$.
Base change $\tilde g$, resp.\ $\tilde f'$ by $Y \to Y'$, resp.\ $X' \to Y'$
to get a morphism $g : V \to Z \times_{Y'} Y$,
resp.\ $f' : U' \to Z \times_{Y'} X'$. Then $(g, f')$ is an element
of the right hand side of the equation above (details omitted).
Conversely, suppose that $(g, f') : (V, U', \varphi) \to F(Z)$ is an
element of the right hand side.
We may consider the composition $\tilde g : V \to Z$,
resp.\ $\tilde f' : U' \to Z$ of $g$, resp.\ $f$ by
$Z \times_{Y'} X' \to Z$, resp.\ $Z \times_{Y'} Y \to Z$.
Then $\tilde g$ and $\tilde f'$ agree as morphism from $U$ to $Z$.
By the universal property of pushout, we obtain a morphism
$g' : V' \to Z$, i.e., an element of the left hand side.
We omit the verification that these constructions are mutually inverse.

\medskip\noindent
To prove that $F \circ G$ is isomorphic to the identity we have to
show that the adjunction mapping
$(V, U', \varphi) \to F(G(V, U', \varphi))$ is an isomorphism.
To do this we may work affine locally. Say $X = \Spec(A)$, $X' = \Spec(A')$,
and $Y = \Spec(B)$. Then $A' \to A$ and $B \to A$ are ring maps as in
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-module-over-fibre-product}
and $Y' = \Spec(B')$ with $B' = B \times_A A'$. Next, suppose that
$V = \Spec(D)$, $U' = \Spec(C')$ and $\varphi$ is given by an
$A$-algebra isomorphism $D \otimes_B A \to C' \otimes_{A'} A = C'/IC'$.
Set $D' = D \times_{C'/IC'} C'$. In this case the statement we have to
prove is that $D' \otimes_{B'} B \cong D$ and $D' \otimes_{B'} A' \cong C'$.
This is a special case of More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-module-over-fibre-product}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-scheme-over-pushout-flat-modules}
Let $X \to X'$ be a thickening of schemes and let $X \to Y$ be an
affine morphism of schemes. Let $Y' = Y \amalg_X X'$ be the pushout
(see Lemma \ref{lemma-pushout-along-thickening}). Let $V' \to Y'$
be a morphism of schemes. Set
$V = Y \times_{Y'} V'$, $U' = X' \times_{Y'} V'$, and $U = X \times_{Y'} V'$.
There is an equivalence of categories between
\begin{enumerate}
\item quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{V'}$-modules flat over $Y'$, and
\item the category of triples $(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F}', \varphi)$ where
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{G}$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_V$-module flat over $Y$,
\item $\mathcal{F}'$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{U'}$-module flat
over $X$, and
\item $\varphi : (U \to V)^*\mathcal{G} \to (U \to U')^*\mathcal{F}'$
is an isomorphism of $\mathcal{O}_U$-modules.
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
The equivalence maps $\mathcal{G}'$ to
$((V \to V')^*\mathcal{G}', (U' \to V')^*\mathcal{G}', can)$.
Suppose $\mathcal{G}'$ corresponds to the triple
$(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F}', \varphi)$. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] $\mathcal{G}'$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_{V'}$-module if and
only if $\mathcal{G}$ and $\mathcal{F}'$ are finite type
$\mathcal{O}_Y$ and $\mathcal{O}_{U'}$-modules.
\item[(b)] if $V' \to Y'$ is locally of finite presentation, then
$\mathcal{G}'$ is an $\mathcal{O}_{V'}$-module of finite
presentation if and only if $\mathcal{G}$ and $\mathcal{F}'$ are
$\mathcal{O}_Y$ and $\mathcal{O}_{U'}$-modules of finite presentation.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
A quasi-inverse functor assigns to the triple
$(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{F}', \varphi)$ the fibre product
$$
(V \to V')_*\mathcal{G}
\times_{(U \to V')_*\mathcal{F}}
(U' \to V')_*\mathcal{F}'
$$
where $\mathcal{F} = (U \to U')^*\mathcal{F}'$. This works, because on
affines we recover the equivalence of More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-relative-flat-module-over-fibre-product}.
Some details omitted.

\medskip\noindent
Parts (a) and (b) follow from
More on Algebra, Lemmas
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-relative-finite-module-over-fibre-product} and
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-relative-finitely-presented-module-over-fibre-product}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-equivalence-categories-schemes-over-pushout-flat}
In the situation of
Lemma \ref{lemma-equivalence-categories-schemes-over-pushout}.
If $V' = G(V, U', \varphi)$ for some triple $(V, U', \varphi)$, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $V' \to Y'$ is locally of finite type if and only if $V \to Y$ and
$U' \to X'$ are locally of finite type,
\item $V' \to Y'$ is flat if and only if $V \to Y$ and $U' \to X'$ are flat,
\item $V' \to Y'$ is flat and locally of finite presentation if and only if
$V \to Y$ and $U' \to X'$ are flat and locally of finite presentation,
\item $V' \to Y'$ is smooth if and only if $V \to Y$ and $U' \to X'$ are smooth,
\item $V' \to Y'$ is \'etale if and only if $V \to Y$ and $U' \to X'$
are \'etale, and
\item add more here as needed.
\end{enumerate}
If $W'$ is flat over $Y'$, then the adjunction mapping
$G(F(W')) \to W'$ is an isomorphism. Hence $F$ and $G$ define mutually
quasi-inverse functors between the category of schemes flat over $Y'$
and the category of triples $(V, U', \varphi)$ with $V \to Y$
and $U' \to X'$ flat.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Looking over affine pieces the assertions of this lemma
are equivalent to the corresponding assertions of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-properties-algebras-over-fibre-product}.
\end{proof}







\section{Openness of the flat locus}
\label{section-open-flat}

\noindent
This result takes some work to prove, and (perhaps)
deserves its own section. Here it is.

\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem-openness-flatness}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism which is locally of finite presentation.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module which is
locally of finite presentation. Then
$$
U = \{x \in X \mid \mathcal{F}\text{ is flat over }S\text{ at }x\}
$$
is open in $X$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
We may test for openness locally on $X$ hence we may assume
that $f$ is a morphism of affine schemes. In this case the
theorem is exactly
Algebra, Theorem \ref{algebra-theorem-openness-flatness}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-locus-base-change}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[r]_{g'} \ar[d]_{f'} & X \ar[d]^f \\
S' \ar[r]^g & S
}
$$
be a cartesian diagram of schemes.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Let $x' \in X'$ with images
$x = g'(x')$ and $s' = g'(x')$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ at $x$, then
$(g')^*\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S'$ at $x'$.
\item If $g$ is flat at $s'$ and $(g')^*\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S'$ at
$x'$, then $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ at $x$.
\end{enumerate}
In particular, if $g$ is flat, $f$ is locally of finite presentation,
and $\mathcal{F}$ is locally of finite presentation,
then formation of the open subset of
Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness}
commutes with base change.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider the commutative diagram of local rings
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_{X', x'} & \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \ar[l] \\
\mathcal{O}_{S', s'} \ar[u] & \mathcal{O}_{S, s} \ar[l] \ar[u]
}
$$
Note that $\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$
is a localization of
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{S, s}} \mathcal{O}_{S', s'}$,
and that $((g')^*\mathcal{F})_{x'}$ is equal to
$\mathcal{F}_x \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X, x}} \mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$.
Hence the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-base-change-flat-up-down}.
\end{proof}






\section{Crit\`ere de platitude par fibres}
\label{section-criterion-flat-fibres}

\noindent
Consider a commutative diagram of schemes (left hand diagram)
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_f \ar[dr] & & Y \ar[dl] \\
& S
}
\quad
\xymatrix{
X_s \ar[rr]_{f_s} \ar[rd] & & Y_s \ar[dl] \\
& \Spec(\kappa(s))
}
$$
and a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$.
Given a point $x \in X$ lying over $s \in S$ with image $y = f(x)$
we consider the question: Is $\mathcal{F}$ flat
over $Y$ at $x$? If $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ at $x$, then
the theorem states this question is intimately related to the
question of whether the restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to the fibre
$$
\mathcal{F}_s = (X_s \to X)^*\mathcal{F}
$$
is flat over $Y_s$ at $x$. Below you will find a ``Noetherian'' version,
a ``finitely presented'' version, and earlier we treated a ``nilpotent''
version, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-flatness-morphism-thickenings}.

\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre-Noetherian}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Let $x \in X$. Set $y = f(x)$ and $s \in S$ the image of $x$ in $S$.
Assume $S$, $X$, $Y$ locally Noetherian,
$\mathcal{F}$ coherent, and $\mathcal{F}_x \not = 0$.
Then the following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ at $x$, and
$\mathcal{F}_s$ is flat over $Y_s$ at $x$, and
\item $Y$ is flat over $S$ at $y$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is
flat over $Y$ at $x$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Consider the ring maps
$$
\mathcal{O}_{S, s} \longrightarrow
\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X, x}
$$
and the module $\mathcal{F}_x$. The stalk of $\mathcal{F}_s$ at $x$
is the module $\mathcal{F}_x/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{F}_x$ and
the local ring of $Y_s$ at $y$ is
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$.
Thus the implication (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) is
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-criterion-flatness-fibre-Noetherian}.
If (2) holds, then the first ring map is faithfully flat
and $\mathcal{F}_x$ is flat over $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ so by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-composition-flat}
we see that $\mathcal{F}_x$ is flat over $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$.
Moreover, $\mathcal{F}_x/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{F}_x$ is the
base change of the flat module $\mathcal{F}_x$ by
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$,
hence flat by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-base-change}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is the non-Noetherian version.

\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X$ is locally of finite presentation over $S$,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module of finite presentation, and
\item $Y$ is locally of finite type over $S$.
\end{enumerate}
Let $x \in X$. Set $y = f(x)$ and let $s \in S$ be the image of $x$ in $S$.
If $\mathcal{F}_x \not = 0$, then the following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ at $x$, and
$\mathcal{F}_s$ is flat over $Y_s$ at $x$, and
\item $Y$ is flat over $S$ at $y$ and $\mathcal{F}$ is
flat over $Y$ at $x$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, the set of points $x$ where (1) and (2) hold is open in
$\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Consider the ring maps
$$
\mathcal{O}_{S, s} \longrightarrow
\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X, x}
$$
and the module $\mathcal{F}_x$. The stalk of $\mathcal{F}_s$ at $x$
is the module $\mathcal{F}_x/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{F}_x$ and
the local ring of $Y_s$ at $y$ is
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$.
Thus the implication (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) is
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-criterion-flatness-fibre-fp-over-ft}.
If (2) holds, then the first ring map is faithfully flat
and $\mathcal{F}_x$ is flat over $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ so by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-composition-flat}
we see that $\mathcal{F}_x$ is flat over $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$.
Moreover, $\mathcal{F}_x/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{F}_x$ is the
base change of the flat module $\mathcal{F}_x$ by
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}/\mathfrak m_s \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$,
hence flat by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-base-change}.

\medskip\noindent
By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}
the morphism $f$ is locally of finite presentation.
Consider the set
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-open}
U = \{x \in X \mid \mathcal{F} \text{ flat at }x
\text{ over both }Y\text{ and }S\}.
\end{equation}
This set is open in $X$ by
Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness}.
Note that if $x \in U$, then $\mathcal{F}_s$ is flat at
$x$ over $Y_s$ as a base change of a flat module under the
morphism $Y_s \to Y$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-module-flat}.
Hence at every point of $U \cap \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$
condition (1) is satisfied. On the other hand, it is
clear that if $x \in \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$ satisfies
(1) and (2), then $x \in U$. Thus the open set we are
looking for is $U \cap \text{Supp}(\mathcal{F})$.
\end{proof}

\noindent
These theorems are often used in the following simplified forms.
We give only the global statements -- of course there are also pointwise
versions.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-morphism-between-flat-Noetherian}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $S$, $X$, $Y$ are locally Noetherian,
\item $X$ is flat over $S$,
\item for every $s \in S$ the morphism
$f_s : X_s \to Y_s$ is flat.
\end{enumerate}
Then $f$ is flat. If $f$ is also surjective, then $Y$ is flat over $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a special case of
Theorem \ref{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre-Noetherian}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-morphism-between-flat}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X$ is locally of finite presentation over $S$,
\item $X$ is flat over $S$,
\item for every $s \in S$ the morphism
$f_s : X_s \to Y_s$ is flat, and
\item $Y$ is locally of finite type over $S$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $f$ is flat. If $f$ is also surjective, then $Y$ is flat over $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a special case of
Theorem \ref{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-criterion-flatness-fibre}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X$ is locally of finite presentation over $S$,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module of finite presentation,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$, and
\item $Y$ is locally of finite type over $S$.
\end{enumerate}
Then the set
$$
U = \{x \in X \mid \mathcal{F} \text{ flat at }x \text{ over }Y\}.
$$
is open in $X$ and its formation commutes with arbitrary base change:
If $S' \to S$ is a morphism of schemes, and $U'$ is the set of points
of $X' = X \times_S S'$ where $\mathcal{F}' = \mathcal{F} \times_S S'$
is flat over $Y' = Y \times_S S'$, then $U' = U \times_S S'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}
the morphism $f$ is locally of finite presentation.
Hence $U$ is open by
Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness}.
Because we have assumed that $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ we see that
Theorem \ref{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre}
implies
$$
U = \{x \in X \mid \mathcal{F}_s \text{ flat at }x \text{ over }Y_s\}.
$$
where $s$ always denotes the image of $x$ in $S$. (This description also
works trivially when $\mathcal{F}_x = 0$.) Moreover, the assumptions
of the lemma remain in force for the morphism $f' : X' \to Y'$
and the sheaf $\mathcal{F}'$. Hence $U'$ has a similar description.
In other words, it suffices to prove that given
$s' \in S'$ mapping to $s \in S$ we have
$$
\{x' \in X'_{s'} \mid
\mathcal{F}'_{s'} \text{ flat at }x' \text{ over }Y'_{s'}\}
$$
is the inverse image of the corresponding locus in $X_s$.
This is true by
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-locus-base-change}
because in the cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X'_{s'} \ar[d] \ar[r] & X_s \ar[d] \\
Y'_{s'} \ar[r] & Y_s
}
$$
the horizontal morphisms are flat as they are base changes by the flat
morphism $\Spec(\kappa(s')) \to \Spec(\kappa(s))$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-flatness-fibres}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X$ is locally of finite presentation over $S$,
\item $X$ is flat over $S$, and
\item $Y$ is locally of finite type over $S$.
\end{enumerate}
Then the set
$$
U = \{x \in X \mid X\text{ flat at }x \text{ over }Y\}.
$$
is open in $X$ and its formation commutes with arbitrary base change.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a special case of
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-criterion-flatness-fibre}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma is a variant of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-free-fibre-flat-free}.
Note that the hypothesis
that $(\mathcal{F}_s)_x$ is a flat $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$-module
means that $(\mathcal{F}_s)_x$ is a free $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$-module
which is always the case if $x \in X_s$ is a generic point of an
irreducible component of $X_s$ and $X_s$ is reduced (namely, in
this case $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$ is a field, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-minimal-prime-reduced-ring}).

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-and-free-at-point-fibre}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes of finite presentation.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a finitely presented $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Let $x \in X$ with image $s \in S$.
If $\mathcal{F}$ is flat at $x$ over $S$ and $(\mathcal{F}_s)_x$ is a flat
$\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$-module, then $\mathcal{F}$
is finite free in a neighbourhood of $x$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $\mathcal{F}_x \otimes \kappa(x)$ is zero, then $\mathcal{F}_x = 0$
by Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-NAK}) and hence
$\mathcal{F}$ is zero in a neighbourhood of $x$
(Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-finite-type-stalk-zero})
and the lemma holds. Thus we may assume $\mathcal{F}_x \otimes \kappa(x)$
is not zero and we see that
Theorem \ref{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre}
applies with $f = \text{id} : X \to X$. We conclude that $\mathcal{F}_x$
is flat over $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$. Hence $\mathcal{F}_x$ is free, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-finite-flat-local} for example.
Choose an open neighbourhood $x \in U \subset X$ and sections
$s_1, \ldots, s_r \in \mathcal{F}(U)$ which map to a basis in
$\mathcal{F}_x$. The corresponding map
$\psi : \mathcal{O}_U^{\oplus r} \to \mathcal{F}|_U$ is surjective after
shrinking $U$ (Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-finite-type-stalk-zero}).
Then $\Ker(\psi)$ is of finite type (see Modules, Lemma
\ref{modules-lemma-kernel-surjection-finite-free-onto-finite-presentation})
and $\Ker(\psi)_x = 0$. Whence after shrinking $U$ once more
$\psi$ is an isomorphism.
\end{proof}






\section{Normalization revisited}
\label{section-normalization}

\noindent
Normalization commutes with smooth base change.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-integral-closure-smooth-pullback}
Let $f : Y \to X$ be a smooth morphism of schemes. Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a
quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-algebras. The integral closure
of $\mathcal{O}_Y$ in $f^*\mathcal{A}$ is equal to $f^*\mathcal{A}'$
where $\mathcal{A}' \subset \mathcal{A}$ is the integral closure of
$\mathcal{O}_X$ in $\mathcal{A}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a translation of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-integral-closure-commutes-smooth}
into the language of schemes. Details omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Normalization commutes with smooth base change]
\label{lemma-normalization-smooth-localization}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
Y_2 \ar[r] \ar[d]_{f_2} & Y_1 \ar[d]^{f_1} \\
X_2 \ar[r]^\varphi & X_1
}
$$
be a fibre square in the category of schemes. Assume $f_1$ is quasi-compact
and quasi-separated, and $\varphi$ is smooth.
Let $Y_i \to X_i' \to X_i$ be the normalization of $X_i$ in $Y_i$.
Then $X_2' \cong X_2 \times_{X_1} X_1'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The base change of the factorization $Y_1 \to X_1' \to X_1$ to $X_2$
is a factorization $Y_2 \to X_2 \times_{X_1} X_1' \to X_1$ and
$X_2 \times_{X_1} X_1' \to X_1$ is integral
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite}).
Hence we get a morphism
$h : X_2' \to X_2 \times_{X_1} X_1'$ by the universal property of
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-characterize-normalization}.
Observe that $X_2'$ is the relative spectrum of the integral closure
of $\mathcal{O}_{X_2}$ in $f_{2, *}\mathcal{O}_{Y_2}$.
If $\mathcal{A}' \subset f_{1, *}\mathcal{O}_{Y_1}$ denotes the integral
closure of $\mathcal{O}_{X_2}$, then $X_2 \times_{X_1} X_1'$ is the
relative spectrum of $\varphi^*\mathcal{A}'$, see
Constructions, Lemma \ref{constructions-lemma-spec-properties}.
By
Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma \ref{coherent-lemma-flat-base-change-cohomology}
we know that $f_{2, *}\mathcal{O}_{Y_2} = \varphi^*f_{1, *}\mathcal{O}_{Y_1}$.
Hence the result follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-integral-closure-smooth-pullback}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Normalization and smooth morphisms]
\label{lemma-normalization-and-smooth}
Let $X \to Y$ be a smooth morphism of schemes. Assume every quasi-compact
open of $Y$ has finitely many irreducible components. Then the same
is true for $X$ and there is a canonical isomorphism
$X^\nu = X \times_Y Y^\nu$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-locally-finite-nr-irred-local-fppf}
every quasi-compact open of $X$ has finitely many irreducible components.
Note that $X_{red} = X \times_Y Y_{red}$ as a scheme smooth over a reduced
scheme is reduced, see
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-reduced-local-smooth}.
Hence we may assume that $X$ and $Y$ are reduced (as the normalization
of a scheme is equal to the normalization of its reduction by
definition). Next, note that $X' = X \times_Y Y^\nu$ is a normal scheme
by Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-normal-local-smooth}.
The morphism $X' \to Y^\nu$ is smooth (hence flat) thus the generic
points of irreducible components of $X'$ lie over generic points of
irreducible components of $Y^\nu$. Since $Y^\nu \to Y$ is birational
we conclude that $X' \to X$ is birational too (because $X' \to Y^\nu$
induces an isomorphism on fibres over generic points of $Y$).
We conclude that there exists a factorization
$X^\nu \to X' \to X$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-normal}
which is an isomorphism as $X'$ is normal and integral over $X$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Normalization and henselization]
\label{lemma-normalization-and-henselization}
Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $\nu : X^\nu \to X$
be the normalization morphism. Then for any point $x \in X$
the base change
$$
X^\nu \times_X \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^h) \to \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^h),
\quad\text{resp.}\quad
X^\nu \times_X \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh}) \to \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh})
$$
is the normalization of $\Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^h)$,
resp.\ $\Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh})$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $\eta_1, \ldots, \eta_r$ be the generic points of the irreducible
components of $X$ passing through $x$. The base change of the normalization to
$\Spec(\mathcal{O}_{X, x})$ is the spectrum of the
integral closure of $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ in $\prod \kappa(\eta_i)$.
This follows from our construction of the normalization of $X$ in
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization}
and Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-integral-closure};
you can also use the description of the normalization
in Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-description-normalization}.
Thus we reduce to the following algebra problem.
Let $A$ be a Noetherian local ring; recall that this implies
the henselization $A^h$ and strict henselization $A^{sh}$
are Noetherian too (More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-henselization-noetherian}).
Let $\mathfrak p_1, \ldots, \mathfrak p_r$
be its minimal primes. Let $A'$ be the integral closure
of $A$ in $\prod \kappa(\mathfrak p_i)$.
Problem: show that
$A' \otimes_A A^h$, resp.\ $A' \otimes_A A^{sh}$ is constructed
from the Noetherian local ring $A^h$, resp.\ $A^{sh}$ in the same
manner.

\medskip\noindent
Since $A^h$, resp.\ $A^{sh}$ are colimits of \'etale $A$-algebras,
we see that the minimal primes of $A$ and $A^{sh}$ are exactly
the primes of $A^h$, resp.\ $A^{sh}$ lying over the minimal primes
of $A$ (by going down, see
Algebra, Lemmas \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-going-down} and
\ref{algebra-lemma-minimal-prime-image-minimal-prime}).
Thus More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-fibres-henselization}
tells us that
$A^h \otimes_A \prod \kappa(\mathfrak p_i)$,
resp.
$A^{sh} \otimes_A \prod \kappa(\mathfrak p_i)$
is the product of the residue fields at the minimal primes
of $A^h$, resp.\ $A^{sh}$. We know that taking the
integral closure in an overring commutes with \'etale
base change, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-integral-closure-commutes-etale}.
Writing $A^h$ and $A^{sh}$ as a limit of \'etale $A$-algebras
we see that the same thing is true for the base change to
$A^h$ and $A^{sh}$ (you can also use the more general
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-integral-closure-commutes-colim-smooth}).
\end{proof}








\section{Normal morphisms}
\label{section-normal}

\noindent
In the article \cite{DM} of Deligne and Mumford the notion of a normal
morphism is mentioned. This is just one in a series of types\footnote{
The other types are coprof $\leq k$, Cohen-Macaulay, $(S_k)$,
regular, $(R_k)$, and reduced. See \cite[IV Definition 6.8.1.]{EGA}.
Gorenstein morphisms will be defined in
Dualizing Complexes, Section \ref{dualizing-section-gorenstein}.}
of morphisms that can all be defined similarly. Over time we will add
these in their own sections as needed.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-normal}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that all the fibres $X_y$ are locally Noetherian schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Let $x \in X$, and $y = f(x)$. We say that $f$ is {\it normal at $x$}
if $f$ is flat at $x$, and the scheme $X_y$ is geometrically
normal at $x$ over $\kappa(y)$ (see
Varieties, Definition \ref{varieties-definition-geometrically-normal}).
\item We say $f$ is a {\it normal morphism} if $f$ is normal
at every point of $X$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
So the condition that the morphism $X \to Y$ is normal
is stronger than just requiring all
the fibres to be normal locally Noetherian schemes.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-normal}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume all fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is normal, and
\item $f$ is flat and its fibres are geometrically normal schemes.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows directly from the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-smooth-normal}
A smooth morphism is normal.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a smooth morphism.
As $f$ is locally of finite presentation, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-locally-finite-presentation}
the fibres $X_y$ are locally of finite type over a field, hence
locally Noetherian. Moreover, $f$ is flat, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-flat}.
Finally, the fibres $X_y$ are smooth over a field (by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-smooth})
and hence geometrically normal by
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-smooth-geometrically-normal}.
Thus $f$ is normal by
Lemma \ref{lemma-normal}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
We want to show that this notion is local on the source and target
for the smooth topology. First we deal with the property of having
locally Noetherian fibres.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-locally-Noetherian-fibres-fppf-local-source-and-target}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian''
is local in the fppf topology on the source and the target.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\{\varphi_i : Y_i \to Y\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf covering of $Y$.
Denote $f_i : X_i \to Y_i$ the base change of $f$ by $\varphi_i$.
Let $i \in I$ and let $y_i \in Y_i$ be a point.
Set $y = \varphi_i(y_i)$. Note that
$$
X_{i, y_i} = \Spec(\kappa(y_i)) \times_{\Spec(\kappa(y))} X_y.
$$
Moreover, as $\varphi_i$ is of finite presentation the field extension
$\kappa(y) \subset \kappa(y_i)$ is finitely generated.
Hence in this situation we have that $X_y$ is locally Noetherian if and
only if $X_{i, y_i}$ is locally Noetherian, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-locally-Noetherian-base-change}.
This fact implies locality on the target.

\medskip\noindent
Let $\{X_i \to X\}$ be an fppf covering of $X$.
Let $y \in Y$. In this case $\{X_{i, y} \to X_y\}$ is an
fppf covering of the fibre. Hence the locality on the source
follows from Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-Noetherian-local-fppf}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-normal-fppf-local-source-and-target}
The property
$\mathcal{P}(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian and $f$ is normal''
is local in the fppf topology on the target and
local in the smooth topology on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We have
$\mathcal{P}(f) =
\mathcal{P}_1(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_2(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_3(f)$
where
$\mathcal{P}_1(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian'',
$\mathcal{P}_2(f)=$``$f$ is flat'', and
$\mathcal{P}_3(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are geometrically normal''.
We have already seen that $\mathcal{P}_1$ and $\mathcal{P}_2$
are local in the fppf topology on the source and the target, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-locally-Noetherian-fibres-fppf-local-source-and-target},
and Descent, Lemmas \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-flat} and
\ref{descent-lemma-flat-fpqc-local-source}. Thus we have to deal
with $\mathcal{P}_3$.

\medskip\noindent
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\{\varphi_i : Y_i \to Y\}_{i \in I}$ be an fpqc covering of $Y$.
Denote $f_i : X_i \to Y_i$ the base change of $f$ by $\varphi_i$.
Let $i \in I$ and let $y_i \in Y_i$ be a point.
Set $y = \varphi_i(y_i)$. Note that
$$
X_{i, y_i} = \Spec(\kappa(y_i)) \times_{\Spec(\kappa(y))} X_y.
$$
Hence in this situation we have that $X_y$ is geometrically normal if and
only if $X_{i, y_i}$ is geometrically normal, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-normal-upstairs}.
This fact implies $\mathcal{P}_3$ is fpqc local on the target.

\medskip\noindent
Let $\{X_i \to X\}$ be a smooth covering of $X$.
Let $y \in Y$. In this case $\{X_{i, y} \to X_y\}$ is a
smooth covering of the fibre. Hence the locality of $\mathcal{P}_3$
for the smooth topology on the source follows from
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-normal-local-smooth}.
Combining the above the lemma follows.
\end{proof}



\section{Regular morphisms}
\label{section-regular}

\noindent
Compare with Section \ref{section-normal}. The algebraic version of
this notion is discussed in
More on Algebra, Section \ref{more-algebra-section-regular}.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-regular}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that all the fibres $X_y$ are locally Noetherian schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Let $x \in X$, and $y = f(x)$. We say that $f$ is {\it regular at $x$}
if $f$ is flat at $x$, and the scheme $X_y$ is geometrically
regular at $x$ over $\kappa(y)$ (see
Varieties, Definition \ref{varieties-definition-geometrically-regular}).
\item We say $f$ is a {\it regular morphism} if $f$ is regular
at every point of $X$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
The condition that the morphism $X \to Y$ is regular
is stronger than just requiring all
the fibres to be regular locally Noetherian schemes.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-regular}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume all fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is regular,
\item $f$ is flat and its fibres are geometrically regular schemes,
\item for every pair of affine opens $U \subset X$, $V \subset Y$
with $f(U) \subset V$ the ring map $\mathcal{O}(V) \to \mathcal{O}(U)$
is regular,
\item there exists an open covering $Y = \bigcup_{j \in J} V_j$
and open coverings $f^{-1}(V_j) = \bigcup_{i \in I_j} U_i$ such
that each of the morphisms $U_i \to V_j$ is regular, and
\item there exists an affine open covering $Y = \bigcup_{j \in J} V_j$
and affine open coverings $f^{-1}(V_j) = \bigcup_{i \in I_j} U_i$ such
that the ring maps $\mathcal{O}(V_j) \to \mathcal{O}(U_i)$ are regular.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The equivalence of (1) and (2) is immediate from the definitions.
Let $x \in X$ with $y = f(x)$. By definition $f$ is flat at $x$
if and only if $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is a
flat ring map, and $X_y$ is geometrically regular at $x$ over
$\kappa(y)$ if and only if
$\mathcal{O}_{X_y, x} = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_y\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is a geometrically regular algebra over $\kappa(y)$. Hence
Whether or not $f$ is regular at $x$
depends only on the local homomorphism of local rings
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$.
Thus the equivalence of (1) and (4) is clear.

\medskip\noindent
Recall (More on Algebra, Definition \ref{more-algebra-definition-regular})
that a ring map $A \to B$ is regular if and only if it is flat
and the fibre rings $B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$ are Noetherian
and geometrically regular for all primes $\mathfrak p \subset A$.
By Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-regular}
this is equivalent to $\Spec(B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p))$
being a geometrically regular scheme over $\kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
Thus we see that (2) implies (3). It is clear that (3) implies
(5). Finally, assume (5). This implies that $f$ is flat
(see Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-characterize}).
Moreover, if $y \in Y$, then $y \in V_j$ for some $j$ and we see
that $X_y = \bigcup_{i \in I_j} U_{i, y}$ with each $U_{i, y}$
geometrically regular over $\kappa(y)$ by
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-regular}.
Another application of
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-regular}
shows that $X_y$ is geometrically regular. Hence (2) holds
and the proof of the lemma is finished.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-smooth-regular}
A smooth morphism is regular.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a smooth morphism.
As $f$ is locally of finite presentation, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-locally-finite-presentation}
the fibres $X_y$ are locally of finite type over a field, hence
locally Noetherian. Moreover, $f$ is flat, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-flat}.
Finally, the fibres $X_y$ are smooth over a field (by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-smooth})
and hence geometrically regular by
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-smooth-geometrically-normal}.
Thus $f$ is regular by
Lemma \ref{lemma-regular}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-regular-fppf-local-source-and-target}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are
locally Noetherian and $f$ is regular''
is local in the fppf topology on the target and
local in the smooth topology on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We have
$\mathcal{P}(f) =
\mathcal{P}_1(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_2(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_3(f)$
where
$\mathcal{P}_1(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian'',
$\mathcal{P}_2(f)=$``$f$ is flat'', and
$\mathcal{P}_3(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are geometrically regular''.
We have already seen that $\mathcal{P}_1$ and $\mathcal{P}_2$
are local in the fppf topology on the source and the target, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-locally-Noetherian-fibres-fppf-local-source-and-target},
and Descent, Lemmas \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-flat} and
\ref{descent-lemma-flat-fpqc-local-source}. Thus we have to deal
with $\mathcal{P}_3$.

\medskip\noindent
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\{\varphi_i : Y_i \to Y\}_{i \in I}$ be an fpqc covering of $Y$.
Denote $f_i : X_i \to Y_i$ the base change of $f$ by $\varphi_i$.
Let $i \in I$ and let $y_i \in Y_i$ be a point.
Set $y = \varphi_i(y_i)$. Note that
$$
X_{i, y_i} = \Spec(\kappa(y_i)) \times_{\Spec(\kappa(y))} X_y.
$$
Hence in this situation we have that $X_y$ is geometrically regular if and
only if $X_{i, y_i}$ is geometrically regular, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-regular-upstairs}.
This fact implies $\mathcal{P}_3$ is fpqc local on the target.

\medskip\noindent
Let $\{X_i \to X\}$ be a smooth covering of $X$.
Let $y \in Y$. In this case $\{X_{i, y} \to X_y\}$ is a
smooth covering of the fibre. Hence the locality of $\mathcal{P}_3$
for the smooth topology on the source follows from
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-regular-local-smooth}.
Combining the above the lemma follows.
\end{proof}




\section{Cohen-Macaulay morphisms}
\label{section-CM}

\noindent
Compare with Section \ref{section-normal}.
Note that, as pointed out in
Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-geometrically-CM}
and
Varieties, Section \ref{varieties-section-CM}
``geometrically Cohen-Macaulay'' is the same as plain Cohen-Macaulay.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-CM}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that all the fibres $X_y$ are locally Noetherian schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Let $x \in X$, and $y = f(x)$. We say that $f$ is
{\it Cohen-Macaulay at $x$} if $f$ is flat at $x$, and the
local ring of the scheme $X_y$ at $x$ is Cohen-Macaulay.
\item We say $f$ is a {\it Cohen-Macaulay morphism} if $f$ is
Cohen-Macaulay at every point of $X$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
Here is a translation.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-CM}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume all fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay, and
\item $f$ is flat and its fibres are Cohen-Macaulay schemes.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows directly from the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-CM-dimension}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of locally Noetherian schemes
which is locally of finite type and Cohen-Macaulay.
For every point $x$ in $X$ with image $y$ in $Y$,
$$
\dim_x(X) = \dim_y(Y) + \dim_x(X_y),
$$
where $X_y$ denotes the fiber over $y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
After replacing $X$ by an open neighborhood of $x$,
there is a natural number $d$ such that all fibers
of $X \to Y$ have dimension $d$ at every point, see
Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-fibres-relative-dimension}.
Then $f$ is flat, locally of finite type
and of relative dimension $d$. Hence the result follows from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-rel-dimension-dimension}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-CM}
Let $f : X \to Y$ and $g : Y \to Z$ be morphisms. Assume that the
fibres $X_y$, $Y_z$ and $X_z$ of $f$, $g$, and $g \circ f$ are
locally Noetherian.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$ and $g$ is Cohen-Macaulay
at $f(x)$, then $g \circ f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$.
\item If $f$ and $g$ are Cohen-Macaulay, then $g \circ f$ is Cohen-Macaulay.
\item If $g \circ f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$ and $f$ is flat at $x$,
then $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$ and $g$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $f(x)$.
\item If $f \circ g$ is Cohen-Macaulay and $f$ is flat, then
$f$ is Cohen-Macaulay and $g$ is Cohen-Macaulay at every point in
the image of $f$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
After translating into algebra this follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-CM-goes-up}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-morphism-from-CM-scheme}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a flat morphism of locally Noetherian schemes.
If $X$ is Cohen-Macaulay, then $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay and
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)}$ is Cohen-Macaulay for all $x \in X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
After translating into algebra this follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-CM-goes-up}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-CM}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that all the fibres $X_y$ are locally Noetherian schemes.
Let $Y' \to Y$ be locally of finite type. Let $f' : X' \to Y'$
be the base change of $f$.
Let $x' \in X'$ be a point with image $x \in X$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$, then
$f' : X' \to Y'$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x'$.
\item If $f$ is flat and $x$ and $f'$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x'$, then $f$
is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$.
\item If $Y' \to Y$ is flat at $f'(x')$ and $f'$ is Cohen-Macaulay at
$x'$, then $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Note that the assumption on $Y' \to Y$ implies that for $y' \in Y'$
mapping to $y \in Y$ the field extension $\kappa(y) \subset \kappa(y')$
is finitely generated. Hence also all the fibres
$X'_{y'} = (X_y)_{\kappa(y')}$ are locally Noetherian, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-locally-Noetherian-base-change}.
Thus the lemma makes sense. Set $y' = f'(x')$ and $y = f(x)$.
Hence we get the following commutative diagram of local rings
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_{X', x'} & \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \ar[l] \\
\mathcal{O}_{Y', y'} \ar[u] & \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \ar[l] \ar[u]
}
$$
where the upper left corner is a localization of the tensor product
of the upper right and lower left corners over the lower right corner.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$.
The flatness of $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
implies the flatness of $\mathcal{O}_{Y', y'} \to \mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-base-change-flat-up-down}.
The fact that $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_y\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is Cohen-Macaulay implies that
$\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}/\mathfrak m_{y'}\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$
is Cohen-Macaulay, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-CM-base-change}. Hence we see that $f'$
is Cohen-Macaulay at $x'$.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $f$ is flat at $x$ and $f'$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x'$.
The fact that $\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}/\mathfrak m_{y'}\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$
is Cohen-Macaulay implies that
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_y\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is Gorenstein, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-CM-base-change}.
Hence we see that $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $Y' \to Y$ is flat at $y'$ and $f'$ is Cohen-Macaulay at
$x'$. The flatness of $\mathcal{O}_{Y', y'} \to \mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$
and $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{Y', y'}$ implies the flatness
of $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-base-change-flat-up-down}.
The fact that $\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}/\mathfrak m_{y'}\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$
is Cohen-Macaulay implies that
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_y\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is Cohen-Macaulay, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-CM-base-change}. Hence we see that $f$
is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-open}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is flat and locally
of finite presentation. Let
$$
W = \{x \in X \mid f\text{ is Cohen-Macaulay at }x\}
$$
Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $W = \{x \in X \mid \mathcal{O}_{X_{f(x)}, x}\text{ is Cohen-Macaulay}\}$,
\item $W$ is open in $X$,
\item $W$ dense in every fibre of $X \to S$,
\item the formation of W commutes with arbitrary base change of $f$:
For any morphism $g : S' \to S$, consider
the base change $f' : X' \to S'$ of $f$ and the
projection $g' : X' \to X$. Then the corresponding
set $W'$ for the morphism $f'$ is equal to $W' = (g')^{-1}(W)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
As $f$ is flat with locally Noetherian fibres the equality in (1) holds
by definition. Parts (2) and (3) follow from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-CM-flat-finite-presentation}.
Part (4) follows either from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-CM-locus-commutes-base-change}
or
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-CM-base-change}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-characterize-CM}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is flat and locally
of finite presentation. Let $x \in X$ with image $s \in S$.
Set $d = \dim_x(X_s)$.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$,
\item there exists an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
and a locally quasi-finite morphism $U \to \mathbf{A}^d_S$ over $S$
which is flat at $x$,
\item there exists an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
and a locally quasi-finite flat morphism $U \to \mathbf{A}^d_S$ over $S$,
\item for any $S$-morphism $g : U \to \mathbf{A}^d_S$
of an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$ we have:
$g$ is quasi-finite at $x$ $\Rightarrow$ $g$ is flat at $x$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Openness of flatness shows (2) and (3)
are equivalent, see Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness}.

\medskip\noindent
Choose affine open $U = \Spec(A) \subset X$ with $x \in U$ and
$V = \Spec(R) \subset S$ with $f(U) \subset V$. Then $R \to A$
is a flat ring map of finite presentation. Let $\mathfrak p \subset A$
be the prime ideal corresponding to $x$. After replacing $A$ by a
principal localization we may assume there exists a quasi-finite map
$R[x_1, \ldots, x_d]  \to A$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-quasi-finite-over-polynomial-algebra}.
Thus there exists at least one pair $(U, g)$ consisting of an
open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$ and a locally\footnote{If $S$
is quasi-separated, then $g$ will be quasi-finite.} quasi-finite morphism
$g : U \to \mathbf{A}^d_S$.

\medskip\noindent
Claim: Given $R \to A$ flat and of finite presentation, a prime
$\mathfrak p \subset A$ and $\varphi : R[x_1, \ldots, x_d] \to A$
quasi-finite at $\mathfrak p$ we have: $\Spec(\varphi)$
is flat at $\mathfrak p$ if and only if $\Spec(A) \to \Spec(R)$
is Cohen-Macaulay at $\mathfrak p$.  Namely, by
Theorem \ref{theorem-criterion-flatness-fibre}
flatness may be checked on fibres. The same is true
for being Cohen-Macaulay (as $A$ is already assumed flat over $R$).
Thus the claim follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-where-CM}.

\medskip\noindent
The claim shows that (1) is equivalent to (4) and combined with the
fact that we have constructed a suitable $(U, g)$ in the second
paragraph, the claim also shows that (1) is equivalent to (2).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-pieces}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is flat and locally
of finite presentation. For $d \geq 0$ there exist opens $U_d \subset X$
with the following properties
\begin{enumerate}
\item $W = \bigcup_{d \geq 0} U_d$ is dense in every fibre of $f$, and
\item $U_d \to S$ is of relative dimension $d$ (see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-relative-dimension-d}).
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows by combining
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-open}
with
Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-fibres-relative-dimension}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-specialization-dimension}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is flat and locally
of finite presentation.
Suppose $x' \leadsto x$ is a specialization of points of $X$
with image $s' \leadsto s$ in $S$. If $x$ is a generic point of an
irreducible component of $X_s$ then $\dim_{x'}(X_{s'}) = \dim_x(X_s)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The point $x$ is contained in $U_d$ for some $d$, where $U_d$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-pieces}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-CM-local-source-and-target}
The property
$\mathcal{P}(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian and $f$ is
Cohen-Macaulay'' is local in the fppf topology on the target and
local in the syntomic topology on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We have
$\mathcal{P}(f) =
\mathcal{P}_1(f) \wedge \mathcal{P}_2(f)$
where
$\mathcal{P}_1(f)=$``$f$ is flat'', and
$\mathcal{P}_2(f)=$``the fibres of $f$ are locally Noetherian
and Cohen-Macaulay''.
We know that $\mathcal{P}_1$ is
local in the fppf topology on the source and the target, see
Descent, Lemmas \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-flat} and
\ref{descent-lemma-flat-fpqc-local-source}. Thus we have to deal
with $\mathcal{P}_2$.

\medskip\noindent
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\{\varphi_i : Y_i \to Y\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf covering of $Y$.
Denote $f_i : X_i \to Y_i$ the base change of $f$ by $\varphi_i$.
Let $i \in I$ and let $y_i \in Y_i$ be a point.
Set $y = \varphi_i(y_i)$. Note that
$$
X_{i, y_i} = \Spec(\kappa(y_i)) \times_{\Spec(\kappa(y))} X_y.
$$
and that $\kappa(y) \subset \kappa(y_i)$ is a finitely generated field
extension. Hence if $X_y$ is locally Noetherian, then
$X_{i, y_i}$ is locally Noetherian, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-locally-Noetherian-base-change}.
And if in addition $X_y$ is Cohen-Macaulay,
then $X_{i, y_i}$ is Cohen-Macaulay, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-CM-base-change}.
Thus $\mathcal{P}_2$ is fppf local on the target.

\medskip\noindent
Let $\{X_i \to X\}$ be a syntomic covering of $X$.
Let $y \in Y$. In this case $\{X_{i, y} \to X_y\}$ is a
syntomic covering of the fibre. Hence the locality of $\mathcal{P}_2$
for the syntomic topology on the source follows from
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-CM-local-syntomic}.
Combining the above the lemma follows.
\end{proof}






\section{Slicing Cohen-Macaulay morphisms}
\label{section-slicing-CM}

\noindent
The results in this section eventually lead to the assertion that
the fppf topology is the same as the
``finitely presented, flat, quasi-finite'' topology.
The following lemma is very closely related to
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-fibre-Cartier}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-given-element}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Let $h \in \mathfrak m_x \subset \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite presentation,
\item $f$ is flat at $x$, and
\item the image $\overline{h}$ of $h$ in
$\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x} = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_s\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is a nonzerodivisor.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
such that $h$ comes from $h \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ and such
that $D = V(h)$ is an effective Cartier divisor in $U$ with $x \in D$ and
$D \to S$ flat and locally of finite presentation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We are going to prove this by reducing to the Noetherian case.
By openness of flatness (see
Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness})
we may assume, after replacing $X$ by an
open neighbourhood of $x$, that $X \to S$ is flat.
We may also assume that $X$ and $S$ are affine.
After possible shrinking $X$ a bit we may assume that there exists
an $h \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ which maps to our given $h$.

\medskip\noindent
We may write $S = \Spec(A)$ and we may write $A = \colim_i A_i$
as a directed colimit of finite type $\mathbf{Z}$ algebras.
Then by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-limit-flat}
or
Limits, Lemmas \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation},
\ref{limits-lemma-descend-affine-finite-presentation}, and
\ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r] \ar[d]_f & X_0 \ar[d]^{f_0} \\
S \ar[r] & S_0
}
$$
with $f_0$ flat and of finite presentation, $X_0$ affine, and
$S_0$ affine and Noetherian. Let $x_0 \in X_0$, resp.\ $s_0 \in S_0$
be the image of $x$, resp.\ $s$. We may also assume there exists an element
$h_0 \in \Gamma(X_0, \mathcal{O}_{X_0})$ which restricts to $h$ on $X$.
(If you used the algebra reference above then this is clear; if you used
the references to the chapter on limits then this follows from
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
by thinking of $h$ as a morphism $X \to \mathbf{A}^1_S$.)
Note that $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$ is a localization of
$\mathcal{O}_{(X_0)_{s_0}, x_0} \otimes_{\kappa(s_0)} \kappa(s)$, so that
$\mathcal{O}_{(X_0)_{s_0}, x_0} \to \mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$ is a flat
local ring map, in particular faithfully flat. Hence the image
$\overline{h}_0 \in \mathcal{O}_{(X_0)_{s_0}, x_0}$
is contained in $\mathfrak m_{(X_0)_{s_0}, x_0}$ and is a nonzerodivisor.
We claim that after replacing $X_0$ by a principal open neighbourhood of
$x_0$ the element $h_0$ is a nonzerodivisor in
$B_0 = \Gamma(X_0, \mathcal{O}_{X_0})$ such that $B_0/h_0B_0$ is flat
over $A_0 = \Gamma(S_0, \mathcal{O}_{S_0})$.
If so then
$$
0 \to B_0 \xrightarrow{h_0} B_0 \to B_0/h_0B_0 \to 0
$$
is a short exact sequence of flat $A_0$-modules. Hence this remains exact
on tensoring with $A$ (by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-tor-zero})
and the lemma follows.

\medskip\noindent
It remains to prove the claim above. The corresponding algebra statement
is the following (we drop the subscript ${}_0$ here):
Let $A \to B$ be a flat, finite type ring map of Noetherian rings.
Let $\mathfrak q \subset B$ be a prime lying over $\mathfrak p \subset A$.
Assume $h \in \mathfrak q$ maps to a nonzerodivisor in
$B_{\mathfrak q}/\mathfrak p B_{\mathfrak q}$.
Goal: show that after possible replacing $B$ by $B_g$ for some
$g \in B$, $g \not \in \mathfrak q$ the element $h$ becomes a nonzerodivisor
and $B/hB$ becomes flat over $A$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-grothendieck}
we see that $h$ is a nonzerodivisor in $B_{\mathfrak q}$ and that
$B_{\mathfrak q}/hB_{\mathfrak q}$ is flat over $A$.
By openness of flatness, see
Algebra, Theorem \ref{algebra-theorem-openness-flatness}
or
Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness}
we see that $B/hB$ is flat over $A$ after replacing $B$ by $B_g$ for some
$g \in B$, $g \not \in \mathfrak q$. Finally, let
$I = \{b \in B \mid hb = 0\}$ be the annihilator of $h$. Then
$IB_{\mathfrak q} = 0$ as $h$ is a nonzerodivisor in $B_{\mathfrak q}$.
Also $I$ is finitely generated as $B$ is Noetherian.
Hence there exists a $g \in B$, $g \not \in \mathfrak q$ such that $IB_g = 0$.
After replacing $B$ by $B_g$ we see that $h$ is a nonzerodivisor.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-given-elements}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Let $h_1, \ldots, h_r \in \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite presentation,
\item $f$ is flat at $x$, and
\item the images of $h_1, \ldots, h_r$ in
$\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x} = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}/\mathfrak m_s\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
form a regular sequence.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
such that $h_1, \ldots, h_r$ come from
$h_1, \ldots, h_r \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ and such
that $Z = V(h_1, \ldots, h_r) \to U$ is a regular immersion with
$x \in Z$ and $Z \to S$ flat and locally of finite presentation.
Moreover, the base change $Z_{S'} \to U_{S'}$ is a regular immersion
for any scheme $S'$ over $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
(Our conventions on regular sequences imply that $h_i \in \mathfrak m_x$
for each $i$.) The case $r = 1$ follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-given-element}
combined with
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-Cartier}
to see that $V(h_1)$ remains an effective Cartier divisor after base change.
The case $r > 1$ follows from a straightforward induction on $r$ (applying
the result for $r = 1$ exactly $r$ times; details omitted).

\medskip\noindent
Another way to prove the lemma is using the material from
Divisors, Section \ref{divisors-section-relative-regular-immersion}.
Namely, first by openness of flatness (see
Theorem \ref{theorem-openness-flatness})
we may assume, after replacing $X$ by an
open neighbourhood of $x$, that $X \to S$ is flat.
We may also assume that $X$ and $S$ are affine.
After possible shrinking $X$ a bit we may assume that we have
$h_1, \ldots, h_r \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$. Set
$Z = V(h_1, \ldots, h_r)$. Note that $X_s$ is a Noetherian scheme
(because it is an algebraic $\kappa(s)$-scheme, see
Varieties, Section \ref{varieties-section-algebraic-schemes})
and that the topology on $X_s$ is induced from the topology on $X$
(see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-fibre-topological}).
Hence after shrinking $X$ a bit more
we may assume that $Z_s \subset X_s$ is a regular immersion
cut out by the $r$ elements $h_i|_{X_s}$, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-Noetherian-scheme-regular-ideal}
and its proof. It is also clear that $r = \dim_x(X_s) - \dim_x(Z_s)$ because
\begin{align*}
\dim_x(X_s) & = \dim(\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}) +
\text{trdeg}_{\kappa(s)}(\kappa(x)), \\
\dim_x(Z_s) & = \dim(\mathcal{O}_{Z_s, x}) +
\text{trdeg}_{\kappa(s)}(\kappa(x)), \\
\dim(\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}) & = \dim(\mathcal{O}_{Z_s, x}) + r
\end{align*}
the first two equalities by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-dimension-at-a-point-finite-type-field}
and the second by $r$ times applying
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-one-equation}.
Hence
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-fibre-quasi-regular} part (3)
applies to show that (after Zariski shrinking $X$) the morphism
$Z \to X$ is a regular immersion to which
Divisors, Lemma
\ref{divisors-lemma-relative-regular-immersion-flat-in-neighbourhood}
applies (which gives the flatness and the statement on base change).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-once}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite presentation,
\item $f$ is flat at $x$, and
\item $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$ has $\text{depth} \geq 1$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
and an effective Cartier divisor $D \subset U$ containing $x$ such that
$D \to S$ is flat and of finite presentation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Pick any $h \in \mathfrak m_x \subset \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ which
maps to a nonzerodivisor in $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$ and apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-given-element}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-CM}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite presentation,
\item $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $x$, and
\item $x$ is a closed point of $X_s$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists a regular immersion $Z \to X$ containing $x$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] $Z \to S$ is flat and locally of finite presentation,
\item[(b)] $Z \to S$ is locally quasi-finite, and
\item[(c)] $Z_s = \{x\}$ set theoretically.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may and do replace $S$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $s$.
We will prove the lemma for affine $S$ by induction on $d = \dim_x(X_s)$.

\medskip\noindent
The case $d = 0$. In this case we show that we may take $Z$ to be
an open neighbourhood of $x$. (Note that an open immersion is
a regular immersion.) Namely, if $d = 0$, then $X \to S$
is quasi-finite at $x$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-quasi-finite-rel-dimension-0}.
Hence there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ such
that $U \to S$ is quasi-finite, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-points-open}.
Thus after replacing $X$ by $U$ we see that the fibre $X_s$ is a finite
discrete set. Hence after replacing $X$ by a further affine open neighbourhood
of $X$ we see that that $f^{-1}(\{s\}) = \{x\}$ (because the topology
on $X_s$ is induced from the topology on $X$, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-fibre-topological}).
This proves the lemma in this case.

\medskip\noindent
Next, assume $d > 0$. Note that because $x$ is a closed point of its
fibre the extension $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(x)$ is finite (by the
Hilbert Nullstellensatz, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-closed-point-fibre-locally-finite-type}).
Thus we see
$$
\text{depth}(\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}) = \dim(\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}) = d > 0
$$
the first equality as $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$ is Cohen-Macaulay and
the second by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-at-a-point}.
Thus we may apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-once}
to find a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
D \ar[r] \ar[rrd] & U \ar[r] \ar[rd] & X \ar[d] \\
& & S
}
$$
with $x \in D$. Note that
$\mathcal{O}_{D_s, x} = \mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}/(\overline{h})$ for some
nonzerodivisor $\overline{h}$, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-Cartier}.
Hence $\mathcal{O}_{D_s, x}$ is Cohen-Macaulay of dimension
one less than the dimension of $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-reformulate-CM}
for example. Thus the morphism $D \to S$ is flat,
locally of finite presentation, and Cohen-Macaulay at $x$ with
$\dim_x(D_s) = \dim_x(X_s) - 1 = d - 1$. By induction hypothesis
we can find a regular immersion $Z \to D$ having properties (a), (b), (c).
As $Z \to D \to U$ are both regular immersions, we see that also
$Z \to U$ is a regular immersion by
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-composition-regular-immersion}.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-qf-fp-flat-neighbourhood-dominates-fppf}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a flat morphism of schemes which is
locally of finite presentation Let $s \in S$ be a point in the image of $f$.
Then there exists a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
S' \ar[rr] \ar[rd]_g & & X \ar[ld]^f \\
& S
}
$$
where $g : S' \to S$ is flat, locally of finite presentation,
locally quasi-finite, and $s \in g(S')$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The fibre $X_s$ is not empty by assumption. Hence there exists a closed
point $x \in X_s$ where $f$ is Cohen-Macaulay, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-open}.
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-CM}
and set $S' = S$.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma shows that sheaves for the fppf topology are
the same thing as sheaves for the
``quasi-finite, flat, finite presentation'' topology.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-qf-fp-flat-dominates-fppf}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{U} = \{S_i \to S\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf
covering of $S$, see
Topologies, Definition \ref{topologies-definition-fppf-covering}.
Then there exists an fppf covering $\mathcal{V} = \{T_j \to S\}_{j \in J}$
which refines (see
Sites, Definition \ref{sites-definition-morphism-coverings})
$\mathcal{U}$ such that each $T_j \to S$ is locally quasi-finite.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For every $s \in S$ there exists an $i \in I$ such that $s$ is in
the image of $S_i \to S$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-qf-fp-flat-neighbourhood-dominates-fppf}
we can find a morphism $g_s : T_s \to S$ such that $s \in g_s(T_s)$
which is flat, locally of finite presentation and locally quasi-finite
and such that $g_s$ factors through $S_i \to S$. Hence
$\{T_s \to S\}$ is the desired covering of $S$ that refines $\mathcal{U}$.
\end{proof}



\section{Generic fibres}
\label{section-generic}

\noindent
Some results on the relationship between generic fibres and
nearby fibres.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of schemes. Assume
$Y$ irreducible with generic point $\eta$. If $X_\eta = \emptyset$
then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such that
$X_V = V \times_Y X = \emptyset$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Follows immediately from the more general
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-compact-generic-point-not-in-image}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nonempty-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of schemes. Assume
$Y$ irreducible with generic point $\eta$. If $X_\eta \not = \emptyset$
then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such that
$X_V = V \times_Y X \to V$ is surjective.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows, upon taking affine opens, from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-image-finite-type}.
(Of course it also follows from generic flatness.)
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of schemes. Assume
$Y$ irreducible with generic point $\eta$.
If $Z \subset X$ is a closed subset with $Z_\eta$ nowhere dense
in $X_\eta$, then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such
that $Z_y$ is nowhere dense in $X_y$ for all $y \in V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Y' \subset Y$ be the reduction of $Y$.
Set $X' = Y' \times_Y X$ and $Z' = Y' \times_Y Z$.
As $Y' \to Y$ is a universal homeomorphism by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reduction-universal-homeomorphism}
we see that it suffices to prove the lemma for $Z' \subset X' \to Y'$.
Thus we may assume that $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
By
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}
there exists a nonempty affine open $V \subset Y$ such that
$X_V \to V$ and $Z_V \to Z$ are flat and of finite presentation.
We claim that $V$ works.
Pick $y \in V$. If $Z_y$ has a nonempty interior, then $Z_y$ contains
a generic point $\xi$ of an irreducible component of $X_y$.
Note that $\eta \leadsto f(\xi)$. Since $Z_V \to V$ is flat we can
choose a specialization $\xi' \leadsto \xi$, $\xi' \in Z$
with $f(\xi') = \eta$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-generalizations-lift-flat}.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-specialization-dimension}
we see that
$$
\dim_{\xi'}(Z_\eta) = \dim_{\xi}(Z_y) = \dim_{\xi}(X_y) = \dim_{\xi'}(X_\eta).
$$
Hence some irreducible component of $Z_\eta$ passing through $\xi'$ has
dimension $\dim_{\xi'}(X_\eta)$ which contradicts the assumption that
$Z_\eta$ is nowhere dense in $X_\eta$ and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-scheme-theoretically-dense-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of schemes.
Assume $Y$ irreducible with generic point $\eta$.
Let $U \subset X$ be an open subscheme such that $U_\eta$ is
scheme theoretically dense in $X_\eta$.
Then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such
that $U_y$ is scheme theoretically dense in $X_y$ for all $y \in V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Y' \subset Y$ be the reduction of $Y$.
Let $X' = Y' \times_Y X$ and $U' = Y' \times_Y U$.
As $Y' \to Y$ induces a bijection on points, and as
$U' \to U$ and $X' \to X$ induce isomorphisms of scheme theoretic fibres,
we may replace $Y$ by $Y'$ and $X$ by $X'$.
Thus we may assume that $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
We may also replace $Y$ by a nonempty affine open. In other words we
may assume that $Y = \Spec(A)$ where $A$ is a domain with fraction
field $K$.

\medskip\noindent
As $f$ is of finite type we see that $X$ is quasi-compact.
Write $X = X_1 \cup \ldots \cup X_n$ for some affine opens $X_i$. By
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-scheme-theoretically-dense}
we see that $U_i = X_i \cap U$ is an open subscheme of $X_i$ such that
$U_{i, \eta}$ is scheme theoretically dense in $X_{i, \eta}$.
Thus it suffices to prove the result for the pairs $(X_i, U_i)$,
in other words we may assume that $X$ is affine.

\medskip\noindent
Write $X = \Spec(B)$. Note that $B_K$ is Noetherian as it is a
finite type $K$-algebra. Hence $U_\eta$ is quasi-compact. Thus we can
find finitely many $g_1, \ldots, g_m \in B$ such that $D(g_j) \subset U$
and such that $U_\eta = D(g_1)_\eta \cup \ldots \cup D(g_m)_\eta$.
The fact that $U_\eta$ is scheme theoretically dense in
$X_\eta$ means that $B_K \to \bigoplus_j (B_K)_{g_j}$
is injective, see
Morphisms, Example \ref{morphisms-example-scheme-theoretic-closure}.
By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-when-injective-covering}
this is equivalent to the injectivity of
$B_K \to \bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} B_K$,
$b \mapsto (g_1b, \ldots, g_mb)$. Let $M$ be the cokernel of this
map over $A$, i.e., such that we have an exact sequence
$$
0 \to I \to B \xrightarrow{(g_1, \ldots, g_m)}
\bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} B \to M \to 0
$$
After replacing $A$ by $A_h$ for some nonzero $h$ we may assume that $B$
is a flat, finitely presented $A$-algebra, and that $M$
is flat over $A$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-flatness}.
The flatness of $B$ over $A$ implies that $B$ is torsion free as an
$A$-module, see
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-torsion-free}.
Hence $B \subset B_K$. By assumption $I_K = 0$ which implies that $I = 0$
(as $I \subset B \subset B_K$ is a subset of $I_K$). Hence now
we have a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to B \xrightarrow{(g_1, \ldots, g_m)}
\bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} B \to M \to 0
$$
with $M$ flat over $A$. Hence for every homomorphism $A \to \kappa$ where
$\kappa$ is a field, we obtain a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to B \otimes_A \kappa \xrightarrow{(g_1 \otimes 1, \ldots, g_m \otimes 1)}
\bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} B \otimes_A \kappa \to
M \otimes_A \kappa \to 0
$$
see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-tor-zero}.
Reversing the arguments above
this means that $\bigcup D(g_j \otimes 1)$ is scheme
theoretically dense in $\Spec(B \otimes_A \kappa)$.
As $\bigcup D(g_j \otimes 1) = \bigcup D(g_j)_\kappa \subset U_\kappa$
we obtain that $U_\kappa$ is scheme theoretically dense in $X_\kappa$
which is what we wanted to prove.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Suppose given a morphism of schemes $f : X \to Y$ and
a point $y \in Y$. Recall that the fibre $X_y$ is homeomorphic
to the subset $f^{-1}(\{y\})$ of $X$ with induced topology, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-fibre-topological}.
Suppose given a closed subset $T(y) \subset X_y$.
Let $T$ be the closure of $T(y)$ in $X$.
Endow $T$ with the induced reduced scheme structure.
Then $T$ is a closed subscheme of $X$ with the property
that $T_y = T(y)$ set-theoretically. In fact $T$ is the smallest
closed subscheme of $X$ with this property. Thus it is ``harmless''
to denote a closed subset of $X_y$ by $T_y$ if we so desire.
In the following lemma we apply this to the generic fibre of $f$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite type morphism of schemes. Assume
$Y$ irreducible with generic point $\eta$. Let
$X_\eta = Z_{1, \eta} \cup \ldots \cup Z_{n, \eta}$ be a covering of
the generic fibre by closed subsets of $X_\eta$.
Let $Z_i$ be the closure of $Z_{i, \eta}$ in $X$ (see discussion above).
Then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such
that $X_y = Z_{1, y} \cup \ldots \cup Z_{n, y}$ for all $y \in V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $Y$ is Noetherian then $U = X \setminus (Z_1 \cup \ldots \cup Z_n)$
is of finite type over $Y$ and we can directly apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}
to get that $U_V = \emptyset$ for a nonempty open $V \subset Y$.
In general we argue as follows. As the question is topological
we may replace $Y$ by its reduction. Thus $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
After shrinking $Y$ we may assume that $X \to Y$ is flat, see
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}.
In this case every point $x$ in $X_y$ is a specialization of a point
$x' \in X_\eta$ by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-generalizations-lift-flat}.
As the $Z_i$ are closed in $X$ and cover the generic fibre this
implies that $X_y = \bigcup Z_{i, y}$ for $y \in Y$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma says that generic fibres of morphisms whose source is
reduced are reduced.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-reduction-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\eta \in Y$ be a generic
point of an irreducible component of $Y$. Then
$(X_\eta)_{red} = (X_{red})_\eta$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose an affine neighbourhood $\Spec(A) \subset Y$ of $\eta$.
Choose an affine open $\Spec(B) \subset X$ mapping into $\Spec(A)$
via the morphism $f$. Let $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be the minimal prime
corresponding to $\eta$. Let $B_{red}$ be the quotient of $B$ by
$\sqrt{(0)}$. The algebraic content of the lemma is that
$B_{red} \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$ is reduced. To prove this, suppose
that $x \in B_{red} \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$ is nilpotent. Say
$x^n = 0$ for some $n > 0$.
Pick an $f \in A$, $f \not \in \mathfrak p$ such that
$fx$ is the image of $y \in B_{red}$. Then $gy^n \in \mathfrak pB_{red}$ for
some $g \in A$, $g \not \in \mathfrak p$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-minimal-prime-reduced-ring}
we see that $\mathfrak pA_{\mathfrak p}$ is locally nilpotent. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-locally-nilpotent}
we see that $\mathfrak p(B_{red})_{\mathfrak p}$ is locally nilpotent.
Hence we conclude that $gy^n$ is nilpotent in $(B_{red})_{\mathfrak p}$.
Thus there exists a $h \in A$, $h \not \in \mathfrak p$ and an $m > 0$
such that $h(gy^n)^m = 0$ in $B_{red}$. This implies that
$hgy$ is nilpotent in $B_{red}$, i.e., that $hgy = 0$. Of course this
means that $x = 0$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-make-generic-fibre-geometrically-reduced}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that $Y$ is irreducible and $f$ is of finite type.
There exists a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d]_{f'} \ar[r]_{g'} & X_V \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d]^f \\
Y' \ar[r]^g & V \ar[r] & Y
}
$$
where
\begin{enumerate}
\item $V$ is a nonempty open of $Y$,
\item $X_V = V \times_Y X$,
\item $g : Y' \to V$ is a finite universal homeomorphism,
\item $X' = (Y' \times_Y X)_{red} = (Y' \times_V X_V)_{red}$,
\item $g'$ is a finite universal homeomorphism,
\item $Y'$ is an integral affine scheme,
\item $f'$ is flat and of finite presentation, and
\item the generic fibre of $f'$ is geometrically reduced.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $V = \Spec(A)$ be a nonempty affine open of $Y$.
By assumption the radical of $A$ is a prime ideal $\mathfrak p$.
Let $K = f.f(A/\mathfrak p)$ be the fraction field.
Let $p$ be the characteristic of $K$ if positive and $1$
if the characteristic is zero. By
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-finite-extension-geometrically-reduced}
there exists a finite purely inseparable field extension
$K \subset K'$ such that $X_{K'}$ is geometrically reduced over $K'$.
Choose elements $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in K'$ which generate $K'$ over
$K$ and such that some $p$-power of $x_i$ is in $A/\mathfrak p$.
Let $A' \subset K'$ be the finite $A$-subalgebra of $K'$ generated by
$x_1, \ldots, x_n$. Note that $A'$ is a domain with fraction field $K'$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-p-ring-map}
we see that $A \to A'$ is a universal homeomorphism.
Set $Y' = \Spec(A')$. Set $X' = (Y' \times_Y X)_{red}$.
The generic fibre of $X' \to Y'$ is $(X_K)_{red}$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-reduction-generic-fibre}
which is geometrically reduced by construction.
Note that $X' \to X_V$ is a finite universal homeomorphism as the
composition of the reduction morphism $X' \to Y' \times_Y X$ (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reduction-universal-homeomorphism})
and the base change of $g$.
At this point all of the properties of the lemma hold except for
possibly (7). This can be achieved by shrinking $Y'$ and hence $V$, see
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-make-components-generic-fibre-geometrically-irreducible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that $Y$ is irreducible and $f$ is of finite type.
There exists a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d]_{f'} \ar[r]_{g'} & X_V \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d]^f \\
Y' \ar[r]^g & V \ar[r] & Y
}
$$
where
\begin{enumerate}
\item $V$ is a nonempty open of $Y$,
\item $X_V = V \times_Y X$,
\item $g : Y' \to V$ is surjective finite \'etale,
\item $X' = Y' \times_Y X = Y' \times_V X_V$,
\item $g'$ is surjective finite \'etale,
\item $Y'$ is an irreducible affine scheme, and
\item all irreducible components of the generic fibre of $f'$
are geometrically irreducible.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $V = \Spec(A)$ be a nonempty affine open of $Y$.
By assumption the radical of $A$ is a prime ideal $\mathfrak p$.
Let $K = f.f(A/\mathfrak p)$ be the fraction field. By
Varieties, Lemma
\ref{varieties-lemma-finite-extension-geometrically-irreducible-components}
there exists a finite separable field extension
$K \subset K'$ such that all irreducible components of $X_{K'}$ are
geometrically irreducible over $K'$.
Choose an element $\alpha \in K'$ which generates $K'$ over
$K$, see
Fields, Lemma \ref{fields-lemma-primitive-element}.
Let $P(T) \in K[T]$ be the minimal polynomial for $\alpha$ over $K$.
After replacing $\alpha$ by $f \alpha$ for some
$f \in A$, $f \not \in \mathfrak p$
we may assume that there exists a monic polynomial
$T^d + a_1T^{d - 1} + \ldots + a_d \in A[T]$ which maps to
$P(T) \in K[T]$ under the map $A[T] \to K[T]$.
Set $A' = A[T]/(P)$. Then $A \to A'$ is a finite free ring map
such that there exists a unique prime $\mathfrak q$ lying over
$\mathfrak p$, such that
$K = \kappa(\mathfrak p) \subset \kappa(\mathfrak q) = K'$
is finite separable, and such that $\mathfrak pA'_{\mathfrak q}$
is the maximal ideal of $A'_{\mathfrak q}$.
Hence $g : Y' = \Spec(A') \to V = \Spec(A)$
is \'etale at $\mathfrak q$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-etale}.
This means that there exists an open $W \subset \Spec(A')$ such
that $g|_W : W \to \Spec(A)$ is \'etale.
Since $g$ is finite and since $\mathfrak q$ is the only point lying over
$\mathfrak p$ we see that $Z = g(Y' \setminus W)$ is a closed subset of $V$
not containing $\mathfrak p$. Hence after replacing $V$ by a principal
affine open of $V$ which does not meet $Z$ we obtain that $g$ is finite
\'etale.
\end{proof}







\section{Relative assassins}
\label{section-assassin}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-assassin-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Let $\xi \in \text{Ass}_{X/S}(\mathcal{F})$ and set
$Z = \overline{\{\xi\}} \subset X$.
If $f$ is locally of finite type and $\mathcal{F}$ is a
finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module, then there exists a nonempty
open $V \subset Z$ such that for every $s \in f(V)$ the generic
points of $V_s$ are elements of $\text{Ass}_{X/S}(\mathcal{F})$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may replace $S$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $f(\xi)$
and $X$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $\xi$. Hence we may assume
$S = \Spec(A)$, $X = \Spec(B)$ and that $f$ is given by
the finite type ring map $A \to B$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-type-characterize}.
Moreover, we may write $\mathcal{F} = \widetilde{M}$ for some finite
$B$-module $M$, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-type-module}.
Let $\mathfrak q \subset B$ be the prime corresponding to $\xi$ and
let $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be the corresponding prime of $A$.
By assumption $\mathfrak q \in \text{Ass}_B(M \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p))$,
see
Algebra, Remark \ref{algebra-remark-bourbaki}
and
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-associated-affine-open}.
With this notation $Z = V(\mathfrak q) \subset \Spec(B)$.
In particular $f(Z) \subset V(\mathfrak p)$. Hence clearly it suffices to
prove the lemma after replacing $A$, $B$, and $M$ by
$A/\mathfrak pA$, $B/\mathfrak pB$, and $M/\mathfrak pM$.
In other words we may assume that $A$ is a domain with fraction field
$K$ and $\mathfrak q \subset B$ is an associated prime of $M \otimes_A K$.

\medskip\noindent
At this point we can use generic flatness. Namely, by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-flatness}
there exists a nonzero $g \in A$ such that $M_g$ is flat
as an $A_g$-module. After replacing $A$ by $A_g$ we may assume that
$M$ is flat as an $A$-module.

\medskip\noindent
In this case, by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-post-bourbaki}
we see that $\mathfrak q$ is also an associated prime of $M$.
Hence we obtain an injective $B$-module map $B/\mathfrak q \to M$.
Let $Q$ be the cokernel so that we obtain a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to B/\mathfrak q \to M \to Q \to 0
$$
of finite $B$-modules. After applying generic flatness
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-flatness}
once more, this time to the $B$-module $Q$, we may assume that $Q$
is a flat $A$-module. In particular we may assume the short exact
sequence above is universally injective, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-tor-zero}.
In this situation
$(B/\mathfrak q) \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p')
\subset M \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p')$
for any prime $\mathfrak p'$ of $A$. The lemma follows as a minimal
prime $\mathfrak q'$ of the support of
$(B/\mathfrak q) \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p')$
is an associated prime of $(B/\mathfrak q) \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p')$ by
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-minimal-support-in-ass}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-bad-case}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a
quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Let $U \subset X$ be an open
subscheme. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is of finite type,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite type,
\item $Y$ is irreducible with generic point $\eta$, and
\item $\text{Ass}_{X_\eta}(\mathcal{F}_\eta)$ is not contained in $U_\eta$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists a nonempty open subscheme $V \subset Y$ such that
for all $y \in V$ the set $\text{Ass}_{X_y}(\mathcal{F}_y)$ is not
contained in $U_y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z \subset X$ be the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}$, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-scheme-theoretic-support}.
Then $Z_\eta$ is the scheme theoretic support of $\mathcal{F}_\eta$
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-pullback-support}).
Hence the generic points of irreducible components of $Z_\eta$
are contained in $\text{Ass}_{X_\eta}(\mathcal{F}_\eta)$ by
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-minimal-support-in-ass}.
Hence we see that $Z_\eta \cap U_\eta = \emptyset$.
Thus $T = Z \setminus U$ is a closed subset of $Z$ with $T_\eta = \emptyset$.
If we endow $T$ with the induced reduced scheme structure then
$T \to Y$ is a morphism of finite type. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}
there is a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ with $T_V = \emptyset$.
Then $V$ works.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-good-case}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a
quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Let $U \subset X$ be an open
subscheme. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is of finite type,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite type,
\item $Y$ is irreducible with generic point $\eta$, and
\item $\text{Ass}_{X_\eta}(\mathcal{F}_\eta) \subset U_\eta$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists a nonempty open subscheme $V \subset Y$ such that
for all $y \in V$ we have $\text{Ass}_{X_y}(\mathcal{F}_y) \subset U_y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
(This proof is the same as the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-scheme-theoretically-dense-generic-fibre}.
We urge the reader to read that proof first.)
Since the statement is about fibres it is clear that we may replace
$Y$ by its reduction. Hence we may assume that $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
We may also assume that $Y = \Spec(A)$ is affine. Then $A$
is a domain with fraction field $K$.

\medskip\noindent
As $f$ is of finite type we see that $X$ is quasi-compact.
Write $X = X_1 \cup \ldots \cup X_n$ for some affine opens $X_i$
and set $\mathcal{F}_i = \mathcal{F}|_{X_i}$. By
assumption the generic fibre of $U_i = X_i \cap U$ contains
$\text{Ass}_{X_{i, \eta}}(\mathcal{F}_{i, \eta})$.
Thus it suffices to prove the result for the triples
$(X_i, \mathcal{F}_i, U_i)$,
in other words we may assume that $X$ is affine.

\medskip\noindent
Write $X = \Spec(B)$. Let $N$ be a finite $B$-module such that
$\mathcal{F} = \widetilde{N}$.
Note that $B_K$ is Noetherian as it is a
finite type $K$-algebra. Hence $U_\eta$ is quasi-compact. Thus we can
find finitely many $g_1, \ldots, g_m \in B$ such that $D(g_j) \subset U$
and such that $U_\eta = D(g_1)_\eta \cup \ldots \cup D(g_m)_\eta$.
Since $\text{Ass}_{X_\eta}(\mathcal{F}_\eta) \subset U_\eta$
we see that $N_K \to \bigoplus_j (N_K)_{g_j}$ is injective. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-when-injective-covering}
this is equivalent to the injectivity of
$N_K \to \bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} N_K$,
$n \mapsto (g_1n, \ldots, g_mn)$. Let $I$ and $M$ be the kernel and
cokernel of this map over $A$, i.e., such that we have an exact sequence
$$
0 \to I \to N \xrightarrow{(g_1, \ldots, g_m)}
\bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} N \to M \to 0
$$
After replacing $A$ by $A_h$ for some nonzero $h$ we may assume that
$B$ is a flat, finitely presented $A$-algebra and that
both $M$ and $N$ are flat over $A$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-flatness}.
The flatness of $N$ over $A$ implies that $N$ is torsion free as an
$A$-module, see
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-torsion-free}.
Hence $N \subset N_K$. By construction $I_K = 0$ which implies that $I = 0$
(as $I \subset N \subset N_K$ is a subset of $I_K$). Hence now
we have a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to N \xrightarrow{(g_1, \ldots, g_m)}
\bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} N \to M \to 0
$$
with $M$ flat over $A$. Hence for every homomorphism $A \to \kappa$ where
$\kappa$ is a field, we obtain a short exact sequence
$$
0 \to N \otimes_A \kappa \xrightarrow{(g_1 \otimes 1, \ldots, g_m \otimes 1)}
\bigoplus\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} N \otimes_A \kappa \to
M \otimes_A \kappa \to 0
$$
see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-tor-zero}.
Reversing the arguments above
this means that $\bigcup D(g_j \otimes 1)$ contains
$\text{Ass}_{B \otimes_A \kappa}(N \otimes_A \kappa)$.
As $\bigcup D(g_j \otimes 1) = \bigcup D(g_j)_\kappa \subset U_\kappa$
we obtain that $U_\kappa$ contains
$\text{Ass}_{X \otimes \kappa}(\mathcal{F} \otimes \kappa)$
which is what we wanted to prove.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-assassin-in-U}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism which is locally of finite type.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
of finite type. Let $U \subset X$ be an open subscheme.
Let $g : S' \to S$ be a morphism of schemes, let
$f' : X' = X_{S'} \to S'$ be the base change of $f$,
let $g' : X' \to X$ be the projection, set
$\mathcal{F}' = (g')^*\mathcal{F}$, and set
$U' = (g')^{-1}(U)$. Finally, let $s' \in S'$ with image $s = g(s')$.
In this case
$$
\text{Ass}_{X_s}(\mathcal{F}_s) \subset U_s
\Leftrightarrow
\text{Ass}_{X'_{s'}}(\mathcal{F}'_{s'}) \subset U'_{s'}.
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows immediately from
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-base-change-relative-assassin}.
See also
Divisors, Remark \ref{divisors-remark-base-change-relative-assassin}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-assassin-constructible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of finite presentation.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
of finite presentation. Let $U \subset X$ be an open subscheme
such that $U \to Y$ is quasi-compact. Then the set
$$
E = \{y \in Y \mid \text{Ass}_{X_y}(\mathcal{F}_y) \subset U_y\}
$$
is locally constructible in $Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $y \in Y$. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood
$V$ of $y$ in $Y$ such that $E \cap V$ is constructible in $V$. Thus we may
assume that $Y$ is affine. Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and
$A = \colim A_i$ as a directed limit of finite type
$\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$.
After possibly increasing $i$ we may assume there exists a
quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X_i}$-module $\mathcal{F}_i$ of finite
presentation whose pullback to $X$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal{F}$, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-modules-finite-presentation}.
After possibly increasing $i$ one more time we may assume there exists
an open subscheme $U_i \subset X_i$ whose inverse image in $X$
is $U$, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-opens}.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-assassin-in-U}
it suffices to prove the lemma for $f_i$. Thus we reduce to
the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
We will use the criterion of
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-characterize-constructible-Noetherian}
to prove that $E$ is constructible in case $Y$ is a Noetherian scheme.
To see this let $Z \subset Y$ be an irreducible closed subscheme.
We have to show that $E \cap Z$ either contains a nonempty open subset
or is not dense in $Z$. This follows from
Lemmas \ref{lemma-bad-case} and
\ref{lemma-good-case}
applied to the base change $(X, \mathcal{F}, U) \times_Y Z$ over $Z$.
\end{proof}











\section{Reduced fibres}
\label{section-reduced}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nonreduced-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $Y$ irreducible with
generic point $\eta$ and $f$ of finite type. If $X_\eta$ is nonreduced,
then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$
such that for all $y \in V$ the fibre $X_y$ is nonreduced.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Y' \subset Y$ be the reduction of $Y$. Let $X' \to Y'$
be the base change of $f$. Note that $Y' \to Y$
induces a bijection on points and that $X' \to X$ identifies fibres.
Hence we may assume that $Y'$ is reduced, i.e., integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
We may also replace $Y$ by an affine open. Hence we may assume that
$Y = \Spec(A)$ with $A$ a domain. Denote $K = f.f.(A)$ the
fraction field of $A$.
Pick an affine open $\Spec(B) = U \subset X$ and a section
$h_\eta \in \Gamma(U_\eta, \mathcal{O}_{U_\eta}) = B_K$
which is nonzero and nilpotent.
After shrinking $Y$ we may assume that $h$ comes from
$h \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U) = B$. After shrinking $Y$ a bit
more we may assume that $h$ is nilpotent. Let
$I = \{b \in B \mid hb = 0\}$ be the annihilator of $h$.
Then $C = B/I$ is a finite type $A$-algebra whose generic fiber
$(B/I)_K$ is nonzero (as $h_\eta \not = 0$). We apply
generic flatness to $A \to C$ and $A \to B/hB$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-flatness},
and we obtain a $g \in A$, $g \not = 0$ such that $C_g$ is free as
an $A_g$-module and $(B/hB)_g$ is flat as an $A_g$-module.
Replace $Y$ by $D(g) \subset Y$. Now we have the short exact sequence
$$
0 \to C \to B \to B/hB \to 0.
$$
with $B/hB$ flat over $A$ and with $C$ nonzero free as an $A$-module.
It follows that for any homomorphism $A \to \kappa$ to a field
the ring $C \otimes_A \kappa$ is nonzero and the sequence
$$
0 \to C \otimes_A \kappa \to B \otimes_A \kappa \to
B/hB \otimes_A \kappa \to 0
$$
is exact, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-tor-zero}.
Note that
$B/hB \otimes_A \kappa = (B \otimes_A \kappa) / h(B \otimes_A \kappa)$
by right exactness of tensor product. Thus we conclude that
multiplication by $h$ is not zero on $B \otimes_A \kappa$.
This clearly means that for any point $y \in Y$ the element $h$
restricts to a nonzero element of $U_y$, whence $X_y$ is nonreduced.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-reduced}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $g : Y' \to Y$ be any morphism, and denote
$f' : X' \to Y'$ the base change of $f$.
Then
\begin{align*}
\{y' \in Y' \mid X'_{y'}\text{ is geometrically reduced}\} \\
= g^{-1}(\{y \in Y \mid X_y\text{ is geometrically reduced}\}).
\end{align*}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This comes down to the statement that for $y' \in Y'$ with image
$y \in Y$ the fibre $X'_{y'} = X_y \times_y y'$ is geometrically
reduced over $\kappa(y')$ if and only if $X_y$ is geometrically
reduced over $\kappa(y)$. This follows from
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-upstairs}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-not-geometrically-reduced-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $Y$ irreducible with
generic point $\eta$ and $f$ of finite type. If $X_\eta$ is not
geometrically reduced, then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$
such that for all $y \in V$ the fibre $X_y$ is not geometrically reduced.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-make-generic-fibre-geometrically-reduced}
to get
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d]_{f'} \ar[r]_{g'} & X_V \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d]^f \\
Y' \ar[r]^g & V \ar[r] & Y
}
$$
with all the properties mentioned in that lemma.
Let $\eta'$ be the generic point of $Y'$.
Consider the morphism $X' \to X_{Y'}$ (which is the reduction
morphism) and the resulting morphism of generic fibres
$X'_{\eta'} \to X_{\eta'}$.
Since $X'_{\eta'}$ is geometrically reduced, and $X_\eta$
is not this cannot be an isomorphism, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-upstairs}.
Hence $X_{\eta'}$ is nonreduced. Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-nonreduced-in-neighbourhood}
the fibres of $X_{Y'} \to Y'$ are nonreduced at all points $y' \in V'$
of a nonempty open $V' \subset Y'$. Since $g : Y' \to V$ is a homeomorphism
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-reduced}
proves that $g(V')$ is the open we are looking for.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-geometrically-reduced-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Y$ is irreducible with generic point $\eta$,
\item $X_\eta$ is geometrically reduced, and
\item $f$ is of finite type.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists a nonempty open subscheme $V \subset Y$
such that $X_V \to V$ has geometrically reduced fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Y' \subset Y$ be the reduction of $Y$. Let $X' \to Y'$
be the base change of $f$. Note that $Y' \to Y$
induces a bijection on points and that $X' \to X$ identifies fibres.
Hence we may assume that $Y'$ is reduced, i.e., integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
We may also replace $Y$ by an affine open. Hence we may assume that
$Y = \Spec(A)$ with $A$ a domain. Denote $K = f.f.(A)$ the
fraction field of $A$. After shrinking $Y$ a bit we may also assume that
$X \to Y$ is flat and of finite presentation, see
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}.

\medskip\noindent
As $X_\eta$ is geometrically reduced there exists an open dense
subset $V \subset X_\eta$ such that $V \to \Spec(K)$ is smooth, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-dense-smooth-open}.
Let $U \subset X$ be the set of points where $f$ is smooth. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-set-points-where-fibres-smooth}
we see that $V \subset U_\eta$. Thus the generic fibre of $U$ is dense
in the generic fibre of $X$. Since $X_\eta$ is reduced, it follows
that $U_\eta$ is scheme theoretically dense in $X_\eta$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reduced-scheme-theoretically-dense}.
We note that as $U \to Y$ is smooth all the fibres of $U \to Y$
are geometrically reduced. Thus it suffices to show that, after
shrinking $Y$, for all $y \in Y$ the scheme $U_y$ is scheme theoretically
dense in $X_y$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reduced-subscheme-closure}.
This follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-scheme-theoretically-dense-generic-fibre}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-geometrically-reduced-constructible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of finite presentation.
Then the set
$$
E = \{y \in Y \mid X_y\text{ is geometrically reduced}\}
$$
is locally constructible in $Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $y \in Y$. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood
$V$ of $y$ in $Y$ such that $E \cap V$ is constructible in $V$. Thus we may
assume that $Y$ is affine. Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and
$A = \colim A_i$ as a directed limit of finite type
$\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-reduced}
it suffices to prove the lemma for $f_i$. Thus we reduce to
the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
We will use the criterion of
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-characterize-constructible-Noetherian}
to prove that $E$ is constructible in case $Y$ is a Noetherian scheme.
To see this let $Z \subset Y$ be an irreducible closed subscheme.
We have to show that $E \cap Z$ either contains a nonempty open subset
or is not dense in $Z$. If $X_\xi$ is geometrically reduced, then
Lemma \ref{lemma-geometrically-reduced-generic-fibre}
(applied to the morphism $X_Z \to Z$)
implies that all fibres $X_y$ are geometrically reduced
for a nonempty open $V \subset Z$.
If $X_\xi$ is not geometrically reduced, then
Lemma \ref{lemma-not-geometrically-reduced-in-neighbourhood}
(applied to the morphism $X_Z \to Z$)
implies that all fibres $X_y$ are geometrically reduced
for a nonempty open $V \subset Z$. Thus we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-proper-flat-over-dvr-reduced-fibre}
Let $X \to \Spec(R)$ be a proper flat morphism where $R$ is a
discrete valuation ring. If the special fibre is reduced, then
both $X$ and the generic fibre $X_\eta$ are reduced.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $x \in X$ be a point in the generic fibre $X_\eta$
such that $\mathcal{O}_{X_\eta}$ is nonreduced.
Then $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is nonreduced.
Let $x \leadsto x'$ be a specialization with $x'$
in the special fibre; such a specialization exists
as a proper morphism is closed. Consider the local
ring $A = \mathcal{O}_{X, x'}$. Let $\pi \in R$ be a uniformizer.
If $a \in A$ then there exists an $n \geq 0$ and an element
$a' \in A$ such that $a = \pi^n a'$ and $a' \not \in \pi A$.
This follows from Krull intersection theorem
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-intersect-powers-ideal-module-zero}).
If $a$ is nilpotent, so is $a'$, because $\pi$ is a nonzerodivisor
by flatness of $A$ over $R$.
But $a'$ maps to a nonzero element of the reduced ring
$A/\pi A = \mathcal{O}_{X_s, x'}$.
This is a contradiction unless $A$ is reduced, which
is what we wanted to show.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-geometrically-reduced-open}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a flat proper morphism of finite presentation.
Then the set $\{y \in Y \mid X_y\text{ is geometrically reduced}\}$
is open in $Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $Y$ is affine. Then $Y$ is a cofiltered limit of affine
schemes of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$.
Hence we can assume $X \to Y$ is the
base change of $X_0 \to Y_0$ where $Y_0$ is the spectrum of a finite
type $\mathbf{Z}$-algebra and $X_0 \to Y_0$ is flat and proper.
See Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation},
\ref{limits-lemma-descend-flat-finite-presentation}, and
\ref{limits-lemma-eventually-proper}. Since the formation of
the set of points where the fibres are geometrically
reduced commutes with base change
(Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-reduced}),
we may assume the base is Noetherian.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $Y$ is Noetherian. The set is constructible by
Lemma \ref{lemma-geometrically-reduced-constructible}.
Hence it suffices to show the set is stable under generalization. By
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-locally-Noetherian-specialization-dvr}
we reduce to the case where $Y = \Spec(R)$, $R$ is a discrete
valuation ring, and the closed fibre $X_y$ is geometrically
reduced. To show: the generic fibre $X_\eta$ is geometrically reduced.

\medskip\noindent
If not then there exists a finite extension $L$ of the fraction
field of $R$ such that $X_L$ is not reduced, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced}.
There exists a discrete valuation ring
$R' \subset L$ with fraction field $L$ dominating $R$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-integral-closure-Dedekind}.
After replacing $R$ by $R'$ we reduce to
Lemma \ref{lemma-proper-flat-over-dvr-reduced-fibre}.
\end{proof}







\section{Irreducible components of fibres}
\label{section-irreducible}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-irreducible-components-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $Y$ irreducible with
generic point $\eta$ and $f$ of finite type. If $X_\eta$ has $n$
irreducible components, then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$
such that for all $y \in V$ the fibre $X_y$ has at least $n$
irreducible components.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
As the question is purely topological we may replace $X$ and $Y$ by
their reductions. In particular this implies that $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
Let $X_\eta = X_{1, \eta} \cup \ldots \cup X_{n, \eta}$
be the decomposition of $X_\eta$ into irreducible components.
Let $X_i \subset X$ be the reduced closed subscheme whose generic
fibre is $X_{i, \eta}$. Note that $Z_{i, j} = X_i \cap X_j$
is a closed subset of $X_i$ whose generic fibre $Z_{i, j, \eta}$
is nowhere dense in $X_{i, \eta}$. Hence after shrinking $Y$ we may
assume that $Z_{i, j, y}$
is nowhere dense in $X_{i, y}$ for every $y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we may assume that
$X_y = \bigcup X_{i, y}$ for $y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}.
Moreover, after shrinking $Y$ we may assume that each $X_i \to Y$
is flat and of finite presentation, see
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}.
The morphisms $X_i \to Y$ are open, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}.
Thus there exists an open neighbourhood $V$ of $\eta$ which is contained
in $f(X_i)$ for each $i$.
For each $y \in V$ the schemes $X_{i, y}$ are
nonempty closed subsets of $X_y$, we have $X_y = \bigcup X_{i, y}$
and the intersections $Z_{i, j, y} = X_{i, y} \cap X_{j, y}$
are not dense in $X_{i, y}$. Clearly this implies that
$X_y$ has at least $n$ irreducible components.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-irreducible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $g : Y' \to Y$ be any morphism, and denote
$f' : X' \to Y'$ the base change of $f$.
Then
\begin{align*}
\{y' \in Y' \mid X'_{y'}\text{ is geometrically irreducible}\} \\
= g^{-1}(\{y \in Y \mid X_y\text{ is geometrically irreducible}\}).
\end{align*}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This comes down to the statement that for $y' \in Y'$ with image
$y \in Y$ the fibre $X'_{y'} = X_y \times_y y'$ is geometrically
irreducible over $\kappa(y')$ if and only if $X_y$ is geometrically
irreducible over $\kappa(y)$. This follows from
Varieties,
Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-irreducible-check-after-extension}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-irreducible-components}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$$
n_{X/Y} : Y \to \{0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots, \infty\}
$$
be the function which associates to $y \in Y$ the number of irreducible
components of $(X_y)_K$ where $K$ is a separably closed extension
of $\kappa(y)$. This is well defined and if $g : Y' \to Y$ is a morphism
then
$$
n_{X'/Y'} = n_{X/Y} \circ g
$$
where $X' \to Y'$ is the base change of $f$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Suppose that $y' \in Y'$ has image $y \in Y$.
Suppose $K \supset \kappa(y)$ and $K' \supset \kappa(y')$ are separably
closed extensions. Then we may choose a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
K \ar[r] & K'' & K' \ar[l] \\
\kappa(y) \ar[u] \ar[rr] & & \kappa(y') \ar[u]
}
$$
of fields. The result follows as the morphisms of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
(X'_{y'})_{K'} &
(X'_{y'})_{K''} = (X_y)_{K''} \ar[l] \ar[r] &
(X_y)_K
}
$$
induce bijections between irreducible components, see
Varieties,
Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-separably-closed-field-irreducible-components}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-irreducible-polynomial-over-domain}
Let $A$ be a domain with fraction field $K$.
Let $P \in A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$.
Denote $\overline{K}$ the algebraic closure of $K$.
Assume $P$ is irreducible in $\overline{K}[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$.
Then there exists a $f \in A$ such that
$P^\varphi \in \kappa[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ is irreducible for all
homomorphisms $\varphi : A_f \to \kappa$ into fields.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
There exists an automorphism $\Psi$ of $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ over $A$
such that $\Psi(P) = ax_n^d +$ lower order terms in $x_n$ with
$a \not = 0$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-helper-polynomial}.
We may replace $P$ by $\Psi(P)$ and we may replace $A$ by $A_a$.
Thus we may assume that $P$ is monic in $x_n$ of degree $d > 0$.
For $i = 1, \ldots, n - 1$ let $d_i$ be the degree of $P$ in $x_i$.
Note that this implies that $P^\varphi$ is monic of degree $d$ in $x_n$
and has degree $\leq d_i$ in $x_i$ for every homomorphism
$\varphi : A \to \kappa$ where $\kappa$ is a field.
Thus if $P^\varphi$ is reducible, then we can write
$$
P^\varphi = Q_1 Q_2
$$
with $Q_1, Q_2$ monic of degree $e_1, e_2 \geq 0$ in $x_n$ with
$e_1 + e_2 = d$ and having degree $\leq d_i$ in $x_i$ for
$i = 1, \ldots, n - 1$. In other words we can write
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-factors}
Q_j = x_n^{e_j} + \sum\nolimits_{0 \leq l < e_j}
\left( \sum\nolimits_{L \in \mathcal{L}} a_{j, l, L} x^L \right) x_n^l
\end{equation}
where the sum is over the set $\mathcal{L}$ of multi-indices $L$
of the form $L = (l_1, \ldots, l_{n - 1})$ with $0 \leq l_i \leq d_i$.
For any $e_1, e_2 \geq 0$ with $e_1 + e_2 = d$ we consider the $A$-algebra
$$
B_{e_1, e_2} =
A[\{a_{1, l, L}\}_{0 \leq l < e_1, L \in \mathcal{L}},
\{a_{2, l, L}\}_{0 \leq l < e_2, L \in \mathcal{L}}]/(\text{relations})
$$
where the $(\text{relations})$ is the ideal generated by the coefficients
of the polynomial
$$
P - Q_1Q_2 \in
A[\{a_{1, l, L}\}_{0 \leq l < e_1, L \in \mathcal{L}},
\{a_{2, l, L}\}_{0 \leq l < e_2, L \in \mathcal{L}}][x_1, \ldots, x_n]
$$
with $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ defined as in (\ref{equation-factors}). OK, and
the assumption that $P$ is irreducible over $\overline{K}$ implies that
there does not exist any $A$-algebra homomorphism
$B_{e_1, e_2} \to \overline{K}$. By the Hilbert Nullstellensatz, see
Algebra, Theorem \ref{algebra-theorem-nullstellensatz}
this means that $B_{e_1, e_2} \otimes_A K = 0$.
As $B_{e_1, e_2}$ is a finitely generated $A$-algebra this signifies that
we can find an $f_{e_1, e_2} \in A$ such that
$(B_{e_1, e_2})_{f_{e_1, e_2}} = 0$. By construction this means that
if $\varphi : A_{f_{e_1, e_2}} \to \kappa$ is a homomorphism to a field,
then $P^\varphi$ does not have a factorization $P^\varphi = Q_1 Q_2$
with $Q_1$ of degree $e_1$ in $x_n$ and $Q_2$ of degree $e_2$ in $x_n$.
Thus taking
$f = \prod_{e1, e_2 \geq 0, e_1 + e_2 = d} f_{e_1, e_2}$ we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-geom-irreducible-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Y$ is irreducible with generic point $\eta$,
\item $X_\eta$ is geometrically irreducible, and
\item $f$ is of finite type.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists a nonempty open subscheme $V \subset Y$
such that $X_V \to V$ has geometrically irreducible fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}[First proof of Lemma \ref{lemma-geom-irreducible-generic-fibre}]
We give two proofs of the lemma. These are essentially equivalent;
the second is more self contained but a bit longer.
Choose a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d]_{f'} \ar[r]_{g'} & X_V \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d]^f \\
Y' \ar[r]^g & V \ar[r] & Y
}
$$
as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-make-generic-fibre-geometrically-reduced}.
Note that the generic fibre of $f'$ is the reduction of the
geometric fibre of $f$ (see
Lemma \ref{lemma-reduction-generic-fibre})
and hence is geometrically irreducible.
Suppose that the lemma holds for the morphism $f'$. Then after shrinking
$V$ all the fibres of $f'$ are geometrically irreducible.
As $X' = (Y' \times_V X_V)_{red}$ this implies that all the fibres
of $Y' \times_V X_V$ are geometrically irreducible. Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-irreducible}
all the fibres of $X_V \to V$ are geometrically irreducible and
we win. In this way we see that we may assume that the generic
fibre is geometrically reduced as well as geometrically irreducible
and we may assume $Y = \Spec(A)$ with $A$ a domain.

\medskip\noindent
Let $x \in X_\eta$ be the generic point. As $X_\eta$ is geometrically
irreducible and reduced we see that $L = \kappa(x)$ is a finitely generated
extension of $K = \kappa(\eta) = f.f.(A)$ which is geometrically reduced and
geometrically irreducible, see
Varieties, Lemmas \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-at-point} and
\ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-irreducible-function-field}.
In particular the field extension $K \subset L$ is separable, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-separable-field-extensions}.
Hence we can find $x_1, \ldots, x_{r + 1} \in L$ which generate $L$
over $K$ and such that $x_1, \ldots, x_r$ is a transcendence basis for
$L$ over $K$, see
Algebra, Lemma
\ref{algebra-lemma-generating-finitely-generated-separable-field-extensions}.
Let $P \in K(x_1, \ldots, x_r)[T]$ be the minimal polynomial for
$x_{r + 1}$. Clearing denominators we may assume that
$P$ has coefficients in $A[x_1, \ldots, x_r]$.
Note that as $L$ is geometrically reduced and geometrically irreducible
over $K$, the polynomial $P$ is irreducible in
$\overline{K}[x_1, \ldots, x_r, T]$ where $\overline{K}$ is the
algebraic closure of $K$. Denote
$$
B' = A[x_1, \ldots, x_{r + 1}]/(P(x_{r + 1}))
$$
and set $X' = \Spec(B')$. By construction the fraction field of $B'$
is isomorphic to $L = \kappa(x)$ as $K$-extensions. Hence there exists an
open $U \subset X$, and open $U' \subset X'$ and a $Y$-isomorphism
$U \to U'$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-common-open}.
Here is a diagram:
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rd] &
U \ar[l] \ar@{=}[r] \ar[d] &
U' \ar[r] \ar[d] &
X' \ar[ld] \ar@{=}[r] & \Spec(B') \\
& Y \ar@{=}[r] & Y &
}
$$
Note that $U_\eta \subset X_\eta$ and $U'_\eta \subset X'_\eta$ are
dense opens. Thus after shrinking $Y$ by applying
Lemma \ref{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}
we obtain that $U_y$ is dense in $X_y$ and $U'_y$ is dense in $X'_y$
for all $y \in Y$. Thus it suffices to prove the lemma for
$X' \to Y$ which is the content of
Lemma \ref{lemma-irreducible-polynomial-over-domain}.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Second proof of Lemma \ref{lemma-geom-irreducible-generic-fibre}]
Let $Y' \subset Y$ be the reduction of $Y$. Let $X' \to X$ be the reduction
of $X$. Note that $X' \to X  \to Y$ factors through $Y'$, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-map-into-reduction}.
As $Y' \to Y$ and $X' \to X$ are universal
homeomorphisms by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reduction-universal-homeomorphism}
we see that it suffices to prove the lemma for $X' \to Y'$. Thus
we may assume that $X$ and $Y$ are reduced. In particular $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
Thus by
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}
there exists a nonempty affine open $V \subset Y$ such that $X_V \to V$ is
flat and of finite presentation. After replacing $Y$ by $V$ we may
assume, in addition to (1), (2), (3) that $Y$ is integral affine, $X$
is reduced, and $f$ is flat and of finite presentation. In particular
$f$ is universally open, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}.

\medskip\noindent
Pick a nonempty affine open $U \subset X$. Then $U \to Y$ is flat and of
finite presentation with geometrically irreducible generic fibre.
The complement $X_\eta \setminus U_\eta$ is nowhere dense. Thus after
shrinking $Y$ we may assume $U_y \subset X_y$ is open dense for all
$y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}.
Thus we may replace $X$ by $U$ and we reduce to the
case where $Y$ is integral affine and $X$ is reduced affine, flat and of finite
presentation over $Y$ with geometrically irreducible generic fibre $X_\eta$.

\medskip\noindent
Write $X = \Spec(B)$ and $Y = \Spec(A)$. Then $A$ is a domain,
$B$ is reduced, $A \to B$ is flat of finite presentation, and $B_K$ is
geometrically irreducible over $K = f.f.(A)$. In particular we see that
$B_K$ is a domain. Let $L = f.f.(B_K)$ be its fraction field. Note that
$L$ is a finitely generated field extension of $K$ as $B$ is an $A$-algebra
of finite presentation. Let $K \subset K'$ be a finite purely inseparable
extension such that $(L \otimes_K K')_{red}$ is a separably generated field
extension, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-make-separable}.
Choose $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in K'$ which generate the field extension
$K'$ over $K$, and such that $x_i^{q_i} \in A$ for some prime power
$q_i$ (proof existence $x_i$ omitted). Let $A'$ be the $A$-subalgebra
of $K'$ generated by $x_1, \ldots, x_n$. Then $A'$ is a finite
$A$-subalgebra $A' \subset K'$ whose fraction field is $K'$. Note that
$\Spec(A') \to \Spec(A)$ is a universal homeomorphism, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-p-ring-map}.
Hence it suffices to prove the result after base changing to $\Spec(A')$.
We are going to replace $A$ by $A'$ and $B$ by $(B \otimes_A A')_{red}$
to arrive at the situation where $L$ is a separably generated field extension
of $K$. Of course it may happen that $(B \otimes_A A')_{red}$ is no longer
flat, or of finite presentation over $A'$, but this can be remedied by
replacing $A'$ by  $A'_f$ for a suitable $f \in A'$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-generic-flatness}.

\medskip\noindent
At this point we know that $A$ is a domain, $B$ is reduced, $A \to B$
is flat and of finite presentation, $B_K$ is a domain, and
$L = f.f.(B_K)$ is a separably generated field extension of $K = f.f.(A)$. By
Algebra, Lemma
\ref{algebra-lemma-generating-finitely-generated-separable-field-extensions}
we may write $L = K(x_1, \ldots, x_{r + 1})$
where $x_1, \ldots, x_r$ are algebraically independent over $K$, and
$x_{r + 1}$ is separable over $K(x_1, \ldots, x_r)$. After clearing
denominators we may assume that the minimal polynomial
$P \in K(x_1, \ldots, x_r)[T]$ of $x_{r + 1}$ over $K(x_1, \ldots, x_r)$
has coefficients in $A[x_1, \ldots, x_r]$. Note that since
$L/K$ is separable and since $L$ is geometrically irreducible over
$K$, the polynomial $P$ is irreducible over the algebraic closure
$\overline{K}$ of $K$. Denote
$$
B' = A[x_1, \ldots, x_{r + 1}]/(P(x_{r + 1})).
$$
By construction the fraction fields of $B$ and $B'$ are isomorphic as
$K$-extensions. Hence there exists an isomorphism of $A$-algebras
$B_h \cong B'_{h'}$ for suitable $h \in B$ and $h' \in B'$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-common-open}.
In other words $X$ and $X' = \Spec(B')$ have a common affine open $U$.
Here is a diagram:
$$
\xymatrix{
X = \Spec(B) \ar[rd] &
U \ar[l] \ar[r] \ar[d] &
\Spec(B') = X' \ar[ld] \\
& Y = \Spec(A) &
}
$$
After shrinking $Y$ once more (by applying
Lemma \ref{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}
to $Z = X \setminus U$ in $X$ and $Z' = X' \setminus U$ in $X'$)
we see that $U_y$ is dense in $X_y$ and $U_y$ is dense in $X'_y$
for all $y \in Y$. Thus it suffices to prove the lemma for
$X' \to Y$ which is the content of
Lemma \ref{lemma-irreducible-polynomial-over-domain}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-geom-irreducible-components-good}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$n_{X/Y}$ be the function on $Y$ counting the numbers of geometrically
irreducible components of fibres of $f$ introduced in
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-irreducible-components}.
Assume $f$ of finite type.
Let $y \in Y$ be a point. Then there exists a nonempty open
$V \subset \overline{\{y\}}$ such that $n_{X/Y}|_V$ is constant.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z$ be the reduced induced scheme structure on $\overline{\{y\}}$.
Let $f_Z : X_Z \to Z$ be the base change of $f$. Clearly it suffices to prove
the lemma for $f_Z$ and the generic point of $Z$. Hence we may assume that
$Y$ is an integral scheme, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
Our goal in this case is to produce a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such that
$n_{X/Y}|_V$ is constant.

\medskip\noindent
We apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-make-components-generic-fibre-geometrically-irreducible}
to $f : X \to Y$ and we get $g : Y' \to V \subset Y$. As $g : Y' \to V$ is
surjective finite \'etale, in particular open (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-open}),
it suffices to prove that there exists an open $V' \subset Y'$
such that $n_{X'/Y'}|_{V'}$ is constant, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-irreducible-components}.
Thus we see that we may assume that all irreducible components of
the generic fibre $X_\eta$ are geometrically irreducible over $\kappa(\eta)$.

\medskip\noindent
At this point suppose that
$X_\eta = X_{1, \eta} \bigcup \ldots \bigcup X_{n, \eta}$
is the decomposition of the generic fibre into
(geometrically) irreducible components.
In particular $n_{X/Y}(\eta) = n$.
Let $X_i$ be the closure of
$X_{i, \eta}$ in $X$. After shrinking $Y$ we may assume that
$X = \bigcup X_i$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we see that each fibre of
$f$ has at least $n$ irreducible components, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-irreducible-components-in-neighbourhood}.
Hence $n_{X/Y}(y) \geq n$ for all $y \in Y$.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we obtain that $X_{i, y}$
is geometrically irreducible for each $i$ and all $y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-geom-irreducible-generic-fibre}.
Since $X_y = \bigcup X_{i, y}$
this shows that $n_{X/Y}(y) \leq n$ and finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-geom-irreducible-components-constructible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$n_{X/Y}$ be the function on $Y$ counting the numbers of geometrically
irreducible components of fibres of $f$ introduced in
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-irreducible-components}.
Assume $f$ of finite presentation. Then the level sets
$$
E_n = \{y \in Y \mid n_{X/Y}(y) = n\}
$$
of $n_{X/Y}$ are locally constructible in $Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Fix $n$. Let $y \in Y$. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood
$V$ of $y$ in $Y$ such that $E_n \cap V$ is constructible in $V$. Thus we may
assume that $Y$ is affine. Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and
$A = \colim A_i$ as a directed limit of finite type
$\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-irreducible-components}
it suffices to prove the lemma for $f_i$. Thus we reduce to
the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
We will use the criterion of
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-characterize-constructible-Noetherian}
to prove that $E_n$ is constructible in case $Y$ is a Noetherian scheme.
To see this let $Z \subset Y$ be an irreducible closed subscheme.
We have to show that $E_n \cap Z$ either contains a nonempty open subset
or is not dense in $Z$. Let $\xi \in Z$ be the generic point. Then
Lemma \ref{lemma-nr-geom-irreducible-components-good}
shows that $n_{X/Y}$ is constant in a neighbourhood of $\xi$ in $Z$.
This clearly implies what we want.
\end{proof}













\section{Connected components of fibres}
\label{section-connected}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-connected-components-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $Y$ irreducible with
generic point $\eta$ and $f$ of finite type. If $X_\eta$ has $n$
connected components, then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$
such that for all $y \in V$ the fibre $X_y$ has at least $n$
connected components.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
As the question is purely topological we may replace $X$ and $Y$ by
their reductions. In particular this implies that $Y$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
Let $X_\eta = X_{1, \eta} \cup \ldots \cup X_{n, \eta}$
be the decomposition of $X_\eta$ into connected components.
Let $X_i \subset X$ be the reduced closed subscheme whose generic
fibre is $X_{i, \eta}$. Note that $Z_{i, j} = X_i \cap X_j$
is a closed subset of $X$ whose generic fibre $Z_{i, j, \eta}$ is empty.
Hence after shrinking $Y$ we may assume that $Z_{i, j} = \emptyset$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we may assume that
$X_y = \bigcup X_{i, y}$ for $y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}.
Moreover, after shrinking $Y$ we may assume that each $X_i \to Y$
is flat and of finite presentation, see
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}.
The morphisms $X_i \to Y$ are open, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}.
Thus there exists an open neighbourhood $V$ of $\eta$ which is contained
in $f(X_i)$ for each $i$.
For each $y \in V$ the schemes $X_{i, y}$ are
nonempty closed subsets of $X_y$, we have $X_y = \bigcup X_{i, y}$
and the intersections $Z_{i, j, y} = X_{i, y} \cap X_{j, y}$
are empty! Clearly this implies that
$X_y$ has at least $n$ connected components.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-connected}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $g : Y' \to Y$ be any morphism, and denote
$f' : X' \to Y'$ the base change of $f$.
Then
\begin{align*}
\{y' \in Y' \mid X'_{y'}\text{ is geometrically connected}\} \\
= g^{-1}(\{y \in Y \mid X_y\text{ is geometrically connected}\}).
\end{align*}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This comes down to the statement that for $y' \in Y'$ with image
$y \in Y$ the fibre $X'_{y'} = X_y \times_y y'$ is geometrically
connected over $\kappa(y')$ if and only if $X_y$ is geometrically connected
over $\kappa(y)$. This follows from
Varieties,
Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-connected-check-after-extension}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$$
n_{X/Y} : Y \to \{0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots, \infty\}
$$
be the function which associates to $y \in Y$ the number of connected
components of $(X_y)_K$ where $K$ is a separably closed extension
of $\kappa(y)$. This is well defined and if $g : Y' \to Y$ is a morphism
then
$$
n_{X'/Y'} = n_{X/Y} \circ g
$$
where $X' \to Y'$ is the base change of $f$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Suppose that $y' \in Y'$ has image $y \in Y$.
Suppose $K \supset \kappa(y)$ and $K' \supset \kappa(y')$ are separably
closed extensions. Then we may choose a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
K \ar[r] & K'' & K' \ar[l] \\
\kappa(y) \ar[u] \ar[rr] & & \kappa(y') \ar[u]
}
$$
of fields. The result follows as the morphisms of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
(X'_{y'})_{K'} &
(X'_{y'})_{K''} = (X_y)_{K''} \ar[l] \ar[r] &
(X_y)_K
}
$$
induce bijections between connected components, see
Varieties,
Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-separably-closed-field-connected-components}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-geometrically-connected-generic-fibre}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Y$ is irreducible with generic point $\eta$,
\item $X_\eta$ is geometrically connected, and
\item $f$ is of finite type.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists a nonempty open subscheme $V \subset Y$
such that $X_V \to V$ has geometrically connected fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d]_{f'} \ar[r]_{g'} & X_V \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d]^f \\
Y' \ar[r]^g & V \ar[r] & Y
}
$$
as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-make-components-generic-fibre-geometrically-irreducible}.
Note that the generic fibre of $f'$ is geometrically connected
(for example by
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}).
Suppose that the lemma holds for the morphism $f'$. This means that
there exists a nonempty open $W \subset Y'$ such that every fibre of
$X' \to Y'$ over $W$ is geometrically connected.
Then, as $g$ is an open morphism by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-open}
all the fibres of $f$ at points of the nonempty open $V = g(W)$ are
geometrically connected, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}.
In this way we see that we may assume that the irreducible
components of the generic fibre $X_\eta$ are geometrically irreducible.

\medskip\noindent
Let $Y'$ be the reduction of $Y$, and set $X' = Y' \times_Y X$.
Then it suffices to prove the lemma for the morphism $X' \to Y'$
(for example by
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}
once again). Since the generic fibre of $X' \to Y'$ is the same as the
generic fibre of $X \to Y$ we see that we may assume that $Y$ is
irreducible and reduced (i.e., integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral})
and that the irreducible
components of the generic fibre $X_\eta$ are geometrically irreducible.

\medskip\noindent
At this point suppose that
$X_\eta = X_{1, \eta} \bigcup \ldots \bigcup X_{n, \eta}$
is the decomposition of the generic fibre into
(geometrically) irreducible components.
Let $X_i$ be the closure of $X_{i, \eta}$ in $X$.
After shrinking $Y$ we may assume that
$X = \bigcup X_i$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}.
Let $Z_{i, j} = X_i \cap X_j$.
Let
$$
\{1, \ldots, n\} \times \{1, \ldots, n\} = I \amalg J
$$
where $(i, j) \in I$ if $Z_{i, j, \eta} = \emptyset$ and
$(i, j) \in J$ if $Z_{i, j, \eta} \not = \emptyset$.
After shrinking $Y$ we may assume that $Z_{i, j} = \emptyset$
for all $(i, j) \in I$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}.
After shrinking $Y$ we obtain that $X_{i, y}$
is geometrically irreducible for each $i$ and all $y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-geom-irreducible-generic-fibre}.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we achieve the situation where
each $Z_{i, j} \to Y$ is flat and of finite presentation for
all $(i, j) \in J$, see
Morphisms, Proposition \ref{morphisms-proposition-generic-flatness}.
This means that $f(Z_{i, j}) \subset Y$ is open, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}.
We claim that
$$
V  = \bigcap\nolimits_{(i, j) \in J} f(Z_{i, j})
$$
works, i.e., that $X_y$ is geometrically connected for each
$y \in V$. Namely, the fact that $X_\eta$ is connected implies that
the equivalence relation generated by the pairs in $J$ has only
one equivalence class. Now if $y \in V$ and $K \supset \kappa(y)$
is a separably closed extension, then the irreducible components
of $(X_y)_K$ are the fibres $(X_{i, y})_K$. Moreover, we see by
construction and $y \in V$ that $(X_{i, y})_K$ meets $(X_{j, y})_K$
if and only $(i, j) \in J$. Hence the remark on equivalence classes
shows that $(X_y)_K$ is connected and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-geom-connected-components-good}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$n_{X/Y}$ be the function on $Y$ counting the numbers of geometrically
connected components of fibres of $f$ introduced in
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}.
Assume $f$ of finite type.
Let $y \in Y$ be a point. Then there exists a nonempty open
$V \subset \overline{\{y\}}$ such that $n_{X/Y}|_V$ is constant.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z$ be the reduced induced scheme structure on $\overline{\{y\}}$.
Let $f_Z : X_Z \to Z$ be the base change of $f$. Clearly it suffices to prove
the lemma for $f_Z$ and the generic point of $Z$. Hence we may assume that
$Y$ is an integral scheme, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
Our goal in this case is to produce a nonempty open $V \subset Y$ such that
$n_{X/Y}|_V$ is constant.

\medskip\noindent
We apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-make-components-generic-fibre-geometrically-irreducible}
to $f : X \to Y$ and we get $g : Y' \to V \subset Y$. As $g : Y' \to V$ is
surjective finite \'etale, in particular open (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-open}),
it suffices to prove that there exists an open $V' \subset Y'$
such that $n_{X'/Y'}|_{V'}$ is constant, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-irreducible-components}.
Thus we see that we may assume that all irreducible components of
the generic fibre $X_\eta$ are geometrically irreducible over $\kappa(\eta)$.
By
Varieties, Lemma
\ref{varieties-lemma-irreducible-components-geometrically-irreducible}
this implies that also the connected components of $X_\eta$ are
geometrically connected.

\medskip\noindent
At this point suppose that
$X_\eta = X_{1, \eta} \bigcup \ldots \bigcup X_{n, \eta}$
is the decomposition of the generic fibre into
(geometrically) connected components.
In particular $n_{X/Y}(\eta) = n$.
Let $X_i$ be the closure of
$X_{i, \eta}$ in $X$. After shrinking $Y$ we may assume that
$X = \bigcup X_i$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we see that each fibre of
$f$ has at least $n$ connected components, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-connected-components-in-neighbourhood}.
Hence $n_{X/Y}(y) \geq n$ for all $y \in Y$.
After shrinking $Y$ some more we obtain that $X_{i, y}$
is geometrically connected for each $i$ and all $y \in Y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-geometrically-connected-generic-fibre}.
Since $X_y = \bigcup X_{i, y}$
this shows that $n_{X/Y}(y) \leq n$ and finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-geom-connected-components-constructible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$n_{X/Y}$ be the function on $Y$ counting the numbers of geometric
connected components of fibres of $f$ introduced in
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}.
Assume $f$ of finite presentation. Then the level sets
$$
E_n = \{y \in Y \mid n_{X/Y}(y) = n\}
$$
of $n_{X/Y}$ are locally constructible in $Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Fix $n$. Let $y \in Y$. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood
$V$ of $y$ in $Y$ such that $E_n \cap V$ is constructible in $V$. Thus we may
assume that $Y$ is affine. Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and
$A = \colim A_i$ as a directed limit of finite type
$\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}
it suffices to prove the lemma for $f_i$. Thus we reduce to
the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
We will use the criterion of
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-characterize-constructible-Noetherian}
to prove that $E_n$ is constructible in case $Y$ is a Noetherian scheme.
To see this let $Z \subset Y$ be an irreducible closed subscheme.
We have to show that $E_n \cap Z$ either contains a nonempty open subset
or is not dense in $Z$. Let $\xi \in Z$ be the generic point. Then
Lemma \ref{lemma-nr-geom-connected-components-good}
shows that $n_{X/Y}$ is constant in a neighbourhood of $\xi$ in $Z$.
This clearly implies what we want.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-connected-flat-over-dvr}
\begin{slogan}
A flat degeneration of a disconnected scheme is either disconnected
or nonreduced.
\end{slogan}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $S$ is the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring,
\item $f$ is flat,
\item $X$ is connected,
\item the closed fibre $X_s$ is reduced.
\end{enumerate}
Then the generic fibre $X_\eta$ is connected.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $Y = \Spec(R)$ and let $\pi \in R$ be a uniformizer.
To get a contradiction assume that $X_\eta$ is disconnected.
This means there exists a nontrivial idempotent
$e \in \Gamma(X_\eta, \mathcal{O}_{X_\eta})$.
Let $U = \Spec(A)$ be any affine open in $X$.
Note that $\pi$ is a nonzerodivisor on $A$ as $A$ is flat over $R$, see
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-torsion-free}
for example. Then $e|_{U_\eta}$ corresponds to an element $e \in A[1/\pi]$.
Let $z \in A$ be an element such that $e = z/\pi^n$ with $n \geq 0$ minimal.
Note that $z^2 = \pi^nz$. This means that $z \bmod \pi A$ is nilpotent
if $n > 0$. By assumption $A/\pi A$ is reduced, and hence minimality of
$n$ implies $n = 0$. Thus we conclude that $e \in A$! In other words
$e \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$. As $X$ is connected it follows
that $e$ is a trivial idempotent which is a contradiction.
\end{proof}







\section{Connected components meeting a section}
\label{section-connected-components}

\noindent
The results in this section are in particular applicable to a group scheme
$G \to S$ and its neutral section $e : S \to G$.

\begin{situation}
\label{situation-connected-along-section}
Here $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes, and
$s : Y \to X$ is a section of $f$.
For every $y \in Y$ we denote $X^0_y$ the connected component of $X_y$
containing $s(y)$. Finally, we set $X^0 = \bigcup_{y \in Y} X^0_y$.
\end{situation}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-connected-along-section}
Let $f : X \to Y$, $s : Y \to X$ be as in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}.
If $g : Y' \to Y$ is any morphism, consider the base change diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[r]_{g'} \ar[d]^{f'} & X \ar[d]_f \\
Y' \ar@/^1pc/[u]^{s'} \ar[r]^g & Y \ar@/_1pc/[u]_s
}
$$
so that we obtain $(X')^0 \subset X'$.
Then $(X')^0 = (g')^{-1}(X^0)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $y' \in Y'$ with image $y \in Y$. We may think of
$X^0_y$ as a closed subscheme of $X_y$, see for example
Morphisms,
Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-scheme-structure-connected-component}.
As $s(y) \in X^0_y$ we conclude from
Varieties, Lemma
\ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-connected-if-connected-and-point}
that $X_y^0$ is a geometrically connected scheme over $\kappa(y)$.
Hence $X_y^0 \times_y y' \to X'_{y'}$ is a connected closed subscheme
which contains $s'(y')$. Thus $X_y^0 \times_y y' \subset (X'_{y'})^0$.
The other inclusion $X_y^0 \times_y y' \supset (X'_{y'})^0$ is clear
as the image of $(X'_{y'})^0$ in $X_y$ is a connected subset of $X_y$ which
contains $s(y)$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-connected-along-section-good}
Let $f : X \to Y$, $s : Y \to X$ be as in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}.
Assume $f$ of finite type. Let $y \in Y$ be a point.
Then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset \overline{\{y\}}$ such that
the inverse image of $X^0$ in the base change $X_V$ is open and closed in
$X_V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z \subset Y$ be the induced reduced closed subscheme
structure on $\overline{\{y\}}$. Let $f_Z : X_Z \to Z$ and $s_Z : Z \to X_Z$
be the base changes of $f$ and $s$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-connected-along-section}
we have $(X_Z)^0 = (X^0)_Z$. Hence it suffices to prove the lemma for
the morphism $X_Z \to Z$ and the point $x \in X_Z$ which maps to the generic
point of $Z$. In other words we have reduced the problem to the case
where $Y$ is an integral scheme (see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral})
with generic point $\eta$. Our goal is to show that after shrinking
$Y$ the subset $X^0$ becomes an open and closed subset of $X$.

\medskip\noindent
Note that the scheme $X_\eta$ is of finite type over a field, hence Noetherian.
Thus its connected components are open as well as closed. Hence we may write
$X_\eta = X_\eta^0 \amalg T_\eta$ for some open and closed subset
$T_\eta$ of $X_\eta$. Next, let $T \subset X$ be the closure of $T_\eta$
and let $X^{00} \subset X$ be the closure of $X_\eta^0$. Note that
$T_\eta$, resp.\ $X^0_\eta$ is the generic fibre of $T$, resp.\ $X^{00}$,
see discussion preceding
Lemma \ref{lemma-cover-generic-fibre-neighbourhood}.
Moreover, that lemma implies that after shrinking $Y$ we may assume that
$X = X^{00} \cup T$ (set theoretically).
Note that $(T \cap X^{00})_\eta = T_\eta \cap X^0_\eta = \emptyset$.
Hence after shrinking $Y$ we may assume that $T \cap X^{00} = \emptyset$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}.
In particular $X^{00}$ is open in $X$. Note that $X^0_\eta$ is connected
and has a rational point, namely $s(\eta)$, hence it is geometrically
connected, see
Varieties,
Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-connected-if-connected-and-point}.
Thus after shrinking $Y$ we may assume that all fibres of $X^{00} \to Y$
are geometrically connected, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-geometrically-connected-generic-fibre}.
At this point it follows that the fibres $X^{00}_y$ are
open, closed, and connected subsets of $X_y$ containing $\sigma(y)$.
It follows that $X^0 = X^{00}$ and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-connected-along-section-locally-constructible}
Let $f : X \to Y$, $s : Y \to X$ be as in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}.
If $f$ is of finite presentation then $X^0$ is locally constructible
in $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $x \in X$. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood
$U$ of $x$ such that $X^0 \cap U$ is constructible in $U$.
This reduces us to the case where $Y$ is affine.
Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and $A = \colim A_i$ as a directed
limit of finite type $\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation, endowed with a section $s_i : \Spec(A_i) \to X_i$
whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$ and the section $s$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-connected-along-section}
it suffices to prove the lemma for $f_i, s_i$. Thus we reduce to
the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $Y$ is a Noetherian affine scheme. Since $f$ is of finite presentation,
i.e., of finite type, we see that $X$ is a Noetherian scheme too, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-noetherian}.
In order to prove the lemma in
this case it suffices to show that for every irreducible closed subset
$Z \subset X$ the intersection $Z \cap X^0$ either contains a nonempty
open of $Z$ or is not dense in $Z$, see
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-characterize-constructible-Noetherian}.
Let $x \in Z$ be the generic point, and let $y = f(x)$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-connected-along-section-good}
there exists a nonempty open subset $V \subset \overline{\{y\}}$ such
that $X^0 \cap X_V$ is open and closed in $X_V$. Since
$f(Z) \subset \overline{\{y\}}$ and $f(x) = y \in V$ we see that
$W = f^{-1}(V) \cap Z$ is a nonempty open subset of $Z$. It follows that
$X^0 \cap W$ is open and closed in $W$. Since $W$ is irreducible
we see that $X^0 \cap W$ is either empty or equal to $W$.
This proves the lemma.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-connected-along-section-open-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$, $s : Y \to X$ be as in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}.
Let $y \in Y$ be a point.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is of finite presentation and flat, and
\item the fibre $X_y$ is geometrically reduced.
\end{enumerate}
Then $X^0$ is a neighbourhood of $X^0_y$ in $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may replace $Y$ with an affine open neighbourhood of $y$.
Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and $A = \colim A_i$ as a directed
limit of finite type $\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation, endowed with a section $s_i : \Spec(A_i) \to X_i$
whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$ and the section $s$.
After possibly increasing $i$ we may also assume that $f_i$ is flat, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-flat-finite-presentation}.
Let $y_i$ be the image of $y$ in $Y_i$. Note that
$X_y = (X_{i, y_i}) \times_{y_i} y$. Hence $X_{i, y_i}$ is geometrically
reduced, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-upstairs}.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-connected-along-section}
it suffices to prove the lemma for the system $f_i, s_i, y_i \in Y_i$.
Thus we reduce to the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.
Since $f$ is of finite presentation,
i.e., of finite type, we see that $X$ is a Noetherian scheme too, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-noetherian}.
Let $x \in X^0$ be a point lying over $y$. By
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-constructible-neighbourhood-Noetherian}
it suffices to prove that for any irreducible closed $Z \subset X$
passing through $x$ the intersection $X^0 \cap Z$ is dense in $Z$.
In particular it suffices to prove that the generic point $x' \in Z$
is in $X^0$. By
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-locally-Noetherian-specialization-dvr}
we can find a discrete valuation ring $R$ and a morphism
$\Spec(R) \to X$ which maps the special point to $x$ and
the generic point to $x'$. We are going to think of $\Spec(R)$
as a scheme over $Y$ via the composition $\Spec(R) \to X \to Y$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-connected-along-section}
we have that $(X_R)^0$ is the inverse image of $X^0$.
By construction we have a second section $t : \Spec(R) \to X_R$
(besides the base change $s_R$ of $s$)
of the structure morphism $X_R \to \Spec(R)$ such that
$t(\eta_R)$ is a point of $X_R$ which maps to $x'$ and
$t(0_R)$ is a point of $X_R$ which maps to $x$. Note that
$t(0_R)$ is in $(X_R)^0$ and that $t(\eta_R) \leadsto t(0_R)$.
Thus it suffices to prove that this implies that $t(\eta_R) \in (X_R)^0$.
Hence it suffices to prove the lemma in the case where $Y$
is the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring and $y$ its closed point.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $Y$ is the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring and $y$ is its closed
point. Our goal is to prove that $X^0$ is a neighbourhood of $X^0_y$.
Note that $X^0_y$ is open and closed in $X_y$ as $X_y$ has finitely
many irreducible components. Hence the complement $C = X_y \setminus X_y^0$
is closed in $X$. Thus $U = X \setminus C$ is an open neighbourhood of
$X^0_y$ and $U^0 = X^0$. Hence it suffices to prove the result for the
morphism $U \to Y$. In other words, we may assume that
$X_y$ is connected. Suppose that $X$ is disconnected, say
$X = X_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg X_n$ is a decomposition into connected
components. Then $s(Y)$ is completely contained in one of the $X_i$.
Say $s(Y) \subset X_1$. Then $X^0 \subset X_1$. Hence we may replace
$X$ by $X_1$ and assume that $X$ is connected. At this point
Lemma \ref{lemma-connected-flat-over-dvr}
implies that $X_\eta$ is connected, i.e., $X^0 = X$ and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-connected-along-section-open}
Let $f : X \to Y$, $s : Y \to X$ be as in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is of finite presentation and flat, and
\item all fibres of $f$ are geometrically reduced.
\end{enumerate}
Then $X^0$ is open in $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is an immediate consequence of
Lemma \ref{lemma-connected-along-section-open-neighbourhood}.
\end{proof}






\section{Dimension of fibres}
\label{section-dimension}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dimension-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume $Y$ irreducible with
generic point $\eta$ and $f$ of finite type. If $X_\eta$ has dimension $n$,
then there exists a nonempty open $V \subset Y$
such that for all $y \in V$ the fibre $X_y$ has dimension $n$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z = \{x \in X \mid \dim_x(X_{f(x)}) > n \}$. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-openness-bounded-dimension-fibres}
this is a closed subset of $X$. By assumption $Z_\eta = \emptyset$.
Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-empty-generic-fibre}
we may shrink $Y$ and assume that $Z = \emptyset$. Let
$Z' = \{x \in X \mid \dim_x(X_{f(x)}) > n - 1 \} =
\{x \in X \mid \dim_x(X_{f(x)}) = n\}$. As before this is a closed subset
of $X$. By assumption we have $Z'_\eta \not = \emptyset$. Hence after
shrinking $Y$ we may assume that $Z' \to Y$ is surjective, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-nonempty-generic-fibre}.
Hence we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-dimension-fibres}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of finite type. Let
$$
n_{X/Y} : Y \to \{0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots, \infty\}
$$
be the function which associates to $y \in Y$ the dimension of $X_y$.
If $g : Y' \to Y$ is a morphism then
$$
n_{X'/Y'} = n_{X/Y} \circ g
$$
where $X' \to Y'$ is the base change of $f$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-after-base-change}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dimension-fibres-constructible}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let
$n_{X/Y}$ be the function on $Y$ giving the dimension of fibres of $f$
introduced in
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-dimension-fibres}.
Assume $f$ of finite presentation. Then the level sets
$$
E_n = \{y \in Y \mid n_{X/Y}(y) = n\}
$$
of $n_{X/Y}$ are locally constructible in $Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Fix $n$. Let $y \in Y$. We have to show that there exists an open neighbourhood
$V$ of $y$ in $Y$ such that $E_n \cap V$ is constructible in $V$. Thus we may
assume that $Y$ is affine. Write $Y = \Spec(A)$ and
$A = \colim A_i$ as a directed limit of finite type
$\mathbf{Z}$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we can find an $i$ and a morphism $f_i : X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$ of
finite presentation whose base change to $Y$ recovers $f$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-dimension-fibres}
it suffices to prove the lemma for $f_i$. Thus we reduce to
the case where $Y$ is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring.

\medskip\noindent
We will use the criterion of
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-characterize-constructible-Noetherian}
to prove that $E_n$ is constructible in case $Y$ is a Noetherian scheme.
To see this let $Z \subset Y$ be an irreducible closed subscheme.
We have to show that $E_n \cap Z$ either contains a nonempty open subset
or is not dense in $Z$. Let $\xi \in Z$ be the generic point. Then
Lemma \ref{lemma-dimension-in-neighbourhood}
shows that $n_{X/Y}$ is constant in a neighbourhood of $\xi$ in $Z$.
This implies what we want.
\end{proof}






\section{Theorem of the cube}
\label{section-theorem-cube}

\noindent
The following lemma tells us that the diagonal of the Picard
functor is representable by locally closed immersions under
the assumptions made in the lemma.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a flat, proper morphism of finite presentation.
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
For a morphism $g : T \to S$ consider the base change diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_T \ar[d]_p \ar[r]_q & X \ar[d]^f \\
T \ar[r]^g & S
}
$$
Assume $\mathcal{O}_T \to p_*\mathcal{O}_{X_T}$ is an
isomorphism for all $g : T \to S$.
Then there is a locally closed subscheme $Z \subset S$ such that
a morphism $g : T \to S$ factors through $Z$ if and only if
there exists an invertible $\mathcal{O}_T$-module $\mathcal{N}$
with $p^*\mathcal{N} \cong q^*\mathcal{L}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $g : T \to S$ be a morphism. If there exists an $\mathcal{N}$
as in the lemma, then, using the projection formula
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-projection-formula})
we see that the modules
$$
p_*(q^*\mathcal{L}) \cong
p_*(p^*\mathcal{N}) \cong
\mathcal{N} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S} p_*\mathcal{O}_{X_T} \cong
\mathcal{N}\quad\text{and similarly }\quad
p_*(q^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1}) \cong \mathcal{N}^{\otimes -1}
$$
are invertible and we see that the map (cup product in degree $0$)
$$
p_*(q^*\mathcal{L})
\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_T}
p_*(q^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})
\longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_T
$$
is an isomorphism. Conversely, suppose that we have $g : T \to S$
such that $p_*(q^*\mathcal{L})$ and $p_*(q^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})$
are invertible and such that the cup product map displayed above is
an isomorphism. Then we see that locally on $T$ we have sections
$\sigma$ in $p_*(q^*\mathcal{L})$ and $\sigma'$ in
$p_*(q^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})$ whose product is $1$.
Thinking of $\sigma$ as a section of $q^*\mathcal{L}$ on $X_T$
and $\sigma'$ as a section of $q^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1}$ on $X_T$
with $\sigma \cdot \sigma' = 1$, we conclude that
$\sigma : \mathcal{O}_{X_T} \to q^*\mathcal{L}$ is an isomorphism.
In other words, we see that $p^*p_*q^*\mathcal{L} \cong q^*\mathcal{L}$.
It is this alternative description of the condition on
$g : T \to S$ that we will show is representable by a
locally closed subscheme of $S$.

\medskip\noindent
By cohomology and base change (more precisely by
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-flat-proper-perfect-direct-image-general})
we see that $E = Rf_*\mathcal{L}$ is a perfect object of the
derived category of $S$ and that its formation commutes with
arbitrary change of base. Similarly for $E' = Rf_*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1}$.
Since there is never any cohomology in degrees $< 0$, we see that
$E$ and $E'$ have (locally) tor-amplitude in $[0, b]$ for some $b$.
By Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-locally-closed-where-H0-invertible}
we see that there exist locally closed subschemes
$Z \subset S$ and $Z' \subset S$ over which $H^0(E)$
and $H^0(E')$ become invertible modules compatible with pullback.
After replacing $S$ by $Z \times_S Z'$ (which is a locally closed
subscheme of $X$) we may assume that $f_*\mathcal{L}$ and
$f_*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1}$ are invertible $\mathcal{O}_S$-modules
whose formation commutes with arbitrary change of base.
Finally, the condition that the cupproduct is nonzero picks
out an open subscheme and the proof is complete.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-get-a-closed}
Let $f : X \to S$ and $\mathcal{L}$ be as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}.
If moreover the geometric fibres of $f$ are
integral, then $Z$ is closed in $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We first do a standard argument to reduce to the Noetherian case.
Namely, the question is local on $S$, hence we may assume that
$S = \Spec(R)$ is affine. Then we write $R = \colim_{i \in I} R_i$
as a filtered colimit with
$R_i$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. Set $S_i = \Spec(R_i)$.
For some $i$ there exists a flat proper morphism $f_i : X_i \to S_i$
and an invertible $\mathcal{O}_{X_i}$-module $\mathcal{L}_i$
whose base change to $S$ gives back $f : X \to S$ and $\mathcal{L}$.
See Limits, Lemmas \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation},
\ref{limits-lemma-descend-flat-finite-presentation},
\ref{limits-lemma-eventually-proper}, and
\ref{limits-lemma-descend-invertible-modules}.
Pick $i \in I$.
By Lemmas \ref{lemma-geometrically-reduced-constructible} and
\ref{lemma-nr-geom-irreducible-components-constructible}
the set $E \subset S_i$ of points where the fibres of
$f_i$ are geometrically integral is constructible.
Since $S \to S_i$ maps into $E$ by assumption (and Lemmas
\ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-reduced} and
\ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-irreducible})
after increasing $i$ we may assume the fibres of $f_i$
are geometrically irreducible, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-limit-contained-in-constructible}.
By Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-flat-proper-perfect-direct-image-general}
$Rf_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_i}$ is a perfect object of
$D(\mathcal{O}_{S_i})$ whose formation commutes with arbitrary base change.
Let $T \subset S_i$ be the locally closed subscheme of $S_i$
constructed in Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-locally-closed-where-H0-invertible}
for $Rf_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_i}$ with $a = 0$.
By our assumption that $f_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_S$ universally
we see that $S \to S_i$ factors through $T$.
Set $Y = X_i \times_{S_i} T \to T$ and $\mathcal{M} = \mathcal{L}_i|_Y$.
By construction the morphism $g : Y \to T$ satisfies
$g_*\mathcal{O}_Y = \mathcal{O}_T$ universally
and we have a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{L} & X \ar[r] \ar[d]_f & Y \ar[d]^g & \mathcal{M} \\
& S \ar[r] & T
}
$$
Thus if we can prove the lemma for $g$ and $\mathcal{M}$,
then it follows for $f$ and $\mathcal{L}$.
Since $T$ is Noetherian, we have reduced to the Noetherian case.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $S$ is Noetherian. Since $Z$ is a locally closed subscheme of a
Noetherian scheme it suffices to show that $Z$ is closed under specialization
in order to prove that it is closed. By
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-locally-Noetherian-specialization-dvr}
and base change we see that it suffices to prove the lemma in
case $S$ is the spectrum of a dvr $A$. In other words, suppose
we have a flat proper morphism $X \to \Spec(A)$ with integral
scheme theoretic fibres $X_\eta$ (generic), $X_0$ (closed) and an invertible
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{L}$ whose restriction to $X_\eta$ is
trivial. Goal: show that $\mathcal{L}$ is trivial. This follows
from Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-in-image-pullback}.
However, we can prove this special case directly as follows:
take a trivializing section $s \in \Gamma(X_\eta, \mathcal{L}_\eta)$.
After replacing $s$ by $\pi^n s$ if necessary ($\pi \in A$ a uniformizer)
we can assume that $s \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{L})$.
If $s|_{X_0} = 0$, then we see
that $s$ is divisible by $\pi$ (because $X_0$ is the scheme theoretic
fibre and $X$ is flat over $A$). Thus we may assume that $s|_{X_0}$
is nonzero. Then the zero locus $Z(s)$ of $s$ is contained in $X_0$
but does not contain the generic point of $X_0$ (because $X_0$ is integral).
This means that the $Z(s)$ has codimension $\geq 2$ in $X$ which contradicts
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-effective-Cartier-codimension-1}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-H1-O-picard-flat-proper}
Consider a commutative diagram of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[rr] \ar[dr]_{f'} & & X \ar[dl]^f \\
& S
}
$$
with $f' : X' \to S$ and $f : X \to S$ satisfying the hypotheses of
Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}.
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
and let $\mathcal{L}'$ be the pullback to $X'$. Let $Z \subset S$,
resp.\ $Z' \subset S$ be the locally closed subscheme constructed
in Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}
for $(f, \mathcal{L})$, resp.\ $(f', \mathcal{L}')$
so that $Z \subset Z'$. If $s \in Z$ and
$$
H^1(X_s, \mathcal{O}) \longrightarrow H^1(X'_s, \mathcal{O})
$$
is injective, then $Z \cap U = Z' \cap U$ for some open neighbourhood
$U$ of $s$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may replace $S$ by $Z'$. After shrinking $S$ to an affine open neighbourhood
of $s$ we may assume that $\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{O}_{X'}$.
Let $E = Rf_*\mathcal{L}$ and $E' = Rf'_*\mathcal{L}' = Rf'_*\mathcal{O}_{X'}$.
These are perfect complexes whose formation commutes with arbitrary
change of base (Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-flat-proper-perfect-direct-image-general}).
In particular we see that
$$
E \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S}^\mathbf{L} \kappa(s) =
R\Gamma(X_s, \mathcal{L}_s) = R\Gamma(X_s, \mathcal{O}_{X_s})
$$
The second equality because $s \in Z$. Set
$h_i = \dim_{\kappa(s)} H^i(X_s, \mathcal{O}_{X_s})$.
After shrinking $S$ we can represent $E$ by a complex
$$
\mathcal{O}_S \to \mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_1} \to
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_2} \to \ldots
$$
see More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-lift-perfect-from-residue-field}
(strictly speaking this also uses
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemmas
\ref{perfect-lemma-affine-compare-bounded} and
\ref{perfect-lemma-perfect-affine}). Similarly, we may assume $E'$
is represented by a complex
$$
\mathcal{O}_S \to \mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h'_1} \to
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h'_2} \to \ldots
$$
where $h'_i = \dim_{\kappa(s)} H^i(X'_s, \mathcal{O}_{X'_s})$.
By functoriality of cohomology we have a map
$$
E \longrightarrow E'
$$
in $D(\mathcal{O}_S)$ whose formation commutes with change of base.
Since the complex representing $E$ is a finite complex of finite free
modules and since $S$ is affine, we can choose a map of complexes
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_S \ar[r]_d \ar[d]_a &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_1} \ar[r] \ar[d]_b &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_2} \ar[r] \ar[d]_c & \ldots \\
\mathcal{O}_S \ar[r]^{d'} &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h'_1} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h'_2} \ar[r] & \ldots
}
$$
representing the given map $E \to E'$. Since $s \in Z$ we see that
the trivializing section of $\mathcal{L}_s$ pulls back to a trivializing
section of $\mathcal{L}'_s = \mathcal{O}_{X'_s}$. Thus
$a \otimes \kappa(s)$ is an isomorphism, hence after shrinking $S$
we see that $a$ is an isomorphism. Finally, we use the hypothesis
that $H^1(X_s, \mathcal{O}) \to H^1(X'_s, \mathcal{O})$
is injective, to see that there exists a $h_1 \times h_1$ minor of the
matrix defining $b$ which maps to a nonzero
element in $\kappa(s)$. Hence after shrinking $S$ we may assume
that $b$ is injective. However, since $\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{O}_{X'}$
we see that $d' = 0$. It follows that $d = 0$. In this way we see
that the trivializing section of $\mathcal{L}_s$ lifts to a section
of $\mathcal{L}$ over $X$. A straightforward topological argument (omitted)
shows that this means that $\mathcal{L}$ is trivial after possibly
shrinking $S$ a bit further.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-H1-O-multiple-picard-flat-proper}
Consider $n$ commutative diagrams of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
X_i \ar[rr] \ar[dr]_{f_i} & & X \ar[dl]^f \\
& S
}
$$
with $f_i : X_i \to S$ and $f : X \to S$ satisfying the hypotheses of
Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}.
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
and let $\mathcal{L}_i$ be the pullback to $X_i$. Let $Z \subset S$,
resp.\ $Z_i \subset S$ be the locally closed subscheme constructed
in Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}
for $(f, \mathcal{L})$, resp.\ $(f_i, \mathcal{L}_i)$
so that $Z \subset \bigcap_{i = 1, \ldots, n} Z_i$. If $s \in Z$ and
$$
H^1(X_s, \mathcal{O}) \longrightarrow
\bigoplus\nolimits_{i = 1, \ldots, n} H^1(X_{i, s}, \mathcal{O})
$$
is injective, then $Z \cap U = (\bigcap_{i = 1, \ldots, n} Z_i) \cap U$
(scheme theoretic intersection) for some open neighbourhood $U$ of $s$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This lemma is a variant of Lemma \ref{lemma-H1-O-picard-flat-proper}
and we strongly urge the reader to read that proof first; this proof
is basically a copy of that proof with minor modifications. It follows
from the description of (scheme valued) points of $Z$ and the $Z_i$
that $Z \subset \bigcap_{i = 1, \ldots, n} Z_i$ where we take the
scheme theoretic intersection. Thus we may replace $S$ by the scheme
theoretic intersection $\bigcap_{i = 1, \ldots, n} Z_i$. After shrinking
$S$ to an affine open neighbourhood of $s$ we may assume that
$\mathcal{L}_i = \mathcal{O}_{X_i}$ for $i = 1, \ldots, n$.
Let $E = Rf_*\mathcal{L}$ and
$E_i = Rf_{i, *}\mathcal{L}_i = Rf_{i, *}\mathcal{O}_{X_i}$.
These are perfect complexes whose formation commutes with arbitrary
change of base (Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-flat-proper-perfect-direct-image-general}).
In particular we see that
$$
E \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S}^\mathbf{L} \kappa(s) =
R\Gamma(X_s, \mathcal{L}_s) = R\Gamma(X_s, \mathcal{O}_{X_s})
$$
The second equality because $s \in Z$. Set
$h_j = \dim_{\kappa(s)} H^j(X_s, \mathcal{O}_{X_s})$.
After shrinking $S$ we can represent $E$ by a complex
$$
\mathcal{O}_S \to \mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_1} \to
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_2} \to \ldots
$$
see More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-lift-perfect-from-residue-field}
(strictly speaking this also uses
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemmas
\ref{perfect-lemma-affine-compare-bounded} and
\ref{perfect-lemma-perfect-affine}). Similarly, we may assume $E_i$
is represented by a complex
$$
\mathcal{O}_S \to \mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_{i, 1}} \to
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_{i, 2}} \to \ldots
$$
where $h_{i, j} = \dim_{\kappa(s)} H^j(X_{i, s}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{i, s}})$.
By functoriality of cohomology we have a map
$$
E \longrightarrow E_i
$$
in $D(\mathcal{O}_S)$ whose formation commutes with change of base.
Since the complex representing $E$ is a finite complex of finite free
modules and since $S$ is affine, we can choose a map of complexes
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_S \ar[r]_d \ar[d]_{a_i} &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_1} \ar[r] \ar[d]_{b_i} &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_2} \ar[r] \ar[d]_{c_i} & \ldots \\
\mathcal{O}_S \ar[r]^{d_i} &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_{i, 1}} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_S^{\oplus h_{i, 2}} \ar[r] & \ldots
}
$$
representing the given map $E \to E_i$. Since $s \in Z$ we see that
the trivializing section of $\mathcal{L}_s$ pulls back to a trivializing
section of $\mathcal{L}_{i, s} = \mathcal{O}_{X_{i, s}}$. Thus
$a_i \otimes \kappa(s)$ is an isomorphism, hence after shrinking $S$
we see that $a_i$ is an isomorphism. Finally, we use the hypothesis
that $H^1(X_s, \mathcal{O}) \to
\bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, n} H^1(X_{i, s}, \mathcal{O})$
is injective, to see that there exists a $h_1 \times h_1$ minor of the
matrix defining $\oplus b_i$ which maps to a nonzero
element in $\kappa(s)$. Hence after shrinking $S$ we may assume that
$(b_1, \ldots, b_n) : \mathcal{O}_S^{h_1}
\to \bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, n} \mathcal{O}_S^{h_{i, 1}}$
is injective. However, since $\mathcal{L}_i = \mathcal{O}_{X_i}$
we see that $d_i = 0$ for $i = 1, \ldots n$. It follows that $d = 0$
because $(b_1, \ldots, b_n) \circ d = (\oplus d_i) \circ (a_1, \ldots, a_n)$.
In this way we see
that the trivializing section of $\mathcal{L}_s$ lifts to a section
of $\mathcal{L}$ over $X$. A straightforward topological argument (omitted)
shows that this means that $\mathcal{L}$ is trivial after possibly
shrinking $S$ a bit further.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pic-of-product}
Let $f : X \to S$ and $g : Y \to S$ be morphisms of schemes
satisfying the hypotheses of Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}.
Let $\sigma : S \to X$ and $\tau : S \to Y$ be sections of
$f$ and $g$. Let $s \in S$.
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible sheaf on $X \times_S Y$.
If $(1 \times \tau)^*\mathcal{L}$ on $X$, $(\sigma \times 1)^*\mathcal{L}$
on $Y$, and $\mathcal{L}|_{(X \times_S Y)_s}$ are trivial, then
there is an open neighbourhood $U$ of $s$ such that
$\mathcal{L}$ is trivial over $(X \times_S Y)_U$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By K\"unneth (Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-kunneth})
the map
$$
H^1(X_s \times_{\Spec(\kappa(s)} Y_s, \mathcal{O}) \to
H^1(X_s, \mathcal{O}) \oplus H^1(Y_s, \mathcal{O})
$$
is injective. Thus we may
apply Lemma \ref{lemma-H1-O-multiple-picard-flat-proper}
to the two morphisms
$$
1 \times \tau : X \to X \times_S Y
\quad\text{and}\quad
\sigma \times 1 : Y \to X \times_S Y
$$
to conclude.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Theorem of the cube]
\label{theorem-of-the-cube}
Let $k$ be a field. Let $X, Y, Z$ be varieties with
$k$-rational points $x, y, z$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible
module on $X \times Y \times Z$. If
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{L}$ is trivial over
$x \times Y \times Z$, $X \times y \times Z$, and $X \times Y \times z$, and
\item $X$ and $Y$ are geometrically integral and proper over $k$,
\end{enumerate}
then $\mathcal{L}$ is trivial.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Since $X$ and $Y$ are geometrically integral and proper over $k$
the product $X \times_k Y$ is geometrically integral and proper over $k$.
This implies that $H^0(X \times Y, \mathcal{O}_{X \times Y}) = k$
and that the same remains true after any base change.
Thus we may apply Lemma \ref{lemma-diagonal-picard-flat-proper}
to the morphism
$$
p : X \times Y \times Z \longrightarrow Z
$$
and the invertible module $\mathcal{L}$ to get a locally closed
subscheme $Z' \subset Z$ such that $\mathcal{L}|_{X \times Y \times Z'}$
is the pullback of an invertible module $\mathcal{N}$ on $Z'$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-get-a-closed}
we see that $Z' \subset Z$ is a closed subscheme.
Hence if $Z'$ contains an open neighbourhood of $z$, then
$Z' = Z$ and we see that $\mathcal{L} = p^*\mathcal{N}$.
Restricting to $x \times y \times Z$ we find that
$\mathcal{N} \cong \mathcal{O}_Z$ and $\mathcal{L}$ is trivial.
To get the desired open neighbourhood of $z$ apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-pic-of-product}
to the morphism $p$, the point $z$, and the sections
$\sigma : Z \to X \times Z$ and $\tau : Z \to Y \times Z$ given by $x$ and $y$.
\end{proof}









\section{Limit arguments}
\label{section-limits}

\noindent
Some lemmas involving limits of schemes, and Noetherian approximation.
We stick mostly to the affine case. Some of these lemmas are special
cases of lemmas in the chapter on limits.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is of finite
presentation. Then there exists a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_0 \ar[d]_{f_0} & X \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^f \\
S_0 & S \ar[l]
}
$$
such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X_0$, $S_0$ are affine schemes,
\item $S_0$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$,
\item $f_0$ is finite of finite type.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $S = \Spec(A)$ and $X = \Spec(B)$.
As $f$ is of finite presentation we see that
$B$ is of finite presentation as an $A$-algebra, see
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-characterize}.
Thus the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-limit-module-finite-presentation}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-module}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is of finite
presentation. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
of finite presentation. Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that there exists a coherent $\mathcal{O}_{X_0}$-module $\mathcal{F}_0$
with $g^*\mathcal{F}_0 = \mathcal{F}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $S = \Spec(A)$, $X = \Spec(B)$, and
$\mathcal{F} = \widetilde{M}$. As $f$ is of finite presentation we see that
$B$ is of finite presentation as an $A$-algebra, see
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-characterize}.
As $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_X$ we see that
$M$ is of finite presentation as a $B$-module, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-presentation-module}.
Thus the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-limit-module-finite-presentation}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-flat-module}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is of finite
presentation. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
of finite presentation and flat over $S$. Then we may choose a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-module}
and sheaf $\mathcal{F}_0$ such that in addition $\mathcal{F}_0$
is flat over $S_0$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $S = \Spec(A)$, $X = \Spec(B)$, and
$\mathcal{F} = \widetilde{M}$. As $f$ is of finite presentation we see that
$B$ is of finite presentation as an $A$-algebra, see
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-presentation-characterize}.
As $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation over $\mathcal{O}_X$ we see that
$M$ is of finite presentation as a $B$-module, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-finite-presentation-module}.
As $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $S$ we see that $M$ is flat over $A$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-module-characterize}.
Thus the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-limit-flat}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-flat}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is of finite
presentation and flat. Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition $f_0$ is flat.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a special case of
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-flat-module}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is smooth.
Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition $f_0$ is smooth.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $S = \Spec(A)$, $X = \Spec(B)$, and
as $f$ is smooth we see that $B$ is smooth as an $A$-algebra, see
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-characterize}.
Hence the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-finite-presentation-fs-Noetherian}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-geometrically-reduced}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is
of finite presentation with geometrically reduced fibres.
Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition $f_0$ has geometrically reduced fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
to get a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_0 \ar[d]_{f_0} & X \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^f \\
S_0 & S \ar[l]_h
}
$$
of affine schemes with $X_0 \to S_0$ a finite type morphism of
schemes of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-geometrically-reduced-constructible}
the set $E \subset S_0$ of points where the fibre of
$f_0$ is geometrically reduced is a constructible subset. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-reduced}
we have $h(S) \subset E$. Write $S_0 = \Spec(A_0)$ and
$S = \Spec(A)$. Write $A = \colim_i A_i$ as a
direct colimit of finite type $A_0$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-limit-contained-in-constructible}
we see that $\Spec(A_i) \to S_0$ has image contained in $E$
for some $i$. After replacing $S_0$ by $\Spec(A_i)$ and
$X_0$ by $X_0 \times_{S_0} \Spec(A_i)$ we see that
all fibres of $f_0$ are geometrically reduced.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-geometrically-irreducible}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is
of finite presentation with geometrically irreducible fibres.
Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition $f_0$ has geometrically irreducible fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
to get a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_0 \ar[d]_{f_0} & X \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^f \\
S_0 & S \ar[l]_h
}
$$
of affine schemes with $X_0 \to S_0$ a finite type morphism of
schemes of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-nr-geom-irreducible-components-constructible}
the set $E \subset S_0$ of points where the fibre of
$f_0$ is geometrically irreducible is a constructible subset. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-irreducible}
we have $h(S) \subset E$. Write $S_0 = \Spec(A_0)$ and
$S = \Spec(A)$. Write $A = \colim_i A_i$ as a
direct colimit of finite type $A_0$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-limit-contained-in-constructible}
we see that $\Spec(A_i) \to S_0$ has image contained in $E$
for some $i$. After replacing $S_0$ by $\Spec(A_i)$ and
$X_0$ by $X_0 \times_{S_0} \Spec(A_i)$ we see that
all fibres of $f_0$ are geometrically irreducible.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-geometrically-connected}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is
of finite presentation with geometrically connected fibres.
Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition $f_0$ has geometrically connected fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
to get a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_0 \ar[d]_{f_0} & X \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^f \\
S_0 & S \ar[l]_h
}
$$
of affine schemes with $X_0 \to S_0$ a finite type morphism of
schemes of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-nr-geom-connected-components-constructible}
the set $E \subset S_0$ of points where the fibre of
$f_0$ is geometrically connected is a constructible subset. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-geometrically-connected}
we have $h(S) \subset E$. Write $S_0 = \Spec(A_0)$ and
$S = \Spec(A)$. Write $A = \colim_i A_i$ as a
direct colimit of finite type $A_0$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-limit-contained-in-constructible}
we see that $\Spec(A_i) \to S_0$ has image contained in $E$
for some $i$. After replacing $S_0$ by $\Spec(A_i)$ and
$X_0$ by $X_0 \times_{S_0} \Spec(A_i)$ we see that
all fibres of $f_0$ are geometrically connected.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-dimension-d}
Let $d \geq 0$ be an integer.
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is
of finite presentation all of whose fibres have dimension $d$.
Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition all fibres of $f_0$ have dimension $d$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
to get a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_0 \ar[d]_{f_0} & X \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^f \\
S_0 & S \ar[l]_h
}
$$
of affine schemes with $X_0 \to S_0$ a finite type morphism of
schemes of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-dimension-fibres-constructible}
the set $E \subset S_0$ of points where the fibre of
$f_0$ has dimension $d$ is a constructible subset. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-dimension-fibres}
we have $h(S) \subset E$. Write $S_0 = \Spec(A_0)$ and
$S = \Spec(A)$. Write $A = \colim_i A_i$ as a
direct colimit of finite type $A_0$-algebras. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-limit-contained-in-constructible}
we see that $\Spec(A_i) \to S_0$ has image contained in $E$
for some $i$. After replacing $S_0$ by $\Spec(A_i)$ and
$X_0$ by $X_0 \times_{S_0} \Spec(A_i)$ we see that
all fibres of $f_0$ have dimension $d$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-standard-syntomic}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes, which is
standard syntomic (see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-syntomic}).
Then there exists a diagram as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-Noetherian-approximation}
such that in addition $f_0$ is standard syntomic.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This lemma is a copy of
Algebra,
Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-relative-global-complete-intersection-Noetherian}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-approximation-combine}
(Noetherian approximation and combining properties.)
Let $P$, $Q$ be properties of morphisms of schemes which are stable
under base change. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of finite presentation
of affine schemes. Assume we can find cartesian diagrams
$$
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
X_1 \ar[d]_{f_1} & X \ar[l] \ar[d]^f \\
S_1 & S \ar[l]
}
}
\quad\text{and}\quad
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
X_2 \ar[d]_{f_2} & X \ar[l] \ar[d]^f \\
S_2 & S \ar[l]
}
}
$$
of affine schemes, with $S_1$, $S_2$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$
and $f_1$, $f_2$ of finite type such that $f_1$ has property $P$
and $f_2$ has property $Q$. Then we can find a cartesian diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X_0 \ar[d]_{f_0} & X \ar[l] \ar[d]^f \\
S_0 & S \ar[l]
}
$$
of affine schemes with $S_0$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$
and $f_0$ of finite type such that $f_0$ has both property $P$ and
property $Q$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The given pair of diagrams correspond to cocartesian diagrams of rings
$$
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
B_1 \ar[r] & B \\
A_1 \ar[u] \ar[r] & A \ar[u]
}
}
\quad\text{and}\quad
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
B_2 \ar[r] & B \\
A_2 \ar[u] \ar[r] & A \ar[u]
}
}
$$
Let $A_0 \subset A$ be a finite type $\mathbf{Z}$-subalgebra of $A$
containing the image of both $A_1 \to A$ and $A_2 \to A$. Such a subalgebra
exists because by assumption both $A_1$ and $A_2$ are of finite type over
$\mathbf{Z}$. Note that the rings $B_{0, 1} = B_1 \otimes_{A_1} A_0$
and $B_{0, 2} = B_2 \otimes_{A_2} A_0$ are finite type $A_0$-algebras
with the property that
$B_{0, 1} \otimes_{A_0} A \cong B \cong B_{0, 2} \otimes_{A_0} A$
as $A$-algebras. As $A$ is the directed colimit of its finite type
$A_0$-subalgebras, by
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation}
we may assume after enlarging $A_0$ that there exists an isomorphism
$B_{0, 1} \cong B_{0, 2}$ as $A_0$-algebras. Since properties $P$ and $Q$
are assumed stable under base change we conclude that setting
$S_0 = \Spec(A_0)$ and
$$
X_0 = X_1 \times_{S_1} S_0 =
\Spec(B_{0, 1}) \cong \Spec(B_{0, 2}) = X_2 \times_{S_2} S_0
$$
works.
\end{proof}












\section{\'Etale neighbourhoods}
\label{section-etale-neighbourhoods}

\noindent
It turns out that some properties of morphisms are easier to study
after doing an \'etale base change. It is convenient to introduce the
following terminology.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-etale-neighbourhood}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $s \in S$ be a point.
\begin{enumerate}
\item An {\it \'etale neighbourhood of $(S, s)$} is a
pair $(U, u)$ together with an \'etale morphism
of schemes $\varphi : U \to S$ such that $\varphi(u) = s$.
\item A {\it morphism of \'etale neighbourhoods} $f : (V, v) \to (U, u)$
of $(S, s)$ is simply a morphism of $S$-schemes $f : V \to U$ such
that $f(v) = u$.
\item An {\it elementary \'etale neighbourhood} is an \'etale neighbourhood
$\varphi : (U, u) \to (S, s)$ such that $\kappa(s) = \kappa(u)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
If $f : (V, v) \to (U, u)$ is a morphism of \'etale
neighbourhoods, then $f$ is automatically \'etale, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-permanence}.
Hence it turns $(V, v)$ into an \'etale neighbourhood of
$(U, u)$. Of course, since the composition of \'etale morphisms
is \'etale (Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-etale})
we see that conversely any \'etale neighbourhood $(V, v)$ of
$(U, u)$ is an \'etale neighbourhood of $(S, s)$ as well.
We also remark that if $U \subset S$ is an open neighbourhood
of $s$, then $(U, s) \to (S, s)$ is an \'etale neighbourhood.
This follows from the fact that an open immersion is
\'etale (Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-open-immersion-etale}).
We will use these remarks without further mention throughout this
section.

\medskip\noindent
Note that $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(u)$ is a finite separable extension
if $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ is an \'etale neighbourhood,
see Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-at-point}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-realize-prescribed-residue-field-extension-etale}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $s \in S$.
Let $\kappa(s) \subset k$ be a finite separable field extension.
Then there exists an \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
such that the field extension $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(u)$ is
isomorphic to $\kappa(s) \subset k$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $S$ is affine.
In this case the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-make-etale-map-prescribed-residue-field}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-neighbourhoods-not-quite-filtered}
Let $S$ be a scheme, and let $s$ be a point of $S$.
The category of \'etale neighborhoods has the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Let $(U_i, u_i)_{i=1, 2}$ be two \'etale neighborhoods of
$s$ in $S$. Then there exists a third \'etale neighborhood
$(U, u)$ and morphisms
$(U, u) \to (U_i, u_i)$, $i = 1, 2$.
\item Let $h_1, h_2: (U, u) \to (U', u')$ be two
morphisms between \'etale neighborhoods of $s$.
Assume $h_1$, $h_2$ induce the same map $\kappa(u') \to \kappa(u)$ of residue
fields. Then there exist an \'etale neighborhood $(U'', u'')$ and a morphism
$h : (U'', u'') \to (U, u)$
which equalizes $h_1$ and $h_2$, i.e., such that
$h_1 \circ h = h_2 \circ h$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For part (1), consider the fibre product $U = U_1 \times_S U_2$.
It is \'etale over both $U_1$ and $U_2$ because \'etale morphisms are
preserved under base change, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-etale}.
There is a point of $U$ mapping to both $u_1$ and $u_2$ for example
by the description of points of a fibre product in
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-points-fibre-product}.
For part (2), define $U''$ as the fibre product
$$
\xymatrix{
U'' \ar[r] \ar[d] & U \ar[d]^{(h_1, h_2)} \\
U' \ar[r]^-\Delta & U' \times_S U'.
}
$$
Since $h_1$ and $h_2$ induce the same map of residue fields
$\kappa(u') \to \kappa(u)$ there exists a point $u'' \in U''$
lying over $u'$ with $\kappa(u'') = \kappa(u')$.
In particular $U'' \not = \emptyset$.
Moreover, since $U'$ is \'etale over $S$, so is the fibre product
$U'\times_S U'$ (see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-etale} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-etale}).
Hence the vertical arrow $(h_1, h_2)$ is \'etale by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-permanence}.
Therefore $U''$ is \'etale over $U'$ by base change, and hence also
\'etale over $S$ (because compositions of \'etale morphisms are \'etale).
Thus $(U'', u'')$ is a solution to the problem.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-elementary-etale-neighbourhoods}
Let $S$ be a scheme, and let $s$ be a point of $S$.
The category of elementary \'etale neighborhoods of $(S, s)$
is cofiltered (see
Categories, Definition \ref{categories-definition-codirected}).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is immediate from the definitions and
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-neighbourhoods-not-quite-filtered}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-describe-henselization}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $s \in S$. Then we have
$$
\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^h =
\colim_{(U, u)} \mathcal{O}(U)
$$
where the colimit is over the filtered category which is opposite to the
category of elementary \'etale neighbourhoods $(U, u)$ of $(S, s)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $\Spec(A) \subset S$ be an affine neighbourhood of $s$.
Let $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be the prime ideal corresponding to $s$.
With these choices we have canonical isomorphisms
$\mathcal{O}_{S, s} = A_{\mathfrak p}$ and $\kappa(s) = \kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
A cofinal system of elementary \'etale neighbourhoods is given by those
elementary \'etale neighbourhoods $(U, u)$ such that $U$ is affine and
$U \to S$ factors through $\Spec(A)$. In other words, we see that
the right hand side is equal to $\colim_{(B, \mathfrak q)} B$
where the colimit is over \'etale $A$-algebras $B$ endowed with a prime
$\mathfrak q$ lying over $\mathfrak p$ with
$\kappa(\mathfrak p) = \kappa(\mathfrak q)$.
Thus the lemma follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-henselization-different}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
We can lift \'etale neighbourhoods of points on fibres
to the total space.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lift-etale-neighbourhood-fibre}
\begin{slogan}
Lift \'etale neighbourhood of point on fibre to total space.
\end{slogan}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $x \in X$ with image $s \in S$.
Let $(V, v) \to (X_s, x)$ be an \'etale neighbourhood.
Then there exists an \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$
such that there exists a morphism $(U_s, u) \to (V, v)$
of \'etale neighbourhoods of $(X_s, x)$ which is an open immersion.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $X$, $V$, and $S$ affine. Say the morphism
$X \to S$ is given by $A \to B$ the point $x$ by a prime
$\mathfrak q \subset B$, the point $s$ by $\mathfrak p = A \cap \mathfrak q$,
and the morphism $V \to X_s$ by $B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p) \to C$.
Since $\kappa(\mathfrak p)$ is a localization of
$A/\mathfrak p$ there exists an $f \in A$, $f \not \in \mathfrak p$
and an \'etale ring map $B \otimes_A (A/\mathfrak p)_f \to D$
such that
$$
C = (B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p))
\otimes_{B \otimes_A (A/\mathfrak p)_f} D
$$
See Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale} part (9).
After replacing $A$ by $A_f$ and $B$ by $B_f$ we may assume
$D$ is \'etale over $B \otimes_A A/\mathfrak p = B/\mathfrak p B$.
Then we can apply Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-lift-etale}.
This proves the lemma.
\end{proof}








\section{\'Etale neighbourhoods and Artin approximation}
\label{section-etale-nbhds-artin}

\noindent
In this section we prove results of the form: if two schemes
pointed schemes have isomorphic complete local rings, then
they have isomorphic \'etale neighbourhoods. We will rely
on Popescu's theorem, see
Smoothing Ring Maps, Theorem \ref{smoothing-theorem-popescu}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-map-approximation}
Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $X$, $Y$ be
schemes locally of finite
type over $S$. Let $x \in X$ and $y \in Y$ be points lying over the
same point $s \in S$. Assume $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$ is a G-ring.
Assume further we are given a local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map
$$
\varphi : \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge
$$
between the complete local rings. For every $N \geq 1$
there exists an elementary \'etale neighbourhood
$(U, u) \to (X, x)$ and an $S$-morphism
$f : U \to Y$ mapping $u$ to $y$ such that the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{U, u}^\wedge \\
\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \ar[r]^{f^\sharp_u} \ar[u]^\varphi &
\mathcal{O}_{U, u} \ar[u]
}
$$
commutes modulo $\mathfrak m_u^N$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The question is local on $X$ hence we may assume $X$, $Y$, $S$ are affine.
Say $S = \Spec(R)$, $X = \Spec(A)$, $Y = \Spec(B)$.
Write $B = R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_m)$.
Let $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be the prime ideal corresponding to $x$.
The local ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x} = A_\mathfrak p$ is a G-ring by
More on Algebra, Proposition
\ref{more-algebra-proposition-finite-type-over-G-ring}.
The map $\varphi$ is a map
$$
B_\mathfrak q^\wedge \longrightarrow A_\mathfrak p^\wedge
$$
where $\mathfrak q \subset B$ is the prime corresponding to $y$.
Let $a_1, \ldots, a_n \in A_\mathfrak p^\wedge$ be the images
of $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ via
$R[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B \to B_\mathfrak q^\wedge \to A_\mathfrak p^\wedge$.
Then we can apply Smoothing Ring Maps, Lemma
\ref{smoothing-lemma-approximation-property-variant}
to get an \'etale ring map $A \to A'$ and a prime ideal
$\mathfrak p' \subset A'$ and $b_1, \ldots, b_n \in A'$ such that
$\kappa(\mathfrak p) = \kappa(\mathfrak p')$,
$a_i - b_i \in (\mathfrak p')^N(A'_{\mathfrak p'})^\wedge$, and
$f_j(b_1, \ldots, b_n) = 0$ for $j = 1, \ldots, n$.
This determines an $R$-algebra map $B \to A'$ by sending the
class of $x_i$ to $b_i \in A'$. This finishes the proof
by taking $U = \Spec(A') \to \Spec(B)$ as the morphism $f$
and $u = \mathfrak p'$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-isomorphism-approximation}
Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. Let $X$, $Y$ be
schemes locally of finite
type over $S$. Let $x \in X$ and $y \in Y$ be points lying over the
same point $s \in S$. Assume $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$ is a G-ring.
Assume we have an $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra isomorphism
$$
\varphi : \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}^\wedge \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge
$$
between the complete local rings. Then for every $N \geq 1$
there exists morphisms
$$
(X, x) \leftarrow (U, u) \rightarrow (Y, y)
$$
of pointed schemes over $S$ such that both arrows define elementary
\'etale neighbourhoods and such that the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
& \mathcal{O}_{U, u}^\wedge \\
\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}^\wedge \ar[rr]^\varphi \ar[ru] & &
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \ar[lu]
}
$$
commutes modulo $\mathfrak m_u^N$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $N \geq 2$. Apply Lemma \ref{lemma-map-approximation} to get
$(U, u) \to (X, x)$ and $f : (U, u) \to (Y, y)$.
We claim that $f$ is \'etale at $u$ which will finish the proof.
In fact, we will show that the induced map
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}^\wedge \to \mathcal{O}_{U, u}^\wedge$
is an isomorphism. Having proved this,
Lemma \ref{lemma-lifting-along-artinian-at-point}
will show that $f$ is smooth at $u$ and of course
$f$ is unramified at $u$ as well, so
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-smooth-unramified}
tells us $f$ is \'etale at $u$.
For a local ring $(R, \mathfrak m)$ we set
$\text{Gr}_\mathfrak m(R) =
\bigoplus_{n \geq 0} \mathfrak m^n/\mathfrak m^{n + 1}$.
To prove the claim we look at the induced diagram
of graded rings
$$
\xymatrix{
& \text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_u}(\mathcal{O}_{U, u}) \\
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_y}(\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}) \ar[rr]^\varphi \ar[ru] & &
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_x}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) \ar[lu]
}
$$
Since $N \geq 2$ this diagram is actually commutative as the
displayed graded algebras are generated in degree $1$!
By assumption the lower arrow is an isomorphism.
By More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-unramified}
(for example) the map
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \to \mathcal{O}_{U, u}^\wedge$
is an isomorphism and hence the north-west arrow
in the diagram is an isomorphism. We conclude that
$f$ induces an isomorphism
$\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_x}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}) \to
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_y}(\mathcal{O}_{U, u})$.
Using induction and the short exact sequences
$$
0 \to \text{Gr}^n_{\mathfrak m}(R) \to R/\mathfrak m^{n + 1} \to
R/\mathfrak m^n \to 0
$$
for both local rings we conclude (from the snake lemma)
that $f$ induces isomorphisms
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}/\mathfrak m_y^n \to \mathcal{O}_{U, u}/\mathfrak m_u^n$
for all $n$ which is what we wanted to show.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-map-approximation}
Consider a diagram
$$
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] & Y \ar[d] \\
S & T \ar[l]
}
}
\quad\text{with points}\quad
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
x \ar[d] & y \ar[d] \\
s & t \ar[l]
}
}
$$
where $S$ be a locally Noetherian scheme and the morphisms are
locally of finite type. Assume $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$ is a G-ring.
Assume further we are given a local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map
$$
\sigma : \mathcal{O}_{T, t} \longrightarrow \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge
$$
and a local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map
$$
\varphi :
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}
\longrightarrow
\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma, y_\sigma}^\wedge
$$
where $Y_\sigma = Y \times_{T, \sigma} \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge)$
and $y_\sigma$ is the unique point of $Y_\sigma$ lying over $y$.
For every $N \geq 1$ there exists a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] & X \times_S V \ar[l] \ar[rd] &
W \ar[l]^-f \ar[r] \ar[d] &
Y \times_{T, \tau} V \ar[r] \ar[ld] & Y \ar[d] \\
S & & V \ar[ll] \ar[rr]^\tau & & T
}
$$
of schemes over $S$ and points $w \in W$, $v \in V$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $v \mapsto s$, $\tau(v) = t$, $f(w) = (x, v)$, and $w \mapsto (y, v)$,
\item $(V, v) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary \'etale neighbourhood,
\item the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge \ar[r] & \mathcal{O}_{V, v}^\wedge \\
\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \ar[r]^{\tau^\sharp_v} \ar[u]_\sigma &
\mathcal{O}_{V, v} \ar[u]
}
$$
commutes module $\mathfrak m_v^N$,
\item $(W, w) \to (Y \times_{T, \tau} V, (y, v))$ is an
elementary \'etale neighbourhood,
\item the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \ar[r]_\varphi &
\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma, y_\sigma}^\wedge \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma, y_\sigma}/\mathfrak m_{y_\sigma}^N \ar@{=}[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{Y \times_{T, \tau} V, (y, v)}/\mathfrak m_{(y, v)}^N
\ar[d]_{\cong} \\
\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \ar[r] \ar@{=}[u] &
\mathcal{O}_{X \times_S V, (x, v)} \ar[r]^{f^\sharp_w} &
\mathcal{O}_{W, w} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{W, w}/\mathfrak m_w^N
}
$$
commutes. The equality comes from the fact that
$Y_\sigma$ and $Y \times_{T, \tau} V$ are canonically isomorphic over
$\mathcal{O}_{V, v}/\mathfrak m_v^N = \mathcal{O}_{S, s}/\mathfrak m_s^N$
by parts (2) and (3).
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
After replacing $X$, $S$, $T$, $Y$ by affine open subschemes we
may assume the diagram in the statement of the lemma comes
from applying $\Spec$ to a diagram
$$
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
A & B \\
R \ar[u] \ar[r] & C \ar[u]
}
}
\quad\text{with primes}\quad
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
\mathfrak p_A & \mathfrak p_B \\
\mathfrak p_R \ar@{-}[u] \ar@{-}[r] & \mathfrak p_C \ar@{-}[u]
}
}
$$
of Noetherian rings and finite type ring maps.
In this proof every ring $E$ will be a Noetherian $R$-algebra endowed with
a prime ideal $\mathfrak p_E$ lying over $\mathfrak p_R$ and all ring maps
will be $R$-algebra maps compatible with the given primes. Moreover,
if we write $E^\wedge$ we mean the completion of the localization
of $E$ at $\mathfrak p_E$. We will also use without further mention
that an \'etale ring map $E_1 \to E_2$ such that
$\kappa(\mathfrak p_{E_1}) = \kappa(\mathfrak p_{E_2})$ induces
an isomorphism $E_1^\wedge = E_2^\wedge$ by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-unramified}.

\medskip\noindent
With this notation $\sigma$ and $\varphi$ correspond to ring maps
$$
\sigma : C \to R^\wedge
\quad\text{and}\quad
\varphi : A \longrightarrow (B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)^\wedge
$$
Here is a picture
$$
\xymatrix{
A \ar@/^1em/[rrr]^\varphi &
B \ar[r] &
B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \ar[r] &
(B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)^\wedge \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] &
C \ar[r]^\sigma \ar[u] & R^\wedge \ar[u] \ar[ru]
}
$$
Observe that $R^\wedge$ is a G-ring by
More on Algebra, Proposition
\ref{more-algebra-proposition-Noetherian-complete-G-ring}.
Thus $B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge$ is a G-ring by
More on Algebra, Proposition
\ref{more-algebra-proposition-finite-type-over-G-ring}.
By Lemma \ref{lemma-map-approximation} (translated into algebra)
there exists an \'etale ring map $B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \to B'$
inducing an isomorphism
$\kappa(\mathfrak p_{B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge})
\to \kappa(\mathfrak p_{B'})$
and an $R$-algebra map $A \to B'$ such that the composition
$$
A \to B' \to (B')^\wedge = (B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)^\wedge
$$
is the same as $\varphi$ modulo
$(\mathfrak p_{(B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)^\wedge})^N$.
Thus we may replace $\varphi$ by this composition because the
only way $\varphi$ enters the conclusion is via the commutativity
requirement in part (5) of the statement of the lemma.
Picture:
$$
\xymatrix{
& & B' \ar[r] & (B')^\wedge \ar@{=}[d] \\
A \ar[rru] &
B \ar[r] &
B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \ar[r] \ar[u] &
(B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)^\wedge \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] &
C \ar[r]^\sigma \ar[u] & R^\wedge \ar[u] \ar[ru]
}
$$
Next, we use that $R^\wedge$ is a filtered colimit of smooth
$R$-algebras (Smoothing Ring Maps, Theorem \ref{smoothing-theorem-popescu})
because $R_{\mathfrak p_R}$ is a G-ring by assumption. Since $C$ is of
finite presentation over $R$ we get a factorization
$$
C \to R' \to R^\wedge
$$
for some $R \to R'$ smooth, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-characterize-finite-presentation}.
After increasing $R'$ we may assume there exists
an \'etale $B \otimes_C R'$-algebra $B''$ whose base change
to $B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge$ is $B'$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale}.
Then $B'$ is the filtered colimit of these $B''$ and we
conclude that after increasing $R'$ we may assume there is
an $R$-algebra map $A \to B''$ such that $A \to B'' \to B'$ is
the previously constructed map (same reference as above). Picture
$$
\xymatrix{
& & B'' \ar[r] & B' \ar[r] & (B')^\wedge \ar@{=}[d] \\
A \ar[rru] &
B \ar[r] &
B \otimes_C R' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \ar[r] \ar[u] &
(B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)^\wedge \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] &
C \ar[r] \ar[u] &
R' \ar[r] \ar[u] &
R^\wedge \ar[u] \ar[ru]
}
$$
and
$$
B' = B'' \otimes_{(B \otimes_C R')} (B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)
$$
This means that we may replace $C$ by $R'$, $\sigma : C \to R^\wedge$ by
$R' \to R^\wedge$, and $B$ by $B''$ so that we simplify to the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
A \ar[r] &
B \ar[r] &
B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \\
R \ar[r] \ar[u] &
C \ar[r]^\sigma \ar[u] & R^\wedge \ar[u]
}
$$
with $\varphi$ equal to the composition of the horizontal arrows
followed by the canonical map from $B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge$
to its completion.
The final step in the proof is to apply Lemma \ref{lemma-map-approximation}
(or its proof)
one more time to $\Spec(C)$ and $\Spec(R)$ over $\Spec(R)$ and the map
$C \to R^\wedge$. The lemma produces a ring map $C \to D$
such that $R \to D$ is \'etale, such that
$\kappa(\mathfrak p_R) = \kappa(\mathfrak p_D)$, and such that
$$
C \to D \to D^\wedge = R^\wedge
$$
is equal to $\sigma : C \to R^\wedge$ modulo $(\mathfrak p_{R^\wedge})^N$.
Then we can take
$$
V = \Spec(D)
\quad\text{and}\quad
W = \Spec(B \otimes_C D)
$$
as our solution to the problem posed by the lemma. Namely the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
A \ar[r] &
B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \ar[r] &
B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge/(\mathfrak p_{R^\wedge})^N \ar@{=}[r] &
B \otimes_C D/(\mathfrak p_D)^N \\
A \ar@{=}[u] \ar[r] &
A \otimes_R D \ar[r] &
B \otimes_R D \ar[r] &
B \otimes_C D/(\mathfrak p_D)^N \ar@{=}[u]
}
$$
commutes because $C \to D \to D^\wedge = R^\wedge$ is equal to
$\sigma$ modulo $(\mathfrak p_{R^\wedge})^N$. This proves part (5)
and the other properties are immediate from the construction.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-control-agreement}
Let $T \to S$ be finite type morphisms of Noetherian schemes.
Let $t \in T$ map to $s \in S$ and let
$\sigma : \mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$
be a local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map. For every $N \geq 1$
there exists a finite type morphism $(T', t') \to (T, t)$
such that $\sigma$ factors through
$\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{T', t'}$
and such that for every local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map
$\sigma' : \mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$
which factors through $\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{T', t'}$
the maps $\sigma$ and $\sigma'$ agree modulo $\mathfrak m_s^N$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $S$ and $T$ are affine. Say $S = \Spec(R)$ and
$T = \Spec(C)$. Let $c_1, \ldots, c_n \in C$ be generators
of $C$ as an $R$-algebra. Let $\mathfrak p \subset R$ be the
prime ideal corresponding to $s$. Say $\mathfrak p = (f_1, \ldots, f_m)$.
After replacing $R$ by a principal localization
(to clear denominators in $R_\mathfrak p$)
we may assume there exist
$r_1, \ldots, r_n \in R$ and $a_{i, I} \in \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$
where $I = (i_1, \ldots, i_m)$ with $\sum i_j = N$ such that
$$
\sigma(c_i) = r_i + \sum\nolimits_I a_{i, I} f_1^{i_1} \ldots f_m^{i_m}
$$
in $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$. Then we consider
$$
C' = C[t_{i, I}]/
\left(c_i - r_i - \sum\nolimits_I t_{i, I} f_1^{i_1} \ldots f_m^{i_m}\right)
$$
with $\mathfrak p' = \mathfrak pC' + (t_{i, I})$ and factorization
of $\sigma : C \to \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$ through $C'$
given by sending $t_{i, I}$ to $a_{i, I}$.
Taking $T' = \Spec(C')$ works because any $\sigma'$ as in the statement
of the lemma will send $c_i$ to $r_i$ modulo the maximal ideal
to the power $N$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-control-graded}
Let $Y \to T \to S$ be finite type morphisms of Noetherian schemes.
Let $t \in T$ map to $s \in S$ and let
$\sigma : \mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$
be a local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map.
There exists a finite type morphism $(T', t') \to (T, t)$
such that $\sigma$ factors through
$\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{T', t'}$
and such that for every local $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$-algebra map
$\sigma' : \mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$
which factors through $\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{T', t'}$
the closed immersions
$$
Y \times_{T, \sigma} \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge) = Y_\sigma
\longleftarrow Y_t \longrightarrow
Y_{\sigma'} =
Y \times_{T, \sigma'} \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge)
$$
have isomorphic conormal algebras.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
A useful observation is that $\kappa(s) = \kappa(t)$ by the existence of
$\sigma$. Observe that the statement makes sense as the fibres of $Y_\sigma$
and $Y_{\sigma'}$ over $s \in \Spec(\mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge)$
are both canonically isomorphic to $Y_t$. We will think of the property
``$\sigma'$ factors through $\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{T', t'}$''
as a constraint on $\sigma'$. If we have several such constraints,
say given by $(T'_i, t'_i) \to (T, t)$, $i = 1, \ldots, n$
then we can combined them by considering
$(T'_1 \times_T \ldots \times_T T'_n, (t'_1, \ldots, t'_n)) \to
(T, t)$. We will use this without further mention in the following.

\medskip\noindent
By Lemma \ref{lemma-control-agreement} we can assume that any $\sigma'$
as in the statement of the lemma is the same as $\sigma$ modulo
$\mathfrak m_s^2$. Note that the conormal algebra of $Y_t$ in
$Y_\sigma$ is just the quasi-coherent graded $\mathcal{O}_{Y_t}$-algebra
$$
\bigoplus\nolimits_{n \geq 0}
\mathfrak m_s^n\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma}/
\mathfrak m_s^{n + 1}\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma}
$$
and similarly for $Y_{\sigma'}$. Since $\sigma$ and $\sigma'$
agree modulo $\mathfrak m_s^2$ we see that these two algebras
are the same in degrees $0$ and $1$. On the other hand, these
conormal algebras are generated in degree $1$ over degree $0$.
Hence if there is an isomorphism extending the isomorphism
just constructed in degrees $0$ and $1$, then it is unique.

\medskip\noindent
We may assume $S$ and $T$ are affine. Let $Y = Y_1 \cup \ldots \cup Y_n$
be an affine open covering. If we can construct $(T_i', t'_i) \to (T, t)$
as in the lemma such that the desired isomorphism (see previous paragraph)
exists for $Y_i \to T \to S$ and $\sigma$, then these glue by
uniqueness to prove the result for $Y \to T$. Thus we may assume $Y$ is affine.

\medskip\noindent
Write $S = \Spec(R)$, $T = \Spec(C)$, and $Y = \Spec(B)$.
Choose a presentation $B = C[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_m)$.
Denote $R^\wedge = \mathcal{O}_{S, s}^\wedge$.
Let $a_{kj} \in R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ be polynomials
such that
$$
\sum\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m} a_{kj}\sigma(f_j) = 0,\quad
\text{for }k = 1, \ldots, K
$$
is a set of generators for the module of relations among
the $\sigma(f_j) \in R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$.
Thus we have an exact sequence
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-resolution}
R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]^{\oplus K} \to
R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]^{\oplus m} \to
R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge \to 0
\end{equation}
Let $c$ be an integer which works in the Artin-Rees lemma for
both the first and the second map in this sequence and the ideal
$\mathfrak m_{R^\wedge}R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ as defined in
More on Algebra, Section \ref{more-algebra-section-artin-rees}.
Write
$$
a_{kj} = \sum\nolimits_{I \in \Omega} a_{kj, I} x^I
\quad\text{and}\quad
f_j = \sum\nolimits_{I \in \Omega} f_{j, I} x^I
$$
in multiindex notation where $a_{kj, I} \in R^\wedge$, $f_{j, I} \in C$,
and $\Omega$ a finite set of multiindices. Then we see that
$$
\sum\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m,\ I, I' \in \Omega,\ I + I' = I''}
a_{kj, I} \sigma(f_{j, I'}) = 0,\quad
I''\text{ a multiindex}
$$
in $R^\wedge$. Thus we take
$$
C' = C[t_{jk, I}]/
\left(
\sum\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m,\ I, I' \in \Omega,\ I + I' = I''}
t_{kj, I} f_{j, I'},\ I''\text{ a multiindex}\right)
$$
Then $\sigma$ factors through a map $\tilde\sigma : C' \to R^\wedge$
sending $t_{kj, I}$ to $a_{jk, I}$.
Thus $T' = \Spec(C')$ comes with a point $t' \in T'$ such that
$\sigma$ factors through $\mathcal{O}_{T, t} \to \mathcal{O}_{T', t'}$.
Let $t_{kj} = \sum t_{kj, I} x^I$ in $C'[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$.
Then we see that we have a complex
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-resolution-new}
C'[x_1, \ldots, x_n]^{\oplus K} \to
C'[x_1, \ldots, x_n]^{\oplus m} \to
C'[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B \otimes_C C' \to 0
\end{equation}
which is exact at $C'[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ and whose base change
by $\tilde\sigma$ gives (\ref{equation-resolution}).

\medskip\noindent
By Lemma \ref{lemma-control-agreement}
we can find a further morphism $(T'', t'') \to (T', t')$
such that $\tilde\sigma$
factors through $\mathcal{O}_{T', t'} \to \mathcal{O}_{T'', t''}$
and such that if $\sigma' : C \to R^\wedge$
factors through $\mathcal{O}_{T'', t''}$, then the induced map
$\tilde \sigma' : C' \to R^\wedge$
agrees modulo $\mathfrak m_s^{c + 1}$ with $\tilde \sigma$.
Thus if $\sigma'$ is such a map, then we obtain a complex
$$
R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]^{\oplus K} \to
R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]^{\oplus m} \to
R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B \otimes_{C, \sigma'} R^\wedge \to 0
$$
over $R^\wedge[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ by applying $\tilde\sigma'$
to the polynomials $t_{kj}$ and $f_j$. In other words, this
is the base change of the complex (\ref{equation-resolution-new})
by $\tilde\sigma'$. The matrices defining this complex
are congruent modulo $\mathfrak m_s^{c + 1}$ to the matrices
defining the complex (\ref{equation-resolution}) because
$\tilde \sigma$ and $\tilde \sigma'$ are congruent modulo
$\mathfrak m_s^{c + 1}$. Since (\ref{equation-resolution}) is exact,
we can apply
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-approximate-complex-graded}
to conclude that
$$
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(B \otimes_{C, \sigma'} R^\wedge)
\cong
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(B \otimes_{C, \sigma} R^\wedge)
$$
as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-isomorphism-approximation}
With notation an assumptions as in Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-map-approximation}
assume that $\varphi$ induces an isomorphism on completions.
Then we can choose our diagram such that $f$ is \'etale.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $N \geq 2$ and we may replace $(T, t)$ with $(T', t')$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-control-graded}. Since $(V, v) \to (S, s)$ is an elementary
\'etale neighbourhood, so is $(X \times_S V, (x, v)) \to (X, x)$.
Thus $\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to \mathcal{O}_{X \times_S V, (x, v)}$
induces an isomorphism on completions by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-unramified}.
We claim $\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to \mathcal{O}_{W, w}$ induces
an isomorphism on completions. Having proved this,
Lemma \ref{lemma-lifting-along-artinian-at-point}
will show that $f$ is smooth at $w$ and of course
$f$ is unramified at $u$ as well, so
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-smooth-unramified}
tells us $f$ is \'etale at $w$.

\medskip\noindent
First we use the commutativity in part (5) of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-map-approximation}
to see that for $i \leq N$ there is a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\text{Gr}^i_{\mathfrak m_x}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x})
\ar[r]_-\varphi &
\text{Gr}^i_{\mathfrak m_{y_\sigma}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma, y_\sigma}^\wedge)
\ar@{=}[r] &
\text{Gr}^i_{\mathfrak m_{(y, v)}}(\mathcal{O}_{Y \times_{T, \tau} V, (y, v)})
\ar[d]_{\cong} \\
\text{Gr}^i_{\mathfrak m_x}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x})
\ar[r]^-{\cong} \ar@{=}[u] &
\text{Gr}^i_{\mathfrak m_{(x, v)}}(\mathcal{O}_{X \times_S V, (x, v)})
\ar[r]^{f^\sharp_w} &
\text{Gr}^i_{\mathfrak m_w}(\mathcal{O}_{W, w})
}
$$
This implies that $f^\sharp_w$ defines an isomorphism
$\kappa(x) \to \kappa(w)$ on residue fields and an isomorphism
$\mathfrak m_x/\mathfrak m_x^2 \to \mathfrak m_w/\mathfrak m_w^2$
on cotangent spaces. Hence $f^\sharp_w$ defines a surjection
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \to \mathcal{O}_{W, w}^\wedge$
on complete local rings.

\medskip\noindent
By Lemma \ref{lemma-control-graded} there is an isomorphism of
$\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(\mathcal{O}_{(Y \times_{T, \tau} V, (y, v)})$
with
$\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma, y_\sigma})$.
This follows by taking stalks of the isomorphism of conormal
sheaves at the point $y$. Since our local rings are Noetherian
taking associated graded with respect to $\mathfrak m_s$
commutes with completion because completion with respect to an ideal
is an exact functor on finite modules over Noetherian rings.
This produces the right vertical isomorphism in the diagram of graded rings
$$
\xymatrix{
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(\mathcal{O}_{W, w}^\wedge) &
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}
(\mathcal{O}_{(Y \times_{T, \tau} V, (y, v)}^\wedge) \ar[l] \\
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge)
\ar[r]^\varphi \ar[u] &
\text{Gr}_{\mathfrak m_s}(\mathcal{O}_{Y_\sigma, y_\sigma}^\wedge)
\ar[u]_{\cong}
}
$$
We do not claim the diagram commutes. By the result of the previous
paragraph the left arrow is surjective. The other three arrows
are isomorphisms. It follows that the left arrow is a surjective map
between isomorphic Noetherian rings. Hence it is an isomorphism
by Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-surjective-endo-noetherian-ring-is-iso}
(you can argue this directly using Hilbert functions as well).
In particular $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^\wedge \to \mathcal{O}_{W, w}^\wedge$
must be injective as well as surjective which finishes the proof.
\end{proof}






\section{\'Etale neighbourhoods and branches}
\label{section-etale-nbhds-branches}

\noindent
The number of (geometric) branches of a scheme at a point was
defined in Properties, Section \ref{properties-section-unibranch}.
In Varieties, Section \ref{varieties-section-number-of-branches}
we related this to fibres of the normalization morphism.
In this section we discuss a characterization of this number in terms of
\'etale neighbourhoods.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-minimal-primes}
Let $R = \colim R_i$ be colimit of a directed system of rings
whose transition maps are faithfully flat.
Then the number of minimal primes of $R$
taken as an element of $\{0, 1, 2, \ldots, \infty\}$
is the supremum of the numbers of minimal primes of the $R_i$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $A \to B$ is a flat ring map, then $\Spec(B) \to \Spec(A)$
maps minimal primes to minimal primes by going down
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-flat-going-down}).
If $A \to B$ is faithfully flat, then every minimal
prime is the image of a minimal prime (by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-ff-rings} and
\ref{algebra-lemma-minimal-prime-image-minimal-prime}).
Hence the number of minimal primes of $R_i$ is
$\geq$ the number of minimal primes of $R_{i'}$ if $i \leq i'$.
By Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-colimit-faithfully-flat}
each of the maps $R_i \to R$ is
faithfully flat and we also see that
the number of minimal primes of $R$ is
$\geq$ the number of minimal primes of $R_i$.
Finally, suppose that $\mathfrak q_1, \ldots, \mathfrak q_n$
are pairwise distinct minimal primes of $R$. Then we can
find an $i$ such that $R_i \cap \mathfrak q_1, \ldots, R_i \cap \mathfrak q_n$
are pairwise distinct (as sets and hence as prime ideals).
This implies the lemma.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-branches}
Let $X$ be a scheme and $x \in X$ a point. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item the number of branches of $X$ at $x$ is equal to
the supremum of the number of irreducible components of $U$
passing through $u$ taken over elementary \'etale neighbourhoods
$(U, u) \to (X, x)$,
\item the number of geometric branches of $X$ at $x$ is equal to
the supremum of the number of irreducible components of $U$
passing through $u$ taken over \'etale neighbourhoods
$(U, u) \to (X, x)$,
\item $X$ is unibranch at $x$ if and only if for every
elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ there
is exactly one irreducible component of $U$ passing through $u$, and
\item $X$ is geometrically unibranch at $x$ if and only if for every
\'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ there
is exactly one irreducible component of $U$ passing through $u$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Parts (3) and (4) follow from parts (1) and (2) via
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-number-of-branches-1}.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (1). Let $\Spec(A)$ be an affine open neighbourhood
of $x$ and let $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be the prime ideal
corresponding to $x$. We may replace $X$ by $\Spec(A)$ and
it suffices to consider affine elementary \'etale neighbourhoods
$(U, u)$ in the supremum as they form a cofinal subsystem.
Recall that the henselization $A_\mathfrak p^h$
is the colimit of the rings $B_\mathfrak q$ over the category
of pairs $(B, \mathfrak q)$ where $B$ is an \'etale $A$-algebra
and $\mathfrak q$ is a prime lying over $\mathfrak p$ with
$\kappa(\mathfrak q) = \kappa(\mathfrak p)$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-henselization-different}.
These pairs $(B, \mathfrak q)$ correspond exactly to
the affine elementary \'etale neighbourhoods $(U, u)$
by the correspondence between rings and affine schemes.
Observe that irreducible components of $\Spec(B)$
passing through $\mathfrak q$ are exactly the minimal
prime ideals of $B_\mathfrak q$. The number of minimal
primes of $A_\mathfrak p^h$ is the number of branches
of $X$ at $x$ by Properties, Definition
\ref{properties-definition-number-of-branches}.
Observe that the transition
maps $B_\mathfrak q \to B'_{\mathfrak q'}$ in the system
are all flat. Since a flat local ring map is faithfully flat
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-local-flat-ff})
we see that the lemma follows
from Lemma \ref{lemma-nr-minimal-primes}.

\medskip\noindent
Proof of (2). The proof is the same as the proof of (1), except that we use
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-strict-henselization-different}.
There is a tiny difference: given a separable algebraic closure
$\kappa^{sep}$ of $\kappa(x)$ for every \'etale neighbourhood
$(U, u)$ we can choose a $\kappa(x)$-embedding
$\phi : \kappa(u) \to \kappa^{sep}$
because $\kappa(u)/\kappa(x)$ is finite separable
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-at-point}).
Hence we can look at the supremum over all triples
$(U, u, \phi)$ where $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ is an affine
\'etale neighbourhood and $\phi : \kappa(u) \to \kappa^{sep}$
is a $\kappa(x)$-embedding. These triples correspond
exactly to the triples in
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-strict-henselization-different}
and the rest of the proof is exactly the same.
\end{proof}

\noindent
We will need a relative variant of the lemma above.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-nr-branches-fibre}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes and $x \in X$ a point with image $s$.
Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item the number of branches of the fibre $X_s$ at $x$ is equal to
the supremum of the number of irreducible components of the fibre $U_s$
passing through $u$ taken over elementary \'etale neighbourhoods
$(U, u) \to (X, x)$,
\item the number of geometric branches of the fibre $X_s$ at $x$ is equal to
the supremum of the number of irreducible components of the fibre $U_s$
passing through $u$ taken over \'etale neighbourhoods
$(U, u) \to (X, x)$,
\item the fibre $X_s$ is unibranch at $x$ if and only if for every
elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ there is
exactly one irreducible component of the fibre $U_s$ passing through $u$, and
\item $X$ is geometrically unibranch at $x$ if and only if for every
\'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (X, x)$ there
is exactly one irreducible component of $U_s$ passing through $u$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Combine Lemmas \ref{lemma-nr-branches} and
\ref{lemma-lift-etale-neighbourhood-fibre}.
\end{proof}





\section{Slicing smooth morphisms}
\label{section-etale-over-smooth}

\noindent
In this section we explain a result that roughly states that
smooth coverings of a scheme $S$ can be refined by \'etale coverings.
The technique to prove this relies on a slicing argument.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-smooth-given-element}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Let $h \in \mathfrak m_x \subset \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is smooth at $x$, and
\item the image $\text{d}\overline{h}$ of $\text{d}h$ in
$$
\Omega_{X_s/s, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}} \kappa(x) =
\Omega_{X/S, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X, x}} \kappa(x)
$$
is nonzero.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
such that $h$ comes from $h \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ and such
that $D = V(h)$ is an effective Cartier divisor in $U$ with $x \in D$ and
$D \to S$ smooth.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
As $f$ is smooth at $x$ we may assume, after replacing $X$ by an open
neighbourhood of $x$ that $f$ is smooth. In particular we see that
$f$ is flat and locally of finite presentation. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-given-element}
we already know there exists an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
such that $h$ comes from $h \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ and such
that $D = V(h)$ is an effective Cartier divisor in $U$ with $x \in D$ and
$D \to S$ flat and of finite presentation. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-relative-immersion}
we have a short exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{D/U} \to i^*\Omega_{U/S} \to \Omega_{D/S} \to 0
$$
where $i : D \to U$ is the closed immersion and $\mathcal{C}_{D/U}$
is the conormal sheaf of $D$ in $U$. As $D$ is an effective Cartier
divisor cut out by $h \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ we see that
$\mathcal{C}_{D/U} = h \cdot \mathcal{O}_S$. Since $U \to S$ is smooth
the sheaf $\Omega_{U/S}$ is finite locally free, hence its pullback
$i^*\Omega_{U/S}$ is finite locally free also. The first arrow of
the sequence maps the free generator $h$ to the section $\text{d}h|_D$
of $i^*\Omega_{U/S}$ which has nonzero value in the fibre
$\Omega_{U/S, x} \otimes \kappa(x)$ by assumption. By right exactness
of $\otimes \kappa(x)$ we conclude that
$$
\dim_{\kappa(x)} \left( \Omega_{D/S, x} \otimes \kappa(x) \right)
=
\dim_{\kappa(x)} \left( \Omega_{U/S, x} \otimes \kappa(x) \right) - 1.
$$
By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-at-point}
we see that $\Omega_{U/S, x} \otimes \kappa(x)$ can be generated by
at most $\dim_x(U_s)$ elements. By the displayed formula we see that
$\Omega_{D/S, x} \otimes \kappa(x)$ can be generated by at most
$\dim_x(U_s) - 1$ elements. Note that
$\dim_x(D_s) = \dim_x(U_s) - 1$ for example because
$\dim(\mathcal{O}_{D_s, x}) = \dim(\mathcal{O}_{U_s, x}) - 1$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-one-equation}
(also $D_s \subset U_s$ is effective Cartier, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-Cartier})
and then using
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-at-a-point}.
Thus we conclude that $\Omega_{D/S, x} \otimes \kappa(x)$ can be generated
by at most $\dim_x(D_s)$ elements and we conclude that $D \to S$
is smooth at $x$ by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-at-point}
again. After shrinking $U$ we get that $D \to S$ is smooth and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-smooth-once}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is smooth at $x$, and
\item the map
$$
\Omega_{X_s/s, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}} \kappa(x)
\longrightarrow
\Omega_{\kappa(x)/\kappa(s)}
$$
has a nonzero kernel.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
and an effective Cartier divisor $D \subset U$ containing $x$ such that
$D \to S$ is smooth.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $k = \kappa(s)$ and $R = \mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$.
Denote $\mathfrak m$ the maximal ideal of $R$ and
$\kappa = R/\mathfrak m$ so that $\kappa = \kappa(x)$.
As formation of modules of differentials commutes with localization (see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-localize})
we have $\Omega_{X_s/s, x} = \Omega_{R/k}$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differential-seq}
there is an exact sequence
$$
\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2 \xrightarrow{\text{d}}
\Omega_{R/k} \otimes_R \kappa \to
\Omega_{\kappa/k} \to 0.
$$
Hence if (2) holds, there exists an element $\overline{h} \in \mathfrak m$
such that $\text{d}\overline{h}$ is nonzero. Choose a lift
$h \in \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ of $\overline{h}$ and apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-smooth-given-element}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-necessary-condition-slice-smooth}
The second condition in
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-smooth-once}
is necessary even if $x$ is a closed point of a positive
dimensional fibre. An example is the following: Let $k$ be a field
of characteristic $p > 0$ which is imperfect. Let $a \in k$ be an
element which is not a $p$th power. Let
$\mathfrak m = (x, y^p - a) \subset k[x, y]$. This corresponds to a closed
point $w$ of $X = \mathbf{A}^2_k$. Set $S = \mathbf{A}^1_k$ and
let $f : X \to S$ be the morphism corresponding to $k[x] \to k[x, y]$.
Then there does not exist any commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
S' \ar[rr]_h \ar[rd]_g & & X \ar[ld]^f \\
& S
}
$$
with $g$ \'etale and $w$ in the image of $h$. This is clear as the residue
field extension $\kappa(f(w)) \subset \kappa(w)$ is purely inseparable,
but for any $s' \in S'$ with $g(s') = f(w)$ the extension
$\kappa(f(w)) \subset \kappa(s')$ would be separable.
\end{remark}

\noindent
If you assume the residue field extension is separable then the
phenomenon of
Remark \ref{remark-necessary-condition-slice-smooth}
does not happen. Here is the precise result.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-smooth-once-separable-residue-field-extension}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is smooth at $x$,
\item the residue field extension $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(x)$
is separable, and
\item $x$ is not a generic point of $X_s$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$
and an effective Cartier divisor $D \subset U$ containing $x$ such that
$D \to S$ is smooth.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $k = \kappa(s)$ and $R = \mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$.
Denote $\mathfrak m$ the maximal ideal of $R$ and
$\kappa = R/\mathfrak m$ so that $\kappa = \kappa(x)$.
As formation of modules of differentials commutes with localization (see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-differentials-localize})
we have $\Omega_{X_s/s, x} = \Omega_{R/k}$. By assumption (2) and
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-computation-differential}
the map
$$
\text{d} :
\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2
\longrightarrow
\Omega_{R/k} \otimes_R \kappa(\mathfrak m)
$$
is injective. Assumption (3) implies that
$\mathfrak m/\mathfrak m^2 \not = 0$.
Thus there exists an element $\overline{h} \in \mathfrak m$
such that $\text{d}\overline{h}$ is nonzero. Choose a lift
$h \in \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ of $\overline{h}$ and apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-smooth-given-element}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The subscheme $Z$ constructed in the following lemma is really a complete
intersection in an affine open neighbourhood of $x$. If we ever need this
we will explicitly formulate a separate lemma stating this fact.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-slice-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $s \in S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is smooth at $x$, and
\item $x$ is a closed point of $X_s$ and $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(x)$
is separable.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an immersion $Z \to X$ containing $x$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Z \to S$ is \'etale, and
\item $Z_s = \{x\}$ set theoretically.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may and do replace $S$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $s$.
We may and do replace $X$ by an affine open neighbourhood of $x$
such that $X \to S$ is smooth.
We will prove the lemma for smooth morphisms of affines
by induction on $d = \dim_x(X_s)$.

\medskip\noindent
The case $d = 0$. In this case we show that we may take $Z$ to be
an open neighbourhood of $x$. Namely, if $d = 0$, then $X \to S$
is quasi-finite at $x$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-quasi-finite-rel-dimension-0}.
Hence there exists an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ such
that $U \to S$ is quasi-finite, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-points-open}.
Thus after replacing $X$ by $U$ we see that
$X$ is quasi-finite and smooth over $S$, hence
smooth of relative dimension $0$ over $S$, hence
\'etale over $S$. Moreover, the fibre $X_s$ is a finite
discrete set. Hence after replacing $X$ by a further affine open neighbourhood
of $X$ we see that that $f^{-1}(\{s\}) = \{x\}$ (because the topology
on $X_s$ is induced from the topology on $X$, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-fibre-topological}).
This proves the lemma in this case.

\medskip\noindent
Next, assume $d > 0$. Note that because $x$ is a closed point of its
fibre the extension $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(x)$ is finite (by the
Hilbert Nullstellensatz, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-closed-point-fibre-locally-finite-type}).
Thus we see $\Omega_{\kappa(x)/\kappa(s)} = 0$ as this holds for
algebraic separable field extensions.
Thus we may apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-smooth-once}
to find a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
D \ar[r] \ar[rrd] & U \ar[r] \ar[rd] & X \ar[d] \\
& & S
}
$$
with $x \in D$. Note that
$\dim_x(D_s) = \dim_x(X_s) - 1$ for example because
$\dim(\mathcal{O}_{D_s, x}) = \dim(\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}) - 1$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-one-equation}
(also $D_s \subset X_s$ is effective Cartier, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-Cartier})
and then using
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-at-a-point}.
Thus the morphism $D \to S$ is smooth with
$\dim_x(D_s) = \dim_x(X_s) - 1 = d - 1$. By induction hypothesis
we can find an immersion $Z \to D$ as desired, which finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-nbhd-dominates-smooth}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a smooth morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$ be a point in the image of $f$.
Then there exists an \'etale neighbourhood $(S', s') \to (S, s)$
and a $S$-morphism $S' \to X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}[First proof of Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-nbhd-dominates-smooth}]
By assumption $X_s \not = \emptyset$. By
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-smooth-separable-closed-points-dense}
there exists a closed point $x \in X_s$ such that $\kappa(x)$
is a finite separable field extension of $\kappa(s)$.
Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-smooth}
there exists an immersion $Z \to X$ such that $Z \to S$ is \'etale and such
that $x \in Z$. Take $(S' , s') = (Z, x)$.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Second proof of Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-nbhd-dominates-smooth}]
Pick a point $x \in X$ with $f(x) = s$.
Choose a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] & U \ar[l] \ar[d] \ar[r]_-\pi & \mathbf{A}^d_V \ar[ld] \\
Y & V \ar[l]
}
$$
with $\pi$ \'etale, $x \in U$ and $V = \Spec(R)$ affine, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-etale-over-affine-space}.
In particular $s \in V$. The morphism
$\pi : U \to \mathbf{A}^d_V$ is open, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-open}.
Thus $W = \pi(V) \cap \mathbf{A}^d_s$ is a nonempty open subset of
$\mathbf{A}^d_s$. Let $w \in W$ be a point with $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(w)$
finite separable, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-affine-space-over-field}.
By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-dim-affine-space}
there exist $d$ elements
$\overline{f}_1, \ldots, \overline{f}_d \in \kappa(s)[x_1, \ldots, x_d]$
which generate the maximal ideal corresponding to $w$ in
$\kappa(s)[x_1, \ldots, x_d]$.
After replacing $R$ by a principal localization
we may assume there are $f_1, \ldots, f_d \in R[x_1, \ldots, x_d]$
which map to
$\overline{f}_1, \ldots, \overline{f}_d \in \kappa(s)[x_1, \ldots, x_d]$.
Consider the $R$-algebra
$$
R' = R[x_1, \ldots, x_d]/(f_1, \ldots, f_d)
$$
and set $S' = \Spec(R')$. By construction we have a closed
immersion $j : S' \to \mathbf{A}^d_V$ over $V$.
By construction the fibre of $S' \to V$ over $s$ is a single
point $s'$ whose residue field is finite separable over $\kappa(s)$.
Let $\mathfrak q' \subset R'$ be the corresponding prime. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-localize-relative-complete-intersection}
we see that $(R')_g$ is a relative global complete intersection over $R$
for some $g \in R'$, $g \not \in \mathfrak q$.
Thus $S' \to V$ is flat and of finite presentation in a
neighbourhood of $s'$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-relative-global-complete-intersection}.
By construction the scheme theoretic fibre
of $S' \to V$ over $s$ is $\Spec(\kappa(s'))$. Hence it follows from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-at-point}
that $S' \to S$ is \'etale at $s'$. Set
$$
S'' = U \times_{\pi, \mathbf{A}^d_V, j} S'.
$$
By construction there exists a point $s'' \in S''$ which maps to
$s'$ via the projection $p : S'' \to S'$. Note that $p$ is \'etale
as the base change of the \'etale morphism $\pi$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-etale}.
Choose a small affine neighbourhood $S''' \subset S''$ of $s''$
which maps into the nonempty open neighbourhood of $s' \in S'$
where the morphism $S' \to S$ is \'etale. Then the \'etale neighbourhood
$(S''', s'') \to (S, s)$ is a solution to the problem posed by the lemma.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma shows that sheaves for the smooth topology are
the same thing as sheaves for the \'etale topology.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-dominates-smooth}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\mathcal{U} = \{S_i \to S\}_{i \in I}$ be a smooth
covering of $S$, see
Topologies, Definition \ref{topologies-definition-smooth-covering}.
Then there exists an \'etale covering $\mathcal{V} = \{T_j \to S\}_{j \in J}$
(see
Topologies, Definition \ref{topologies-definition-etale-covering})
which refines (see
Sites, Definition \ref{sites-definition-morphism-coverings})
$\mathcal{U}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
For every $s \in S$ there exists an $i \in I$ such that $s$ is in
the image of $S_i \to S$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-nbhd-dominates-smooth}
we can find an \'etale morphism $g_s : T_s \to S$ such that $s \in g_s(T)_s$
and such that $g_s$ factors through $S_i \to S$. Hence
$\{T_s \to S\}$ is an \'etale covering of $S$ that refines $\mathcal{U}$.
\end{proof}




\section{Finite free locally dominates \'etale}
\label{section-finite-free-over-etale}

\noindent
In this section we explain a result that roughly states that
\'etale coverings of a scheme $S$ can be refined by Zariski coverings
of finite locally free covers of $S$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dominate-etale-neighbourhood-finite-flat}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $s \in S$.
Let $f : (U, u) \to (S, s)$ be an \'etale neighbourhood.
There exists an affine open neighbourhood $s \in V \subset S$
and a surjective, finite locally free morphism $\pi : T \to V$
such that for every $t \in \pi^{-1}(s)$ there exists an
open neighbourhood $t \in W_t \subset T$ and a commutative
diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
T \ar[d]^\pi & W_t \ar[l] \ar[rr]_{h_t} \ar[rd] & & U \ar[dl] \\
V \ar[rr] & & S
}
$$
with $h_t(t) = u$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The problem is local on $S$ hence we may replace $S$ by any
open neighbourhood of $s$.
We may also replace $U$ by an open neighbourhood of $u$.
Hence, by Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-locally-standard-etale}
we may assume that
$U \to S$ is a standard \'etale morphism of affine schemes.
In this case the lemma (with $V = S$) follows from
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-standard-etale-finite-flat-Zariski}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dominate-etale-affine-finite-flat}
Let $f : U \to S$ be a surjective \'etale morphism of affine schemes.
There exists a surjective, finite locally free morphism
$\pi : T \to S$ and a finite open covering
$T = T_1 \cup \ldots \cup T_n$ such that each
$T_i \to S$ factors through $U \to S$. Diagram:
$$
\xymatrix{
& \coprod T_i  \ar[rd] \ar[ld] & \\
T \ar[rd]^\pi & & U \ar[ld]_f \\
& S &
}
$$
where the south-west arrow is a Zariski-covering.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a restatement of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale-finite-flat-zariski}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-topologies}
In terms of topologies
Lemmas \ref{lemma-dominate-etale-neighbourhood-finite-flat} and
\ref{lemma-dominate-etale-affine-finite-flat} mean the following.
Let $S$ be any scheme. Let $\{f_i : U_i \to S\}$ be an \'etale covering
of $S$. There exists a Zariski open covering $S = \bigcup V_j$,
for each $j$ a finite locally free, surjective morphism
$W_j \to V_j$, and for each $j$ a Zariski open covering
$\{W_{j, k} \to W_j\}$ such that the family
$\{W_{j, k} \to S\}$ refines the given \'etale covering
$\{f_i : U_i \to S\}$. What does this mean in practice?
Well, for example, suppose we have a descent problem which we
know how to solve for Zariski coverings and for fppf coverings
of the form $\{\pi : T \to S\}$ with $\pi$ finite locally free
and surjective. Then this descent problem has an affirmative
answer for \'etale coverings as well. This trick was used by
Gabber in his proof that $\text{Br}(X) = \text{Br}'(X)$
for an affine scheme $X$, see \cite{Hoobler}.
\end{remark}




\section{\'Etale localization of quasi-finite morphisms}
\label{section-etale-localization}

\noindent
Now we come to a series of lemmas around the theme
``quasi-finite morphisms become finite after \'etale localization''.
The general idea is the following. Suppose given a morphism
of schemes $f : X \to S$ and a point $s \in S$. Let
$\varphi : (U, u) \to (S, s)$ be an \'etale neighbourhood of $s$ in $S$.
Consider the fibre product $X_U = U \times_S X$ and the
basic diagram
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-basic-diagram}
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
V \ar[r] \ar[dr] & X_U \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \ar[d]^f \\
& U \ar[r]^\varphi & S
}
}
\end{equation}
where $V \subset X_U$ is open.
Is there some standard model for the morphism $f_U : X_U \to U$, or for
the morphism $V \to U$ for suitable opens $V$?
Of course the answer is no in general. But for quasi-finite morphisms
we can say something.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-at-point}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$. Set $s = f(x)$.
Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite type, and
\item $x \in X_s$ is isolated\footnote{In the presence of (1)
this means that $f$ is
quasi-finite at $x$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-at-point-characterize}.}.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exist
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$,
\item[(b)] an open subscheme $V \subset X_U$
(see \ref{equation-basic-diagram})
\end{enumerate}
such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(\romannumeral1)] $V \to U$ is a finite morphism,
\item[(\romannumeral2)] there is a unique point $v$ of $V$
mapping to $u$ in $U$, and
\item[(\romannumeral3)] the point $v$ maps to $x$
under the morphism $X_U \to X$, inducing $\kappa(x) = \kappa(v)$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, for any elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U', u') \to (U, u)$
setting $V' = U' \times_U V \subset X_{U'}$ the triple $(U', u', V')$
satisfies the properties
(\romannumeral1), (\romannumeral2), and (\romannumeral3) as well.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Y \subset X$, $W \subset S$ be affine opens such that
$f(Y) \subset W$ and such that $x \in Y$. Note that $x$ is
also an isolated point of the fibre of the morphism $f|_Y : Y \to W$.
If we can prove the theorem for $f|_Y : Y \to W$, then the
theorem follows for $f$. Hence we reduce to the case where
$f$ is a morphism of affine schemes. This case is
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-one-prime}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
In the preceding and following lemma we do not assume that the morphism
$f$ is separated. This means that the opens $V$, $V_i$ created
in them are not necessarily closed in $X_U$. Moreover, if we choose
the neighbourhood $U$ to be affine, then each $V_i$ is affine, but
the intersections $V_i \cap V_j$ need not be affine (in the nonseparated
case).

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-multiple-points}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X$ be points having the same image $s$ in $S$.
Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite type, and
\item $x_i \in X_s$ is isolated for $i = 1, \ldots, n$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exist
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$,
\item[(b)] for each $i$ an open subscheme $V_i \subset X_U$,
\end{enumerate}
such that for each $i$ we have
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(\romannumeral1)] $V_i \to U$ is a finite morphism,
\item[(\romannumeral2)] there is a unique point $v_i$ of $V_i$
mapping to $u$ in $U$, and
\item[(\romannumeral3)] the point $v_i$ maps to $x_i$ in $X$ and
$\kappa(x_i) = \kappa(v_i)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will use induction on $n$.
Namely, suppose $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and $V_i \subset X_U$,
$i = 1, \ldots, n - 1$ work for $x_1, \ldots, x_{n - 1}$. Since
$\kappa(s) = \kappa(u)$ the fibre $(X_U)_u = X_s$. Hence there
exists a unique point $x'_n \in X_u \subset X_U$ corresponding to
$x_n \in X_s$. Also $x'_n$ is isolated in $X_u$. Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-at-point} there
exists an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U', u') \to (U, u)$
and an open $V_n \subset X_{U'}$ which works for $x'_n$ and hence
for $x_n$.
By the final assertion of
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-at-point}
the open subschemes $V'_i = U'\times_U V_i$ for $i = 1, \ldots, n - 1$ still
work with respect to $x_1, \ldots, x_{n - 1}$. Hence we win.
\end{proof}

\noindent
If we allow a nontrivial field extension $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(u)$, i.e.,
general \'etale neighbourhoods, then we can split the points as follows.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-multiple-points-var}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X$ be points having the same image $s$ in $S$.
Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite type, and
\item $x_i \in X_s$ is isolated for $i = 1, \ldots, n$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exist
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] an \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$,
\item[(b)] for each $i$ an integer $m_i$ and
open subschemes $V_{i, j} \subset X_U$, $j = 1, \ldots, m_i$
\end{enumerate}
such that we have
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(\romannumeral1)] each $V_{i, j} \to U$ is a finite morphism,
\item[(\romannumeral2)] there is a unique point $v_{i, j}$ of $V_{i, j}$
mapping to $u$ in $U$ with $\kappa(u) \subset \kappa(v_{i, j})$
finite purely inseparable,
\item[(\romannumeral4)] if $v_{i, j} = v_{i', j'}$, then $i = i'$ and
$j = j'$, and
\item[(\romannumeral3)] the points $v_{i, j}$ map to $x_i$ in $X$ and
no other points of $(X_U)_u$ map to $x_i$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This proof is a variant of the proof of
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-variant}
in the language of schemes.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-at-point-characterize}
the morphism $f$ is quasi-finite at each of the points $x_i$.
Hence $\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(x_i)$ is finite for each $i$
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-residue-field-quasi-finite}).
For each $i$, let $\kappa(s) \subset L_i \subset \kappa(x_i)$
be the subfield such that $L_i/\kappa(s)$ is separable, and
$\kappa(x_i)/L_i$ is purely inseparable. Choose a finite Galois
extension $\kappa(s) \subset L$ such that there exist
$\kappa(s)$-embeddings $L_i \to L$ for $i = 1, \ldots, n$.
Choose an \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ such that
$L \cong \kappa(u)$ as $\kappa(s)$-extensions
(Lemma \ref{lemma-realize-prescribed-residue-field-extension-etale}).

\medskip\noindent
Let $y_{i, j}$, $j = 1, \ldots, m_i$ be the points of $X_U$
lying over $x_i \in X$ and $u \in U$. By
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-points-fibre-product}
these points $y_{i, j}$ correspond exactly to the primes in the rings
$\kappa(u) \otimes_{\kappa(s)} \kappa(x_i)$. This also
explains why there are finitely many; in fact
$m_i = [L_i : \kappa(s)]$ but we do not need this.
By our choice of
$L$ (and elementary field theory)
we see that $\kappa(u) \subset \kappa(y_{i, j})$ is
finite purely inseparable for each pair $i, j$.
Also, by Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite}
for example, the morphism
$X_U \to U$ is quasi-finite at the points $y_{i, j}$ for
all $i, j$.

\medskip\noindent
Apply Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-multiple-points}
to the morphism $X_U \to U$, the point $u \in U$
and the points $y_{i, j} \in (X_U)_u$. This gives an \'etale neighbourhood
$(U', u') \to (U, u)$ with $\kappa(u) = \kappa(u')$ and
opens $V_{i, j} \subset X_{U'}$ with the properties
(\romannumeral1), (\romannumeral2), and (\romannumeral3)
of that lemma. We claim that the \'etale neighbourhood
$(U', u') \to (S, s)$ and the opens $V_{i, j} \subset X_{U'}$
are a solution to the problem posed by the lemma.
We omit the verifications.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part-technical}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$. Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X_s$. Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite type,
\item $f$ is separated, and
\item $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ are pairwise distinct isolated points of $X_s$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
and a decomposition
$$
U \times_S X = W \amalg V_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg V_n
$$
into open and closed subschemes such that the morphisms
$V_i \to U$ are finite, the fibres of $V_i \to U$ over $u$ are
singletons $\{v_i\}$, each $v_i$ maps to $x_i$ with
$\kappa(x_i) = \kappa(v_i)$, and the fibre of $W \to U$
over $u$ contains no points mapping to any of the $x_i$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and $V_i \subset X_U$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-multiple-points}.
Since $X_U \to U$ is separated
(Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-separated-permanence})
and $V_i \to U$ is finite hence proper
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-proper})
we see that $V_i \subset X_U$ is closed by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-image-proper-scheme-closed}.
Hence $V_i \cap V_j$ is a closed subset of $V_i$ which
does not contain $v_i$. Hence the image of $V_i \cap V_j$
in $U$ is a closed set (because $V_i \to U$ proper) not
containing $u$. After shrinking $U$ we may therefore assume
that $V_i \cap V_j = \emptyset$ for all $i, j$. This gives the
decomposition as in the lemma.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is the variant where we reduce to purely inseparable
field extensions.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part-technical-variant}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$. Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X_s$. Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite type,
\item $f$ is separated, and
\item $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ are pairwise distinct isolated points of $X_s$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
and a decomposition
$$
U \times_S X =
W \amalg
\ \coprod\nolimits_{i = 1, \ldots, n}
\ \coprod\nolimits_{j = 1, \ldots, m_i}
V_{i, j}
$$
into open and closed subschemes such that the morphisms
$V_{i, j} \to U$ are finite, the fibres of $V_{i, j} \to U$ over $u$ are
singletons $\{v_{i, j}\}$, each $v_{i, j}$ maps to $x_i$,
$\kappa(u) \subset \kappa(v_{i, j})$ is purely inseparable,
and the fibre of $W \to U$ over $u$ contains no points mapping
to any of the $x_i$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is proved in exactly the same way as the proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part-technical} except that it
uses Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-multiple-points-var}
instead of Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-multiple-points}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following version may be a little easier to parse.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$. Assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite type,
\item $f$ is separated, and
\item $X_s$ has at most finitely many isolated points.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
and a decomposition
$$
U \times_S X = W \amalg V
$$
into open and closed subschemes such that the morphism
$V \to U$ is finite, and the fibre $W_u$ of the
morphism $W \to U$ contains no isolated points.
In particular, if $f^{-1}(s)$ is a finite set, then $W_u = \emptyset$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is clear from
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part-technical}
by choosing $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ the complete set of
isolated points of $X_s$ and setting $V = \bigcup V_i$.
\end{proof}






\section{\'Etale localization of integral morphisms}
\label{section-etale-localization-integral}

\noindent
Some variants of the results of Section \ref{section-etale-localization}
for the case of integral morphisms.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-makes-integral-split}
Let $R \to S$ be an integral ring map. Let $\mathfrak p \subset R$ be a prime
ideal. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item there are finitely many primes $\mathfrak q_1, \ldots, \mathfrak q_n$
lying over $\mathfrak p$, and
\item for each $i$ the maximal separable subextension
$\kappa(\mathfrak q)/\kappa(\mathfrak q_i)_{sep}/\kappa(\mathfrak p)$
(Fields, Lemma \ref{fields-lemma-separable-first})
is finite over $\kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an \'etale ring map $R \to R'$ and a prime
$\mathfrak p'$ lying over $\mathfrak p$ such that
$$
S \otimes_R R' = A_1 \times \ldots \times A_m
$$
with $R' \to A_j$ integral having a unique prime $\mathfrak r_j$
over $\mathfrak p'$ such that $\kappa(\mathfrak r_j)/\kappa(\mathfrak p')$
is purely inseparable.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}[First proof]
This proof uses
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-variant}.
Namely, choose a generator $\theta_i \in \kappa(\mathfrak q_i)_{sep}$
of this field over $\kappa(\mathfrak p)$
(Fields, Lemma \ref{fields-lemma-primitive-element}).
The spectrum of the fibre ring $S \otimes_R \kappa(\mathfrak p)$
is finite discrete with points corresponding to
$\mathfrak q_1, \ldots, \mathfrak q_n$.
By the Chinese remainder theorem
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-chinese-remainder})
we see that $S \otimes_R \kappa(\mathfrak p) \to \prod \kappa(\mathfrak q_i)$
is surjective. Hence after replacing $R$ by $R_g$ for some
$g \in R$, $g \not \in \mathfrak p$ we may assume that
$(0, \ldots, 0, \theta_i, 0, \ldots, 0) \in \prod \kappa(\mathfrak q_i)$
is the image of some $x_i \in S$.
Let $S' \subset S$ be the $R$-subalgebra generated by our $x_i$.
Since $\Spec(S) \to \Spec(S')$ is surjective
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-integral-overring-surjective})
we conclude that
$\mathfrak q_i' = S' \cap \mathfrak q_i$ are the primes of
$S'$ over $\mathfrak p$. By our choice of $x_i$ we conclude
these primes are distinct that and
$\kappa(\mathfrak q'_i)_{sep} = \kappa(\mathfrak q_i)_{sep}$.
In particular the field extensions
$\kappa(\mathfrak q_i)/\kappa(\mathfrak q'_i)$ are purely
inseparable.
Since $R \to S'$ is finite we may apply
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-variant}.
and we get $R \to R'$ and $\mathfrak p'$ and a decomposition
$$
S' \otimes_R R' = A'_1 \times \ldots \times A'_m \times B'
$$
with $R' \to A'_j$ integral having a unique prime
$\mathfrak r'_j$ over $\mathfrak p'$ such that
$\kappa(\mathfrak r'_j)/\kappa(\mathfrak p')$
is purely inseparable and such that $B'$ does not have a prime
lying over $\mathfrak p'$. Since $R' \to B'$ is finite
(as $R \to S'$ is finite) we can
after localizing $R'$ at some $g' \in R'$, $g' \not \in \mathfrak p'$
assume that $B' = 0$. Via the map $S' \otimes_R R' \to S \otimes_R R'$
we get the corresponding decomposition for $S$.
\end{proof}

\begin{proof}[Second proof]
This proof uses strict henselization. First, assume $R$ is strictly
henselization with maximal ideal $\mathfrak p$. Then $S/\mathfrak p S$
has finitely many primes corresponding to
$\mathfrak q_1, \ldots, \mathfrak q_n$, each maximal,
each with purely inseparable residue field over $\kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
Hence $S/\mathfrak p S$ is equal to $\prod (S/\mathfrak p S)_{\mathfrak p_i}$.
By More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-characterize-henselian-pair}
we can lift this product decomposition to a product composition of $S$
as in the statement.

\medskip\noindent
In the general case, let $R^{sh}$ be the strict henselization of
$R_\mathfrak p$. Then we can apply the result of the first paragraph
to $R^{sh} \to S \otimes_R R^{sh}$. Consider the $m$ mutually orthogonal
idempotents in $S \otimes_R R^{sh}$ corresponding to the product
decomposition. Since $R^{sh}$ is a filtered colimit of \'etale
ring maps $(R, \mathfrak p) \to (R', \mathfrak p')$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-strict-henselization-different}
we see that these idempotents descend to some $R'$ as desired.
\end{proof}







\section{Zariski's Main Theorem}
\label{section-application-etale-neighbourhoods}

\noindent
In this section we prove Zariski's main theorem as reformulated by Grothendieck.
Often when we say ``Zariski's main theorem'' in this content we mean either of
Lemma \ref{lemma-finite-type-separated},
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}, or
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-pass-through-finite}.
In most texts people refer to the last of these as
Zariski's main theorem. These lemmas have many consequences
some of which the reader can find in this section.

\medskip\noindent
We have already proved the algebraic version in
Algebra, Theorem \ref{algebra-theorem-main-theorem}
and we have already restated this algebraic version
in the language of schemes, see
Morphisms, Theorem \ref{morphisms-theorem-main-theorem}.
The version in this section is more subtle; to get the full
result we use the \'etale localization techniques
of Section \ref{section-etale-localization} to reduce to
the algebraic case.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-finite-type-separated}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $f$ is of finite type and separated.
Let $S'$ be the normalization of $S$ in $X$, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization-X-in-Y}.
Picture:
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rd]_f \ar[rr]_{f'} & & S' \ar[ld]^\nu \\
& S &
}
$$
Then there exists an open subscheme $U' \subset S'$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $(f')^{-1}(U') \to U'$ is an isomorphism, and
\item $(f')^{-1}(U') \subset X$ is the set of points at which
$f$ is quasi-finite.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-points-open}
the subset $U \subset X$ of points where $f$ is quasi-finite is open.
The lemma is equivalent to
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] $U' = f'(U) \subset S'$ is open,
\item[(b)] $U = f^{-1}(U')$, and
\item[(c)] $U \to U'$ is an isomorphism.
\end{enumerate}
Let $x \in U$ be arbitrary. We claim there exists an open
neighbourhood $f'(x) \in V \subset S'$ such that $(f')^{-1}V \to V$ is an
isomorphism. We first prove the claim implies the lemma.
Namely, then $(f')^{-1}V \cong V$ is both locally of finite
type over $S$ (as an open subscheme of $X$) and for $v \in V$ the residue
field extension $\kappa(v) \supset \kappa(\nu(v))$ is algebraic (as
$V \subset S'$ and $S'$ is integral over $S$). Hence the fibres
of $V \to S$ are discrete (Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-algebraic-residue-field-extension-closed-point-fibre})
and $(f')^{-1}V \to S$ is locally quasi-finite
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-quasi-finite-fibres}).
This implies $(f')^{-1}V \subset U$ and $V \subset U'$. Since $x$ was
arbitrary we see that (a), (b), and (c) are true.

\medskip\noindent
Let $s = f(x)$. Let $(T, t) \to (S, s)$ be an elementary \'etale
neighbourhood. Denote by a subscript ${}_T$ the base change to $T$.
Let $y = (x, t) \in X_T$ be the unique point in
the fibre $X_t$ lying over $x$. Note that $U_T \subset X_T$
is the set of points where $f_T$ is quasi-finite, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite}.
Note that
$$
X_T \xrightarrow{f'_T} S'_T \xrightarrow{\nu_T} T
$$
is the normalization of $T$ in $X_T$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-normalization-smooth-localization}.
Suppose that the claim holds for $y \in U_T \subset X_T \to S'_T \to T$, i.e.,
suppose that we can find an open neighbourhood
$f'_T(y) \in V' \subset S'_T$ such that $(f'_T)^{-1}V' \to V'$ is an
isomorphism. The morphism $S'_T \to S'$ is \'etale hence the image
$V \subset S'$ of $V'$ is open. Observe that $f'(x) \in V$ as $f'_T(y) \in V'$.
Observe that
$$
\xymatrix{
(f'_T)^{-1}V' \ar[r] \ar[d] & (f')^{-1}(V) \ar[d] \\
V' \ar[r] & V
}
$$
is a fibre square (as $S'_T \times_{S'} X = X_T$).
Since the left vertical arrow is an isomorphism
and $\{V' \to V\}$ is a \'etale covering, we conclude that the right vertical
arrow is an isomorphism by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-isomorphism}.
In other words, the claim holds for $x \in U \subset X \to S' \to S$.

\medskip\noindent
By the result of the previous paragraph we may replace $S$ by an
elementary \'etale neighbourhood of $s = f(x)$ in order to prove the claim.
Thus we may assume there is a decomposition
$$
X = V \amalg W
$$
into open and closed subschemes where $V \to S$ is finite and $x \in V$,
see Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part-technical}.
Since $X$ is a disjoint union of $V$ and $W$ over $S$ and since
$V \to S$ is finite we see that the
normalization of $S$ in $X$ is the morphism
$$
X = V \amalg W \longrightarrow V \amalg W' \longrightarrow S
$$
where $W'$ is the normalization of $S$ in $W$, see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-in-disjoint-union},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-integral}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-in-integral}.
The claim follows and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $f$ is quasi-finite and separated.
Let $S'$ be the normalization of $S$ in $X$, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization-X-in-Y}.
Picture:
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rd]_f \ar[rr]_{f'} & & S' \ar[ld]^\nu \\
& S &
}
$$
Then $f'$ is a quasi-compact open immersion and $\nu$ is integral.
In particular $f$ is quasi-affine.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows from Lemma \ref{lemma-finite-type-separated}. Namely, by
that lemma there exists an open subscheme $U' \subset S'$ such that
$(f')^{-1}(U') = X$ (!) and $X \to U'$ is an isomorphism! In other
words, $f'$ is an open immersion. Note that $f'$ is quasi-compact as
$f$ is quasi-compact and $\nu : S' \to S$ is separated
(Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-quasi-compact-permanence}).
It follows that $f$ is quasi-affine by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-characterize-quasi-affine}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Zariski's Main Theorem]
\label{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-pass-through-finite}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $f$ is quasi-finite and separated and assume that
$S$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Then there exists
a factorization
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rd]_f \ar[rr]_j & & T \ar[ld]^\pi \\
& S &
}
$$
where $j$ is a quasi-compact open immersion and $\pi$ is finite.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $X \to S' \to S$ be as in the conclusion of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}.
By
Properties, Lemma
\ref{properties-lemma-integral-algebra-directed-colimit-finite}
we can write
$\nu_*\mathcal{O}_{S'} = \colim_{i \in I} \mathcal{A}_i$ as a
directed colimit of finite quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-algebras
$\mathcal{A}_i \subset \nu_*\mathcal{O}_{S'}$. Then
$\pi_i : T_i = \underline{\Spec}_S(\mathcal{A}_i) \to S$
is a finite morphism for each $i$.
Note that the transition morphisms $T_{i'} \to T_i$ are affine
and that $S' = \lim T_i$.

\medskip\noindent
By Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-opens}
there exists an $i$ and a quasi-compact open
$U_i \subset T_i$ whose inverse image in $S'$ equals
$f'(X)$. For $i' \geq i$ let $U_{i'}$ be the inverse image
of $U_i$ in $T_{i'}$. Then $X \cong f'(X) = \lim_{i' \geq i} U_{i'}$, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-directed-inverse-system-has-limit}.
By Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-finite-type-eventually-closed} we see that
$X \to U_{i'}$ is a closed immersion for some $i' \geq i$.
(In fact $X \cong U_{i'}$ for sufficiently
large $i'$ but we don't need this.) Hence $X \to T_{i'}$ is an immersion. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-factor-quasi-compact-immersion}
we can factor this as $X \to T \to T_{i'}$ where the first arrow
is an open immersion and the second a closed immersion. Thus we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-characterize-finite}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is finite,
\item $f$ is proper with finite fibres,
\item $f$ is proper and locally quasi-finite,
\item $f$ is universally closed, separated, locally of finite type
and has finite fibres.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We have (1) implies (2) by
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-proper},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite},
and \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-quasi-finite}.
We have (2) implies (3) by Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-fibre}.
We have (3) implies (4) by the definition of proper morphisms and
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-locally-quasi-compact} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite}.

\medskip\noindent
Assume (3). Pick $s \in S$. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-fibre} we
see that all the finitely many points of $X_s$ are isolated in $X_s$.
Choose an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
and decomposition $X_U = V \amalg W$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part}.
Note that $W_u = \emptyset$ because all points of $X_s$ are isolated.
Since $f$ is universally closed we see that
the image of $W$ in $U$ is a closed set not containing $u$.
After shrinking $U$ we may assume that $W = \emptyset$.
In other words we see that $X_U = V$ is finite over $U$.
Since $s \in S$ was arbitrary
this means there exists a family $\{U_i \to S\}$
of \'etale morphisms whose images cover $S$ such that
the base changes $X_{U_i} \to U_i$ are finite.
Note that $\{U_i \to S\}$ is an \'etale covering,
see Topologies, Definition \ref{topologies-definition-etale-covering}.
Hence it is an fpqc covering, see
Topologies,
Lemma \ref{topologies-lemma-zariski-etale-smooth-syntomic-fppf-fpqc}.
Hence we conclude $f$ is finite by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-finite}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
As a consequence we have the following useful results.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-proper-finite-fibre-finite-in-neighbourhood}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$.
Assume that $f$ is proper and $f^{-1}(\{s\})$ is a finite set.
Then there exists an open neighbourhood $V \subset S$ of $s$
such that $f|_{f^{-1}(V)} : f^{-1}(V) \to V$ is finite.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The morphism $f$ is quasi-finite at all the points of $f^{-1}(\{s\})$
by Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-fibre}.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-points-open} the
set of points at which $f$ is quasi-finite is an open $U \subset X$.
Let $Z = X \setminus U$. Then $s \not \in f(Z)$. Since $f$ is proper
the set $f(Z) \subset S$ is closed. Choose any open neighbourhood
$V \subset S$ of $s$ with $Z \cap V = \emptyset$. Then
$f^{-1}(V) \to V$ is locally quasi-finite and proper.
Hence it is quasi-finite
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-locally-quasi-compact}),
hence has finite fibres
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite}), hence
is finite by Lemma \ref{lemma-characterize-finite}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-proper-family-cannot-collapse-fibre}
Consider a commutative diagram of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_h \ar[rd]_f & & Y \ar[ld]^g \\
& S
}
$$
Let $s \in S$. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X \to S$ is a proper morphism,
\item $Y \to S$ is separated and locally of finite type, and
\item the image of $X_s \to Y_s$ is finite.
\end{enumerate}
Then there is an open
subspace $U \subset S$ containing $s$ such that $X_U \to Y_U$
factors through a closed subscheme $Z \subset Y_U$ finite over $U$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Z \subset Y$ be the scheme theoretic image of $h$, see
Morphisms, Section \ref{morphisms-section-scheme-theoretic-image}.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-scheme-theoretic-image-is-proper}
the morphism $X \to Z$ is surjective and $Z \to S$ is proper.
Thus $X_s \to Z_s$ is surjective. We see that either
(3) implies $Z_s$ is finite.
Hence $Z \to S$ is finite in an open neighbourhood of $s$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-proper-finite-fibre-finite-in-neighbourhood}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quasi-finite-finite-over-dense-open}
Let $f : Y \to X$ be a quasi-finite morphism.
There exists a dense open $U \subset X$ such that
$f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U$ is finite.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $U_i \subset X$, $i \in I$ is a collection of opens such that the
restrictions $f|_{f^{-1}(U_i)} : f^{-1}(U_i) \to U_i$ are finite,
then with $U = \bigcup U_i$ the restriction $f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U$
is finite, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-local}.
Thus the problem is local on $X$ and we may assume that $X$ is affine.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $X$ is affine.
Write $Y = \bigcup_{j = 1, \ldots, m} V_j$ with $V_j$ affine.
This is possible since $f$ is quasi-finite and hence
in particular quasi-compact. Each $V_j \to X$ is quasi-finite
and separated. Let $\eta \in X$ be a generic point of an irreducible
component of $X$. We see from
Morphisms, Lemmas
\ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite} and \ref{morphisms-lemma-generically-finite}
that there exists an open neighbourhood $\eta \in U_\eta$ such that
$f^{-1}(U_\eta) \cap V_j \to U_\eta$ is finite. We may choose $U_\eta$ such
that it works for each $j = 1, \ldots, m$.
Note that the collection of generic points of $X$ is dense in $X$.
Thus we see there exists a dense open $W = \bigcup_\eta U_\eta$
such that each $f^{-1}(W) \cap V_j \to W$ is finite.
It suffices to show that there exists a dense open $U \subset W$
such that $f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U$ is finite.
Thus we may replace $X$ by an affine open subscheme of $W$ and
assume that each $V_j \to X$ is finite.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $X$ is affine, $Y = \bigcup_{j = 1, \ldots, m} V_j$ with $V_j$ affine,
and the restrictions $f|_{V_j} : V_j \to X$ are finite.
Set
$$
\Delta_{ij} =
\Big(\overline{V_i \cap V_j} \setminus V_i \cap V_j\Big) \cap V_j.
$$
This is a nowhere dense closed subset of $V_j$ because it is the boundary
of the open subset $V_i \cap V_j$ in $V_j$. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-image-nowhere-dense-finite}
the image $f(\Delta_{ij})$ is a nowhere dense closed subset of $X$. By
Topology, Lemma \ref{topology-lemma-nowhere-dense}
the union $T = \bigcup f(\Delta_{ij})$ is a nowhere dense closed
subset of $X$. Thus $U = X \setminus T$ is a dense open subset of $X$.
We claim that $f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U$ is finite.
To see this let $U' \subset U$ be an affine open.
Set $Y' = f^{-1}(U') = U' \times_X Y$,
$V_j' = Y' \cap V_j = U' \times_X V_j$. Consider the restriction
$$
f' = f|_{Y'} : Y' \longrightarrow U'
$$
of $f$. This morphism now has the property that
$Y' = \bigcup_{j = 1, \ldots, m} V'_j$ is an affine open covering,
each $V'_j \to U'$ is finite, and $V_i' \cap V_j'$ is (open and) closed
both in $V'_i$ and $V'_j$. Hence $V_i' \cap V_j'$ is affine, and the map
$$
\mathcal{O}(V'_i) \otimes_{\mathbf{Z}} \mathcal{O}(V'_j)
\longrightarrow
\mathcal{O}(V'_i \cap V'_j)
$$
is surjective. This implies that $Y'$ is separated, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-characterize-separated}.
Finally, consider the commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\coprod_{j = 1, \ldots, m} V'_j \ar[rd] \ar[rr] & & Y' \ar[ld] \\
& U' &
}
$$
The south-east arrow is finite, hence proper, the horizontal arrow is
surjective, and the south-west arrow is separated. Hence by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-image-proper-is-proper}
we conclude that $Y' \to U'$ is proper. Since it is also quasi-finite,
we see that it is finite by Lemma \ref{lemma-characterize-finite},
and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-lqf-universally-bounded}
Let $f : X \to S$ be flat, locally of finite presentation, separated,
locally quasi-finite with universally bounded fibres. Then there exist
closed subsets
$$
\emptyset = Z_{-1} \subset Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset Z_2 \subset
\ldots \subset Z_n = S
$$
such that with $S_r = Z_r \setminus Z_{r - 1}$ the stratification
$S = \coprod_{r = 0, \ldots, n} S_r$ is characterized by the following
universal property: Given $g : T \to S$ the projection
$X \times_S T \to T$ is finite locally
free of degree $r$ if and only if $g(T) \subset S_r$ (set theoretically).
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $n$ be an integer bounding the degree of the fibres of $X \to S$.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-universally-bounded}
we see that any base change has degrees of fibres bounded by $n$ also.
In particular, all the integers $r$ that occur in the statement of the lemma
will be $\leq n$. We will prove the lemma by induction on $n$. The base
case is $n = 0$ which is obvious.

\medskip\noindent
We claim the set of points $s \in S$
with $\deg_{\kappa(s)}(X_s) = n$ is an open subset $S_n \subset S$
and that $X \times_S S_n \to S_n$ is finite locally free of degree $n$.
Namely, suppose that $s \in S$ is such a point. Choose an elementary
\'etale morphism $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ and a decomposition
$U \times_S X = W \amalg V$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-splits-off-quasi-finite-part}.
Since $V \to U$ is finite, flat, and locally of finite presentation,
we see that $V \to U$ is finite locally free, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-flat}.
After shrinking $U$ to a smaller neighbourhood of $u$
we may assume $V \to U$ is finite locally free of some degree $d$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-locally-free}.
As $u \mapsto s$ and $W_u = \emptyset$ we see that $d = n$. Since $n$
is the maximum degree of a fibre we see that $W = \emptyset$!
Thus $U \times_S X \to U$ is finite locally free of degree $n$.
By Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-finite-locally-free}
we conclude that $X \to S$ is finite locally free of degree $n$
over $\Im(U \to S)$ which is an open neighbourhood of $s$
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-open}).
This proves the claim.

\medskip\noindent
Let $S' = S \setminus S_n$ endowed with the reduced induced scheme
structure and set $X' = X \times_S S'$. Note that the degrees of fibres
of $X' \to S'$ are universally bounded by $n - 1$. By induction we find a
stratification $S' = S_0 \amalg \ldots \amalg S_{n - 1}$ adapted
to the morphism $X' \to S'$. We claim that $S = \coprod_{r = 0, \ldots, n} S_r$
works for the morphism $X \to S$. Let $g : T \to S$ be a morphism of schemes
and assume that $X \times_S T \to T$ is finite locally free of degree $r$.
As remarked above this implies that $r \leq n$. If $r = n$, then it is
clear that $T \to S$ factors through $S_n$. If $r < n$, then
$g(T) \subset S' = S \setminus S_d$ (set theoretically) hence
$T_{red} \to S$ factors through $S'$, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-map-into-reduction}.
Note that $X \times_S T_{red} \to T_{red}$ is also
finite locally free of degree $r$ as a base change.
By the universal property of the stratification
$S' = \coprod_{r = 0, \ldots, n - 1} S_r$ we see that $g(T) = g(T_{red})$
is contained in $S_r$.
Conversely, suppose that we have $g : T \to S$ such that
$g(T) \subset S_r$ (set theoretically).
If $r = n$, then $g$ factors through $S_n$ and
it is clear that $X \times_S T \to T$
is finite locally free of degree $n$ as a base change.
If $r < n$, then $X \times_S T \to T$ is a morphism which is
separated, flat, and locally of finite presentation, such that
the restriction to $T_{red}$ is finite locally free of degree $r$.
Since $T_{red} \to T$ is a universal homeomorphism, we conclude
that $X \times_S T_{red} \to X \times_S T$ is a universal homeomorphism
too and hence $X \times_S T \to T$ is universally closed (as this
is true for the finite morphism $X \times_S T_{red} \to T_{red}$).
It follows that $X \times_S T \to T$ is finite, for example by
Lemma \ref{lemma-characterize-finite}. Then we can use
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-flat}
to see that $X \times_S T \to T$ is finite locally free.
Finally, the degree is $r$ as all the fibres have degree $r$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-qf}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is flat, locally of
finite presentation, separated, and quasi-finite. Then there exist
closed subsets
$$
\emptyset = Z_{-1} \subset Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset Z_2 \subset
\ldots \subset S
$$
such that with $S_r = Z_r \setminus Z_{r - 1}$ the stratification
$S = \coprod S_r$ is characterized by the following universal property:
Given a morphism $g : T \to S$ the projection $X \times_S T \to T$ is
finite locally free of degree $r$ if and only if $g(T) \subset S_r$
(set theoretically). Moreover, the inclusion maps $S_r \to S$ are
quasi-compact.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The question is local on $S$, hence we may assume that $S$ is affine.
By Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-quasi-finite-qc-source-universally-bounded}
the fibres of $f$ are universally bounded in this case.
Hence the existence of the stratification follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-lqf-universally-bounded}.

\medskip\noindent
We will show that $U_r = S \setminus Z_r \to S$ is quasi-compact for
each $r \geq 0$. This will prove the final statement by elementary topology.
Since a composition of quasi-compact maps is quasi-compact
it suffices to prove that $U_r \to U_{r - 1}$ is quasi-compact.
Choose an affine open $W \subset U_{r - 1}$. Write $W = \Spec(A)$.
Then $Z_r \cap W = V(I)$ for some ideal $I \subset A$
and $X \times_S \Spec(A/I) \to \Spec(A/I)$ is finite locally
free of degree $r$. Note that $A/I = \colim A/I_i$ where $I_i \subset I$
runs through the finitely generated ideals. By
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-locally-free}
we see that $X \times_S \Spec(A/I_i) \to \Spec(A/I_i)$
is finite locally free of degree $r$ for some $i$. (This uses
that $X \to S$ is of finite presentation, as it is locally of finite
presentation, separated, and quasi-compact.)
Hence $\Spec(A/I_i) \to \Spec(A) = W$ factors (set theoretically)
through $Z_r \cap W$. It follows that $Z_r \cap W = V(I_i)$ is the zero
set of a finite subset of elements of $A$. This means that
$W \setminus Z_r$ is a finite union of standard opens, hence quasi-compact,
as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-lqf}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a flat, locally of finite presentation, separated, and
locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes. Then there
exist open subschemes
$$
S = U_0 \supset U_1 \supset U_2 \supset \ldots
$$
such that a morphism $\Spec(k) \to S$ factors through $U_d$ if and
only if $X \times_S \Spec(k)$ has degree $\geq d$ over $k$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The statement simply means that the collection of points where the degree
of the fibre is $\geq d$ is open. Thus we can work locally on $S$ and
assume $S$ is affine. In this case, for every $W \subset X$ quasi-compact
open, the set of points $U_d(W)$ where the fibres of $W \to S$ have
degree $\geq d$ is open by Lemma \ref{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-qf}.
Since $U_d = \bigcup_W U_d(W)$ the result follows.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-go-down-with-annihilators}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is flat, locally of
finite presentation, and locally quasi-finite. Let
$g \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ nonzero. Then there exist
an open $V \subset X$ such that $g|_V \not = 0$, an open
$U \subset S$ fitting into a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
V \ar[r] \ar[d]_\pi & X \ar[d]^f \\
U \ar[r] & S,
}
$$
a quasi-coherent subsheaf $\mathcal{F} \subset \mathcal{O}_U$, an integer
$r > 0$, and an injective $\mathcal{O}_U$-module map
$\mathcal{F}^{\oplus r} \to \pi_*\mathcal{O}_V$
whose image contains $g|_V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume $X$ and $S$ affine. We obtain a filtration
$\emptyset = Z_{-1} \subset Z_0 \subset Z_1 \subset Z_2 \subset \ldots
\subset Z_n = S$ as in
Lemmas \ref{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-lqf-universally-bounded} and
\ref{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-qf}.
Let $T \subset X$ be the scheme theoretic support of the finite
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\Im(g : \mathcal{O}_X \to \mathcal{O}_X)$.
Note that $T$ is the support of $g$ as a section of $\mathcal{O}_X$
(Modules, Definition \ref{modules-definition-support}) and
for any open $V \subset X$ we have $g|_V \not = 0$ if and only if
$V \cap T \not = \emptyset$.
Let $r$ be the smallest integer such that $f(T) \subset Z_r$
set theoretically. Let $\xi \in T$ be a generic point of an irreducible
component of $T$ such that $f(\xi) \not \in Z_{r - 1}$ (and hence
$f(\xi) \in Z_r$). We may replace $S$ by an affine neighbourhood of
$f(\xi)$ contained in $S \setminus Z_{r - 1}$. Write $S = \Spec(A)$
and let $I = (a_1, \ldots, a_m) \subset A$ be a finitely generated ideal
such that $V(I) = Z_r$ (set theoretically, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-qc-open}).
Since the support of $g$ is contained in $f^{-1}V(I)$ by our choice of $r$
we see that there exists an integer $N$ such that
$a_j^N g = 0$ for $j = 1, \ldots, m$. Replacing $a_j$ by $a_j^r$
we may assume that $Ig = 0$. For any $A$-module $M$ write
$M[I]$ for the $I$-torsion of $M$, i.e., $M[I] = \{m \in M \mid Im = 0\}$.
Write $X = \Spec(B)$, so $g \in B[I]$. Since $A \to B$ is flat we
see that
$$
B[I] = A[I] \otimes_A B \cong A[I] \otimes_{A/I} B/IB
$$
By our choice of $Z_r$, the $A/I$-module $B/IB$ is
finite locally free of rank $r$. Hence after replacing $S$ by
a smaller affine open neighbourhood of $f(\xi)$ we may assume
that $B/IB \cong (A/IA)^{\oplus r}$ as $A/I$-modules.
Choose a map $\psi : A^{\oplus r} \to B$ which reduces modulo $I$ to the
isomorphism of the previous sentence. Then we see that
the induced map
$$
A[I]^{\oplus r} \longrightarrow B[I]
$$
is an isomorphism. The lemma follows by taking $\mathcal{F}$ the
quasi-coherent sheaf associated to the $A$-module $A[I]$ and
the map $\mathcal{F}^{\oplus r} \to \pi_*\mathcal{O}_V$ the
one corresponding to $A[I]^{\oplus r} \subset A^{\oplus r} \to B$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-separated-locally-quasi-finite-over-affine}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a separated, locally quasi-finite morphism
with $Y$ affine. Then every finite set of points of $X$ is contained
in an open affine of $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X$. Choose a quasi-compact open
$U \subset X$ with $x_i \in U$. Then $U \to Y$ is quasi-affine by
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}.
Hence there exists an affine open $V \subset U$ containing
$x_1, \ldots, x_n$ by
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-ample-finite-set-in-affine}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-there-is-a-scheme-integral-over}
Let $U \to X$ be a surjective \'etale morphism of schemes. Assume $X$
is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Then there exists a surjective
integral morphism $Y \to X$, such that for
every $y \in Y$ there is an open neighbourhood $V \subset Y$
such that $V \to X$ factors through $U$. In fact, we may assume
$Y \to X$ is finite and of finite presentation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since $X$ is quasi-compact, there exist finitely many affine opens
$U_i \subset U$ such that $U' = \coprod U_i \to X$ is surjective.
After replacing $U$ by $U'$, we see that we may assume $U$ is affine.
Then there exists an integer $d$ bounding the degree of the geometric
fibres of $U \to X$ (see Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-quasi-finite-qc-source-universally-bounded}).
We will prove the lemma by induction on $d$ for all quasi-compact
and separated schemes $U$ mapping surjective and \'etale onto $X$.
If $d = 1$, then $U = X$ and the result holds with $Y = U$.
Assume $d > 1$.

\medskip\noindent
We apply Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}
and we obtain a factorization
$$
\xymatrix{
U \ar[rr]_j \ar[rd] & & Y \ar[ld]^\pi \\
& X
}
$$
with $\pi$ integral and $j$ a quasi-compact open immersion. We may and do
assume that $j(U)$ is scheme theoretically dense in $Y$. Note that
$$
U \times_X Y = U \amalg W
$$
where the first summand is the image of $U \to U \times_X Y$
(which is closed by
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-semi-diagonal}
and open because it is \'etale as a morphism between schemes \'etale over $Y$)
and the second summand is the (open and closed) complement.
The image $V \subset Y$ of $W$ is an open subscheme containing
$Y \setminus U$.

\medskip\noindent
The \'etale morphism $W \to Y$ has geometric fibres of cardinality $< d$.
Namely, this is clear for geometric points of $U \subset Y$ by inspection.
Since $U \subset Y$ is dense, it holds for all geometric points of $Y$
for example by Lemma
\ref{lemma-stratify-flat-fp-lqf-universally-bounded}
(the degree of the fibres of a quasi-compact \'etale morphism
does not go up under specialization). Thus we may apply the induction
hypothesis to $W \to V$ and find a surjective integral morphism
$Z \to V$ with $Z$ a scheme, which Zariski locally factors through $W$.
Choose a factorization $Z \to Z' \to Y$ with $Z' \to Y$ integral and
$Z \to Z'$ open immersion
(Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}).
After replacing $Z'$ by the scheme theoretic closure of $Z$ in $Z'$
we may assume that $Z$ is scheme theoretically dense in $Z'$.
After doing this we have $Z' \times_Y V = Z$. Finally,
let $T \subset Y$ be the induced reduced closed subscheme structure
on $Y \setminus V$. Consider the morphism
$$
Z' \amalg T \longrightarrow X
$$
This is a surjective integral morphism by construction.
Since $T \subset U$ it is clear that the morphism $T \to X$
factors through $U$. On the other hand, let $z \in Z'$
be a point. If $z \not \in Z$, then $z$ maps to a point of
$Y \setminus V \subset U$ and we find a neighbourhood of $z$
on which the morphism factors through $U$.
If $z \in Z$, then we have a neighbourhood $V \subset Z$
which factors through $W \subset U \times_X Y$ and hence through $U$.
This proves existence.

\medskip\noindent
Assume we have found $Y \to X$ integral and surjective which Zariski
locally factors through $U$. Choose a finite affine open covering
$Y = \bigcup V_j$ such that $V_j \to X$ factors through $U$. We can
write $Y = \lim Y_i$ with $Y_i \to X$ finite and of finite
presentation, see Limits, Lemma
\ref{limits-lemma-integral-limit-finite-and-finite-presentation}.
For large enough $i$ we can find affine opens $V_{i, j} \subset Y_i$
whose inverse image in $Y$ recovers $V_j$, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-opens}.
For even larger $i$ the morphisms $V_j \to U$ over $X$ come
from morphisms $V_{i, j} \to U$ over $X$, see
Limits, Proposition
\ref{limits-proposition-characterize-locally-finite-presentation}.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}







\section{Application to morphisms with connected fibres}
\label{section-application-geometrically-connected}

\noindent
In this section we prove some lemmas that produce morphisms all of
whose fibres are geometrically connected or geometrically integral.
This will be useful in our study of the local structure of morphisms
of finite type later.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-descent-connected-fibres}
Consider a diagram of morphisms of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_{\sigma} \ar[rd] & X \ar[d] \\
& Y
}
$$
an a point $y \in Y$. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X \to Y$ is of finite presentation and flat,
\item $Z \to Y$ is finite locally free,
\item $Z_y \not = \emptyset$,
\item all fibres of $X \to Y$ are geometrically reduced, and
\item $X_y$ is geometrically connected over $\kappa(y)$.
\end{enumerate}
Then there exists an open $X^0 \subset X$ such that $X^0_y = X_y$
and such that all nonempty fibres of $X^0 \to Y$ are geometrically connected.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
In this proof we will use that flat, finite presentation, finite locally
free are properties that are preserved under base change and composition.
We will also use that a finite locally free morphism is both open and
closed. You can find these facts as
Morphisms, Lemmas
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-presentation},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-locally-free},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-flat},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-finite-presentation},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-finite-locally-free},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-proper}.

\medskip\noindent
Note that $X_Z \to Z$ is flat morphism of finite presentation
which has a section $s$ coming from $\sigma$. Let $X_Z^0$ denote
the subset of $X_Z$ defined in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-connected-along-section-open}
it is an open subset of $X_Z$.

\medskip\noindent
The pullback $X_{Z \times_Y Z}$ of $X$ to $Z \times_Y Z$ comes equipped
with two sections $s_0, s_1$, namely the base changes of $s$ by
$\text{pr}_0, \text{pr}_1 : Z \times_Y Z \to Z$. The construction of
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}
gives two subsets $(X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_0}^0$ and
$(X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_1}^0$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-connected-along-section}
these are the inverse images of $X_Z^0$ under the morphisms
$1_X \times \text{pr}_0, 1_X \times \text{pr}_1 : X_{Z \times_Y Z} \to X_Z$.
In particular these subsets are open.

\medskip\noindent
Let $(Z \times_Y Z)_y = \{z_1, \ldots, z_n\}$.
As $X_y$ is geometrically connected, we see that the fibres of
$(X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_0}^0$ and $(X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_1}^0$
over each $z_i$ agree (being equal to the whole fibre). Another
way to say this is that
$$
s_0(z_i) \in (X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_1}^0
\quad\text{and}\quad
s_1(z_i) \in (X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_0}^0.
$$
Since the sets $(X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_0}^0$ and $(X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_1}^0$
are open in $X_{Z \times_Y Z}$ there exists an open neighbourhood
$W \subset Z \times_Y Z$ of $(Z \times_Y Z)_y$ such that
$$
s_0(W) \subset (X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_1}^0
\quad\text{and}\quad
s_1(W) \subset (X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_0}^0.
$$
Then it follows directly from the construction in
Situation \ref{situation-connected-along-section}
that
$$
p^{-1}(W) \cap (X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_0}^0
=
p^{-1}(W) \cap (X_{Z \times_Y Z})_{s_1}^0
$$
where $p : X_{Z \times_Y Z} \to Z \times_W Z$ is the projection.
Because $Z \times_Y Z \to Y$ is finite locally free, hence open and closed,
there exists an open neighbourhood $V \subset Y$ of $y$ such that
$q^{-1}(V) \subset W$, where $q : Z \times_Y Z \to Y$ is the
structure morphism. To prove the lemma we may replace $Y$ by $V$.
After we do this we see that $X_Z^0 \subset Y_Z$ is an open such that
$$
(1_X \times \text{pr}_0)^{-1}(X_Z^0) =
(1_X \times \text{pr}_1)^{-1}(X_Z^0).
$$
This means that the image $X^0 \subset X$ of $X_Z^0$ is an open such
that $(X_Z \to X)^{-1}(X^0) = X_Z^0$, see
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-open-fpqc-covering}.
At this point it is clear that $X^0$ is the desired open subscheme.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-fibre-geometrically-connected-reduced}
Let $h : Y \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$ be a point.
Let $T \subset Y_s$ be an open subscheme.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $h$ is flat and of finite presentation,
\item all fibres of $h$ are geometrically reduced, and
\item $T$ is geometrically connected over $\kappa(s)$.
\end{enumerate}
Then we can find an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(S', s') \to (S, s)$
and an open $V \subset Y_{S'}$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] all fibres of $V \to S'$ are geometrically connected,
\item[(b)] $V_{s'} = T \times_s s'$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The problem is clearly local on $S$, hence we may replace $S$ by an
affine open neighbourhood of $s$.
The topology on $Y_s$ is induced from the topology on $X$, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-fibre-topological}.
Hence we can find a quasi-compact open $V \subset Y$ such that $V_s = T$.
The restriction of $h$ to $V$ is quasi-compact (as $S$ affine and $V$
quasi-compact), quasi-separated, locally of finite presentation, and
flat hence flat of finite presentation.
Thus after replacing $Y$ by $V$ we may assume, in addition
to (1) and (2) that $Y_s = T$ and $S$ affine.

\medskip\noindent
Pick a point $y \in Y_s$ such that $h$ is Cohen-Macaulay at $y$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-CM-open}.
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-slice-CM}
there exists a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r] \ar[rd] & Y \ar[d] \\
& S
}
$$
such that $Z \to S$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, locally
quasi-finite with $Z_s = \{z\}$. Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-at-point}
to find an elementary neighbourhood $(S', s') \to (S, s)$ and an open
$Z' \subset Z_{S'} = S' \times_S Z$ with $Z' \to S'$ finite with a unique
point $z' \in Z'$ lying over $s$. Note that $Z' \to S'$ is also
locally of finite presentation and flat (as an open of the base change
of $Z \to S$), hence $Z' \to S'$ is finite locally free, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-flat}.
Note that $Y_{S'} \to S'$ is flat and of finite presentation
with geometrically reduced fibres as a base change of $h$.
Also $Y_{s'} = Y_s$ is geometrically connected.
Apply Lemma \ref{lemma-descent-connected-fibres}
to $Z' \to Y_{S'}$ over $S'$ to get $V \subset Y_{S'}$
satisfying (2) whose fibres over $S'$ are either empty or
geometrically connected. As $V \to S'$ is open
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}), after shrinking
$S'$ we may assume $V \to S'$ is surjective, whence (1) holds.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-normal-morphism-irreducible}
Let $h : Y \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$ be a point.
Let $T \subset Y_s$ be an open subscheme.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $h$ is of finite presentation,
\item $h$ is normal, and
\item $T$ is geometrically irreducible over $\kappa(s)$.
\end{enumerate}
Then we can find an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(S', s') \to (S, s)$
and an open $V \subset Y_{S'}$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(a)] all fibres of $V \to S'$ are geometrically integral,
\item[(b)] $V_{s'} = T \times_s s'$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-fibre-geometrically-connected-reduced}
to find an elementary \'etale neighbourhood $(S', s') \to (S, s)$ and
an open $V \subset Y_{S'}$ such that all fibres of
$V \to S'$ are geometrically integral and $V_{s'} = T \times_s s'$.
Note that $V \to S'$ is open, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}
Hence after replacing $S'$ by the image of $V \to S'$ we see that
all fibres of $V \to S'$ are nonempty. As $V$ is an open of the
base change of $h$ all fibres of $V \to S'$ are geometrically normal, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-normal}.
In particular, they are geometrically reduced. To finish the proof
we have to show they are geometrically irreducible. But, if $t \in S'$
then $V_t$ is of finite type over $\kappa(t)$ and hence
$V_t \times_{\kappa(t)} \overline{\kappa(t)}$ is of finite type
over $\overline{\kappa(t)}$ hence Noetherian. By choice of $S' \to S$
the scheme $V_t \times_{\kappa(t)} \overline{\kappa(t)}$ is connected.
Hence $V_t \times_{\kappa(t)} \overline{\kappa(t)}$ is irreducible by
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-normal-Noetherian}
and we win.
\end{proof}








\section{Application to the structure of finite type morphisms}
\label{section-application-finite-type}

\noindent
The result in this section can be found in \cite{GruRay}.
Loosely stated it says that a finite type morphism is \'etale
locally on the source and target the composition of a finite
morphism by a smooth morphism with geometrically connected fibres
of relative dimension equal to the fibre dimension of the original
morphism.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-local-structure-finite-type}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism. Let $x \in X$ and set $s = f(x)$.
Assume that $f$ is locally of finite type and that $n = \dim_x(X_s)$.
Then there exists a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[dd] & X' \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^\pi & x \ar@{|->}[dd] &
x' \ar@{|->}[l]  \ar@{|->}[d] \\
& Y \ar[d]^h & & y \ar@{|->}[d] \\
S \ar@{=}[r] & S & s & s \ar@{=}[l]
}
$$
and a point $x' \in X'$ with $g(x') = x$ such that with $y = \pi(x')$
we have
\begin{enumerate}
\item $h : Y \to S$ is smooth of relative dimension $n$,
\item $g : (X', x') \to (X, x)$ is an elementary \'etale neighbourhood,
\item $\pi$ is finite, and $\pi^{-1}(\{y\}) = \{x'\}$, and
\item $\kappa(y)$ is a purely transcendental extension of $\kappa(s)$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, if $f$ is locally of finite presentation then $\pi$ is
of finite presentation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The problem is local on $X$ and $S$, hence we may assume that $X$ and
$S$ are affine. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-refined-quasi-finite-over-polynomial-algebra}
after replacing $X$ by a standard open neighbourhood of $x$ in $X$
we may assume there is a factorization
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r]^\pi & \mathbf{A}^n_S \ar[r] & S
}
$$
such that $\pi$ is quasi-finite and such that $\kappa(\pi(x))$
is purely transcendental over $\kappa(s)$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-at-point}
there exists an elementary \'etale neighbourhood
$$
(Y, y) \to (\mathbf{A}^n_S, \pi(x))
$$
and an open $X' \subset X \times_{\mathbf{A}^n_S} Y$ which contains a
unique point $x'$ lying over $y$ such that $X' \to Y$ is finite.
This proves (1) -- (4) hold. For the final assertion, use
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-local-local-structure-finite-type}
\begin{slogan}
A morphism of finite type is, in \'etale neighbourhoods, finite over a
smooth morphism.
\end{slogan}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism. Let $x \in X$ and set $s = f(x)$.
Assume that $f$ is locally of finite type and that $n = \dim_x(X_s)$.
Then there exists a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[dd] & X' \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^\pi & x \ar@{|->}[dd] &
x' \ar@{|->}[l] \ar@{|->}[d] \\
& Y' \ar[d]^h & & y' \ar@{|->}[d] \\
S & S' \ar[l]_e & s & s' \ar@{|->}[l]
}
$$
and a point $x' \in X'$ with $g(x') = x$ such that with $y' = \pi(x')$,
$s' = h(y')$ we have
\begin{enumerate}
\item $h : Y' \to S'$ is smooth of relative dimension $n$,
\item all fibres of $Y' \to S'$ are geometrically integral,
\item $g : (X', x') \to (X, x)$ is an elementary \'etale neighbourhood,
\item $\pi$ is finite, and $\pi^{-1}(\{y'\}) = \{x'\}$,
\item $\kappa(y')$ is a purely transcendental extension of $\kappa(s')$, and
\item $e : (S', s') \to (S, s)$ is an elementary \'etale neighbourhood.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, if $f$ is locally of finite presentation, then $\pi$ is
of finite presentation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The question is local on $S$, hence we may replace $S$ by an affine open
neighbourhood of $s$. Next, we apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-local-structure-finite-type}
to get a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[dd] & X' \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^\pi & x \ar@{|->}[dd] &
x' \ar@{|->}[l] \ar@{|->}[d] \\
& Y \ar[d]^h & & y \ar@{|->}[d] \\
S \ar@{=}[r] & S & s & s \ar@{=}[l]
}
$$
where $h$ is smooth of relative dimension $n$ and $\kappa(y)$ is
a purely transcendental extension of $\kappa(s)$. Since the question is
local on $X$ also, we may replace $Y$ by an affine neighbourhood of $y$
(and $X'$ by the inverse image of this under $\pi$). As $S$ is affine
this guarantees that $Y \to S$ is quasi-compact, separated and smooth,
in particular of finite presentation.
Let $T$ be the connected component of $Y_s$ containing $y$.
As $Y_s$ is Noetherian we see that $T$ is open.
We also see that $T$ is geometrically connected over $\kappa(s)$ by
Varieties,
Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-connected-if-connected-and-point}.
Since $T$ is also smooth over $\kappa(s)$ it is geometrically normal, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-smooth-geometrically-normal}.
We conclude that $T$ is geometrically irreducible over $\kappa(s)$ (as a
connected Noetherian normal scheme is irreducible, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-normal-Noetherian}).
Finally, note that the smooth morphism $h$ is normal by
Lemma \ref{lemma-smooth-normal}.
At this point we have verified all assumption of
Lemma \ref{lemma-normal-morphism-irreducible}
hold for the morphism $h : Y \to S$ and open $T \subset Y_s$.
As a result of applying
Lemma \ref{lemma-normal-morphism-irreducible}
we obtain $e : S' \to S$, $s' \in S'$, $Y'$ as
in the commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[dd] & X' \ar[l]^g \ar[d]^\pi & X' \times_Y Y' \ar[l] \ar[d] &
x \ar@{|->}[dd] & x' \ar@{|->}[l] \ar@{|->}[d] &
(x', s') \ar@{|->}[l] \ar@{|->}[d] \\
& Y \ar[d]^h & Y' \ar[d] \ar[l] & & y \ar@{|->}[d] &
(y, s') \ar@{|->}[l] \ar@{|->}[d] \\
S \ar@{=}[r] & S & S' \ar[l]_e & s & s \ar@{=}[l] & s' \ar@{|->}[l]
}
$$
where $e : (S', s') \to (S, s)$ is an elementary \'etale neighbourhood,
and where $Y' \subset Y_{S'}$ is an open neighbourhood all of whose fibres
over $S'$ are geometrically irreducible, such that $Y'_{s'} = T$ via
the identification $Y_s = Y_{S', s'}$. Let $(y, s') \in Y'$ be the point
corresponding to $y \in T$; this is also the unique point of $Y \times_S S'$
lying over $y$ with residue field equal to $\kappa(y)$ which maps to $s'$
in $S'$. Similarly, let $(x', s') \in X' \times_Y Y' \subset X' \times_S S'$
be the unique point over $x'$ with residue field equal to $\kappa(x')$
lying over $s'$. Then the outer part of this diagram is a solution to the
problem posed in the lemma. Some minor details omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-local-local-structure-finite-type-affine}
Assumption and notation as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-local-local-structure-finite-type}.
In addition to properties (1) -- (6) we may also arrange it so that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(7)] $S'$, $Y'$, $X'$ are affine.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Note that if $Y'$ is affine, then $X'$ is affine as $\pi$ is finite.
Choose an affine open neighbourhood $U' \subset S'$ of $s'$.
Choose an affine open neighbourhood $V' \subset h^{-1}(U')$ of $y'$.
Let $W' = h(V')$. This is an open neighbourhood of $s'$ in $S'$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-open},
contained in $U'$. Choose an affine open neighbourhood $U'' \subset W'$
of $s'$. Then $h^{-1}(U'') \cap V'$ is affine because it is equal to
$U'' \times_{U'} V'$. By construction
$h^{-1}(U'') \cap V' \to U''$ is a surjective smooth morphism whose
fibres are (nonempty) open subschemes of geometrically integral fibres
of $Y' \to S'$, and hence geometrically integral. Thus we may replace
$S'$ by $U''$ and $Y'$ by $h^{-1}(U'') \cap V'$.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The significance of the property $\pi^{-1}(\{y'\}) = \{x'\}$ is partially
explained by the following lemma.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-finite-morphism-single-point-in-fibre}
Let $\pi : X \to Y$ be a finite morphism.
Let $x \in X$ with $y = \pi(x)$ such that $\pi^{-1}(\{y\}) = \{x\}$.
Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item For every neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$ in $X$, there
exists a neighbourhood $V \subset Y$ of $y$ such that
$\pi^{-1}(V) \subset U$.
\item The ring map $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is finite.
\item If $\pi$ is of finite presentation, then
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is of finite presentation.
\item For any quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$
we have $\mathcal{F}_x = \pi_*\mathcal{F}_y$ as
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$-modules.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The first assertion is purely topological; use that
$\pi$ is a continuous and closed map such that $\pi^{-1}(\{y\}) = \{x\}$.
To prove the second and third parts we may assume
$X = \Spec(B)$ and $Y = \Spec(A)$. Then
$A \to B$ is a finite ring map and $y$ corresponds to a prime
$\mathfrak p$ of $A$ such that there exists a unique prime $\mathfrak q$ of
$B$ lying over $\mathfrak p$. Then
$B_{\mathfrak q} = B_{\mathfrak p}$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-unique-prime-over-localize-below}.
In other words, the map $A_{\mathfrak p} \to B_{\mathfrak q}$
is equal to the map $A_{\mathfrak p} \to B_{\mathfrak p}$ you get
from localizing $A \to B$ at $\mathfrak p$.
Thus (2) and (3) follow from simple properties of localization
(some details omitted). For the final statement, suppose that
$\mathcal{F} = \widetilde M$ for some $B$-module $M$.
Then $\mathcal{F} = M_{\mathfrak q}$ and
$\pi_*\mathcal{F}_y = M_{\mathfrak p}$. By the above these
localizations agree. Alternatively you can use part (1) and
the definition of stalks to see that $\mathcal{F}_x = \pi_*\mathcal{F}_y$
directly.
\end{proof}






\section{Application to the fppf topology}
\label{section-application-fppf}

\noindent
We can use the above \'etale localization techniques to prove the
following result describing the fppf topology as being equal to
the topology ``generated by'' Zariski coverings and by coverings of the
form $\{f : T \to S\}$ where $f$ is surjective finite locally free.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dominate-fppf}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\{S_i \to S\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf covering.
Then there exist
\begin{enumerate}
\item a Zariski open covering $S = \bigcup U_j$,
\item surjective finite locally free morphisms $W_j \to U_j$,
\item Zariski open coverings $W_j = \bigcup_k W_{j, k}$,
\item surjective finite locally free morphisms $T_{j, k} \to W_{j, k}$
\end{enumerate}
such that the fppf covering $\{T_{j, k} \to S\}$ refines the given
covering $\{S_i \to S\}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We may assume that each $S_i \to S$ is locally quasi-finite, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-qf-fp-flat-dominates-fppf}.

\medskip\noindent
Fix a point $s \in S$. Pick an $i \in I$ and a point
$s_i \in S_i$ mapping to $s$. Choose an elementary \'etale neighbourhood
$(S', s) \to (S, s)$ such that there exists an open
$$
S_i \times_S S'  \supset V
$$
which contains a unique point $v \in V$ mapping to $s \in S'$
and such that $V \to S'$ is finite, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-quasi-finite-finite-at-point}.
Then $V \to S'$ is finite locally free, because it is finite
and because $S_i \times_S S' \to S'$ is flat and locally of finite presentation
as a base change of the morphism $S_i \to S$, see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-presentation},
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat}, and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-flat}.
Hence $V \to S'$ is open, and after shrinking $S'$
we may assume that $V \to S'$ is surjective finite locally free.
Since we can do this for every point of $S$ we conclude that
$\{S_i \to S\}$ can be refined by a covering of the form
$\{V_a \to S\}_{a \in A}$ where each $V_a \to S$ factors as
$V_a \to S'_a \to S$ with $S'_a \to S$ \'etale and $V_a \to S'_a$ surjective
finite locally free.

\medskip\noindent
By
Remark \ref{remark-topologies}
there exists a Zariski open covering $S = \bigcup U_j$,
for each $j$ a finite locally free, surjective morphism
$W_j \to U_j$, and for each $j$ a Zariski open covering
$\{W_{j, k} \to W_j\}$ such that the family
$\{W_{j, k} \to S\}$ refines the \'etale covering
$\{S'_a \to S\}$, i.e., for each pair $j, k$ there exists
an $a(j, k)$ and a factorization $W_{j, K} \to S'_a \to S$
of the morphism $W_{j, K} \to S$. Set
$T_{j, k} = W_{j, k} \times_{S'_a} V_a$ and everything is clear.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-extend-integral-surjective-morphisms}
Let $S$ be a scheme. If $U \subset S$ is open and $V \to U$ is a surjective
integral morphism, then there exists a surjective integral
morphism $\overline{V} \to S$ with $\overline{V} \times_S U$
isomorphic to $V$ as schemes over $U$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $V' \to S$ be the normalization of $S$ in $U$, see
Morphisms, Section \ref{morphisms-section-normalization-X-in-Y}.
By construction $V' \to S$ is integral.
By Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-localization} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-in-integral} we see that
the inverse image of $U$ in $V'$ is $V$. Let $Z$ be the reduced
induced scheme structure on $S \setminus U$. Then
$\overline{V} = V' \amalg Z$ works.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-extend-finite-surjective-morphisms}
Let $S$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme.
If $U \subset S$ is a quasi-compact open
and $V \to U$ is a surjective finite morphism, then there exists a
surjective finite morphism $\overline{V} \to S$ with $\overline{V} \times_S U$
isomorphic to $V$ as schemes over $U$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Zariski's Main Theorem
(Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-pass-through-finite})
we can assume $V$ is a quasi-compact open in a scheme $V'$
finite over $S$. After replacing $V'$ by the scheme theoretic image
of $V$ we may assume that $V$ is dense in $V'$.
It follows that $V' \times_S U = V$ because $V \to V' \times_S U$
is closed as $V$ is finite over $U$. Let $Z$ be the reduced
induced scheme structure on $S \setminus U$. Then
$\overline{V} = V' \amalg Z$ works.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dominate-fppf-integral}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $\{S_i \to S\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf covering.
Then there exists a surjective integral morphism $S' \to S$ and an
open covering $S' = \bigcup U'_\alpha$ such that for each $\alpha$ the
morphism $U'_\alpha \to S$ factors through $S_i \to S$ for some $i$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose $S = \bigcup U_j$, $W_j \to U_j$, $W_j = \bigcup W_{j, k}$, and
$T_{j, k} \to W_{j, k}$ as in Lemma \ref{lemma-dominate-fppf}.
By Lemma \ref{lemma-extend-integral-surjective-morphisms}
we can extend $W_j \to U_j$ to a surjective integral
morphism $\overline{W}_j \to S$.
After this we can extend $T_{j, k} \to W_{j, k}$ to a surjective
integral morphism $\overline{T}_{j, k} \to \overline{W}_j$.
We set $\overline{T}_j$ equal to the product of all the schemes
$\overline{T}_{j, k}$ over $\overline{W}_j$
(Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-infinite-product}).
Then we set $S'$ equal to the product of all the schemes
$\overline{T}_j$ over $S$.
If $x \in S'$, then there is a $j$ such that the image of $x$ in
$S$ lies in $U_j$. Hence there is a $k$ such that the image of
$x$ under the projection $S' \to \overline{W}_j$ lies in $W_{j, k}$.
Hence under the projection $S' \to \overline{T}_j \to \overline{T}_{j, k}$
the point $x$ ends up in $T_{j, k}$. And $T_{j, k} \to S$
factors through $S_i$ for some $i$.
Finally, the morphism $S' \to S$ is integral and surjective
by Limits, Lemmas \ref{limits-lemma-infinite-product-integral} and
\ref{limits-lemma-infinite-product-surjective}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-dominate-fppf-finite}
Let $S$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme.
Let $\{S_i \to S\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf covering.
Then there exists a surjective finite morphism $S' \to S$
of finite presentation and an
open covering $S' = \bigcup U'_\alpha$ such that for each $\alpha$ the
morphism $U'_\alpha \to S$ factors through $S_i \to S$ for some $i$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $Y \to X$ be the integral surjective morphism found in
Lemma \ref{lemma-dominate-fppf-integral}.
Choose a finite affine open covering $Y = \bigcup V_j$
such that $V_j \to X$ factors through $S_{i(j)}$.
We can write $Y = \lim Y_\lambda$ with
$Y_\lambda \to X$ finite and of finite presentation, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-integral-limit-finite-and-finite-presentation}.
For large enough $\lambda$ we can find affine opens
$V_{\lambda, j} \subset Y_\lambda$
whose inverse image in $Y$ recovers $V_j$, see
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-opens}.
For even larger $\lambda$ the morphisms $V_j \to S_{i(j)}$
over $X$ come from morphisms $V_{\lambda, j} \to S_{i(j)}$ over
$X$, see
Limits, Proposition
\ref{limits-proposition-characterize-locally-finite-presentation}.
Setting $S' = Y_\lambda$ for this $\lambda$ finishes the proof.
\end{proof}




\section{Quasi-projective schemes}
\label{section-quasi-projective}

\noindent
The term ``quasi-projective scheme'' has not yet been defined.
A possible definition could be a scheme which has an ample invertible
sheaf. However, if $X$ is a scheme over a base scheme $S$, then
we say that {\it $X$ is quasi-projective over $S$} if the morphism
$X \to S$ is quasi-projective
(Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-quasi-projective}).
Since the identity morphism of any scheme is quasi-projective, we
see that a scheme quasi-projective over $S$ doesn't necessarily
have an ample invertible sheaf. For this reason it seems better to
leave the term ``quasi-projective scheme'' undefined.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quasi-projective}
Let $S$ be a scheme which has an ample invertible sheaf.
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are
equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X \to S$ is quasi-projective,
\item $X \to S$ is H-quasi-projective,
\item there exists a quasi-compact open immersion $X \to X'$ of schemes
over $S$ with $X' \to S$ projective,
\item $X \to S$ is of finite type and $X$ has an ample invertible
sheaf, and
\item $X \to S$ is of finite type and there exists an
$f$-very ample invertible sheaf.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The implication (2) $\Rightarrow$ (1) is
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-H-quasi-projective-quasi-projective}.
The implication (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) is
Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-projective-over-quasi-projective-is-H-projective}.
The implication (2) $\Rightarrow$ (3) is
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-H-quasi-projective-open-H-projective}

\medskip\noindent
Assume $X \subset X'$ is as in (3). In particular $X \to S$ is
of finite type. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-H-quasi-projective-open-H-projective}
the morphism $X \to S$ is H-projective.
Thus there exists a quasi-compact immersion $i : X \to \mathbf{P}^n_S$.
Hence $\mathcal{L} = i^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_S}(1)$
is $f$-very ample. As $X \to S$ is quasi-compact we conclude from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-ample-very-ample}
that $\mathcal{L}$ is $f$-ample. Thus $X \to S$ is quasi-projective
by definition.

\medskip\noindent
The implication (4) $\Rightarrow$ (2) is
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-projective-finite-type-over-S}.

\medskip\noindent
Assume the equivalent conditions (1), (2), (3) hold.
Choose an immersion $i : X \to \mathbf{P}^n_S$ over $S$.
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an ample invertible sheaf on $S$. To finish the
proof we will show that
$\mathcal{N} =
f^*\mathcal{L} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} i^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_X}(1)$
is ample on $X$. By
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-ample-on-locally-closed}
we reduce to the case $X = \mathbf{P}^n_S$. Let
$s \in \Gamma(S, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes d})$ be a section
such that the corresponding open $S_s$ is affine.
Say $S_s = \Spec(A)$.
Recall that $\mathbf{P}^n_S$ is the projective bundle
associated to $\mathcal{O}_S T_0 \oplus \ldots \oplus \mathcal{O}_S T_n$, see
Constructions, Lemma \ref{constructions-lemma-projective-space-bundle}
and its proof.
Let $s_i \in \Gamma(\mathbf{P}^n_S, \mathcal{O}(1))$
be the global section corresponding to the section $T_i$
of $\mathcal{O}_S T_0 \oplus \ldots \oplus \mathcal{O}_S T_n$.
Then we see that $X_{f^*s \otimes s_i^{\otimes n}}$ is affine
because it is equal to $\Spec(A[T_0/T_i, \ldots, T_n/T_i])$.
This proves that $\mathcal{N}$ is ample by definition.

\medskip\noindent
The equivalence of (1) and (5) follows from
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-ample-very-ample} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-ample-very-ample}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-category-quasi-projective}
Let $S$ be a scheme which has an ample invertible sheaf.
Let $\text{QP}_S$ be the full subcategory of the
category of schemes over $S$ satisfying the equivalent
conditions of Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-projective}.
\begin{enumerate}
\item if $S' \to S$ is a morphism of schemes and $S'$ has
an ample invertible sheaf, then base change determines
a functor $\text{QP}_S \to \text{QP}_{S'}$,
\item if $X \in \text{QP}_S$ and $Y \in \text{QP}_X$, then $Y \in \text{QP}_S$,
\item the category $\text{QP}_S$ is closed under fibre products,
\item the category $\text{QP}_S$ is closed under
finite disjoint unions,
\item if $X \to S$ is projective, then $X \in \text{QP}_S$,
\item if $X \to S$ is quasi-affine of finite type, then
$X$ is in $\text{QP}_S$,
\item if $X \to S$ is quasi-finite and separated, then
$X \in \text{QP}_S$,
\item if $X \to S$ is a quasi-compact immersion, then
$X \in \text{QP}_S$,
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Part (1) follows from Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (2) follows from the fourth characterization of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
If $X \to S$ and $Y \to S$ are quasi-projective, then
$X \times_S Y \to Y$ is quasi-projective by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-projective}.
Hence (3) follows from (2).

\medskip\noindent
If $X = Y \amalg Z$ is a disjoint union of schemes
and $\mathcal{L}$ is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
such that $\mathcal{L}|_Y$ and $\mathcal{L}|_Z$ are ample, then
$\mathcal{L}$ is ample (details omitted). Thus
part (4) follows from the fourth characterization of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (5) follows from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-projective-quasi-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (6) follows from
Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-affine-finite-type-quasi-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (7) follows from part (6) and
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (8) follows from part (7) and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-immersion-locally-quasi-finite}.
\end{proof}









\section{Projective schemes}
\label{section-projective}

\noindent
This section is the analogue of Section \ref{section-quasi-projective}
for projective morphisms.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-projective}
Let $S$ be a scheme which has an ample invertible sheaf.
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are
equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X \to S$ is projective,
\item $X \to S$ is H-projective,
\item $X \to S$ is quasi-projective and proper,
\item $X \to S$ is H-quasi-projective and proper,
\item $X \to S$ is proper and $X$ has an ample invertible sheaf,
\item $X \to S$ is proper and there exists an $f$-ample invertible sheaf,
\item $X \to S$ is proper and there exists an $f$-very ample invertible sheaf,
\item there is a quasi-coherent graded $\mathcal{O}_S$-algebra $\mathcal{A}$
generated by $\mathcal{A}_1$ over $\mathcal{A}_0$ with $\mathcal{A}_1$ a
finite type $\mathcal{O}_S$-module such that
$X = \underline{\text{Proj}}_S(\mathcal{A})$. 
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Observe first that in each case the morphism $f$ is proper, see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-H-projective} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-projective-proper}.
Hence it suffices to prove the equivalence of the notions in
case $f$ is a proper morphism. We will use this without further
mention in the following.

\medskip\noindent
The equivalences (1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (3) and
(2) $\Leftrightarrow$ (4) are
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-projective-is-quasi-projective-proper}.

\medskip\noindent
The implication (2) $\Rightarrow$ (1) is
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-H-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
The implications (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2) and (3) $\Rightarrow$ (4) are
Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-projective-over-quasi-projective-is-H-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
The implication (1) $\Rightarrow$ (7) is immediate from
Morphisms, Definitions \ref{morphisms-definition-projective} and
\ref{morphisms-definition-very-ample}.

\medskip\noindent
The conditions (3) and (6) are equivalent by
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-quasi-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Thus (1) -- (4), (6) are equivalent and imply (7). By
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-projective}
conditions (3), (5), and (7) are equivalent.
Thus we see that (1) -- (7) are equivalent.

\medskip\noindent
By Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-proj-projective}
we see that (8) implies (1). Conversely, if (2) holds, then
we can choose a closed immersion
$$
i :
X
\longrightarrow
\mathbf{P}^n_S = \underline{\text{Proj}}_S(\mathcal{O}_S[T_0, \ldots, T_n]).
$$
See Constructions, Lemma \ref{constructions-lemma-projective-space-bundle}
for the equality. By
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-closed-subscheme-proj}
we see that $X$ is the relative Proj of a quasi-coherent graded quotient
algebra $\mathcal{A}$ of $\mathcal{O}_S[T_0, \ldots, T_n]$.
Then $\mathcal{A}$ satisfies the conditions of (8).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-category-projective}
Let $S$ be a scheme which has an ample invertible sheaf.
Let $\text{P}_S$ be the full subcategory of the
category of schemes over $S$ satisfying the equivalent
conditions of Lemma \ref{lemma-projective}.
\begin{enumerate}
\item if $S' \to S$ is a morphism of schemes and $S'$ has
an ample invertible sheaf, then base change determines
a functor $\text{P}_S \to \text{P}_{S'}$,
\item if $X \in \text{P}_S$ and $Y \in \text{P}_X$, then $Y \in \text{P}_S$,
\item the category $\text{P}_S$ is closed under fibre products,
\item the category $\text{P}_S$ is closed under
finite disjoint unions,
\item if $X \to S$ is finite, then $X$ is in $\text{P}_S$,
\item add more here.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Part (1) follows from Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (2) follows from the fifth characterization of
Lemma \ref{lemma-projective} and the fact that compositions
of proper morphisms are proper
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-proper}).

\medskip\noindent
If $X \to S$ and $Y \to S$ are projective, then
$X \times_S Y \to Y$ is projective by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-projective}.
Hence (3) follows from (2).

\medskip\noindent
If $X = Y \amalg Z$ is a disjoint union of schemes
and $\mathcal{L}$ is an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
such that $\mathcal{L}|_Y$ and $\mathcal{L}|_Z$ are ample, then
$\mathcal{L}$ is ample (details omitted). Thus
part (4) follows from the fifth characterization of
Lemma \ref{lemma-projective}.

\medskip\noindent
Part (5) follows from
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-projective}.
\end{proof}












\section{Closed points in fibres}
\label{section-closed-points-fibres}

\noindent
Some of the material in this section is taken from the preprint
\cite{Osserman-Payne}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-locally-principal-vertical}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme.
Let $s \in S$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $S$ is irreducible with generic point $\eta$,
\item $X$ is irreducible,
\item $f$ is dominant,
\item $f$ is locally of finite type,
\item $\dim(X_s) \leq \dim(X_\eta)$,
\item $Z$ is locally principal in $X$, and
\item $Z_\eta = \emptyset$.
\end{enumerate}
Then the fibre $Z_s$ is (set theoretically) a union of
irreducible components of $X_s$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $X_{red}$ denote the reduction of $X$. Then $Z \cap X_{red}$ is
a locally principal closed subscheme of $X_{red}$, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-pullback-locally-principal}.
Hence we may assume that $X$ is reduced. In other words $X$ is integral, see
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-characterize-integral}.
In this case the morphism $X \to S$ factors through $S_{red}$, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-map-into-reduction}.
Thus we may replace $S$ by $S_{red}$ and assume that $S$ is integral too.

\medskip\noindent
The assertion that $f$ is dominant signifies that the generic point of $X$
is mapped to $\eta$, see
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dominant-finite-number-irreducible-components}.
Moreover, the scheme $X_\eta$ is an integral scheme which is locally of
finite type over the field $\kappa(\eta)$. Hence
$d = \dim(X_\eta) \geq 0$ is equal to $\dim_\xi(X_\eta)$ for
every point $\xi$ of $X_\eta$, see
Algebra, Lemmas \ref{algebra-lemma-dimension-spell-it-out} and
\ref{algebra-lemma-dimension-at-a-point-finite-type-over-field}.
In view of
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-openness-bounded-dimension-fibres}
and condition (5) we conclude that $\dim_x(X_s) = d$
for every $x \in X_s$.

\medskip\noindent
In the Noetherian case the assertion can be proved as follows.
If the lemma does not holds there exists $x \in Z_s$ which is a generic
point of an irreducible component of $Z_s$ but not a generic point
of any irreducible component of $X_s$. Then we see that
$\dim_x(Z_s) \leq d - 1$, because $\dim_x(X_s) = d$ and in a neighbourhood
of $x$ in $X_s$ the closed subscheme $Z_s$ does not contain any of the
irreducible components of $X_s$. Hence after replacing $X$ by an
open neighbourhood of $x$ we may assume that
$\dim_z(Z_{f(z)}) \leq d - 1$ for all $z \in Z$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-openness-bounded-dimension-fibres}.
Let $\xi' \in Z$ be a generic point of an irreducible component of $Z$
and set $s' = f(\xi)$. As $Z \not = X$ is locally principal we see that
$\dim(\mathcal{O}_{X, \xi}) = 1$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-minimal-over-1}
(this is where we use $X$ is Noetherian).
Let $\xi \in X$ be the generic point of $X$ and
let $\xi_1$ be a generic point of any irreducible component
of $X_{s'}$ which contains $\xi'$. Then we see that we have
the specializations
$$
\xi \leadsto \xi_1 \leadsto \xi'.
$$
As $\dim(\mathcal{O}_{X, \xi}) = 1$ one of the two specializations
has to be an equality.
By assumption $s' \not = \eta$, hence the first specialization
is not an equality.
Hence $\xi' = \xi_1$ is a generic point of an irreducible component of
$X_{s'}$. Applying
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-openness-bounded-dimension-fibres}
one more time this implies
$\dim_{\xi'}(Z_{s'}) = \dim_{\xi'}(X_{s'}) \geq \dim(X_\eta) = d$
which gives the desired contradiction.

\medskip\noindent
In the general case we reduce to the Noetherian case as follows.
If the lemma is false then there exists a point
$x \in X$ lying over $s$ such that $x$ is a generic point of an
irreducible component of $Z_s$, but
not a generic point of any of the irreducible components of $X_s$.
Let $U \subset S$ be an affine neighbourhood of $s$ and let
$V \subset X$ be an affine neighbourhood of $x$ with $f(V) \subset U$.
Write $U = \Spec(A)$ and $V = \Spec(B)$ so that $f|_V$
is given by a ring map $A \to B$. Let $\mathfrak q \subset B$,
resp.\ $\mathfrak p \subset A$ be the prime corresponding to $x$, resp.\ $s$.
After possibly shrinking $V$ we may assume $Z \cap V$ is cut out by
some element $g \in B$. Denote $K = f.f.(A)$. What we know at this point
is the following:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $A \subset B$ is a finitely generated extension of domains,
\item the element $g \otimes 1$ is invertible in $B \otimes_A K$,
\item $d = \dim(B \otimes_A K) = \dim(B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p))$,
\item $g \otimes 1$ is not a unit of $B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$, and
\item $g \otimes 1$ is not in any of the minimal primes of
$B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
\end{enumerate}
We are seeking a contradiction.

\medskip\noindent
Pick elements $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in B$ which generate $B$ over $A$.
For a finitely generated $\mathbf{Z}$-algebra $A_0 \subset A$
let $B_0 \subset B$ be the $A_0$-subalgebra generated by
$x_1, \ldots, x_n$, denote $K_0 = f.f.(A_0)$, and set
$\mathfrak p_0 = A_0 \cap \mathfrak p$.
We claim that when $A_0$ is large enough then (1) -- (5) also hold for
the system $(A_0 \subset B_0, g, \mathfrak p_0)$.

\medskip\noindent
We prove each of the conditions in turn. Part (1) holds by construction.
For part (2) write $(g \otimes 1) h = 1$ for some
$h \otimes 1/a \in B \otimes_A K$. Write
$g = \sum a_I x^I$, $h = \sum a'_I x^I$ (multi-index notation)
for some coefficients $a_I, a'_I \in A$. As soon as $A_0$ contains
$a$ and the $a_I, a'_I$ then (2) holds because
$B_0 \otimes_{A_0} K_0 \subset B \otimes_A K$ (as localizations of the
injective map $B_0 \to B$).
To achieve (3) consider the exact sequence
$$
0 \to I \to A[X_1, \ldots, X_n] \to B \to 0
$$
which defines $I$ where the second map sends $X_i$ to $x_i$. Since $\otimes$
is right exact we see that $I \otimes_A K$, respectively
$I \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$ is the kernel of the surjection
$K[X_1, \ldots, X_n] \to B \otimes_A K$, respectively
$\kappa(\mathfrak p)[X_1, \ldots, X_n] \to B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
As a polynomial ring over a field is Noetherian
there exist finitely many elements $h_j \in I$, $j = 1, \ldots, m$
which generate $I \otimes_A K$ and $I \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$.
Write $h_j = \sum a_{j, I}X^I$. As soon as
$A_0$ contains all $a_{j, I}$ we get to the situation where
$$
B_0 \otimes_{A_0} K_0 \otimes_{K_0} K = B \otimes_A K
\quad\text{and}\quad
B_0 \otimes_{A_0} \kappa(\mathfrak p_0)
\otimes_{\kappa(\mathfrak p_0)} \kappa(\mathfrak p)
=
B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p).
$$
By either
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-after-base-change}
or
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-dimension-preserved-field-extension}
we see that the dimension equalities of (3) are satisfied.
Part (4) is immediate. As
$B_0 \otimes_{A_0} \kappa(\mathfrak p_0) \subset
B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$ each minimal prime of
$B_0 \otimes_{A_0} \kappa(\mathfrak p_0)$ lies under a minimal
prime of $B \otimes_A \kappa(\mathfrak p)$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-image-dense-generic-points}.
This implies that (5) holds.
In this way we reduce the problem to the Noetherian case which we
have dealt with above.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is an algebraic application of the lemma above.
The fourth assumption of the lemma holds if $A \to B$ is flat, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-equality-dimensions}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-horizontal}
Let $A \to B$ be a local homomorphism of local rings, and
$g \in \mathfrak m_B$. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $A$ and $B$ are domains and $A \subset B$,
\item $B$ is essentially of finite type over $A$,
\item $g$ is not contained in any minimal prime over $\mathfrak m_AB$, and
\item $\dim(B/\mathfrak m_AB) +
\text{trdeg}_{\kappa(\mathfrak m_A)}(\kappa(\mathfrak m_B)) =
\text{trdeg}_A(B)$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $A \subset B/gB$, i.e., the generic point of $\Spec(A)$
is in the image of the morphism $\Spec(B/gB) \to \Spec(A)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Note that the two assertions are equivalent by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-image-dense-generic-points}.
To start the proof let $C$ be an $A$-algebra of finite type
and $\mathfrak q$ a prime of $C$ such that $B = C_{\mathfrak q}$.
Of course we may assume that $C$ is a domain and that $g \in C$.
After replacing $C$ by a localization we see that
$\dim(C/\mathfrak m_AC) = \dim(B/\mathfrak m_AB) +
\text{trdeg}_{\kappa(\mathfrak m_A)}(\kappa(\mathfrak m_B))$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-at-a-point}.
Setting $K = f.f.(A)$ we see by the same reference that
$\dim(C \otimes_A K) = \text{trdeg}_A(B)$. Hence assumption
(4) means that the generic and closed fibres of the morphism
$\Spec(C) \to \Spec(A)$ have the same dimension.

\medskip\noindent
Suppose that the lemma is false. Then $(B/gB) \otimes_A K = 0$.
This means that $g \otimes 1$ is invertible in $B \otimes_A K
= C_{\mathfrak q} \otimes_A K$. As $C_{\mathfrak q}$ is a limit
of principal localizations we conclude that $g \otimes 1$
is invertible in $C_h \otimes_A K$ for some
$h \in C$, $h \not \in \mathfrak q$. Thus after replacing $C$
by $C_h$ we may assume that $(C/gC) \otimes_A K = 0$.
We do one more replacement of $C$ to make sure that the minimal
primes of $C/\mathfrak m_AC$ correspond one-to-one with the minimal
primes of $B/\mathfrak m_AB$. At this point we apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-locally-principal-vertical}
to $X = \Spec(C) \to \Spec(A) = S$ and the locally closed
subscheme $Z = \Spec(C/gC)$. Since $Z_K = \emptyset$ we see that
$Z \otimes \kappa(\mathfrak m_A)$ has to contain an irreducible
component of
$X \otimes \kappa(\mathfrak m_A) = \Spec(C/\mathfrak m_AC)$.
But this contradicts the assumption that $g$ is not contained
in any prime minimal over $\mathfrak m_AB$. The lemma follows.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-equality-dimensions}
Let $A \to B$ be a local homomorphism of local rings. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $A$ and $B$ are domains and $A \subset B$,
\item $B$ is essentially of finite type over $A$, and
\item $B$ is flat over $A$.
\end{enumerate}
Then we have
$$
\dim(B/\mathfrak m_AB) +
\text{trdeg}_{\kappa(\mathfrak m_A)}(\kappa(\mathfrak m_B)) =
\text{trdeg}_A(B).
$$
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $C$ be an $A$-algebra of finite type and $\mathfrak q$ a prime of $C$
such that $B = C_{\mathfrak q}$. We may assume $C$ is a domain.
We have
$\dim_{\mathfrak q}(C/\mathfrak m_AC) = \dim(B/\mathfrak m_AB) +
\text{trdeg}_{\kappa(\mathfrak m_A)}(\kappa(\mathfrak m_B))$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-dimension-fibre-at-a-point}.
Setting $K = f.f.(A)$ we see by the same reference that
$\dim(C \otimes_A K) = \text{trdeg}_A(B)$.
Thus we are really trying to prove that
$\dim_{\mathfrak q}(C/\mathfrak m_AC) = \dim(C \otimes_A K)$.
Choose a valuation ring $A'$ in $K$ dominating $A$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-dominate}.
Set $C' = C \otimes_A A'$.
Choose a prime $\mathfrak q'$ of $C'$ lying over $\mathfrak q$; such a
prime exists because
$$
C'/\mathfrak m_{A'}C' =
C/\mathfrak m_AC \otimes_{\kappa(\mathfrak m_A)} \kappa(\mathfrak m_{A'})
$$
which proves that $C/\mathfrak m_AC \to C'/\mathfrak m_{A'}C'$ is faithfully
flat. This also proves that
$\dim_{\mathfrak q}(C/\mathfrak m_AC) =
\dim_{\mathfrak q'}(C'/\mathfrak m_{A'}C')$, see
Algebra,
Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-dimension-at-a-point-preserved-field-extension}.
Note that $B' = C'_{\mathfrak q'}$ is a localization of $B \otimes_A A'$.
Hence $B'$ is flat over $A'$. The generic fibre $B' \otimes_{A'} K$
is a localization of $B \otimes_A K$. Hence $B'$ is a domain.
If we prove the lemma for $A' \subset B'$, then we get the equality
$\dim_{\mathfrak q'}(C'/\mathfrak m_{A'}C') = \dim(C' \otimes_{A'} K)$
which implies the desired equality
$\dim_{\mathfrak q}(C/\mathfrak m_AC) = \dim(C \otimes_A K)$
by what was said above. This reduces the
lemma to the case where $A$ is a valuation ring.

\medskip\noindent
Let $A \subset B$ be as in the lemma with $A$ a valuation ring.
As before write $B = C_{\mathfrak q}$ for some domain $C$ of finite
type over $A$. By
Algebra,
Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-finite-type-domain-over-valuation-ring-dim-fibres}
we obtain $\dim(C/\mathfrak m_AC) = \dim(C \otimes_A K)$ and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-closed-point-nearby-fibre}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \leadsto x'$ be a specialization of points in $X$.
Set $s = f(x)$ and $s' = f(x')$.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $x'$ is a closed point of $X_{s'}$, and
\item $f$ is locally of finite type.
\end{enumerate}
Then the set
$$
\{x_1 \in X
\text{ such that }
f(x_1) = s
\text{ and }
x_1\text{ is closed in }X_s
\text{ and }
x \leadsto x_1 \leadsto x'
\}
$$
is dense in the closure of $x$ in $X_s$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We apply
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-points-specialize}
to the specialization $x \leadsto x'$.
This produces a morphism $\varphi : \Spec(B) \to X$
where $B$ is a valuation ring such that $\varphi$ maps the
generic point to $x$ and the closed point to $x'$. We may also
assume that $\kappa(x) = f.f.(B)$.
Let $A = B \cap \kappa(s)$. Note that this is a valuation ring (see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-valuation-ring-cap-field})
which dominates the image of $\mathcal{O}_{S, s'} \to \kappa(s)$.
Consider the commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\Spec(B) \ar[rd] \ar[r] &
X_A \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \ar[d] \\
& \Spec(A) \ar[r] & S
}
$$
The generic (resp.\ closed) point of $B$ maps to a point $x_A$
(resp.\ $x'_A$) of $X_A$ lying over the generic (resp.\ closed)
point of $\Spec(A)$. Note that $x'_A$ is a closed point
of the special fibre of $X_A$ by
Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-closed-point-fibre-locally-finite-type}.
Note that the generic fibre of $X_A \to \Spec(A)$ is isomorphic
to $X_s$. Thus we have reduced the lemma to the case where $S$ is
the spectrum of a valuation ring, $s = \eta \in S$ is the generic point, and
$s' \in S$ is the closed point.

\medskip\noindent
We will prove the lemma by induction on $\dim_x(X_\eta)$.
If $\dim_x(X_\eta) = 0$, then there are no other points of $X_\eta$
specializing to $x$ and $x$ is closed in its fibre, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-finite-at-point-characterize},
and the result holds. Assume $\dim_x(X_\eta) > 0$.

\medskip\noindent
Let $X' \subset X$ be the reduced induced scheme structure on
the irreducible closed subscheme $\overline{\{x\}}$ of $X$, see
Schemes, Definition \ref{schemes-definition-reduced-induced-scheme}.
To prove the lemma we may replace $X$ by $X'$ as this only decreases
$\dim_x(X_\eta)$. Hence we may also assume that $X$ is an integral scheme
and that $x$ is its generic point. In addition, we may replace $X$ by an
affine neighbourhood of $x'$. Thus we have $X = \Spec(B)$ where
$A \subset B$ is a finite type extension of domains. Note that in
this case $\dim_x(X_\eta) = \dim(X_\eta) = \dim(X_{s'})$, and that in fact
$X_{s'}$ is equidimensional, see
Algebra,
Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-finite-type-domain-over-valuation-ring-dim-fibres}.

\medskip\noindent
Let $W \subset X_\eta$ be a proper closed subset (this is the
subset we want to ``avoid''). As $X_s$ is of finite type over a field
we see that $W$ has finitely many irreducible components
$W = W_1 \cup \ldots \cup W_n$. Let
$\mathfrak q_j \subset B$, $j = 1, \ldots, r$
be the corresponding prime ideals. Let $\mathfrak q \subset B$
be the maximal ideal corresponding to the point $x'$.
Let $\mathfrak p_1, \ldots, \mathfrak p_s \subset B$ be the
minimal primes lying over $\mathfrak m_AB$. There are finitely
many as these correspond to the irreducible components of the
Noetherian scheme $X_{s'}$. Moreover, each of these irreducible
components has dimension $> 0$ (see above) hence we see that
$\mathfrak p_i \not = \mathfrak q$ for all $i$.
Now, pick an element $g \in \mathfrak q$ such that
$g \not \in \mathfrak q_j$ for all $j$ and $g \not \in \mathfrak p_i$
for all $i$, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-silly}.
Denote $Z \subset X$ the locally principal closed subscheme defined by $g$.
Let $Z_\eta = Z_{1, \eta} \cup \ldots \cup Z_{n, \eta}$, $n \geq 0$
be the decomposition of the generic fibre of $Z$ into irreducible
components (finitely many as the generic fibre is Noetherian).
Denote $Z_i \subset X$ the closure of $Z_{i, \eta}$.
After replacing $X$ by a smaller affine neighbourhood
we may assume that $x' \in Z_i$ for each $i = 1, \ldots, n$.
By construction $Z \cap X_{s'}$ does not contain any irreducible
component of $X_{s'}$. Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-locally-principal-vertical}
we conclude that $Z_\eta \not = \emptyset$! In other words
$n \geq 1$. Letting $x_1 \in Z_1$ be the generic point we see
that $x_1 \leadsto x'$ and $f(x_1) = \eta$.
Also, by construction $Z_{1, \eta} \cap W_j \subset W_j$
is a proper closed subset. Hence every irreducible component of
$Z_{1, \eta} \cap W_j$ has codimension $\geq 2$ in $X_\eta$
whereas $\text{codim}(Z_{1, \eta}, X_\eta) = 1$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-minimal-over-1}.
Thus $W \cap Z_{1, \eta}$ is a proper closed subset.
At this point we see that the induction hypothesis applies to
$Z_1 \to S$ and the specialization $x_1 \leadsto x'$.
This produces a closed point $x_2$ of $Z_{1, \eta}$ not contained
in $W$ which specializes to $x'$. Thus we obtain
$x \leadsto x_2 \leadsto x'$, the point $x_2$ is closed in $X_\eta$,
and $x_2 \not \in W$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-full-specialization-sequence}
The proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-closed-point-nearby-fibre}
actually shows that there exists a sequence of specializations
$$
x \leadsto x_1 \leadsto x_2 \leadsto \ldots \leadsto x_d \leadsto x'
$$
where all $x_i$ are in the fibre $X_s$, each specialization is
immediate, and $x_d$ is a closed point of $X_s$. The integer
$d = \text{trdeg}_{\kappa(s)}(\kappa(x)) = \dim(\overline{\{x\}})$
where the closure is taken in $X_s$. Moreover, the points
$x_i$ can be chosen to avoid any closed subset of $X_s$ which
does not contain the point $x$.
\end{remark}

\noindent
Examples, Section \ref{examples-section-topology-finite-type}
shows that the following lemma is false if $A$ is not assumed
Noetherian.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open}
Let $\varphi : A \to B$ be a local ring map of local rings.
Let $V \subset \Spec(B)$ be an open subscheme
which contains at least one prime not lying over $\mathfrak m_A$.
Assume $A$ is Noetherian, $\varphi$ essentially of finite type, and
$A/\mathfrak m_A \subset B/\mathfrak m_B$ is finite.
Then there exists a $\mathfrak q \in V$,
$\mathfrak m_A \not = \mathfrak q \cap A$ such that
$A \to B/\mathfrak q$ is the localization of a quasi-finite ring map.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since $A$ is Noetherian and $A \to B$ is essentially of finite type,
we know that $B$ is Noetherian too. By
Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-complement-closed-point-Jacobson}
the topological space $\Spec(B) \setminus \{\mathfrak m_B\}$
is Jacobson. Hence we can choose a closed point $\mathfrak q$
which is contained in the nonempty open
$$
V \setminus \{\mathfrak q \subset B \mid \mathfrak m_A = \mathfrak q \cap A\}.
$$
(Nonempty by assumption, open because $\{\mathfrak m_A\}$ is a closed
subset of $\Spec(A)$.)
Then $\Spec(B/\mathfrak q)$ has two points, namely $\mathfrak m_B$
and $\mathfrak q$ and $\mathfrak q$ does not lie over $\mathfrak m_A$.
Write $B/\mathfrak q = C_{\mathfrak m}$ for some finite type $A$-algebra
$C$ and prime ideal $\mathfrak m$. Then $A \to C$ is quasi-finite at
$\mathfrak m$ by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-isolated-point-fibre} (2).
Hence by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-quasi-finite-open}
we see that after replacing $C$ by a principal localization the ring
map $A \to C$ is quasi-finite.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open-X}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $x \in X$ with image $s \in S$.
Let $U \subset X$ be an open subscheme.
Assume $f$ locally of finite type, $S$ locally Noetherian, $x$ a closed
point of $X_s$, and assume there exists a point $x' \in U$ with
$x' \leadsto x$ and $f(x') \not = s$. Then there exists a closed
subscheme $Z \subset X$ such that (a) $x \in Z$, (b) $f|_Z : Z \to S$ is
quasi-finite at $x$, and (c) there exists a $z \in Z$, $z \in U$,
$z \leadsto x$ and $f(z) \not = s$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is a reformulation of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open}.
Namely, set $A = \mathcal{O}_{S, s}$ and $B = \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$.
Denote $V \subset \Spec(B)$ the inverse image of $U$.
The ring map $f^\sharp : A \to B$ is essentially of finite type.
By assumption there exists at least one point of $V$ which does not
map to the closed point of $\Spec(A)$. Hence all the assumptions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open}
hold and we obtain a prime $\mathfrak q \subset B$ which does not
lie over $\mathfrak m_A$ and such that $A \to B/\mathfrak q$ is
the localization of a quasi-finite ring map. Let $z \in X$ be the
image of the point $\mathfrak q$ under the canonical
morphism $\Spec(B) \to X$. Set $Z = \overline{\{z\}}$
with the induced reduced scheme structure. As $z \leadsto x$
we see that $x \in Z$ and $\mathcal{O}_{Z, x} = B/\mathfrak q$.
By construction $Z \to S$ is quasi-finite at $x$.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-alternative-closed-point-nearby-fibre}
We can use
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open}
or its variant
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open-X}
to give an alternative proof of
Lemma \ref{lemma-closed-point-nearby-fibre}
in case $S$ is locally Noetherian.
Here is a rough sketch.
Namely, first replace $S$ by
the spectrum of the local ring at $s'$. Then we may use induction
on $\dim(S)$. The case $\dim(S) = 0$ is trivial because then $s' = s$.
Replace $X$ by the reduced induced scheme structure on $\overline{\{x\}}$.
Apply
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open-X}
to $X \to S$ and $x' \mapsto s'$ and any nonempty
open $U \subset X$ containing $x$. This gives us a closed subscheme
$x' \in Z \subset X$ a point $z \in Z$
such that $Z \to S$ is quasi-finite at $x'$ and such that $f(z) \not = s'$.
Then $z$ is a closed point of $X_{f(z)}$, and $z \leadsto x'$.
As $f(z) \not = s'$ we see $\dim(\mathcal{O}_{S, f(z)}) < \dim(S)$.
Since $x$ is the generic point of $X$ we see $x \leadsto z$, hence
$s = f(x) \leadsto f(z)$.
Apply the induction hypothesis to $s \leadsto f(z)$ and $z \mapsto f(z)$
to win.
\end{remark}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-change-hypotheses}
Suppose that $f : X \to S$ is locally of finite type, $S$ locally Noetherian,
$x \in X$ a closed point of its fibre $X_s$, and $U \subset X$ an open
subscheme such that $U \cap X_s = \emptyset$ and $x \in \overline{U}$, then
the conclusions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-quasi-section-meeting-nearby-open-X}
hold.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Namely, we can reduce this to the cited lemma as follows: First we
replace $X$ and $S$ by affine neighbourhoods of $x$ and $s$. Then $X$ is
Noetherian, in particular $U$ is quasi-compact (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-noetherian}
and
Topology, Lemmas \ref{topology-lemma-Noetherian} and
\ref{topology-lemma-Noetherian-quasi-compact}).
Hence there exists a specialization $x' \leadsto x$ with $x' \in U$ (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-reach-points-scheme-theoretic-image}).
Note that $f(x') \not = s$. Thus we see all hypotheses of the lemma
are satisfied and we win.
\end{proof}



\section{Stein factorization}
\label{section-stein-factorization}

\noindent
Stein factorization is the statement that a proper morphism $f : X \to S$
with $f_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_S$ has connected fibres.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-stein-universally-closed}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to S$ be a universally closed and
quasi-separated morphism. There exists a factorization
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_{f'} \ar[rd]_f & & S' \ar[dl]^\pi \\
& S &
}
$$
with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}
\item the morphism $f'$ is universally closed, quasi-compact, quasi-separated,
and surjective,
\item the morphism $\pi : S' \to S$ is integral,
\item we have $f'_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_{S'}$,
\item we have $S' = \underline{\Spec}_S(f_*\mathcal{O}_X)$, and
\item $S'$ is the normalization of $S$ in $X$, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization-X-in-Y}.
\end{enumerate}
Formation of the factorization $f = \pi \circ f'$ commutes
with flat base change.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-universally-closed-quasi-compact}
the morphism $f$ is quasi-compact. Hence the normalization $S'$ of $S$ in
$X$ is defined (Morphisms, Definition
\ref{morphisms-definition-normalization-X-in-Y})
we obtain the factorization and (5) and (2) hold by construction. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-in-universally-closed}
we see that (4) holds. The morphism $f'$ is universally closed by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-image-proper-scheme-closed}.
It is quasi-compact by
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-quasi-compact-permanence}
and quasi-separated by
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-compose-after-separated}.

\medskip\noindent
To show the remaining statements we may assume the base scheme $S$ is affine,
say $S = \Spec(R)$. Then $S' = \Spec(A)$ with
$A = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ an integral $R$-algebra.
Thus it is clear that $f'_*\mathcal{O}_X$
is $\mathcal{O}_{S'}$ (because $f'_*\mathcal{O}_X$ is quasi-coherent,
by
Schemes, Lemma
\ref{schemes-lemma-push-forward-quasi-coherent},
and hence equal to $\widetilde{A}$). This proves (3).

\medskip\noindent
Let us show that $f'$ is surjective. As $f'$ is universally closed (see above)
the image of $f'$ is a closed subset
$V(I) \subset S' = \Spec(A)$. Pick $h \in I$. Then
$h|_X = f^\sharp(h)$ is a global section of the structure sheaf of
$X$ which vanishes at every point. As $X$ is quasi-compact this means
that $h|_X$ is a nilpotent section, i.e., $h^n|X = 0$ for some $n > 0$.
But $A = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$, hence $h^n = 0$.
In other words $I$ is contained in the radical ideal of $A$ and we conclude
that $V(I) = S'$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-characterize-geometrically-connected-fibres}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $s \in S$. Then $X_s$ is geometrically connected, if and
only if for every \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$
the base change $X_U \to U$ has connected fibre $X_u$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If $X_s$ is geometrically connected, then any base change of it is connected.
On the other hand, suppose that $X_s$ is not geometrically connected.
Then by
Varieties, Lemma
\ref{varieties-lemma-characterize-geometrically-disconnected}
we see that $X_s \times_{\Spec(\kappa(s)} \Spec(k)$ is
disconnected for some
finite separable field extension $\kappa(s) \subset k$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-realize-prescribed-residue-field-extension-etale}
there exists an affine \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$ such that
$\kappa(s) \subset \kappa(u)$ is identified with $\kappa(s) \subset k$.
In this case $X_u$ is disconnected.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Stein factorization; Noetherian case]
\label{theorem-stein-factorization-Noetherian}
Let $S$ be a locally Noetherian scheme.
Let $f : X \to S$ be a proper morphism.
There exists a factorization
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_{f'} \ar[rd]_f & & S' \ar[dl]^\pi \\
& S &
}
$$
with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}
\item the morphism $f'$ is proper with geometrically connected fibres,
\item the morphism $\pi : S' \to S$ is finite,
\item we have $f'_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_{S'}$,
\item we have $S' = \underline{\Spec}_S(f_*\mathcal{O}_X)$, and
\item $S'$ is the normalization of $S$ in $X$, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization-X-in-Y}.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
Let $f = \pi \circ f'$ be the factorization of
Lemma \ref{lemma-stein-universally-closed}. Note that besides the
conclusions of Lemma \ref{lemma-stein-universally-closed} we
also have that $f'$ is separated
(Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-compose-after-separated})
and finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}).
Hence $f'$ is proper. By
Cohomology of Schemes, Proposition
\ref{coherent-proposition-proper-pushforward-coherent}
we see that $f_*\mathcal{O}_X$ is a coherent $\mathcal{O}_S$-module.
Hence we see that $\pi$ is finite, i.e., (2) holds.

\medskip\noindent
This proves all but the most interesting assertion, namely that
all the fibres of $f'$ are geometrically connected.
It is clear from the discussion above that we may replace $S$ by $S'$,
and we may therefore assume that $S$ is Noetherian, affine,
$f : X \to S$ is proper, and $f_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_S$.
Let $s \in S$ be a point of $S$. We have to show that $X_s$ is
geometrically connected. By Lemma
\ref{lemma-characterize-geometrically-connected-fibres}
we see that it suffices to show $X_u$ is connected
for every \'etale neighbourhood $(U, u) \to (S, s)$.
We may assume $U$ is affine. Thus $U$ is Noetherian
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-noetherian}),
the base change $f_U : X_U \to U$ is proper
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-proper}),
and that also $(f_U)_*\mathcal{O}_{X_U} = \mathcal{O}_U$
(Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma \ref{coherent-lemma-flat-base-change-cohomology}).
Hence after replacing
$(f : X \to S, s)$ by the base change $(f_U : X_U \to U, u)$
it suffices to prove that the fibre $X_s$ is connected.

\medskip\noindent
At this point we apply the theorem on formal functions,
more precisely Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{coherent-lemma-formal-functions-stalk}.
It tells us that
$$
\mathcal{O}^\wedge_{S, s} =
\lim_n H^0(X_n, \mathcal{O}_{X_n})
$$
where $X_n$ is the $n$th infinitesimal neighbourhood of $X_s$.
Since the underlying topological space of $X_n$ is equal to that
of $X_s$ we see that if $X_s = T_1 \amalg T_2$ is a disjoint union
of nonempty open and closed subschemes, then similarly
$X_n = T_{1, n} \amalg T_{2, n}$ for all $n$. And this in turn means
$H^0(X_n, \mathcal{O}_{X_n})$ contains a nontrivial idempotent $e_{1, n}$,
namely the function which is identically $1$ on $T_{1, n}$ and
identically $0$ on $T_{2, n}$. It is clear that $e_{1, n + 1}$
restricts to $e_{1, n}$ on $X_n$. Hence $e_1 = \lim e_{1, n}$
is a nontrivial idempotent of the limit. This contradicts the fact
that $\mathcal{O}^\wedge_{S, s}$ is a local ring. Thus the
assumption was wrong, i.e., $X_s$ is connected, and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Stein factorization; general case]
\label{theorem-stein-factorization-general}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $f : X \to S$ be a proper morphism.
There exists a factorization
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_{f'} \ar[rd]_f & & S' \ar[dl]^\pi \\
& S &
}
$$
with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}
\item the morphism $f'$ is proper with geometrically connected fibres,
\item the morphism $\pi : S' \to S$ is integral,
\item we have $f'_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_{S'}$,
\item we have $S' = \underline{\Spec}_S(f_*\mathcal{O}_X)$, and
\item $S'$ is the normalization of $S$ in $X$, see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization-X-in-Y}.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
We may apply Lemma \ref{lemma-stein-universally-closed} to get the
morphism $f' : X \to S'$.
Note that besides the
conclusions of Lemma \ref{lemma-stein-universally-closed} we
also have that $f'$ is separated
(Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-compose-after-separated})
and finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-permanence-finite-type}).
Hence $f'$ is proper. At this point we have proved all of the
statements except for the statement
that $f'$ has geometrically connected fibres.

\medskip\noindent
We may assume that $S = \Spec(R)$ is affine.
Set $R' = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$. Then $S' = \Spec(R')$.
Thus we may replace $S$ by $S'$ and assume that
$S = \Spec(R)$ is affine $R = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$.
Next, let $s \in S$ be a point. Let $U \to S$ be an \'etale morphism
of affine schemes and let $u \in U$ be a point mapping to $s$.
Let $X_U \to U$ be the base change of $X$. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-characterize-geometrically-connected-fibres}
it suffices to show that the fibre of $X_U \to U$ over $u$ is
connected. By
Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma \ref{coherent-lemma-flat-base-change-cohomology}
we see that
$\Gamma(X_U, \mathcal{O}_{X_U}) = \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$.
Hence we have to show: Given
$S = \Spec(R)$ affine, $X \to S$ proper with $\Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X) = R$
and $s \in S$ is a point, the fibre $X_s$ is connected.

\medskip\noindent
By Limits, Lemma
\ref{limits-lemma-proper-limit-of-proper-finite-presentation-noetherian}
we can write $(X \to S) = \lim (X_i \to S_i)$ with $X_i \to S_i$
proper and of finite presentation and $S_i$ Noetherian. For $i$ large
enough $S_i$ is affine (Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-limit-affine}).
Say $S_i = \Spec(R_i)$. Let $R'_i = \Gamma(X_i, \mathcal{O}_{X_i})$.
Observe that we have ring maps $R_i \to R_i' \to R$. Namely, we have
the first because $X_i$ is a scheme over $R_i$ and the second because
we have $X \to X_i$ and $R = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$. Note that
$R = \colim R'_i$ by Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-section}.
Then 
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d]  \ar[r] & X_i \ar[d] \\
S \ar[r] & S'_i \ar[r] & S_i
}
$$
is commutative with $S'_i = \Spec(R'_i)$.
Let $s'_i \in S'_i$ be the image of $s$.
We have $X_s = \lim X_{i, s'_i}$ because $X = \lim X_i$,
$S = \lim S'_i$, and $\kappa(s) = \colim \kappa(s'_i)$.
Now let $X_s = U \amalg V$ with $U$ and $V$ open and closed.
Then $U, V$ are the inverse images of opens $U_i, V_i$ in $X_{i, s'_i}$
(Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-descend-opens}).
By Theorem \ref{theorem-stein-factorization-Noetherian} the fibres
of $X_i \to S'_i$ are connected, hence either $U$ or $V$ is empty.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is an application.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-geometrically-connected-fibres-towards-normal}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is proper,
\item $Y$ is integral with generic point $\xi$,
\item $Y$ is normal,
\item $X$ is reduced,
\item every generic point of an irreducible component of $X$ maps to $\xi$,
\item we have $H^0(X_\xi, \mathcal{O}) = \kappa(\xi)$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $f_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_Y$ and $f$
has geometrically connected fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Apply Theorem \ref{theorem-stein-factorization-general} to get a
factorization $X \to Y' \to Y$. It is enough to show that $Y' = Y$.
This will follow from Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-birational-over-normal}.
Namely, $Y'$ is reduced because $X$ is reduced
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-in-reduced}).
The morphism $Y' \to Y$ is integral by the theorem cited above.
Every generic point of $Y'$ lies over $\xi$ by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-normalization-generic}
and assumption (5). On the other hand, since $Y'$ is the relative
spectrum of $f_*\mathcal{O}_X$ we see that the scheme theoretic fibre
$Y'_\xi$ is the spectrum of $H^0(X_\xi, \mathcal{O})$ which is
equal to $\kappa(\xi)$ by assumption. Hence $Y'$ is an integral
scheme with function field equal to the function field of $Y$.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Here is another application.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-proper-flat-nr-geom-conn-comps-lower-semicontinuous}
Let $X \to S$ be a flat proper morphism of finite presentation. Let
$n_{X/S}$ be the function on $Y$ counting the numbers of geometric
connected components of fibres of $f$ introduced in
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-fibres-nr-geometrically-connected-components}.
Then $n_{X/S}$ is lower semi-continuous.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $s \in S$. Set $n = n_{X/S}(s)$. Note that $n < \infty$ as the geometric
fibre of $X \to S$ at $s$ is a proper scheme over a field, hence Noetherian,
hence has a finite number of connected components. We have to find an open
neighbourhood of $s$ such that $n_{X/S}|_U \geq n$.
Let $X \to S' \to S$ be the Stein factorization as in
Theorem \ref{theorem-stein-factorization-general}.
Because $n < \infty$ there are finitely many points
$s'_1, \ldots, s'_m \in S'$ lying over $s$.
For each $i$ we can pick a closed point $x_i \in X_s$
mapping to $s'_i$. Hence $\kappa(s'_i)/\kappa(s)$ is finite
as $\kappa(x_i)/\kappa(s)$ is finite (Morphisms,
Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-closed-point-fibre-locally-finite-type}).
Lemma \ref{lemma-etale-makes-integral-split}
tells us that after replacing $S$ by an \'etale neighbourhood
of $s$ we may assume $S' = V_1 \amalg \ldots \amalg V_m$ as a scheme
with $s'_i \in V_i$ and $\kappa(s'_i)/\kappa(s)$ purely inseparable.
Then the schemes $X_{s_i'}$ are geometrically connected over
$\kappa(s)$, hence $m = n$. The schemes
$X_i = (f')^{-1}(V_i)$, $i = 1, \ldots, n$
are flat and of finite presentation over $S$. Hence the image of $X_i \to S$
is open (Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}).
Thus in a neighbourhood of $s$ we see that $n_{X/S}$ is
at least $n$.
\end{proof}

\noindent
A final application.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-split-off-proper-part-henselian}
Let $(A, I)$ be a henselian pair. Let $X \to \Spec(A)$
be separated and of finite type. Set $X_0 = X \times_{\Spec(A)} \Spec(A/I)$.
Let $Y \subset X_0$ be an open and closed subscheme such that
$Y \to \Spec(A/I)$ is proper. Then there exists an open and closed
subscheme $W \subset X$ which is proper over $A$ with
$W \times_{\Spec(A)} \Spec(A/I) = Y$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will denote $T \mapsto T_0$ the base change by
$\Spec(A/I) \to \Spec(A)$.
By Chow's lemma (in the form of
Limits, Lemma \ref{limits-lemma-chow-finite-type})
there exists a surjective proper morphism $\varphi : X' \to X$ such
that $X'$ admits an immersion into $\mathbf{P}^n_A$.
Set $Y' = \varphi^{-1}(Y)$. This is an open and closed subscheme
of $X'_0$.
Suppose the lemma holds for $(X', Y')$. Let $W' \subset X'$
be the open and closed subscheme proper over $A$ such that $Y' = W'_0$.
Then $W = \varphi(W') \subset X$ is an open and closed subscheme
of $X$ proper over $A$ by
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-image-proper-is-proper}.
Thus we reduce to the case described in the next paragraph.

\medskip\noindent
Assume there exists an immersion $j : X \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$ over $A$.
Let $\overline{X}$ be the scheme theoretic image of $j$.
Since $j$ is a quasi-compact morphism
(Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-quasi-compact-permanence})
we see that $j : X \to \overline{X}$ is an open immersion
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-compact-immersion}).
Hence the base change $j_0 : X_0 \to \overline{X}_0$
is an open immersion as well.
Thus $j_0(Y) \subset \overline{X}_0$ is open.
It is also closed by Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-image-proper-scheme-closed}.
Suppose that the lemma holds for $(\overline{X}, j_0(Y))$.
Let $\overline{W} \subset \overline{X}$ be the
corresponding open and closed subscheme proper over $A$
such that $j_0(Y) = \overline{W}_0$.
Then $T = \overline{W} \setminus j(X)$ is closed in $\overline{W}$,
hence has closed image in $\Spec(A)$ by properness of $\overline{W}$
over $A$. Since $(A, I)$ is henselian, we find that if $T$
is nonempty, then there is a point of $T$ mapping into $\Spec(A/I)$.
This is impossible because $j_0(Y) = \overline{W}_0$ is contained in $j(X)$.
Hence $\overline{W}$ is contained in $j(X)$ and we can
set $W \subset X$ equal to the unique open and closed
subscheme mapping isomorphically to $\overline{W}$ via $j$.
Thus we reduce to the case described in the next paragraph.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $X \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$ is a closed subscheme.
Then $X \to \Spec(A)$ is a proper morphism.
Let $Z = X_0 \setminus Y$. This is an open and closed
subscheme of $X_0$ and $X_0 = Y \amalg Z$.
Let $X \to X' \to \Spec(A)$ be the Stein factorization as in
Theorem \ref{theorem-stein-factorization-general}.
Let $Y' \subset X'_0$ and $Z' \subset X'_0$ be the images of
$Y$ and $Z$.
Since the fibres of $X \to Z$ are geometrically connected,
we see that $Y' \cap Z' = \emptyset$.
Hence $X'_0 = Y' \amalg Z'$ as $X \to X'$ is surjective.
Since $X' \to \Spec(A)$ is integral, we see that
$X'$ is the spectrum of an $A$-algebra integral over $A$.
Recall that open and closed subsets of spectra correspond
$1$-to-$1$ with idempotents in the corresponding ring, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-disjoint-decomposition}.
Hence by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-characterize-henselian-pair}
we see that we may write $X' = W' \amalg V'$
with $W'$ and $V'$ open and closed and
with $Y' = W'_0$ and $Z' = V'_0$.
Let $W$ be the inverse image in $X$
to finish the proof.
\end{proof}













\section{Descending separated locally quasi-finite morphisms}
\label{section-separated-locally-quasi-finite}

\noindent
In this section we show that ``separated locally quasi-finite morphisms
satisfy descent for fppf-coverings''. See Descent, Definition
\ref{descent-definition-descending-types-morphisms} for terminology.
This is in the marvellous
(for many reasons) paper by Raynaud and Gruson hidden in the proof
of \cite[Lemma 5.7.1]{GruRay}.
It can also be found in \cite{Murre-representation}, and
\cite[Expos\'e X, Lemma 5.4]{SGA3}
under the additional
hypothesis that the morphism is locally of finite presentation.
Here is the formal statement.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-separated-locally-quasi-finite-morphisms-fppf-descend}
Let $S$ be a scheme.
Let $\{X_i \to S\}_{i\in I}$ be an fppf covering, see
Topologies, Definition \ref{topologies-definition-fppf-covering}.
Let $(V_i/X_i, \varphi_{ij})$ be a descent datum
relative to $\{X_i \to S\}$. If each morphism
$V_i \to X_i$ is separated and locally quasi-finite,
then the descent datum is effective.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Being separated and being locally quasi-finite
are properties of morphisms of schemes
which are preserved under any base change, see
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-separated-permanence} and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-finite}.
Hence Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-types-morphisms}
applies and it suffices to prove the statement of the lemma
in case the fppf-covering is given by a single
$\{X \to S\}$ flat surjective morphism of finite presentation of affines.
Say $X = \Spec(A)$ and $S = \Spec(R)$ so
that $R \to A$ is a faithfully flat ring map.
Let $(V, \varphi)$ be a descent datum relative to $X$ over $S$
and assume that $\pi : V \to X$ is separated and
locally quasi-finite.

\medskip\noindent
Let $W^1 \subset V$ be any affine open.
Consider $W = \text{pr}_1(\varphi(W^1 \times_S X)) \subset V$.
Here is a picture
$$
\xymatrix{
W^1 \times_S X \ar[rrrrr] \ar[ddd] \ar[rd]
& & & & &
\varphi(W^1 \times_S X) \ar[ddd] \ar[ld] \\
& V \times_S X \ar[rrr]^\varphi \ar[rd] \ar[dd]
& & &
X \times_S V \ar[ld] \ar[dd] & \\
& &
X \times_S X \ar[r]^1 \ar[d]_{\text{pr}_0}
&
X \times_S X \ar[d]^{\text{pr}_1}
& & \\
W^1 \ar[r] &
V \ar[r] &
X &
X &
V \ar[l] &
W \ar[l]
}
$$
Ok, and now since $X \to S$ is flat and of finite presentation it
is universally open (Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open}).
Hence we conclude that $W$ is open. Moreover, it is
also clearly the case that $W$ is quasi-compact, and
$W^1 \subset W$. Moreover, we note that
$\varphi(W \times_S X) = X \times_S W$ by the cocycle
condition for $\varphi$. Hence we obtain a new descent datum
$(W, \varphi')$ by restricting $\varphi$ to $W \times_S X$.
Note that the morphism $W \to X$ is quasi-compact, separated
and locally quasi-finite. This implies that it is
separated and quasi-finite by definition. Hence it is quasi-affine by
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}.
Thus by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-quasi-affine}
we see that the descent datum
$(W, \varphi')$ is effective.

\medskip\noindent
In other words, we find that there exists an open covering
$V = \bigcup W_i$ by quasi-compact opens $W_i$ which are
stable for the descent morphism $\varphi$.
Moreover, for each such quasi-compact open $W \subset V$
the corresponding descent data $(W, \varphi')$ is effective.
It is an exercise to show this means the
original descent datum is effective by glueing the
schemes obtained from descending the opens $W_i$ (details omitted).
\end{proof}






\section{Relative finite presentation}
\label{section-finite-type-finite-presentation}

\noindent
Let $R \to A$ be a finite type ring map. Let $M$ be an $A$-module. In
More on Algebra,
Section \ref{more-algebra-section-relative-finite-presentation}
we defined what it means for $M$ to be finitely presented relative to $R$.
We also proved this notion has good localization properties and glues.
Hence we can define the corresponding global notion as follows.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-relatively-finitely-presented-sheaf}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. We say
$\mathcal{F}$ is {\it finitely presented relative to $S$} or
{\it of finite presentation relative to $S$}
if there exists an affine open covering $S = \bigcup V_i$ and
for every $i$ an affine open covering
$f^{-1}(V_i) = \bigcup_j U_{ij}$ such that $\mathcal{F}(U_{ij})$
is a $\mathcal{O}_X(U_{ij})$-module of finite presentation relative
to $\mathcal{O}_S(V_i)$.
\end{definition}

\noindent
Note that this implies that $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite type
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module. If $X \to S$ is just locally of finite
type, then $\mathcal{F}$ may be of finite presentation relative
to $S$, without $X \to S$ being locally of finite presentation.
We will see that $X \to S$ is locally of finite presentation if
and only if $\mathcal{O}_X$ is of finite presentation relative to $S$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-finite-presentation-characterize}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. The following
are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation relative to $S$,
\item for every affine opens $U \subset X$, $V \subset S$
with $f(U) \subset V$ the $\mathcal{O}_X(U)$-module $\mathcal{F}(U)$
is finitely presented relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, if this is true, then for every open subschemes
$U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ with $f(U) \subset V$
the restriction $\mathcal{F}|_U$ is of finite presentation relative to $V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The final statement is clear from the equivalence of (1) and (2).
It is also clear that (2) implies (1). Assume (1) holds.
Let $S = \bigcup V_i$ and $f^{-1}(V_i) = \bigcup U_{ij}$ be
affine open coverings as in
Definition \ref{definition-relatively-finitely-presented-sheaf}.
Let $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ be as in (2).
By More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-glue-relative-finite-presentation}
it suffices to find a standard open covering $U = \bigcup U_k$ of $U$
such that $\mathcal{F}(U_k)$ is finitely presented relative to
$\mathcal{O}_S(V)$. In other words, for every $u \in U$ it suffices
to find a standard affine open $u \in U' \subset U$ such that
$\mathcal{F}(U')$ is finitely presented relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$.
Pick $i$ such that $f(u) \in V_i$ and then pick $j$ such that
$u \in U_{ij}$. By
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-standard-open-two-affines}
we can find $v \in V' \subset V \cap V_i$ which is standard affine
open in $V'$ and $V_i$. Then $f^{-1}V'  \cap U$, resp.\ $f^{-1}V' \cap U_{ij}$
are standard affine opens of $U$, resp.\ $U_{ij}$.
Applying the lemma again we can find
$u \in U' \subset f^{-1}V' \cap U \cap U_{ij}$ which is standard affine
open in both $f^{-1}V'  \cap U$ and $f^{-1}V' \cap U_{ij}$.
Thus $U'$ is also a standard affine open of $U$ and $U_{ij}$.
By More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-localize-relative-finite-presentation}
the assumption that $\mathcal{F}(U_{ij})$ is finitely presented
relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V_i)$ implies that
$\mathcal{F}(U')$ is finitely presented relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V_i)$.
Since $\mathcal{O}_X(U') =
\mathcal{O}_X(U') \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_S(V_i)} \mathcal{O}_S(V')$
we see from More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-base-change-relative-finite-presentation}
that $\mathcal{F}(U')$ is finitely presented relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V')$.
Applying More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-localize-relative-finite-presentation}
again we conclude that
$\mathcal{F}(U')$ is finitely presented relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-finite-presentation}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite
type. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $f$ is locally of finite presentation, then $\mathcal{F}$
is of finite presentation relative to $S$ if and only if $\mathcal{F}$
is of finite presentation.
\item The morphism $f$ is locally of finite presentation if and only
if $\mathcal{O}_X$ is of finite presentation relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Follows immediately from the definitions, see
discussion following
More on Algebra, Definition
\ref{more-algebra-definition-relatively-finitely-presented}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-finite-morphism-relative-finite-presentation}
Let $\pi : X \to Y$ be a finite morphism of schemes locally of finite
type over a base scheme $S$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Then $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation
relative to $S$ if and only if $\pi_*\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation
relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-finite-extension}
into the language of schemes.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-relative-finite-presentation}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite
type. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
Let $S' \to S$ be a morphism of schemes, set $X' = X \times_S S'$
and denote $\mathcal{F}'$ the pullback of $\mathcal{F}$ to $X'$.
If $\mathcal{F}$ is of finite presentation relative to $S$, then
$\mathcal{F}'$ is of finite presentation relative to $S'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-base-change-relative-finite-presentation}
into the language of schemes.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pull-relative-finite-presentation}
Let $X \to Y \to S$ be morphisms of schemes which are locally of finite
type. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_Y$-module.
If $f : X \to Y$ is locally of finite presentation and
$\mathcal{G}$ of finite presentation relative to $S$, then
$f^*\mathcal{G}$ is of finite presentation relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-pull-relative-finite-presentation}
into the language of schemes.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-relative-finite-presentation}
Let $X \to Y \to S$ be morphisms of schemes which are locally of finite
type. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
If $Y \to S$ is locally of finite presentation and $\mathcal{F}$
is of finite presentation relative to $Y$, then $\mathcal{F}$
is of finite presentation relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-composition-relative-finite-presentation}
into the language of schemes.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-ses-relatively-finite-presentation}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$
be a short exact sequence of quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $\mathcal{F}', \mathcal{F}''$ are finitely presented relative to
$S$, then so is $\mathcal{F}$.
\item If $\mathcal{F}'$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module
and $\mathcal{F}$ is finitely presented relative to $S$, then
$\mathcal{F}''$ is finitely presented relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-ses-relatively-finite-presentation}
into the language of schemes.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-sum-relatively-finite-presentation}
\begin{slogan}
A direct summand of a module inherits the property of being finitely
presented relative to a base.
\end{slogan}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{F}'$ be quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules.
If $\mathcal{F} \oplus \mathcal{F}'$ is finitely presented relative to $S$,
then so are $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-sum-relatively-finite-presentation}
into the language of schemes.
\end{proof}










\section{Relative pseudo-coherence}
\label{section-relative-pseudo-coherence}

\noindent
This section is the analogue of
More on Algebra, Section \ref{more-algebra-section-relative-pseudo-coherent}
for schemes. We strongly urge the reader to take a look at that
section first. Although we have developed the material in this section
and the material on pseudo-coherent complexes in
Cohomology, Sections \ref{cohomology-section-strictly-perfect},
\ref{cohomology-section-pseudo-coherent},
\ref{cohomology-section-tor}, and
\ref{cohomology-section-perfect}
for arbitrary complexes of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules, if
$X$ is a scheme then working exclusively with objects in
$D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$
greatly simplifies many of the lemmmas and arguments, often
reducing the problem at hand immediately to the algebraic counterpart.
Moreover, one of the first thing we do is to show that
being relatively pseudo-coherent implies the cohomology
sheaves are quasi-coherent, see Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence}.
Hence, on a first reading we suggest the reader work exclusively
with objects in $D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
Let $X \to S$ be a finite type morphism of affine schemes.
Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item for some closed immersion $i : X \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$
the object $Ri_*E$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_S})$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent, and
\item for all closed immersions $i : X \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$
the object $Ri_*E$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_S})$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Say $S = \Spec(R)$ and $X = \Spec(A)$. Let $i$ correspond to the surjection
$\alpha : R[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to A$ and let $X \to \mathbf{A}^m_S$
correspond to $\beta : R[y_1, \ldots, y_m] \to A$.
Choose $f_j \in R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ with $\alpha(f_j) = \beta(y_j)$
and $g_i \in R[y_1, \ldots, y_m]$ with $\beta(g_i) = \alpha(x_i)$.
Then we get a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
R[x_1, \ldots, x_n, y_1, \ldots, y_m]
\ar[d]^{x_i \mapsto g_i} \ar[rr]_-{y_j \mapsto f_j} & &
R[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \ar[d] \\
R[y_1, \ldots, y_m] \ar[rr] & & A
}
$$
corresponding to the commutative diagram of closed immersions
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S & \mathbf{A}^n_S \ar[l] \\
\mathbf{A}^m_S \ar[u] & X \ar[u] \ar[l]
}
$$
Thus it suffices to show that under a closed immersion
$$
f : \mathbf{A}^m_S \to \mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S
$$
an object $E$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^m_S})$ is
$m$-pseudo-coherent if and only if $Rf_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent.
This follows from
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-closed-push-pseudo-coherent}
and the fact that $f_*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^m_S}$ is
a pseudo-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S}$-module.
The pseudo-coherence of $f_*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^m_S}$ is
straightforward to prove directly, but it also follows from
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-pseudo-coherent-affine}
and
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Recall that if $f : X \to S$ is a morphism of scheme which is locally of
finite type, then for every pair of affine opens $U \subset X$ and
$V \subset S$ such that $f(U) \subset V$, the ring map
$\mathcal{O}_S(V) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is of finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-locally-finite-type-characterize}).
Hence there always exist closed
immersions $U \to \mathbf{A}^n_V$ and the following definition makes sense.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-relative-pseudo-coherence}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Fix $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item We say $E$ is {\it $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$}
if there exists an affine open covering $S = \bigcup V_i$ and
for each $i$ an affine open covering $f^{-1}(V_i) = \bigcup U_{ij}$
such that the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for each of the pairs $(U_{ij} \to V_i, E|_{U_{ij}})$.
\item We say $E$ is {\it pseudo-coherent relative to $S$}
if $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ for all $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
\item We say $\mathcal{F}$ is {\it $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$} if
$\mathcal{F}$ viewed as an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$ is
$m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\item We say $\mathcal{F}$ is {\it pseudo-coherent relative to $S$} if
$\mathcal{F}$ viewed as an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$ is
pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
If $X$ is quasi-compact and $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
for some $m$, then $E$ is bounded above. If $E$ is
pseudo-coherent relative to $S$, then $E$ has
quasi-coherent cohomology sheaves.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
If $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$,
then $H^i(E)$ is a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module for $i > m$.
If $E$ is pseudo-coherent, then $E$ is an object of
$D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose an affine open covering $S = \bigcup V_i$ and
for each $i$ an affine open covering $f^{-1}(V_i) = \bigcup U_{ij}$
such that the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for each of the pairs $(U_{ij} \to V_i, E|_{U_{ij}})$.
Since being quasi-coherent is local on $X$, we may assume
that there exists an closed immersion $i : X \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$
such that $Ri_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent on $\mathbf{A}^n_S$.
By Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-pseudo-coherent}
this means that $H^q(Ri_*E)$ is quasi-coherent for $q > m$.
Since $i_*$ is an exact functor, we have $i_*H^q(E) = H^q(Ri_*E)$
is quasi-coherent on $\mathbf{A}^n_S$.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-i-star-equivalence}
this implies that $H^q(E)$ is quasi-coherent as desired
(strictly speaking it implies there exists some quasi-coherent
$\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ such that
$i_*\mathcal{F} = i_*H^q(E)$ and then
Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-i-star-equivalence}
tells us that $\mathcal{F} \cong H^q(E)$ hence the result).
\end{proof}

\noindent
Next, we prove the condition of relative pseudo-coherence localizes well.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-localize-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $S$ be an affine scheme. Let $V \subset S$ be a standard open.
Let $X \to V$ be a finite type morphism of affine schemes.
Let $U \subset X$ be an affine open. Let $E$ be an object of
$D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. If the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(X \to V, E)$, then
the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(U \to S, E|_U)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $S = \Spec(R)$, $V = D(f)$, $X = \Spec(A)$, and $U = D(g)$.
Assume the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(X \to V, E)$.

\medskip\noindent
Choose $R_f[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to A$ surjective. Write
$R_f = R[x_0]/(fx_0 - 1)$. Then $R[x_0, x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to A$
is surjective, and $R_f[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ is pseudo-coherent as
an $R[x_0, \ldots, x_n]$-module. Thus we have
$$
X \to \mathbf{A}^n_V \to \mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_S
$$
and we can apply
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-closed-push-pseudo-coherent}
to conclude that the pushforward $E'$ of $E$ to $\mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_S$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent.

\medskip\noindent
Choose an element $g' \in R[x_0, x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ which maps to
$g \in A$. Consider the surjection
$R[x_0, \ldots, x_{n + 1}] \to R[x_0, \ldots, x_n, 1/g']$.
We obtain
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] & U \ar[d] \ar[l] \ar[dr] \\
\mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_S & D(g')\ar[l] \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^{n + 2}_S
}
$$
where the lower left arrow is an open immersion and the lower right arrow is
a closed immersion. We conclude as before that the pushforward of
$E'|_{D(g')}$ to $\mathbf{A}^{n + 2}_S$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent.
Since this is also the pushforward of $E|_U$ to $\mathbf{A}^{n + 2}_S$
we conclude the lemma is true.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-glue-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $X \to S$ be a finite type morphism of affine schemes. Let $E$ be an
object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Let $X = \bigcup U_i$ be a standard affine open covering.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
hold for the pairs $(U_i \to S, E|_{U_i})$,
\item the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
hold for the pair $(X \to S, E)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The implication (2) $\Rightarrow$ (1) is
Lemma \ref{lemma-localize-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
Assume (1). Say $S = \Spec(R)$ and $X = \Spec(A)$ and
$U_i = D(f_i)$. Write $1 = \sum f_ig_i$ in $A$.
Consider the surjections
$$
R[x_i, y_i, z_i] \to R[x_i, y_i, z_i]/(\sum y_iz_i - 1) \to A.
$$
which sends $y_i$ to $f_i$ and $z_i$ to $g_i$. Note that
$R[x_i, y_i, z_i]/(\sum y_iz_i - 1)$ is pseudo-coherent as an
$R[x_i, y_i, z_i]$-module. Thus it suffices to prove that
the pushforward of $E$ to $T = \Spec(R[x_i, y_i, z_i]/(\sum y_iz_i - 1))$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent, see
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-closed-push-pseudo-coherent}.
For each $i_0$ it suffices to prove the restriction of this
pushforward to
$W_{i_0} = \Spec(R[x_i, y_i, z_i, 1/y_{i_0}]/(\sum y_iz_i - 1))$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent. Note that there is a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] & U_{i_0} \ar[l] \ar[d] \\
T & W_{i_0} \ar[l]
}
$$
which implies that the pushforward of $E$ to $T$ restricted to $W_{i_0}$
is the pushforward of $E|_{U_{i_0}}$ to $W_{i_0}$. Since
$R[x_i, y_i, z_i, 1/y_{i_0}]/(\sum y_iz_i - 1)$ is isomorphic
to a polynomial ring over $R$ this proves what we want.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
Fix $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$,
\item for every affine opens $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$
with $f(U) \subset V$ the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(U \to V, E|_U)$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, if this is true, then for every open subschemes
$U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ with $f(U) \subset V$
the restriction $E|_U$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $V$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The final statement is clear from the equivalence of (1) and (2).
It is also clear that (2) implies (1). Assume (1) holds.
Let $S = \bigcup V_i$ and $f^{-1}(V_i) = \bigcup U_{ij}$ be
affine open coverings as in
Definition \ref{definition-relative-pseudo-coherence}.
Let $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$ be as in (2).
By Lemma \ref{lemma-glue-relative-pseudo-coherent}
it suffices to find a standard open covering $U = \bigcup U_k$ of $U$
such that the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pairs $(U_k \to V, E|_{U_k})$.
In other words, for every $u \in U$ it suffices
to find a standard affine open $u \in U' \subset U$ such that
the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(U' \to V, E|_{U'})$.
Pick $i$ such that $f(u) \in V_i$ and then pick $j$ such that
$u \in U_{ij}$. By
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-standard-open-two-affines}
we can find $v \in V' \subset V \cap V_i$ which is standard affine
open in $V'$ and $V_i$. Then $f^{-1}V'  \cap U$, resp.\ $f^{-1}V' \cap U_{ij}$
are standard affine opens of $U$, resp.\ $U_{ij}$.
Applying the lemma again we can find
$u \in U' \subset f^{-1}V' \cap U \cap U_{ij}$ which is standard affine
open in both $f^{-1}V'  \cap U$ and $f^{-1}V' \cap U_{ij}$.
Thus $U'$ is also a standard affine open of $U$ and $U_{ij}$.
By Lemma \ref{lemma-localize-relative-pseudo-coherent}
the assumption that the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(U_{ij} \to V_i, E|_{U_{ij}})$
implies that the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied for the pair $(U' \to V, E|_{U'})$.
\end{proof}

\noindent
For objects of the derived category whose cohomology sheaves are
quasi-coherent, we can relate relative $m$-pseudo-coherence
to the notion defined in More on Algebra, Definition
\ref{more-algebra-definition-relatively-pseudo-coherent}.
We will use the fact that for an affine scheme
$U = \Spec(A)$ the functor $R\Gamma(U, -)$ induces an equivalence
between $D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_U)$ and $D(A)$, see
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-affine-compare-bounded}.
This functor is compatible with pullbacks:
if $E$ is an object of $D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_U)$
and $A \to B$ is a ring map corresponding to a morphism of affine
schemes $g : V = \Spec(B) \to \Spec(A) = U$, then
$R\Gamma(V, Lg^*E) = R\Gamma(U, E) \otimes_A^\mathbf{L} B$.
See Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-quasi-coherence-pullback}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-qcoh-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $E$ be an object of $D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
Fix $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$,
\item there exists an affine open covering $S = \bigcup V_i$ and
for each $i$ an affine open covering $f^{-1}(V_i) = \bigcup U_{ij}$
such that the complex of $\mathcal{O}_X(U_{ij})$-modules
$R\Gamma(U_{ij}, E)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to
$\mathcal{O}_S(V_i)$, and
\item for every affine opens $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$
with $f(U) \subset V$ the complex of $\mathcal{O}_X(U)$-modules
$R\Gamma(U, E)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $U$ and $V$ be as in (2) and choose a closed immersion
$i : U \to \mathbf{A}^n_V$. A formal argument, using
Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}, shows it
suffices to prove that
$Ri_*(E|_U)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent if and only if $R\Gamma(U, E)$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$.
Say $U = \Spec(A)$, $V = \Spec(R)$, and
$\mathbf{A}^n_V = \Spec(R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$. By the remarks
preceding the lemma, $E|_U$ is quasi-isomorphic to the
complex of quasi-coherent sheaves on $U$ associated to the object
$R\Gamma(U, E)$ of $D(A)$. Note that
$R\Gamma(U, E) = R\Gamma(\mathbf{A}^n_V, Ri_*(E|_U))$ as $i$ is a
closed immersion (and hence $i_*$ is exact). Thus $Ri_*E$
is associated to $R\Gamma(U, E)$ viewed as an object of
$D(R[x_1, \ldots, x_n])$. We conclude as $m$-pseudo-coherence
of $Ri_*(E|_U)$ is equivalent to $m$-pseudo-coherence of
$R\Gamma(U, E)$ in $D(R[x_1, \ldots, x_n])$ by
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-pseudo-coherent-affine}
which is equivalent to $R\Gamma(U, E)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent
relative to $R = \mathcal{O}_S(V)$ by definition.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-closed-morphism-relative-pseudo-coherence}
Let $i : X \to Y$ morphism of schemes locally of finite type over a
base scheme $S$. Assume that $i$ induces a homeomorphism of $X$ with a closed
subset of $Y$. Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
Then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ if and only if
$Ri_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-homeomorphism-affine}
the morphism $i$ is affine. Thus we may assume $S$, $Y$, and $X$ are affine.
Say $S = \Spec(R)$, $Y = \Spec(A)$, and $X = \Spec(B)$.
The condition means that $A/\text{rad}(A) \to B/\text{rad}(B)$ is
surjective. As $B$ is of finite type over $A$, we can find
$b_1, \ldots, b_m \in \text{rad}(B)$ which generate $B$ as an
$A$-algebra. Say $b_j^N = 0$ for all $j$. Consider the diagram of
rings
$$
\xymatrix{
B & R[x_i, y_j]/(y_j^N) \ar[l] & R[x_i, y_j] \ar[l] \\
A \ar[u] & R[x_i] \ar[l] \ar[u] \ar[ru]
}
$$
which translates into a diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] \ar[r] & T \ar[d] \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S \ar[ld] \\
Y \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^n_S
}
$$
of affine schemes. By Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}
we see that $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ if and only if its
pushforward to $\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent. 
By Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-closed-push-pseudo-coherent}
we see that this is true if and only if its pushforward to $T$ is
$m$-pseudo-coherent. The same lemma shows that this holds if and only
if the pushforward to $\mathbf{A}^n_S$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent.
Again by
Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}
this holds if and only if $Ri_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-finite-morphism-relative-pseudo-coherence}
Let $\pi : X \to Y$ be a finite morphism of schemes locally of finite
type over a base scheme $S$. Let $E$ be an object of
$D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent
relative to $S$ if and only if $R\pi_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent
relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translation of the result of
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-finite-extension-pseudo-coherent}
into the language of schemes. Observe that $R\pi_*$ indeed
maps $D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$ into $D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_Y)$
by Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-quasi-coherence-direct-image}.
To do the translation use
Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-cone-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $(E, E', E'')$ be a distinguished triangle of
$D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $E$ is $(m + 1)$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ and
$E'$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ then $E''$ is
$m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\item If $E, E''$ are $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$,
then $E'$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\item If $E'$ is $(m + 1)$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
and $E''$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$, then
$E$ is $(m + 1)$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, if two out of three of $E, E', E''$ are pseudo-coherent
relative to $S$, the so is the third.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Immediate from Lemma \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize} and
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-cone-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-rel-n-pseudo-module}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ for all $m > 0$,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is $0$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ if and only if
$\mathcal{F}$ is a finite type $\mathcal{O}_X$-module,
\item $\mathcal{F}$ is $(-1)$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ if and only if
$\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent and finitely presented relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Part (1) is immediate from the definition. To see part (3)
we may work locally on $X$ (both properties are local). Thus we
may assume $X$ and $S$ are affine. Choose a closed immersion
$i : X \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$. Then we see that $\mathcal{F}$ is
$(-1)$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ if and only if $i_*\mathcal{F}$
is $(-1)$-pseudo-coherent, which is true if and only if $i_*\mathcal{F}$
is an $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_S}$-module of finite presentation, see
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-finite-cohomology}.
A module of finite presentation is quasi-coherent, see
Modules, Lemma \ref{modules-lemma-finite-presentation-quasi-coherent}.
By Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-i-star-equivalence}
we see that $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent if and only if $i_*\mathcal{F}$
is quasi-coherent. Having said this part (3) follows. The proof of (2)
is similar but less involved.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-summands-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $E, K$ be objects of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
If $E \oplus K$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ so are $E$ and $K$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Follows from
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-summands-pseudo-coherent}
and the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-complex-relative-pseudo-coherent-modules}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $\mathcal{F}^\bullet$ be a (locally) bounded
above complex of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules such that $\mathcal{F}^i$ is
$(m - i)$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ for all $i$. Then
$\mathcal{F}^\bullet$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Follows from
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-complex-pseudo-coherent-modules}
and the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-cohomology-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
If $E$ is (locally) bounded above and $H^i(E)$ is $(m - i)$-pseudo-coherent
relative to $S$ for all $i$, then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Follows from
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-cohomology-pseudo-coherent}
and the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $E$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$
which is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$. Let $S' \to S$ be a
morphism of schemes. Set $X' = X \times_S S'$ and denote $E'$
the derived pullback of $E$ to $X'$. If $S'$ and $X$ are
Tor independent over $S$, then $E'$ is
is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The problem is local on $X$ and $X'$ hence we may assume $X$, $S$, $S'$,
and $X'$ are affine. Choose a closed immersion $i : X \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$
and denote $i' : X' \to \mathbf{A}^n_{S'}$ the base change to $S'$.
Denote $g : X' \to X$ and $g' : \mathbf{A}^n_{S'} \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$
the projections, so $E' = Lg^*E$. Since $X$ and $S'$ are tor-independent
over $S$, the base change map
(Cohomology, Remark \ref{cohomology-remark-base-change})
induces an isomorphism
$$
Ri'_*(Lg^*E) = L(g')^*Ri_*E
$$
Namely, for a point $x' \in X'$ lying over $x \in X$ the base change
map on stalks at $x'$ is the map
$$
E_x \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_S, x}}^\mathbf{L}
\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_{S'}, x'}
\longrightarrow
E_x \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X, x}}^\mathbf{L}
\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}
$$
coming from the closed immersions $i$ and $i'$. Note that the source
is quasi-isomorphic to a localization of
$E_x \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{S, s}}^\mathbf{L} \mathcal{O}_{S', s'}$
which is isomorphic to the target as
$\mathcal{O}_{X', x'}$ is isomorphic to (the same) localization of
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{S, s}}^\mathbf{L}
\mathcal{O}_{S', s'}$ by assumption. We conclude the lemma holds
by an application of
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-pseudo-coherent-pullback}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pull-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes locally of finite type
over a base $S$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $E$ be an object of
$D(\mathcal{O}_Y)$. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathcal{O}_X$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $Y$\footnote{This
means $f$ is pseudo-coherent, see
Definition \ref{definition-pseudo-coherent}.}, and
\item $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $Lf^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The problem is local on $X$. Thus we may assume $X$, $Y$, and $S$ are affine.
Arguing as in the proof of More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-pull-relative-pseudo-coherent}
we can find a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r]_i \ar[d]_f &
\mathbf{A}^d_Y \ar[r]_j \ar[ld]^p &
\mathbf{A}^{n + d}_S \ar[ld] \\
Y \ar[r] &
\mathbf{A}^n_S
}
$$
Observe that
$$
Ri_* Lf^*E = Ri_* Li^* Lp^*E =
Lp^*E \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}}^\mathbf{L} Ri_*\mathcal{O}_X
$$
by Cohomology, Lemma
\ref{cohomology-lemma-projection-formula-closed-immersion}.
By assumption and the fact that $Y$ is affine, we can represent
$Ri_*\mathcal{O}_X = i_*\mathcal{O}_X$ by a complexes of finite free
$\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}$-modules $\mathcal{F}^\bullet$, with
$\mathcal{F}^q = 0$ for $q > 0$
(details omitted; use Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-pseudo-coherent-affine}
and
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-rel-n-pseudo-module}).
By assumption $E$ is bounded above, say $H^q(E) = 0$ for $q > a$.
Represent $E$ by a complex $\mathcal{E}^\bullet$ of $\mathcal{O}_Y$-modules
with $\mathcal{E}^q = 0$ for $q > a$. Then the derived tensor product above
is represented by $\text{Tot}(p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet
\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}} \mathcal{F}^\bullet)$.

\medskip\noindent
Since $j$ is a closed immersion, the functor $j_*$ is exact and
$Rj_*$ is computed by applying $j_*$ to any representating complex
of sheaves. Thus we have to show that
$j_*\text{Tot}(p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}}
\mathcal{F}^\bullet)$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent
as a complex of $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S}$-modules.
Note that
$\text{Tot}(p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}}
\mathcal{F}^\bullet)$ has a filtration by
subcomplexes with successive quotients the complexes
$p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet
\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}} \mathcal{F}^q[-q]$.
Note that for $q \ll 0$ the complexes
$p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}}
\mathcal{F}^q[-q]$
have zero cohomology in degrees $\leq m$ and hence are $m$-pseudo-coherent.
Hence, applying
Lemma \ref{lemma-cone-relatively-pseudo-coherent}
and induction, it suffices to show that
$p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}_Y^n}}
\mathcal{F}^q[-q]$
is pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ for all $q$. Note that $\mathcal{F}^q = 0$
for $q > 0$. Since also $\mathcal{F}^q$ is finite free this
reduces to proving that $p^*\mathcal{E}^\bullet$ is
$m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ which follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-relative-pseudo-coherent}
for instance.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-relative-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes locally of finite type
over a base $S$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $E$ be an object of
$D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Assume $\mathcal{O}_Y$ is pseudo-coherent relative
to $S$\footnote{This means $Y \to S$ is pseudo-coherent, see
Definition \ref{definition-pseudo-coherent}.}.
Then the following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $Y$, and
\item $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The question is local on $X$, hence we may assume $X$, $Y$, and $S$ are affine.
Arguing as in the proof of More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-pull-relative-pseudo-coherent}
we can find a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r]_i \ar[d]_f &
\mathbf{A}^m_Y \ar[r]_j \ar[ld]^p &
\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S \ar[ld] \\
Y \ar[r] &
\mathbf{A}^n_S
}
$$
The assumption that $\mathcal{O}_Y$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
implies that $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^m_Y}$ is pseudo-coherent relative
to $\mathbf{A}^m_S$ (by flat base change; this can be seen by using
for example Lemma \ref{lemma-base-change-relative-pseudo-coherent}).
This in turn implies that $j_*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_Y}$ is
pseudo-coherent as an
$\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S}$-module. Then the equivalence of
the lemma follows from
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-closed-push-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-check-relative-pseudo-coherence-on-charts}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rd] \ar[rr]_i & & P \ar[ld] \\
& S
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of schemes. Assume $i$ is a closed immersion
and $P \to S$ flat and locally of finite presentation. Let $E$
be an object of $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Then the following
are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$,
\item $Ri_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$, and
\item $Ri_*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent on $P$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The equivalence of (1) and (2) is
Lemma \ref{lemma-finite-morphism-relative-pseudo-coherence}.
The equivalence of (2) and (3) follows from
Lemma
\ref{lemma-composition-relative-pseudo-coherent}
applied to $\text{id} : P \to P$
provided we can show that $\mathcal{O}_P$ is
pseudo-coherent relative to $S$. This follows from
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-perfect}
and the definitions.
\end{proof}









\section{Pseudo-coherent morphisms}
\label{section-pseudo-coherent}

\noindent
Avoid reading this section at all cost.
If you need some of this material, first take a look at the
corresponding algebra sections, see
More on Algebra, Sections \ref{more-algebra-section-pseudo-coherent},
\ref{more-algebra-section-relative-pseudo-coherent}, and
\ref{more-algebra-section-pseudo-coherent-perfect-ring-map}.
For now the only thing you need to know is that a ring map
$A \to B$ is pseudo-coherent if and only if $B = A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/I$
and $B$ as an $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module has a resolution by
finite free $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-modules.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item there exist an affine open covering $S = \bigcup V_j$ and for each $j$
an affine open covering $f^{-1}(V_j) = \bigcup U_{ji}$ such that
$\mathcal{O}_S(V_j) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U_{ij})$ is a pseudo-coherent
ring map,
\item for every pair of affine opens $U \subset X$, $V \subset S$
such that $f(U) \subset V$ the ring map
$\mathcal{O}_S(V) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is pseudo-coherent, and
\item $f$ is locally of finite type and $\mathcal{O}_X$
is pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
To see the equivalence of (1) and (2) it suffices to check conditions
(1)(a), (b), (c) of
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-property-local}
for the property of being a pseudo-coherent ring map.
These properties follow (using localization is flat) from
More on Algebra, Lemmas
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-base-change-relative-pseudo-coherent},
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-localize-relative-pseudo-coherent}, and
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-glue-relative-pseudo-coherent}.

\medskip\noindent
If (1) holds, then $f$ is locally of finite type as a pseudo-coherent
ring map is of finite type by definition. Moreover, (1) implies
via Lemma \ref{lemma-qcoh-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}
and the definitions that $\mathcal{O}_X$ is pseudo-coherent
relative to $S$. Conversely, if (3) holds, then we see
that for every $U$ and $V$ as in (2) the ring
$\mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is of finite type over $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$
and $\mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is as a module
pseudo-coherent relative to $\mathcal{O}_S(V)$, see
Lemmas \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize} and
\ref{lemma-qcoh-relative-pseudo-coherence-characterize}.
This is the definition of a pseudo-coherent ring map, hence
(2) and (1) hold.
\end{proof}

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-pseudo-coherent}
A morphism of schemes $f : X \to S$ is called {\it pseudo-coherent}
if the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied. In this case we also say that $X$ is pseudo-coherent
over $S$.
\end{definition}

\noindent
Beware that a base change of a pseudo-coherent morphism is not
pseudo-coherent in general.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-base-change-pseudo-coherent}
A flat base change of a pseudo-coherent morphism is pseudo-coherent.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This translates into the following algebra result:
Let $A \to B$ be a pseudo-coherent ring map.
Let $A \to A'$ be flat. Then $A' \to B \otimes_A A'$ is
pseudo-coherent. This follows from the more general
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-base-change-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-pseudo-coherent}
A composition of pseudo-coherent morphisms of schemes is
pseudo-coherent.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This translates into the following algebra result:
If $A \to B \to C$ are composable pseudo-coherent ring maps
then $A \to C$ is pseudo-coherent. This follows from either
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-pull-relative-pseudo-coherent}
or
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-composition-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pseudo-coherent-finite-presentation}
A pseudo-coherent morphism is locally of finite presentation.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Immediate from the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-pseudo-coherent}
A flat morphism which is locally of finite presentation is pseudo-coherent.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows from the fact that a flat ring map of finite presentation is
pseudo-coherent (and even perfect), see
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-perfect}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-permanence-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes pseudo-coherent
over a base scheme $S$. Then $f$ is pseudo-coherent.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This translates into the following algebra result:
If $R \to A \to B$ are composable ring maps
and $R \to A$, $R \to B$ pseudo-coherent, then
$R \to B$ is pseudo-coherent. This follows from
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-composition-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-finite-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a finite morphism of schemes.
Then $f$ is pseudo-coherent if and only if $f_*\mathcal{O}_X$
is pseudo-coherent as an $\mathcal{O}_S$-module.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Translated into algebra this lemma says the following: If $R \to A$
is a finite ring map, then $R \to A$ is pseudo-coherent as a ring map
(which means by definition that $A$ as an $A$-module is
pseudo-coherent relative to $R$) if and only if
$A$ is pseudo-coherent as an $R$-module. This follows from
the more general
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-finite-extension-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-Noetherian-pseudo-coherent}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
If $S$ is locally Noetherian, then $f$ is pseudo-coherent if
and only if $f$ is locally of finite type.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This translates into the following algebra result:
If $R \to A$ is a finite type ring map with $R$ Noetherian, then
$R \to A$ is pseudo-coherent if and only if $R \to A$ is of finite type.
To see this, note that a pseudo-coherent ring map is of finite type by
definition. Conversely, if $R \to A$ is of finite type, then
we can write $A = R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/I$ and it follows from
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-Noetherian-pseudo-coherent}
that $A$ is pseudo-coherent as an $R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module, i.e.,
$R \to A$ is a pseudo-coherent ring map.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-descending-property-pseudo-coherent}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is pseudo-coherent''
is fpqc local on the base.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will use the criterion of
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-properties-morphisms}
to prove this. By
Definition \ref{definition-pseudo-coherent}
being pseudo-coherent is Zariski local on the base. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-base-change-pseudo-coherent}
being pseudo-coherent is preserved under flat base change.
The final hypothesis (3) of
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-properties-morphisms}
translates into the following algebra statement:
Let $A \to B$ be a faithfully flat ring map.
Let $C = A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/I$ be an $A$-algebra.
If $C \otimes_A B$ is pseudo-coherent as an $B[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module,
then $C$ is pseudo-coherent as a $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module.
This is
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-descent-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-quotient-of-flat-finitely-presented}
Let $A \to B$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation.
Let $I \subset B$ be an ideal. Then $A \to B/I$ is pseudo-coherent
if and only if $I$ is pseudo-coherent as a $B$-module.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose a presentation $B = A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/J$.
Note that $B$ is pseudo-coherent as an $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module
because $A \to B$ is a pseudo-coherent ring map by
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-pseudo-coherent}.
Note that $A \to B/I$ is pseudo-coherent if and only if
$B/I$ is pseudo-coherent as an $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module. By
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-finite-push-pseudo-coherent}
we see this is equivalent to the condition that $B/I$ is
pseudo-coherent as an $B$-module. This proves the lemma as the
short exact sequence $0 \to I \to B \to B/I \to 0$
shows that $I$ is pseudo-coherent if and only if $B/I$ is (see
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-two-out-of-three-pseudo-coherent}).
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma will be obsoleted by the stronger
Lemma \ref{lemma-pseudo-coherent-fppf-local-source}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pseudo-coherent-syntomic-local-source}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is pseudo-coherent''
is syntomic local on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will use the criterion of
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-properties-morphisms-local-source}
to prove this. It follows from
Lemmas \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-pseudo-coherent} and
\ref{lemma-composition-pseudo-coherent}
that being pseudo-coherent is preserved under precomposing with
flat morphisms locally of finite presentation, in particular under
precomposing with syntomic morphisms (see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-syntomic-flat} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-syntomic-locally-finite-presentation}).
It is clear from
Definition \ref{definition-pseudo-coherent}
that being pseudo-coherent is
Zariski local on the source and target.
Hence, according to the aforementioned
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-properties-morphisms-local-source}
it suffices to prove the following: Suppose $X' \to X \to Y$ are
morphisms of affine schemes with $X' \to X$ syntomic and $X' \to Y$
pseudo-coherent. Then $X \to Y$ is pseudo-coherent.
To see this, note that in any case $X \to Y$ is of finite presentation by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-flat-finitely-presented-permanence-algebra}.
Choose a closed immersion $X \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-lift-syntomic}
we can find an affine open covering $X' = \bigcup_{i = 1, \ldots, n} X'_i$
and syntomic morphisms $W_i \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ lifting the morphisms
$X'_i \to X$, i.e., such that there are fibre product diagrams
$$
\xymatrix{
X'_i \ar[d] \ar[r] & W_i \ar[d] \\
X \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^n_Y
}
$$
After replacing $X'$ by $\coprod X'_i$ and setting $W = \coprod W_i$
we obtain a fibre product diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d] \ar[r] & W \ar[d]^h \\
X \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^n_Y
}
$$
with $W \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ flat and of finite presentation and
$X' \to Y$ still pseudo-coherent. Since
$W \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ is open (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open})
and $X' \to X$ is surjective we can find
$f \in \Gamma(\mathbf{A}^n_Y, \mathcal{O})$ such that
$X \subset D(f) \subset \Im(h)$. Write
$Y = \Spec(R)$, $X = \Spec(A)$, $X' = \Spec(A')$
and $W = \Spec(B)$, $A = R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/I$ and
$A' = B/IB$. Then $R \to A'$ is pseudo-coherent. Picture
$$
\xymatrix{
A' = B/IB & B \ar[l] \\
A = R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/I \ar[u] & R[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \ar[l] \ar[u]
}
$$
By
Lemma \ref{lemma-quotient-of-flat-finitely-presented}
we see that $IB$ is pseudo-coherent as a $B$-module.
The ring map $R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]_f \to B_f$ is faithfully flat by
our choice of $f$ above. This implies that
$I_f \subset R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]_f$
is pseudo-coherent, see
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-descent-pseudo-coherent}.
Applying
Lemma \ref{lemma-quotient-of-flat-finitely-presented}
one more time we see that $R \to A$ is pseudo-coherent.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-pseudo-coherent-fppf-local-source}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is pseudo-coherent''
is fppf local on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\{g_i : X_i \to X\}$ be an fppf covering such that each composition
$f \circ g_i$ is pseudo-coherent. According to
Lemma \ref{lemma-dominate-fppf}
there exist
\begin{enumerate}
\item a Zariski open covering $X = \bigcup U_j$,
\item surjective finite locally free morphisms $W_j \to U_j$,
\item Zariski open coverings $W_j = \bigcup_k W_{j, k}$,
\item surjective finite locally free morphisms $T_{j, k} \to W_{j, k}$
\end{enumerate}
such that the fppf covering $\{h_{j, k} : T_{j, k} \to X\}$ refines the given
covering $\{X_i \to X\}$. Denote $\psi_{j, k} : T_{j, k} \to X_{\alpha(j, k)}$
the morphisms that witness the fact that $\{T_{j, k} \to X\}$ refines
the given covering $\{X_i \to X\}$. Note that $T_{j, k} \to X$ is a flat,
locally finitely presented morphism, so both $X_i$ and $T_{j, k}$ are
pseudo-coherent over $X$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-pseudo-coherent}.
Hence $\psi_{j, k} : T_{j, k} \to X_i$ is pseudo-coherent, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-permanence-pseudo-coherent}.
Hence $T_{j, k} \to S$ is pseudo coherent as the composition
of $\psi_{j, k}$ and $f \circ g_{\alpha(j, k)}$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-composition-pseudo-coherent}.
Thus we see we have reduced the lemma to the case of
a Zariski open covering (which is OK) and the case of a covering
given by a single surjective finite locally free morphism which we
deal with in the following paragraph.

\medskip\noindent
Assume that $X' \to X \to S$ is a sequence of morphisms of schemes
with $X' \to X$ surjective finite locally free and $X' \to Y$ pseudo-coherent.
Our goal is to show that $X \to S$ is pseudo-coherent.
Note that by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-flat-finitely-presented-permanence}
the morphism $X \to S$ is locally of finite presentation.
It is clear that the problem reduces to the case that $X'$, $X$ and $S$
are affine and $X' \to X$ is free of some rank $r > 0$. The corresponding
algebra problem is the following: Suppose $R \to A \to A'$ are ring maps
such that $R \to A'$ is pseudo-coherent, $R \to A$ is of finite presentation,
and $A' \cong A^{\oplus r}$ as an $A$-module. Goal: Show $R \to A$ is
pseudo-coherent. The assumption that $R \to A'$ is pseudo-coherent
means that $A'$ as an $A'$-module is pseudo-coherent relative to $R$. By
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-finite-extension-pseudo-coherent}
this implies that $A'$ as an $A$-module is pseudo-coherent relative to $R$.
Since $A' \cong A^{\oplus r}$ as an $A$-module we see that
$A$ as an $A$-module is pseudo-coherent relative to $R$, see
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-summands-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
This by definition means that $R \to A$ is pseudo-coherent and we win.
\end{proof}








\section{Perfect morphisms}
\label{section-perfect}

\noindent
In order to understand the material in this
section you have to understand the material of the section
on pseudo-coherent morphisms just a little bit.
For now the only thing you need to know is that a ring map
$A \to B$ is perfect if and only if it is pseudo-coherent
and $B$ has finite tor dimension as an $A$-module.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-perfect}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally of finite type.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item there exist an affine open covering $S = \bigcup V_j$ and for each $j$
an affine open covering $f^{-1}(V_j) = \bigcup U_{ji}$ such that
$\mathcal{O}_S(V_j) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U_{ij})$ is a perfect
ring map, and
\item for every pair of affine opens $U \subset X$, $V \subset S$
such that $f(U) \subset V$ the ring map
$\mathcal{O}_S(V) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is perfect.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume (1) and let $U, V$ be as in (2).
It follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-pseudo-coherent}
that $\mathcal{O}_S(V) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is pseudo-coherent.
Hence it suffices to prove that the property of a ring map
being "of finite tor dimension" satisfies
conditions (1)(a), (b), (c) of
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-property-local}.
These properties follow from
More on Algebra,
Lemmas \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-push-tor-amplitude},
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-base-change-finite-tor-dimension}, and
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-glue-tor-amplitude}.
Some details omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-perfect}
A morphism of schemes $f : X \to S$ is called {\it perfect}
if the equivalent conditions of
Lemma \ref{lemma-pseudo-coherent}
are satisfied. In this case we also say that $X$ is perfect
over $S$.
\end{definition}

\noindent
Note that a perfect morphism is in particular pseudo-coherent, hence
locally of finite presentation. Beware that a base change of a perfect
morphism is not perfect in general.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-base-change-perfect}
A flat base change of a perfect morphism is perfect.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This translates into the following algebra result:
Let $A \to B$ be a perfect ring map.
Let $A \to A'$ be flat. Then $A' \to B \otimes_A A'$ is
perfect. This result for pseudo-coherent ring maps we have seen in
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-base-change-pseudo-coherent}.
The corresponding fact for finite tor dimension follows from
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-base-change-finite-tor-dimension}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-perfect}
A composition of perfect morphisms of schemes is perfect.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This translates into the following algebra result:
If $A \to B \to C$ are composable perfect ring maps
then $A \to C$ is perfect. We have seen this is the case for
pseudo-coherent in
Lemma \ref{lemma-composition-pseudo-coherent}
and its proof. By assumption there exist integers $n$, $m$ such
that $B$ has tor dimension $\leq n$ over $A$ and $C$ has tor dimension
$\leq m$ over $B$. Then for any $A$-module $M$ we have
$$
M \otimes_A^{\mathbf{L}} C =
(M \otimes_A^{\mathbf{L}} B) \otimes_B^{\mathbf{L}} C
$$
and the spectral sequence of
More on Algebra, Example \ref{more-algebra-example-tor}
shows that $\text{Tor}^A_p(M, C) = 0$ for $p > n + m$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-perfect}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is flat and perfect, and
\item $f$ is flat and locally of finite presentation.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The implication (2) $\Rightarrow$ (1) is
More on Algebra,
Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-finite-presentation-perfect}.
The converse follows from the fact that a pseudo-coherent morphism
is locally of finite presentation, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-pseudo-coherent-finite-presentation}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-regular-target-perfect}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Assume $S$ is regular and $f$ is locally of finite type.
Then $f$ is perfect.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
See
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-regular-perfect-ring-map}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-regular-immersion-perfect}
A regular immersion of schemes is perfect.
A Koszul-regular immersion of schemes is perfect.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since a regular immersion is a Koszul-regular immersion, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-regular-quasi-regular-immersion},
it suffices to prove the second statement. This translates into the
following algebraic statement: Suppose that $I \subset A$ is an
ideal generated by a Koszul-regular sequence $f_1, \ldots, f_r$ of $A$.
Then $A \to A/I$ is a perfect ring map. Since $A \to A/I$ is surjective
this is a presentation of $A/I$ by a polynomial algebra over $A$.
Hence it suffices to see that $A/I$ is pseudo-coherent as an $A$-module
and has finite tor dimension. By definition of a Koszul sequence
the Koszul complex $K(A, f_1, \ldots, f_r)$ is a finite free resolution
of $A/I$. Hence $A/I$ is a perfect complex of $A$-modules and we win.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-perfect-permanence}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_f \ar[rd] & & Y \ar[ld] \\
& S
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of morphisms of schemes. Assume $Y \to S$
smooth and $X \to S$ perfect. Then $f : X \to Y$ is perfect.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We can factor $f$ as the composition
$$
X \longrightarrow X \times_S Y \longrightarrow Y
$$
where the first morphism is the map $i = (1, f)$ and the second
morphism is the projection. Since $Y \to S$ is flat, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-smooth-flat},
we see that $X \times_S Y \to Y$ is perfect by
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-base-change-perfect}.
As $Y \to S$ is smooth, also $X \times_S Y \to X$ is smooth, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-smooth}.
Hence $i$ is a section of a smooth morphism, therefore $i$ is
a regular immersion, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-section-smooth-regular-immersion}.
This implies that $i$ is perfect, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-regular-immersion-perfect}.
We conclude that $f$ is perfect because the composition of perfect
morphisms is perfect, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-composition-perfect}.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\label{remark-perfect-permanence}
It is not true that a morphism between schemes $X, Y$ perfect over a base $S$
is perfect. An example is $S = \Spec(k)$, $X = \Spec(k)$,
$Y = \Spec(k[x]/(x^2)$ and $X \to Y$ the unique $S$-morphism.
\end{remark}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-descending-property-perfect}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is perfect''
is fpqc local on the base.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will use the criterion of
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-properties-morphisms}
to prove this. By
Definition \ref{definition-perfect}
being perfect is Zariski local on the base. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-base-change-perfect}
being perfect is preserved under flat base change.
The final hypothesis (3) of
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-properties-morphisms}
translates into the following algebra statement:
Let $A \to B$ be a faithfully flat ring map.
Let $C = A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/I$ be an $A$-algebra.
If $C \otimes_A B$ is perfect as an $B[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module,
then $C$ is perfect as a $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module.
This is
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-descent-perfect}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-check-perfect-stalks}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a pseudo-coherent morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is perfect,
\item $\mathcal{O}_X$ locally has finite tor dimension as a
sheaf of $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S$-modules, and
\item for all $x \in X$ the ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ has finite tor
dimension as an $\mathcal{O}_{S, f(x)}$-module.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The problem is local on $X$ and $S$. Hence we may assume that
$X = \Spec(B)$, $S = \Spec(A)$ and $f$ corresponds to a pseudo-coherent
ring map $A \to B$.

\medskip\noindent
If (1) holds, then $B$ has finite tor dimension $d$ as $A$-module. Then
$B_\mathfrak q$ has tor dimension $d$ as an $A_\mathfrak p$-module for all
primes $\mathfrak q \subset B$ with $\mathfrak p = A \cap \mathfrak q$, see
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-tor-amplitude-localization}.
Then $\mathcal{O}_X$ has tor dimension $d$ as a 
sheaf of $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S$-modules by
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-tor-amplitude-stalk}.
Thus (1) implies (2).

\medskip\noindent
By Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-tor-amplitude-stalk} (2) implies
(3).

\medskip\noindent
Assume (3). We cannot use
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-tor-amplitude-localization}
to conclude as we are not given that the tor dimension of
$B_\mathfrak q$ over $A_\mathfrak p$ is bounded independent of $\mathfrak q$.
Choose a presentation $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \to B$. Then $B$ is
pseudo-coherent as a $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module. Let
$\mathfrak q \subset A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ be a prime ideal
lying over $\mathfrak p \subset A$. Then either $B_\mathfrak q$ is zero
or by assumption it has finite tor dimension as an
$A_\mathfrak p$-module. Since the fibres of $A \to A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$
have finite global dimension, we can apply
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-perfect-over-polynomial-ring}
to $A_\mathfrak p \to A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]_\mathfrak q$
to see that $B_\mathfrak q$ is a perfect
$A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]_\mathfrak q$-module. Hence
$B$ is a perfect $A[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$-module by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-check-perfect-stalks}.
Thus $A \to B$ is a perfect ring map by definition.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-perfect-proper-perfect-direct-image}
Let $S$ be a Noetherian scheme. Let $f : X \to S$ be a perfect proper
morphism of schemes. Let $E \in D(\mathcal{O}_X)$ be perfect. Then
$Rf_*E$ is a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_S)$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We claim that Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-perfect-direct-image} applies.
Conditions (1) and (2) are immediate. Condition (3) is local
on $X$. Thus we may assume $X$ and $S$ affine and $E$
represented by a strictly perfect complex of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules.
Thus it suffices to show that $\mathcal{O}_X$ has finite
tor dimension as a sheaf of $f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_S$-modules.
This is equivalent to being perfect by
Lemma \ref{lemma-check-perfect-stalks}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-perfect-fppf-local-source}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is perfect''
is fppf local on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $\{g_i : X_i \to X\}_{i \in I}$ be an fppf covering of schemes and let
$f : X \to S$ be a morphism such that each $f \circ g_i$ is
perfect. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-pseudo-coherent-fppf-local-source}
we conclude that $f$ is pseudo-coherent.
Hence by
Lemma \ref{lemma-check-perfect-stalks}
it suffices to check that $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is an
$\mathcal{O}_{S, f(x)}$-module of finite tor dimension for all $x \in X$.
Pick $i \in I$ and $x_i \in X_i$ mapping to $x$. Then we see that
$\mathcal{O}_{X_i, x_i}$ has finite tor dimension over
$\mathcal{O}_{S, f(x)}$ and that
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to \mathcal{O}_{X_i, x_i}$ is faithfully flat.
The desired conclusion follows from
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-flat-descent-tor-amplitude}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-factor-regular-immersion}
Let $i : Z \to Y$ and $j : Y \to X$ be immersions of schemes.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X$ is locally Noetherian,
\item $j \circ i$ is a regular immersion, and
\item $i$ is perfect.
\end{enumerate}
Then $i$ and $j$ are regular immersions.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since $X$ (and hence $Y$) is locally Noetherian all 4 types of regular
immersions agree, and moreover we may check whether a morphism is a
regular immersion on the level of local rings, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-Noetherian-scheme-regular-ideal}.
Thus the result follows from
Divided Power Algebra, Lemma \ref{dpa-lemma-regular-sequence}.
\end{proof}









\section{Local complete intersection morphisms}
\label{section-lci}

\noindent
In
Divisors, Section \ref{divisors-section-regular-immersions}
we have defined 4 different types of regular immersions: regular,
Koszul-regular, $H_1$-regular, and quasi-regular. In this section
we consider morphisms $f : X \to S$ which locally on $X$ factors as
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_i \ar[rd] & & \mathbf{A}^n_S \ar[ld] \\
& S
}
$$
where $i$ is a $*$-regular immersion for
$* \in \{\emptyset, Koszul, H_1, quasi\}$.
However, we don't know how to prove that this condition is independent
of the factorization if $* = \emptyset$, i.e., when we require $i$ to
be a regular immersion. On the other hand, we want a
local complete intersection morphism to be perfect, which is only
going to be true if $* = Koszul$ or $* = \emptyset$. Hence we will define a
{\it local complete intersection morphism} or
{\it Koszul morphism} to be a morphism of schemes $f : X \to S$
that locally on $X$ has a factorization as above with $i$ a Koszul-regular
immersion. To see that this works we first prove this is independent
of the chosen factorizations.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-koszul-independence-factorization}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $U$, $P$, $P'$ be schemes over $S$.
Let $u \in U$. Let $i : U \to P$, $i' : U \to P'$ be immersions over $S$.
Assume $P$ and $P'$ smooth over $S$. Then the following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $i$ is a Koszul-regular immersion in a neighbourhood of $x$, and
\item $i'$ is a Koszul-regular immersion in a neighbourhood of $x$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $i$ is a Koszul-regular immersion in a neighbourhood of $x$.
Consider the morphism $j = (i, i') : U \to P \times_S P' = P''$.
Since $P'' = P \times_S P' \to P$ is smooth, it follows from
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-lift-regular-immersion-to-smooth}
that $j$ is a Koszul-regular immersion, whereupon it follows from
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-push-regular-immersion-thru-smooth}
that $i'$ is a Koszul-regular immersion.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Before we state the definition, let us make the following simple
remark. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which is locally
of finite type. Let $x \in X$. Then there exist an open neighbourhood
$U \subset X$ and a factorization of $f|_U$ as the composition of an
immersion $i : U \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$ followed by the projection
$\mathbf{A}^n_S \to S$ which is smooth. Picture
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rd] & U \ar[l] \ar[d] \ar[r]_-i & \mathbf{A}^n_S = P \ar[ld]^\pi \\
& S
}
$$
In fact you can do this with any affine open neighbourhood
$U$ of $x$ in $X$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-quasi-affine-finite-type-over-S}.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-lci}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item Let $x \in X$. We say that $f$ is {\it Koszul at $x$} if $f$
is of finite type at $x$ and there exists an open neighbourhood
and a factorization of $f|_U$ as $\pi \circ i$ where $i : U \to P$
is a Koszul-regular immersion and $\pi : P \to S$ is smooth.
\item We say $f$ is a {\it Koszul morphism}, or that
$f$ is a {\it local complete intersection morphism}
if $f$ is Koszul at every point.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}

\noindent
We have seen above that the choice of the factorization
$f|_U = \pi \circ i$ is irrelevant, i.e., given a factorization
of $f|_U$ as an immersion $i$ followed by a smooth morphism $\pi$, whether or
not $i$ is Koszul regular in a neighbourhood of $x$ is an intrinsic
property of $f$ at $x$. Let us record this here explicitly as a lemma
so that we can refer to it

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lci}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a local complete intersection morphism.
Let $P$ be a scheme smooth over $S$. Let $U \subset X$ be an open subscheme
and $i : U \to P$ an immersion of schemes over $S$.
Then $i$ is a Koszul-regular immersion.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is the defining property of a local complete intersection
morphism. See discussion above.
\end{proof}

\noindent
It seems like a good idea to collect here some properties in common
with all Koszul morphisms.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lci-properties}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a local complete intersection morphism.
Then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is locally of finite presentation,
\item $f$ is pseudo-coherent, and
\item $f$ is perfect.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since a perfect morphism is pseudo-coherent
(because a perfect ring map is pseudo-coherent)
and a pseudo-coherent morphism is locally of finite presentation
(because a pseudo-coherent ring map is of finite presentation)
it suffices to prove the last statement. Being perfect is a local
property, hence we may assume that $f$ factors as $\pi \circ i$ where
$\pi$ is smooth and $i$ is a Koszul-regular immersion.
A Koszul-regular immersion is perfect, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-regular-immersion-perfect}.
A smooth morphism is perfect as it is flat and locally of finite
presentation, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-perfect}.
Finally a composition of perfect morphisms is perfect, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-composition-perfect}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-affine-lci}
Let $f : X = \Spec(B) \to S = \Spec(A)$ be a morphism of affine schemes.
Then $f$ is a local complete intersection morphism if and only if
$A \to B$ is a local complete intersection homomorphism, see
More on Algebra, Definition
\ref{more-algebra-definition-local-complete-intersection}.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Follows immediately from the definitions.
\end{proof}

\noindent
Beware that a base change of a Koszul morphism is not
Koszul in general.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-base-change-lci}
A flat base change of a local complete intersection morphism is a
local complete intersection morphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Omitted. Hint: This is true because a base change of a smooth morphism
is smooth and a flat base change of a Koszul-regular immersion is a
Koszul-regular immersion, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-regular-immersion-noetherian}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-lci}
A composition of local complete intersection morphisms
is a local complete intersection morphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $g : Y \to S$ and $f : X \to Y$ be local complete intersection
morphisms. Let $x \in X$ and set $y = f(x)$. Choose an open neighbourhood
$V \subset Y$ of $y$ and a factorization $g|_V = \pi \circ i$ for some
Koszul-regular immersion $i : V \to P$ and smooth morphism $\pi : P \to S$.
Next choose an open neighbourhood $U$ of $x \in X$ and a factorization
$f|_U = \pi' \circ i'$ for some Koszul-regular immersion $i' : U \to P'$
and smooth morphism $\pi' : P' \to Y$. In fact, we may assume that
$P' = \mathbf{A}^n_V$, see discussion preceding and following
Definition \ref{definition-lci}. Picture:
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[d] & U \ar[l] \ar[r]_-{i'} & P' = \mathbf{A}^n_V \ar[d] \\
Y \ar[d] &  & V \ar[ll] \ar[r]_i & P \ar[d] \\
S & & & S \ar[lll]
}
$$
Set $P'' = \mathbf{A}^n_P$. Then $U \to P' \to P''$ is a
Koszul-regular immersion as a composition
of Koszul-regular immersions, namely $i'$ and the flat base change of
$i$ via $P'' \to P$, see
Divisors,
Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-regular-immersion-noetherian}
and
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-composition-regular-immersion}.
Also $P'' \to P \to S$ is smooth as a composition of smooth morphisms,
see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-smooth}.
Hence we conclude that $X \to S$ is Koszul at $x$ as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-flat-lci}
\begin{slogan}
A morphism is flat and lci if and only if it is syntomic.
\end{slogan}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is flat and a local complete intersection morphism, and
\item $f$ is syntomic.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume (2). By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-syntomic-locally-standard-syntomic}
for every point $x$ of $X$ there exist affine open neighbourhoods
$U$ of $x$ and $V$ of $f(x)$ such that $f|_U : U \to V$ is standard syntomic.
This means that $U = \Spec(R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_c))
\to V = \Spec(R)$ where $R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_c)$ is a
relative global complete intersection over $R$. By
Algebra,
Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-relative-global-complete-intersection-conormal}
the sequence $f_1, \ldots, f_c$ is a regular sequence in each local
ring $R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]_{\mathfrak q}$ for every prime
$\mathfrak q \supset (f_1, \ldots, f_c)$. Consider the Koszul complex
$K_\bullet = K_\bullet(R[x_1, \ldots, x_n], f_1, \ldots, f_c)$
with homology groups $H_i = H_i(K_\bullet)$. By
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-regular-koszul-regular}
we see that $(H_i)_{\mathfrak q} = 0$, $i > 0$ for every $\mathfrak q$
as above. On the other hand, by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-homotopy-koszul}
we see that $H_i$ is annihilated by $(f_1, \ldots, f_c)$. Hence we
see that $H_i = 0$, $i > 0$ and $f_1, \ldots, f_c$ is a Koszul-regular
sequence. This proves that $U \to V$ factors as a Koszul-regular
immersion $U \to \mathbf{A}^n_V$ followed by a smooth morphism as desired.

\medskip\noindent
Assume (1). Then $f$ is a flat and locally of finite presentation
(Lemma \ref{lemma-lci-properties}).
Hence, according to
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-syntomic-locally-standard-syntomic}
it suffices to show that the local rings $\mathcal{O}_{X_s, x}$
are local complete intersection rings. Choose, locally on $X$, a factorization
$f = \pi \circ i$ for some Koszul-regular immersion $i : X \to P$
and smooth morphism $\pi : P \to S$. Note that $X \to P$ is
a relative quasi-regular immersion over $S$, see
Divisors, Definition \ref{divisors-definition-relative-H1-regular-immersion}.
Hence according to
Divisors,
Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-regular-immersion-flat-in-neighbourhood}
we see that $X \to P$ is a regular immersion and the same remains true
after any base change. Thus each fibre is a regular immersion, whence
all the local rings of all the fibres of $X$ are local complete intersections.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-regular-immersion-lci}
A regular immersion of schemes is a local complete intersection morphism.
A Koszul-regular immersion of schemes is a local complete intersection
morphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since a regular immersion is a Koszul-regular immersion, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-regular-quasi-regular-immersion},
it suffices to prove the second statement. The second statement
follows immediately from the definition.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lci-permanence}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_f \ar[rd] & & Y \ar[ld] \\
& S
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of morphisms of schemes. Assume $Y \to S$
smooth and $X \to S$ is a local complete intersection morphism.
Then $f : X \to Y$ is a local complete intersection morphism.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Immediate from the definitions.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma is of a different nature.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lci-avramov}
Let
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[rr]_f \ar[rd] & & Y \ar[ld] \\
& S
}
$$
be a commutative diagram of morphisms of schemes. Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $S$ is locally Noetherian,
\item $Y \to S$ is locally of finite type,
\item $f : X \to Y$ is perfect,
\item $X \to S$ is a local complete intersection morphism.
\end{enumerate}
Then $X \to Y$ is a local complete intersection morphism
and $Y \to S$ is Koszul at $f(x)$ for all $x \in X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
In the course of this proof all schemes will be locally Noetherian
and all rings will be Noetherian. We will use without further mention
that regular sequences and Koszul regular sequences agree in this
setting, see More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-noetherian-finite-all-equivalent}.
Moreover, whether an ideal (resp.\ ideal sheaf) is regular
may be checked on local rings (resp.\ stalks), see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-regular-sequence-in-neighbourhood}
(resp.\ Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-Noetherian-scheme-regular-ideal})

\medskip\noindent
The question is local. Hence we may assume $S$, $X$, $Y$ are
affine. In this situation we may choose a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S \ar[d] & X \ar[l] \ar[d] \\
\mathbf{A}^n_S \ar[d] & Y \ar[l] \ar[ld] \\
S
}
$$
whose horizontal arrows are closed immersions. Let $x \in X$ be a
point and consider the corresponding commutative diagram of local
rings
$$
\xymatrix{
J \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^{n + m}_S, x} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \\
I \ar[r] \ar[u] &
\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^n_S, f(x)} \ar[r] \ar[u] &
\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)} \ar[u]
}
$$
where $J$ and $I$ are the kernels of the horizontal arrows.
Since $X \to S$ is a local complete intersection morphism, the
ideal $J$ is generated by a regular sequence. Since $X \to Y$ is
perfect the ring $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ has finite tor dimension over
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)}$. Hence we may apply
Divided Power Algebra, Lemma \ref{dpa-lemma-perfect-map-ci}
to conclude that $I$ and $J/I$ are generated by regular sequences.
By our initial remarks, this finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-descending-property-lci}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is a local complete intersection
morphism'' is fpqc local on the base.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes.
Let $\{S_i \to S\}$ be an fpqc covering of $S$.
Assume that each base change $f_i : X_i \to S_i$ of $f$ is
a local complete intersection morphism.
Note that this implies in particular that $f$ is locally of finite
type, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-lci-properties}
and
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-locally-finite-type}.
Let $x \in X$. Choose an open neighbourhood $U$ of $x$ and
an immersion $j : U \to \mathbf{A}^n_S$ over $S$ (see
discussion preceding
Definition \ref{definition-lci}).
We have to show that $j$ is a Koszul-regular immersion.
Since $f_i$ is a local complete intersection morphism, we see
that the base change $j_i : U \times_S S_i \to \mathbf{A}^n_{S_i}$
is a Koszul-regular immersion, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-lci}.
Because $\{\mathbf{A}^n_{S_i} \to \mathbf{A}^n_S\}$ is a
fpqc covering we see from
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-regular-immersion}
that $j$ is a Koszul-regular immersion as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-lci-syntomic-local-source}
The property $\mathcal{P}(f) =$``$f$ is a local complete intersection
morphism'' is syntomic local on the source.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will use the criterion of
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-properties-morphisms-local-source}
to prove this. It follows from
Lemmas \ref{lemma-flat-lci} and
\ref{lemma-composition-lci}
that being a local complete intersection morphism is preserved under
precomposing with syntomic morphisms. It is clear from
Definition \ref{definition-lci}
that being a local complete intersection morphism is Zariski local on the
source and target. Hence, according to the aforementioned
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-properties-morphisms-local-source}
it suffices to prove the following: Suppose $X' \to X \to Y$ are
morphisms of affine schemes with $X' \to X$ syntomic and $X' \to Y$
a local complete intersection morphism. Then $X \to Y$ is a local complete
intersection morphism. To see this, note that in any case $X \to Y$ is of
finite presentation by
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-flat-finitely-presented-permanence-algebra}.
Choose a closed immersion $X \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$. By
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-lift-syntomic}
we can find an affine open covering $X' = \bigcup_{i = 1, \ldots, n} X'_i$
and syntomic morphisms $W_i \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ lifting the morphisms
$X'_i \to X$, i.e., such that there are fibre product diagrams
$$
\xymatrix{
X'_i \ar[d] \ar[r] & W_i \ar[d] \\
X \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^n_Y
}
$$
After replacing $X'$ by $\coprod X'_i$ and setting $W = \coprod W_i$
we obtain a fibre product diagram of affine schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d] \ar[r] & W \ar[d]^h \\
X \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^n_Y
}
$$
with $h : W \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ syntomic and $X' \to Y$ still a local complete
intersection morphism. Since $W \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ is open (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-fppf-open})
and $X' \to X$ is surjective we see that $X$ is contained in the image
of $W \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$. Choose a closed immersion
$W \to \mathbf{A}^{n + m}_Y$ over $\mathbf{A}^n_Y$. Now the diagram looks like
$$
\xymatrix{
X' \ar[d] \ar[r] & W \ar[d]^h \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^{n + m}_Y \ar[ld] \\
X \ar[r] & \mathbf{A}^n_Y
}
$$
Because $h$ is syntomic and hence a local complete intersection morphism (see
above) the morphism $W \to \mathbf{A}^{n + m}_Y$ is a Koszul-regular immersion.
Because $X' \to Y$ is a local complete intersection morphism the morphism
$X' \to \mathbf{A}^{n + m}_Y$ is a Koszul-regular immersion. We conclude from
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-permanence-regular-immersion}
that $X' \to W$ is a Koszul-regular immersion. Hence, since being
a Koszul-regular immersion is fpqc local on the target (see
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-regular-immersion})
we conclude that $X \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ is a Koszul-regular immersion
which is what we had to show.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-lci-fibres}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
Assume both $X$ and $Y$ are flat and locally of finite presentation over $S$.
Then the set
$$
\{x \in X \mid f\text{ Koszul at }x\}.
$$
is open in $X$ and its formation commutes with arbitrary base change
$S' \to S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The set is open by definition (see
Definition \ref{definition-lci}).
Let $S' \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Set $X' = S' \times_S X$,
$Y' = S' \times_S Y$, and denote $f' : X' \to Y'$ the base change of $f$.
Let $x' \in X'$ be a point such that $f'$ is Koszul at $x'$. Denote
$s' \in S'$, $x \in X$, $y' \in Y'$ , $y \in Y$, $s \in S$ the image
of $x'$. Note that $f$ is locally of finite presentation, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}.
Hence we may choose an affine neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of
$x$ and an immersion $i : U \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$. Denote $U' = S' \times_S U$
and $i' : U' \to \mathbf{A}^n_{Y'}$ the base change of $i$.
The assumption that $f'$ is Koszul at $x'$ implies that $i'$ is a
Koszul-regular immersion in a neighbourhood of $x'$, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-lci}.
The scheme $X'$ is flat and locally of finite
presentation over $S'$ as a base change of $X$ (see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-presentation}).
Hence $i'$ is a relative $H_1$-regular immersion over $S'$
in a neighbourhood of $x'$ (see
Divisors, Definition \ref{divisors-definition-relative-H1-regular-immersion}).
Thus the base change $i'_{s'} : U'_{s'} \to \mathbf{A}^n_{Y'_{s'}}$ is
a $H_1$-regular immersion in an open neighbourhood of $x'$, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-relative-regular-immersion}
and the discussion following
Divisors, Definition \ref{divisors-definition-relative-H1-regular-immersion}.
Since $s' = \Spec(\kappa(s')) \to \Spec(\kappa(s)) = s$
is a surjective flat universally open morphism (see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-scheme-over-field-universally-open})
we conclude that the base change $i_s : U_s \to \mathbf{A}^n_{Y_s}$ is an
$H_1$-regular immersion in a neighbourhood of $x$, see
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-regular-immersion}.
Finally, note that $\mathbf{A}^n_Y$ is flat and locally of finite
presentation over $S$, hence
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-fibre-quasi-regular}
implies that $i$ is a (Koszul-)regular immersion in a neighbourhood of $x$
as desired.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-unramified-lci}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a local complete intersection morphism of schemes.
Then $f$ is unramified if and only if $f$ is formally unramified and in
this case the conormal sheaf $\mathcal{C}_{X/Y}$ is finite locally free
on $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The first assertion follows immediately from
Lemma \ref{lemma-unramified-formally-unramified}
and the fact that a local complete intersection morphism is locally
of finite type. To compute the conormal sheaf of $f$ we choose, locally
on $X$, a factorization of $f$ as $f = p \circ i$ where $i : X \to V$
is a Koszul-regular immersion and $V \to Y$ is smooth. By
Lemma \ref{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms-formally-smooth}
we see that $\mathcal{C}_{X/Y}$ is a locally direct summand of
$\mathcal{C}_{X/V}$ which is finite locally free as $i$ is a Koszul-regular
(hence quasi-regular) immersion, see
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-quasi-regular-immersion}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-transitivity-conormal-lci}
Let $Z \to Y \to X$ be formally unramified morphisms of schemes.
Assume that $Z \to Y$ is a local complete intersection morphism.
The exact sequence
$$
0 \to i^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/X} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to 0
$$
of
Lemma \ref{lemma-transitivity-conormal}
is short exact.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The question is local on $Z$ hence we may assume there exists a factorization
$Z \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y \to Y$ of the morphism $Z \to Y$. Then we get a
commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Z \ar[r]_{i'} \ar@{=}[d] &
\mathbf{A}^n_Y \ar[r] \ar[d] &
\mathbf{A}^n_X \ar[d] \\
Z \ar[r]^i & Y \ar[r] & X
}
$$
As $Z \to Y$ is a local complete intersection morphism, we see that
$Z \to \mathbf{A}^n_Y$ is a Koszul-regular immersion. Hence by
Divisors, Lemma \ref{divisors-lemma-transitivity-conormal-quasi-regular}
the sequence
$$
0 \to (i')^*\mathcal{C}_{\mathbf{A}^n_Y/\mathbf{A}^n_X} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/\mathbf{A}^n_X} \to
\mathcal{C}_{Z/\mathbf{A}^n_Y} \to 0
$$
is exact and locally split. Note that
$i^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/X} = (i')^*\mathcal{C}_{\mathbf{A}^n_Y/\mathbf{A}^n_X}$
by
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-fibre-product-flat}
and note that the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
(i')^*\mathcal{C}_{\mathbf{A}^n_Y/\mathbf{A}^n_X} \ar[r] &
\mathcal{C}_{Z/\mathbf{A}^n_X} \\
i^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/X} \ar[u]^{\cong} \ar[r] & \mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \ar[u]
}
$$
is commutative. Hence the lower horizontal arrow is a locally split
injection. This proves the lemma.
\end{proof}













\section{Exact sequences of differentials and conormal sheaves}
\label{section-exact}

\noindent
In this section we collect some results on exact sequences of conormal
sheaves and sheaves of differentials. In some sense these are all
realizations of the triangle of cotangent complexes associated to a pair of
composable morphisms of schemes.

\medskip\noindent
In the sequences below each of the maps
are as constructed in either
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-functoriality-differentials}
or
Lemma \ref{lemma-universal-thickening-functorial}.
Let $g : Z \to Y$ and $f : Y \to X$ be morphisms of schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item There is a canonical exact sequence
$$
g^*\Omega_{Y/X} \to \Omega_{Z/X} \to \Omega_{Z/Y} \to 0,
$$
see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-triangle-differentials}.
If $g : Z \to Y$ is formally smooth, then this sequence is a
short exact sequence, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-triangle-differentials-formally-smooth}.
\item If $g$ is formally unramified, then there is a canonical exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to g^*\Omega_{Y/X} \to \Omega_{Z/X} \to 0,
$$
see
Lemma \ref{lemma-universally-unramified-differentials-sequence}.
If $f \circ g : Z \to X$ is formally smooth, then this sequence is a short
exact sequence, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-differentials-formally-unramified-formally-smooth}.
\item If $g$ and $f \circ g$ are formally unramified, then there is a
canonical exact sequence
$$
\mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to g^*\Omega_{Y/X} \to 0,
$$
see
Lemma \ref{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms}. If $f : Y \to X$ is formally
smooth, then this sequence is a short exact sequence, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-two-unramified-morphisms-formally-smooth}.
\item If $g$ and $f$ are formally unramified, then there is a canonical
exact sequence
$$
g^*\mathcal{C}_{Y/X} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/X} \to \mathcal{C}_{Z/Y} \to 0.
$$
see
Lemma \ref{lemma-transitivity-conormal}.
If $g : Z \to Y$ is a local complete intersection morphism, then this
sequence is a short exact sequence, see
Lemma \ref{lemma-transitivity-conormal-lci}.
\end{enumerate}










\section{Weakly \'etale morphisms}
\label{section-weakly-etale}

\noindent
A ring homomorphism $A \to B$ is weakly \'etale if both $A \to B$ and
$B \otimes_A B \to B$ are flat, see
More on Algebra, Definition \ref{more-algebra-definition-weakly-etale}.
The analogous notion for morphisms of schemes is the following.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-weakly-etale}
A morphism of schemes $X \to Y$ is {\it weakly \'etale} or
{\it absolutely flat} if both $X \to Y$ and the diagonal
morphism $X \to X \times_Y X$ are flat.
\end{definition}

\noindent
An \'etale morphism is weakly \'etale and conversely
it turns out that a weakly \'etale morphism is indeed somewhat
like an \'etale morphism. For example, if $X \to Y$ is weakly
\'etale, then $L_{X/Y} = 0$, as follows from
Cotangent, Lemma \ref{cotangent-lemma-when-zero}.
We will prove a very precise result relating weakly \'etale
morphisms to \'etale morphisms later (see
Pro-\'etale Cohomology, Section \ref{proetale-section-weakly-etale}).
In this section we stick with the basics.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-check-weakly-etale-stalks}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X \to Y$ is weakly \'etale, and
\item for every $x \in X$ the ring map
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is weakly \'etale.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Observe that under both assumptions (1) and (2) the morphism $f$ is flat.
Thus we may assume $f$ is flat. Let $x \in X$ with image $y = f(x)$ in $Y$.
There are canonical maps of rings
$$
\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}} \mathcal{O}_{X, x}
\longrightarrow
\mathcal{O}_{X \times_Y X, \Delta_{X/Y}(x)}
\longrightarrow
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}
$$
where the first map is a localization (hence flat) and the second map is a
surjection (hence an epimorphism of rings).
Condition (1) means that for all $x$ the second arrow is flat.
Condition (2) is that for all $x$ the composition is flat.
These conditions are equivalent by
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-composition-flat} and
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-key}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-key}
Let $X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes such that
$X \to X \times_Y X$ is flat. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module.
If $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $Y$, then $\mathcal{F}$ is flat over $X$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $x \in X$ with image $y = f(x)$ in $Y$.
Since $X \to X \times_Y X$ is flat, we see that
$\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}} \mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to
\mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ is flat. Hence the result follows from
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-key}
and the definitions.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-weakly-etale-characterize}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item The morphism $f$ is weakly \'etale.
\item For every affine opens $U \subset X$, $V \subset S$
with $f(U) \subset V$ the ring map
$\mathcal{O}_S(V) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is weakly \'etale.
\item There exists an open covering $S = \bigcup_{j \in J} V_j$
and open coverings $f^{-1}(V_j) = \bigcup_{i \in I_j} U_i$ such
that each of the morphisms $U_i \to V_j$, $j\in J, i\in I_j$
is weakly \'etale.
\item There exists an affine open covering $S = \bigcup_{j \in J} V_j$
and affine open coverings $f^{-1}(V_j) = \bigcup_{i \in I_j} U_i$ such
that the ring map $\mathcal{O}_S(V_j) \to \mathcal{O}_X(U_i)$ is
of weakly \'etale, for all $j\in J, i\in I_j$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, if $f$ is weakly \'etale then for
any open subschemes $U \subset X$, $V \subset S$ with $f(U) \subset V$
the restriction $f|_U : U \to V$ is weakly-\'etale.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Suppose given open subschemes $U \subset X$, $V \subset S$ with
$f(U) \subset V$. Then $U \times_V U \subset X \times_Y X$ is open
(Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-open-fibre-product})
and the diagonal $\Delta_{U/V}$ of $f|_U : U \to V$ is
the restriction $\Delta_{X/Y}|_U : U \to U \times_V U$.
Since flatness is a local property of morphisms of schemes
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-characterize})
the final statement of the lemma is follows
as well as the equivalence of (1) and (3).
If $X$ and $Y$ are affine, then $X \to Y$ is weakly \'etale
if and only if $\mathcal{O}_Y(Y) \to \mathcal{O}_X(X)$ is
weakly \'etale (use again
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-characterize}).
Thus (1) and (3) are also equivalent to (2) and (4).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-composition-weakly-etale}
Let $X \to Y \to Z$ be morphisms of schemes.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $X \to X \times_Y X$ and $Y \to Y \times_Z Y$ are flat,
then $X \to X \times_Z X$ is flat.
\item If $X \to Y$ and $Y \to Z$ are weakly \'etale, then
$X \to Z$ is weakly \'etale.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Part (1) follows from the factorization
$$
X \to X \times_Y X \to X \times_Z X
$$
of the diagonal of $X$ over $Z$, the fact that
$$
X \times_Y X = (X \times_Z X) \times_{(Y \times_Z Y)} Y,
$$
the fact that a base change of a flat morphism is flat, and
the fact that the composition of flat morphisms is flat
(Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-flat}).
Part (2) follows from part (1) and the fact (just used)
that the composition of flat morphisms is flat.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-weakly-etale}
Let $X \to Y$ and $Y' \to Y$ be morphisms of schemes and let
$X' = Y' \times_Y X$ be the base change of $X$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $X \to X \times_Y X$ is flat, then $X' \to X' \times_{Y'} X'$
is flat.
\item If $X \to Y$ is weakly \'etale, then $X' \to Y'$ is weakly \'etale.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $X \to X \times_Y X$ is flat. The morphism $X' \to X' \times_{Y'} X'$
is the base change of $X \to X \times_Y X$ by $Y' \to Y$. Hence it
is flat by Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat}.
This proves (1). Part (2) follows from (1) and the fact (just used)
that the base change of a flat morphism is flat.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-go-down}
Let $X \to Y \to Z$ be morphisms of schemes. Assume that $X \to Y$ is
flat and surjective and that $X \to X \times_Z X$ is flat.
Then $Y \to Y \times_Z Y$ is flat.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider the commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
X \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \times_Z X \ar[d] \\
Y \ar[r] & Y \times_Z Y
}
$$
The top horizontal arrow is flat and the vertical arrows are flat.
Hence $X$ is flat over $Y \times_Z Y$. By
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-flat-permanence}
we see that $Y$ is flat over $Y \times_Z Y$.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-weakly-etale-formally-unramified}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a weakly \'etale morphism of schemes.
Then $f$ is formally unramified, i.e., $\Omega_{X/Y} = 0$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Recall that $f$ is formally unramified if and only if $\Omega_{X/Y} = 0$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-formally-unramified-differentials}.
Via Lemma \ref{lemma-weakly-etale-characterize} and
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-differentials-affine}
this follows from the case of rings which is
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-formally-unramified}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-when-weakly-etale}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Then $X \to Y$ is weakly \'etale
in each of the following cases
\begin{enumerate}
\item $X \to Y$ is a flat monomorphism,
\item $X \to Y$ is an open immersion,
\item $X \to Y$ is flat and unramified,
\item $X \to Y$ is \'etale.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
If (1) holds, then $\Delta_{X/Y}$ is an isomorphism, hence certainly
$f$ is weakly \'etale. Case (2) is a special case of (1).
The diagonal of an unramified morphism is an open immersion
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-diagonal-unramified-morphism}),
hence flat. Thus a flat unramified morphism is weakly \'etale.
An \'etale morphism is flat and unramified
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-etale-smooth-unramified}),
hence (4) follows from (3).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-reduced-goes-up}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
If $Y$ is reduced and $f$ weakly \'etale, then $X$ is reduced.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Via Lemma \ref{lemma-weakly-etale-characterize}
this follows from the case of rings which is
More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-absolutely-flat-over-absolutely-flat}.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The following lemma uses a nontrivial result about weakly
\'etale ring maps.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-weakly-etale-strictly-henselian-local-rings}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes.
The following are equivalent
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f$ is weakly \'etale, and
\item for $x \in X$ the local ring map
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, f(x)} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$ induces an isomorphism
on strict henselizations.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $x \in X$ be a point with image $y = f(x)$ in $Y$.
Choose a separable algebraic closure $\kappa^{sep}$ of $\kappa(x)$.
Let $\mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh}$ be the strict henselization
corresponding to $\kappa^{sep}$ and $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}^{sh}$
the strict henselization relative to the separable algebraic
closure of $\kappa(y)$ in $\kappa^{sep}$.
Consider the commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \ar[r] & \mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh} \\
\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \ar[u] \ar[r] & \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}^{sh} \ar[u]
}
$$
local homomorphisms of local rings, see
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-strictly-henselian-functorial}.
Since the strict henselization is a filtered colimit of \'etale
ring maps, More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-when-weakly-etale}
shows the horizontal maps are weakly \'etale.
Moreover, the horizontal maps are faithfully flat by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-dumb-properties-henselization}.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $f$ weakly \'etale. By Lemma \ref{lemma-check-weakly-etale-stalks}
the left vertical arrow is weakly \'etale. By
More on Algebra, Lemmas \ref{more-algebra-lemma-composition-weakly-etale} and
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-weakly-etale-permanence}
the right vertical arrow is weakly \'etale. By
More on Algebra, Theorem \ref{more-algebra-theorem-olivier}
we conclude the right vertical map is an isomorphism.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}^{sh} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh}$ is an isomorphism.
Then $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh}$ is weakly \'etale.
Since $\mathcal{O}_{X, x} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}^{sh}$ is faithfully
flat we conclude that $\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to \mathcal{O}_{X, x}$
is weakly \'etale by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-go-down}.
Thus (2) implies (1) by Lemma \ref{lemma-check-weakly-etale-stalks}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-normal-goes-up}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. If $Y$ is a normal scheme
and $f$ weakly \'etale, then $X$ is a normal scheme.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
By More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-henselization-normal}
a scheme $S$ is normal if and only if for all $s \in S$
the strict henselization of $\mathcal{O}_{S, s}$ is a normal domain.
Hence the lemma follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-weakly-etale-strictly-henselian-local-rings}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-weakly-etale-permanence}
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$.
If $X$, $Y$ are weakly \'etale over $S$, then $f$ is weakly \'etale.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We will use Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-flat} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-composition-flat} without further mention.
Write $X \to Y$ as the composition $X \to X \times_S Y \to Y$.
The second morphism is flat as the base change of the flat morphism
$X \to S$. The first is the base change of the flat morphism
$Y \to Y \times_S Y$ by the morphism $X \times_S Y \to Y \times_S Y$,
hence flat. Thus $X \to Y$ is flat. The morphism
$X \times_Y X \to X \times_S X$ is an immersion.
Thus Lemma \ref{lemma-key} implies, that since
$X$ is flat over $X \times_S X$ it follows that $X$ is
flat over $X \times_Y X$.
\end{proof}





\section{Reduced fibre theorem}
\label{section-reduced-fibre-theorem}

\noindent
In this section we discuss the simplest kind of theorem of the kind
advertised by the title. Although the proof of the result is kind of
laborious, in essence it follows in a straightforward manner from
Epp's result on eliminating ramification, see
More on Algebra, Theorem \ref{more-algebra-theorem-epp}.

\medskip\noindent
Let $A$ be a Dedekind domain with fraction field $K$.
Let $X$ be a scheme flat and of finite type over $A$.
Let $L$ be a finite extension of $K$. Let $B$ be the integral
closure of $A$ in $L$. Then $B$ is a Dedekind domain
(Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-integral-closure-Dedekind}).
Let $X_B = X \times_{\Spec(A)} \Spec(B)$ be the base change.
Then $X_B \to \Spec(B)$ is of finite type
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-finite-type}).
Hence $X_B$ is Noetherian
(Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-noetherian}).
Thus the normalization $\nu : Y \to X_B$ exists (see
Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-normalization}
and the discussion following). Picture
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-normalized-base-change}
\xymatrix{
Y \ar[rd] \ar[r]_\nu & X_B \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \ar[d] \\
 & \Spec(B) \ar[r] & \Spec(A)
}
\end{equation}
We sometimes call $Y$ the {\it normalized base change} of $X$.
In general the morphism $\nu$ may not be finite. But if $A$ is
a Nagata ring (a condition that is virtually always satisfied in
practice) then $\nu$ is of finite and $Y$ is of finite type over $B$, see
Morphisms, Lemmas \ref{morphisms-lemma-nagata-normalization} and
\ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-type-nagata}.

\medskip\noindent
Taking the normalized base change commutes with composition.
More precisely, if $K \subset L \subset M$ are finite extensions
of fields with integral closures $A \subset B \subset C$
then the normalized base change $Z$ of $Y \to \Spec(B)$
relative to $L \subset M$ is equal to the normalized base change
of $X \to \Spec(A)$ relative to $K \subset M$.

\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre}
Let $A$ be a Dedekind ring with fraction field $K$.
Let $X$ be a scheme flat and of finite type over $A$.
Assume $A$ is a Nagata ring.
There exists a finite extension $K \subset L$ such that
the normalized base change $Y$ is smooth over $\Spec(B)$
at all generic points of all fibres.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
During the proof we will repeatedly use that formation of the set of points
where a (flat, finitely presented) morphism like $X \to \Spec(A)$ is
smooth commutes with base change, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-set-points-where-fibres-smooth}.

\medskip\noindent
We first choose a finite extension $K \subset L$ such that
$(X_L)_{red}$ is geometrically reduced over $L$, see
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-finite-extension-geometrically-reduced}.
Since $Y \to (X_B)_{red}$ is birational we see applying
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-generic-points-geometrically-reduced}
that $Y_L$ is geometrically reduced over $L$ as well.
Hence $Y_L \to \Spec(L)$ is smooth on a dense open $V \subset Y_L$ by
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-dense-smooth-open}.
Thus the smooth locus $U \subset Y$ of the morphism $Y \to \Spec(B)$
is open (by Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-smooth})
and is dense in the generic fibre. Replacing $A$ by $B$ and $X$ by $Y$
we reduce to the case treated in the next paragraph.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $X$ is normal and the smooth locus $U \subset X$ of $X \to \Spec(A)$
is dense in the generic fibre. This implies that $U$ is dense in all but
finitely many fibres, see Lemma \ref{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}.
Let $x_1, \ldots, x_r \in X \setminus U$ be the finitely many generic
points of irreducible components of $X \setminus U$ which are moreover
generic points of irreducible components of fibres of $X \to \Spec(A)$.
Set $\mathcal{O}_i = \mathcal{O}_{X, x_i}$. Let $A_i$ be the localization of
$A$ at the maximal ideal corresponding to the image of $x_i$ in $\Spec(A)$.
By
More on Algebra, Proposition
\ref{more-algebra-proposition-epp-essentially-finite-type}
there exist finite extensions
$K \subset K_i$ which are solutions for the extension of discrete valuation
rings $A_i \to \mathcal{O}_i$. Let $K \subset L$ be a finite extension
dominating all of the extensions $K \subset K_i$. Then $K \subset L$
is still a solution for $A_i \to \mathcal{O}_i$ by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-formally-smooth-goes-up}.

\medskip\noindent
Consider the diagram (\ref{equation-normalized-base-change})
with the extension $L/K$ we just produced. Note that $U_B \subset X_B$
is smooth over $B$, hence normal (for example use
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-normal-goes-up}).
Thus $Y \to X_B$ is an isomorphism over $U_B$.
Let $y \in Y$ be a generic point of an irreducible
component of a fibre of $Y \to \Spec(B)$ lying over the maximal
ideal $\mathfrak m \subset B$. Assume that $y \not \in U_B$.
Then $y$ maps to one of the points $x_i$. It follows that
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is a local ring of the integral closure
of $\mathcal{O}_i$ in $R(X) \otimes_K L$ (details omitted).
Hence because $K \subset L$ is a solution for
$A_i \to \mathcal{O}_i$ we see that
$B_\mathfrak m \to \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is formally smooth
(this is the definition of being a "solution").
In other words, $\mathfrak m\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} = \mathfrak m_y$
and the residue field extension is separable. Hence the local ring
of the fibre at $y$ is $\kappa(y)$.
This implies the fibre is smooth over $\kappa(\mathfrak m)$
at $y$ for example by Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-separable-smooth}.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Variant over curves]
\label{lemma-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre-over-curve}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a flat, finite type morphism of schemes.
Assume $S$ is Nagata, integral with function field $K$, and
regular of dimension $1$. Then there exists a finite extension $L/K$
such that in the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Y \ar[rd]_g \ar[r]_-\nu & X \times_S T \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \ar[d]_f \\
& T \ar[r] & S
}
$$
the morphism $g$ is smooth at all generic points of fibres. Here
$T$ is the normalization of $S$ in $\Spec(L)$ and $\nu : Y \to X \times_S T$
is the normalization.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose a finite affine open covering $S = \bigcup \Spec(A_i)$.
Then $K$ is equal to the fraction field of $A_i$ for all $i$.
Let $X_i = X \times_S \Spec(A_i)$.
Choose $L_i/K$ as in
Theorem \ref{theorem-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre}
for the morphism $X_i \to \Spec(A_i)$.
Let $B_i \subset L_i$ be the integral closure of $A_i$ and
let $Y_i$ be the normalized base change of $X$ to $B_i$.
Let $L/K$ be a finite extension dominating each $L_i$.
Let $T_i \subset T$ be the inverse image of $\Spec(A_i)$.
For each $i$ we get a commutative diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
g^{-1}(T_i) \ar[r] \ar[d] & Y_i \ar[r] \ar[d] & X \times_S \Spec(A_i) \ar[d] \\
T_i \ar[r] & \Spec(B_i) \ar[r] & \Spec(A_i)
}
$$
and in fact the left hand square is a normalized base change
as discussed at the beginning of the section. In the proof
of Theorem \ref{theorem-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre}
we have seen that the smooth locus of $Y \to T$ contains the
inverse image in $g^{-1}(T_i)$ of the set of points
where $Y_i$ is smooth over $B_i$. This proves the lemma.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Variant with separable extension]
\label{lemma-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre-separable}
Let $A$ be a Dedekind ring with fraction field $K$.
Let $X$ be a scheme flat and of finite type over $A$.
Assume $A$ is a Nagata ring and that for every generic point
$\eta$ of an irreducible component of $X$ the field
extension $K \subset \kappa(\eta)$ is separable.
Then there exists a finite separable extension $K \subset L$ such that
the normalized base change $Y$ is smooth over $\Spec(B)$
at all generic points of all fibres.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This is proved in exactly the same manner as
Theorem \ref{theorem-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre}
with a few minor modifications. The most important change
is to use More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-epp-essentially-finite-type-separable}
instead of More on Algebra, Proposition
\ref{more-algebra-proposition-epp-essentially-finite-type}.
During the proof we will repeatedly use that formation of the set of points
where a (flat, finitely presented) morphism like $X \to \Spec(A)$ is
smooth commutes with base change, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-set-points-where-fibres-smooth}.

\medskip\noindent
Since $X$ is flat over $A$ every generic point $\eta$ of $X$ maps to the
generic point of $\Spec(A)$.
After replacing $X$ by its reduction we may assume $X$ is reduced.
In this case $X_K$ is geometrically reduced over $K$
by Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-generic-points-geometrically-reduced}.
Hence $X_K \to \Spec(K)$ is smooth on a dense open by
Varieties, Lemma \ref{varieties-lemma-geometrically-reduced-dense-smooth-open}.
Thus the smooth locus $U \subset X$ of the morphism $X \to \Spec(A)$
is open (by Morphisms, Definition \ref{morphisms-definition-smooth})
and is dense in the generic fibre. This reduces us to the situation
of the following paragraph.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $X$ is normal and the smooth locus $U \subset X$ of $X \to \Spec(A)$
is dense in the generic fibre. This implies that $U$ is dense in all but
finitely many fibres, see Lemma \ref{lemma-nowhere-dense-generic-fibre}.
Let $x_1, \ldots, x_r \in X \setminus U$ be the finitely many generic
points of irreducible components of $X \setminus U$ which are moreover
generic points of irreducible components of fibres of $X \to \Spec(A)$.
Set $\mathcal{O}_i = \mathcal{O}_{X, x_i}$. Observe that the fraction
field of $\mathcal{O}_i$ is the residue field of a generic point of $X$.
Let $A_i$ be the localization of $A$ at the maximal ideal corresponding
to the image of $x_i$ in $\Spec(A)$. We may apply More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-epp-essentially-finite-type-separable}
and we find finite separable extensions $K \subset K_i$ which are
solutions for $A_i \to \mathcal{O}_i$. Let $K \subset L$ be a finite
separable extension dominating all of the extensions $K \subset K_i$.
Then $K \subset L$ is still a solution for $A_i \to \mathcal{O}_i$ by
More on Algebra, Lemma \ref{more-algebra-lemma-formally-smooth-goes-up}.

\medskip\noindent
Consider the diagram (\ref{equation-normalized-base-change})
with the extension $L/K$ we just produced. Note that $U_B \subset X_B$
is smooth over $B$, hence normal (for example use
Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-normal-goes-up}).
Thus $Y \to X_B$ is an isomorphism over $U_B$.
Let $y \in Y$ be a generic point of an irreducible
component of a fibre of $Y \to \Spec(B)$ lying over the maximal
ideal $\mathfrak m \subset B$. Assume that $y \not \in U_B$.
Then $y$ maps to one of the points $x_i$. It follows that
$\mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is a local ring of the integral closure
of $\mathcal{O}_i$ in $R(X) \otimes_K L$ (details omitted).
Hence because $K \subset L$ is a solution for
$A_i \to \mathcal{O}_i$ we see that
$B_\mathfrak m \to \mathcal{O}_{Y, y}$ is formally smooth
(this is the definition of being a "solution").
In other words, $\mathfrak m\mathcal{O}_{Y, y} = \mathfrak m_y$
and the residue field extension is separable. Hence the local ring
of the fibre at $y$ is $\kappa(y)$.
This implies the fibre is smooth over $\kappa(\mathfrak m)$
at $y$ for example by Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-separable-smooth}.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Variant with separable extensions over curves]
\label{lemma-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre-over-curve-separable}
Let $f : X \to S$ be a flat, finite type morphism of schemes.
Assume $S$ is Nagata, integral with function field $K$, and
regular of dimension $1$. Assume the field extensions $K \subset \kappa(\eta)$
are separable for every generic point $\eta$ of an irreducible
component of $X$. Then there exists a finite separable extension $L/K$
such that in the diagram
$$
\xymatrix{
Y \ar[rd]_g \ar[r]_-\nu & X \times_S T \ar[d] \ar[r] & X \ar[d]_f \\
& T \ar[r] & S
}
$$
the morphism $g$ is smooth at all generic points of fibres. Here
$T$ is the normalization of $S$ in $\Spec(L)$ and $\nu : Y \to X \times_S T$
is the normalization.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre-separable}
in exactly the same manner that
Lemma \ref{lemma-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre-over-curve}
follows from
Theorem \ref{theorem-normalized-base-change-with-reduced-fibre}.
\end{proof}








\section{Ind-quasi-affine morphisms}
\label{section-ind-quasi-affine}

\noindent
A bit of theory to be used later.

\begin{definition}
\label{definition-ind-quasi-affine}
A scheme $X$ is {\it ind-quasi-affine} if every quasi-compact open of
$X$ is quasi-affine. Similarly, a morphism of schemes $X \to Y$
is {\it ind-quasi-affine} if $f^{-1}(V)$ is ind-quasi-affine
for each affine open $V$ in $Y$.
\end{definition}

\noindent
An example of an ind-quasi-affine scheme is an open of an affine scheme.
If $X = \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ is a union of quasi-affine opens such that
any two $U_i$ are contained in a third, then $X$ is ind-quasi-affine.
An ind-quasi-affine scheme $X$ is separated because any two affine
opens $U, V$ are contained in a separated open subscheme of $X$, namely
$U \cup V$. Similarly an ind-quasi-affine morphism is separated.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-base-change-ind-quasi-affine}
The property of being ind-quasi-affine is stable under base change.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be an ind-quasi-affine morphism. Let $Z$ be an affine
scheme and let $Z \to Y$ be a morphism. To show: $Z \times_Y X$ is
ind-quasi-affine. Let $W \subset Z \times_Y X$ be a quasi-compact open.
We can find finitely many affine opens $V_1, \ldots, V_n$ of $Y$
and finitely many quasi-compact opens $U_i \subset f^{-1}(V_i)$
such that $Z$ maps into $\bigcup V_i$ and $W$ maps into $\bigcup U_i$.
Then we may replace $Y$ by $\bigcup V_i$ and $X$ by $\bigcup W_i$.
In this case $f^{-1}(V_i)$ is quasi-compact open (details omitted; use
that $f$ is separated) and hence quasi-affine. Thus now $X \to Y$
is a quasi-affine morphism (Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-characterize-quasi-affine}) and the result
follows from the fact that the base change of a quasi-affine morphism
is quasi-affine (Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-base-change-quasi-affine}).
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-descending-property-ind-quasi-affine}
The property of being ind-quasi-affine is fpqc local on the base.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $\{g_i : Y_i \to Y\}$
be an fpqc covering such that the base change $f_i : X_i \to Y_i$
is ind-quasi-affine for all $i$. We will show $f$ is ind-quasi-affine.
Namely, let $U \subset X$ be a quasi-compact open mapping into
an affine open $V \subset Y$. We have to show that $U$ is quasi-affine.
Let $V_j \subset Y_{i_j}$, $j = 1, \ldots, m$ be affine opens
such that $V = \bigcup g_{i_j}(V_j)$ (exist by definition of
fpqc coverings). Then $V_i \times_Y X \to V_i$ is ind-quasi-affine
as well. Hence we may replace $Y$ by $V$ and $\{g_i : Y_i \to Y\}$
by the finite covering $\{V_j \to V\}$. We may replace $X$ by
$U$, because $V_j \times_Y U \subset V_j \times_Y X$ is open and
hence $V_j \times_Y U \to V_j$ is ind-quasi-affine as well
(ind-quasi-affineness is inherited by opens).
Hence we may assume $X$ is quasi-compact and $Y$ affine.
In this case we have to show that $X$ is quasi-affine and we
know that $X_i$ is quasi-affine. Thus the result follows from
Descent, Lemma \ref{descent-lemma-descending-property-quasi-affine}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-etale-separated-ind-quasi-affine}
A separated locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes is ind-quasi-affine.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Let $f : X \to Y$ be a separated locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes.
Let $V \subset Y$ be affine and $U \subset f^{-1}(V)$ quasi-compact
open. We have to show $U$ is quasi-affine. Since $U \to V$ is a
separated quasi-finite morphism of schemes, this follows from
Zariski's Main Theorem. See
Lemma \ref{lemma-quasi-finite-separated-quasi-affine}.
\end{proof}







\section{Relative morphisms}
\label{section-relative-morphisms}

\noindent
In this section we prove a representability result which we will use in
Fundamental Groups, Section \ref{pione-section-finite-etale}
to prove a result on the category of finite \'etale coverings of a scheme.
The material in this section is discussed in the correct
generality in Criteria for Representability, Section
\ref{criteria-section-relative-morphisms}.

\medskip\noindent
Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $Z$ and $X$ be schemes over $S$.
Given a scheme $T$ over $S$ we can consider morphisms
$b : T \times_S Z \to T \times_S X$ over $S$. Picture
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-hom}
\vcenter{
\xymatrix{
T \times_S Z \ar[rd] \ar[rr]_b & &
T \times_S X \ar[ld] & Z \ar[rd] & & X \ar[ld] \\
& T \ar[rrr] & & & S
}
}
\end{equation}
Of course, we can also think of $b$ as a morphism
$b : T \times_S Z \to X$ such that
$$
\xymatrix{
T \times_S Z \ar[r] \ar[d] \ar@/^1pc/[rrr]_-b &
Z \ar[rd] & & X \ar[ld] \\
T \ar[rr] & & S
}
$$
commutes. In this situation we can define a functor
\begin{equation}
\label{equation-hom-functor}
\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X) : (\Sch/S)^{opp} \longrightarrow \textit{Sets},
\quad
T \longmapsto \{b\text{ as above}\}
\end{equation}
Here is a basic representability result.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-hom-from-finite-free-into-affine}
Let $Z \to S$ and $X \to S$ be morphisms of affine schemes.
Assume $\Gamma(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z)$ is a finite free
$\Gamma(S, \mathcal{O}_S)$-module. Then $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$
is representable by an affine scheme over $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Write $S = \Spec(R)$. Choose a basis $\{e_1, \ldots, e_m\}$
for $\Gamma(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z)$ over $R$. Choose a presentation
$$
\Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X) = R[\{x_i\}_{i \in I}]/(\{f_k\}_{k \in K}).
$$
We will denote $\overline{x}_i$ the image of $x_i$ in this quotient.
Write
$$
P = R[\{a_{ij}\}_{i \in I, 1 \leq j \leq m}].
$$
Consider the $R$-algebra map
$$
\Psi :
R[\{x_i\}_{i \in I}]
\longrightarrow
P \otimes_R \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z), \quad
x_i \longmapsto \sum\nolimits_j a_{ij} \otimes e_j.
$$
Write $\Psi(f_k) = \sum c_{kj} \otimes e_j$ with $c_{kj} \in P$.
Finally, denote $J \subset P$ the ideal generated by the elements
$c_{kj}$, $k \in K$, $1 \leq j \leq m$. We claim that
$W = \Spec(P/J)$ represents the functor $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$.

\medskip\noindent
First, note that by construction $P/J$ is an $R$-algebra, hence
a morphism $W \to S$. Second, by construction the map
$\Psi$ factors through $\Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$, hence we obtain
an $P/J$-algebra homomorphism
$$
P/J \otimes_R \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)
\longrightarrow
P/J \otimes_R \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z)
$$
which determines a morphism
$b_{univ} : W \times_S Z \to W \times_S X$.
By the Yoneda lemma $b_{univ}$ determines a
transformation of functors $W \to \mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$ which we
claim is an isomorphism. To show that it is an isomorphism it suffices
to show that it induces a bijection of sets
$W(T) \to \mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)(T)$ over any affine
scheme $T$.

\medskip\noindent
Suppose $T = \Spec(R')$ is an affine scheme over $S$
and $b \in \mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)(T)$. The structure morphism $T \to S$
defines an $R$-algebra structure on $R'$ and $b$ defines an $R'$-algebra map
$$
b^\sharp :
R' \otimes_R \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X)
\longrightarrow
R' \otimes_R \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z).
$$
In particular we can write
$b^\sharp(1 \otimes \overline{x}_i) = \sum \alpha_{ij} \otimes e_j$
for some $\alpha_{ij} \in R'$. This corresponds to an $R$-algebra map
$P \to R'$ determined by the rule $a_{ij} \mapsto \alpha_{ij}$. This
map factors through the quotient $P/J$ by the construction of the ideal
$J$ to give a map $P/J \to R'$. This in turn corresponds to a morphism
$T \to W$ such that $b$ is the pullback of $b_{univ}$.
Some details omitted.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-hom-from-finite-locally-free-into-affine}
Let $Z \to S$ and $X \to S$ be morphisms of schemes.
If $Z \to S$ is finite locally free and $X \to S$ is affine,
then $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$ is representable by a scheme
affine over $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Choose an affine open covering $S = \bigcup U_i$ such that
$\Gamma(Z \times_S U_i, \mathcal{O}_{Z \times_S U_i})$ is
finite free over $\mathcal{O}_S(U_i)$. Let $F_i \subset \mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$
be the subfunctor which assigns to $T/S$ the empty set if
$T \to S$ does not factor through $U_i$ and $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)(T)$
otherwise. Then the collection of these subfunctors satisfy the conditions
(2)(a), (2)(b), (2)(c) of
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-glue-functors} which proves the lemma.
Condition (2)(a) follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-hom-from-finite-free-into-affine}
and the other two follow from straightforward arguments.
\end{proof}

\noindent
The condition on the morphism $f : X \to S$ in the lemma below is very
useful to prove statements like it. It holds if one of the following
is true: $X$ is quasi-affine, $f$ is quasi-affine, $f$ is quasi-projective,
$f$ is locally projective, there exists an ample invertible sheaf on $X$,
there exists an $f$-ample invertible sheaf on $X$, or
there exists an $f$-very ample invertible sheaf on $X$.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-hom-from-finite-locally-free-representable}
Let $Z \to S$ and $X \to S$ be morphisms of schemes.
Assume
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Z \to S$ is finite locally free, and
\item for all $(s, x_1, \ldots, x_d)$ where $s \in S$ and
$x_1, \ldots, x_d \in X_s$ there exists an affine open $U \subset X$
with $x_1, \ldots, x_d \in U$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$ is representable by a scheme.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Consider the set $I$ of pairs $(U, V)$ where $U \subset X$ and $V \subset S$
are affine open and $U \to S$ factors through $V$. For $i \in I$ denote
$(U_i, V_i)$ the corresponding pair. Set
$F_i = \mathit{Mor}_{V_i}(Z_{V_i}, U_i)$.
It is immediate that $F_i$ is a subfunctor of $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$.
Then we claim that conditions
(2)(a), (2)(b), (2)(c) of
Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-glue-functors} which proves the lemma.

\medskip\noindent
Condition (2)(a) follows from
Lemma \ref{lemma-hom-from-finite-locally-free-into-affine}.

\medskip\noindent
To check condition (2)(b) consider $T/S$ and $b \in \mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$.
Thinking of $b$ as a morphism $T \times_S Z \to X$ we find an open
$b^{-1}(U_i) \subset T \times_S Z$. Clearly, $b \in F_i(T)$
if and only if $b^{-1}(U_i) = T \times_S Z$. Since the projection
$p : T \times_S Z \to T$ is finite hence closed, the set
$U_{i, b} \subset T$ of points $t \in T$ with
$p^{-1}(\{t\}) \subset b^{-1}(U_i)$ is open.
Then $f : T' \to T$ factors through $U_{i, b}$ if and only
if $b \circ f \in F_i(T')$ and we are done checking (2)(b).

\medskip\noindent
Finally, we check condition (2)(c) and this is where our condition
on $X \to S$ is used. Namely, consider
$T/S$ and $b \in \mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$.
It suffices to prove that every $t \in T$
is contained in one of the opens $U_{i, b}$ defined
in the previous paragraph.
This is equivalent to the condition that
$b(p^{-1}(\{t\})) \subset U_i$ for some $i$
where $p : T \times_S Z \to T$ is the projection and
$b : T \times_S Z \to X$ is the given morphism.
Since $p$ is finite, the set $b(p^{-1}(\{t\})) \subset X$
is finite and contained in the fibre of $X \to S$ over
the image $s$ of $t$ in $S$.
Thus our condition on $X \to S$ exactly shows a
suitable pair exists.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-hom-from-finite-locally-free-separated-lqf}
Let $Z \to S$ and $X \to S$ be morphisms of schemes.
Assume $Z \to S$ is finite locally free and $X \to S$
is separated and locally quasi-finite.
Then $\mathit{Mor}_S(Z, X)$ is representable by a scheme.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows from
Lemmas \ref{lemma-hom-from-finite-locally-free-representable} and
\ref{lemma-separated-locally-quasi-finite-over-affine}.
\end{proof}









\section{Characterizing pseudo-coherent complexes}
\label{section-characterize-pseudo-coherent}

\noindent
In this section we discuss characterizations of pseudo-coherent complexes
in terms of cohomology. This is a continuation of
Derived Categories of Schemes, Section
\ref{perfect-section-pseudo-coherent}.
A basic tool will be to reduce to the case of projective space
using a derived version of Chow's lemma, see Lemma \ref{lemma-derived-chow}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-case-of-tor-independence}
Consider a commutative diagram of schemes
$$
\xymatrix{
Z' \ar[d] \ar[r] & Y' \ar[d] \\
X' \ar[r] & S'
}
$$
Let $S \to S'$ be a morphism. Denote by $X$ and $Y$ the base
changes of $X'$ and $Y'$ to $S$.
Assume $Y' \to S'$ and $Z' \to X'$ are flat.
Then $X \times_S Y$ and $Z'$ are Tor independent over $X' \times_{S'} Y'$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
The question is local, hence we may assume all schemes are affine
(some details omitted). Observe that
$$
\xymatrix{
X \times_S Y \ar[r] \ar[d] & X' \times_{S'} Y' \ar[d] \\
X \ar[r] & X'
}
$$
is cartesian with flat vertical arrows.
Write $X = \Spec(A)$, $X' = \Spec(A')$,
$X' \times_{S'} Y' = \Spec(B')$. Then
$X \times_S Y = \Spec(A \otimes_{A'} B')$.
Write $Z' = \Spec(C')$. We have to show
$$
\text{Tor}_p^{B'}(A \otimes_{A'} B', C') = 0,
\quad\text{for } p > 0
$$
Since $A' \to B'$ is flat
we have $A \otimes_{A'} B' = A \otimes_{A'}^\mathbf{L} B'$.
Hence
$$
(A \otimes_{A'} B') \otimes_{B'}^\mathbf{L} C' =
(A \otimes_{A'}^\mathbf{L} B') \otimes_{B'}^\mathbf{L} C' =
A \otimes_{A'}^\mathbf{L} C' =
A \otimes_{A'} C'
$$
The second equality by More on Algebra, Lemma
\ref{more-algebra-lemma-double-base-change}.
The last equality because $A' \to C'$ is flat. This proves the lemma.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}[Derived Chow's lemma]
\label{lemma-derived-chow}
Let $A$ be a ring. Let $X$ be a separated scheme of finite presentation
over $A$. Let $x \in X$. Then there exist
an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$,
an $n \geq 0$,
an open $V \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$,
a closed subscheme $Z \subset X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A$,
a point $z \in Z$, and
an object $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_{X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A})$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $Z \to X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A$ is of finite presentation,
\item $b : Z \to X$ is an isomorphism over $U$ and $b(z) = x$,
\item $c : Z \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$ is a closed immersion over $V$,
\item $b^{-1}(U) = c^{-1}(V)$, in particular $c(z) \in V$,
\item $E|_{X \times_A V} \cong
(b, c)_*\mathcal{O}_Z|_{X \times_A V}$,
\item $E$ is pseudo-coherent and supported on $Z$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
We can find a finite type $\mathbf{Z}$-subalgebra $A' \subset A$
and a scheme $X'$ separated and of finite presentation over $A'$
whose base change to $A$ is $X$. See
Limits, Lemmas \ref{limits-lemma-descend-finite-presentation} and
\ref{limits-lemma-descend-separated-finite-presentation}.
Let $x' \in X'$ be the image of $x$.
If we can prove the lemma for $x' \in X'/A'$, then
the lemma follows for $x \in X/A$.
Namely, if $U', n', V', Z', z', E'$ provide the solution
for $x' \in X'/A'$, then we can let
$U \subset X$ be the inverse image of $U'$,
let $n = n'$,
let $V \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$ be the inverse image of $V'$,
let $Z \subset X \times \mathbf{P}^n$ be
the scheme theoretic inverse image of $Z'$,
let $z \in Z$ be the unique point mapping to $x$, and
let $E$ be the derived pullback of $E'$.
Observe that $E$ is pseudo-coherent by
Cohomology, Lemma \ref{cohomology-lemma-pseudo-coherent-pullback}.
It only remains to check (5). To see this
set $W = b^{-1}(U) = c^{-1}(V)$ and $W' = (b')^{-1}(U) = (c')^{-1}(V')$ 
and consider the cartesian square
$$
\xymatrix{
W \ar[d]_{(b, c)} \ar[r] & W' \ar[d]^{(b', c')} \\
X \times_A V \ar[r] & X' \times_{A'} V'
}
$$
By Lemma \ref{lemma-case-of-tor-independence} the schemes
$X \times_A V$ and $W'$ are Tor independent over $X' \times_{A'} V'$.
Hence the derived pullback of
$(b', c')_*\mathcal{O}_{W'}$ to $X \times_A V$
is $(b, c)_*\mathcal{O}_W$ by
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-compare-base-change}.
This also uses that $R(b', c')_*\mathcal{O}_{Z'} = (b', c')_*\mathcal{O}_{Z'}$
because $(b', c')$ is a closed immersion and simiarly for
$(b, c)_*\mathcal{O}_Z$.
Since $E'|_{U' \times_{A'} V'} =
(b', c')_*\mathcal{O}_{W'}$ we obtain
$E|_{U \times_A V} = (b, c)_*\mathcal{O}_W$
and (5) holds.
This reduces us to the situation described in the next
paragraph.

\medskip\noindent
Assume $A$ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$.
Choose an affine open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ of $x$.
Then $U$ is of finite type over $A$.
Choose a closed immersion $U \to \mathbf{A}^n_A$ and denote
$j : U \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$ the immersion we get by composing
with the open immersion $\mathbf{A}^n_A \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$.
Let $Z$ be the scheme theoretic closure of
$$
(\text{id}_U, j) : U \longrightarrow X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A
$$
Since the projection $X \times \mathbf{P}^n \to X$ is separated,
we conclude from Morphisms, Lemma
\ref{morphisms-lemma-scheme-theoretic-image-of-partial-section}
that $b : Z \to X$ is an isomorphism over $U$.
Let $z \in Z$ be the unique point lying over $x$.

\medskip\noindent
Let $Y \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$ be the scheme theoretic
closure of $j$. Then it is clear that $Z \subset X \times_A Y$
is the scheme theoretic closure of
$(\text{id}_U, j) : U \to X \times_A Y$.
As $X$ is separated, the morphism
$X \times_A Y \to Y$ is separated as well.
Hence we see that $Z \to Y$ is an isomorphism over
the open subscheme $j(U) \subset Y$ by the same lemma we used above.
Choose $V \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$ open with $V \cap Y = j(U)$.
Then we see that (3) and (4) hold.

\medskip\noindent
Because $A$ is Noetherian we see that $X$ and $X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A$
are Noetherian schemes. Hence we can take $E = (b, c)_*\mathcal{O}_Z$
in this case, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-identify-pseudo-coherent-noetherian}.
This finishes the proof.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-compute-Fourier-Mukai-for-derived-chow}
Let $A$, $x \in X$, and
$U, n, V, Z, z, E$ be as in Lemma \ref{lemma-derived-chow}.
For any $K \in D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$ we have
$$
Rq_*(Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)|_V = R(U \to V)_*K|_U
$$
where $p : X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A \to X$ and
$q : X \times_A \mathbf{P}^n_A \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$ are
the projections and where the morphism $U \to V$ is
the finitely presented closed immersion $c \circ (b|_U)^{-1}$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Since $b^{-1}(U) = c^{-1}(V)$ and since $c$ is a closed immersion
over $V$, we see that $c \circ (b|_U)^{-1}$ is a closed immersion.
It is of finite presentation because $U$ and $V$ are of finite
presentation over $A$, see
Morphisms, Lemma \ref{morphisms-lemma-finite-presentation-permanence}.
First we have
$$
Rq_*(Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)|_V =
Rq'_*\left((Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)|_{X \times_A V}\right)
$$
where $q' : X \times_A V \to V$ is the projection because
formation of total direct image commutes with localization.
Set $W = b^{-1}(U) = c^{-1}(V)$ and denote $i : W \to X \times_A V$
the closed immersion $i = (b, c)|_W$. Then
$$
Rq'_*\left((Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)|_{X \times_A V}\right) =
Rq'_*(Lp^*K|_{X \times_A V} \otimes^\mathbf{L} i_*\mathcal{O}_W)
$$
by property (5). Since $i$ is a closed immersion we have
$i_*\mathcal{O}_W = Ri_*\mathcal{O}_W$.
Using
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-cohomology-base-change}
we can rewrite this as
$$
Rq'_* Ri_* Li^* Lp^*K|_{X \times_A V} =
R(q' \circ i)_* Lb^*K|_W =
R(U \to V)_* K|_U
$$
which is what we want.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-characterize-pseudo-coherent}
Let $A$ be a ring. Let $X$ be a scheme separated and
of finite presentation over $A$. Let $K \in D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
If $R\Gamma(X, E \otimes^\mathbf{L} K)$ is pseudo-coherent
in $D(A)$ for every pseudo-coherent $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$,
then $K$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $A$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $K \in D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$ and
$R\Gamma(X, E \otimes^\mathbf{L} K)$ is pseudo-coherent
in $D(A)$ for every pseudo-coherent $E$ in $D(\mathcal{O}_X)$.
Let $x \in X$. We will show that $K$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $A$
in a neighbourhood of $x$ and this will prove the lemma.

\medskip\noindent
Choose $U, n, V, Z, z, E$ as in Lemma \ref{lemma-derived-chow}.
Denote $p : X \times \mathbf{P}^n \to X$ and
$q : X \times \mathbf{P}^n \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$
the projections.
Then for any $i \in \mathbf{Z}$ we have
\begin{align*}
& R\Gamma(\mathbf{P}^n_A,
Rq_*(Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)
\otimes^\mathbf{L}
\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_A}(i)) \\
& =
R\Gamma(X \times \mathbf{P}^n,
Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E \otimes^\mathbf{L}
Lq^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_A}(i)) \\
& =
R\Gamma(X,
K \otimes^\mathbf{L} Rq_*(E \otimes^\mathbf{L}
Lq^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_A}(i)))
\end{align*}
by 
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-cohomology-base-change}.
By
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-flat-proper-pseudo-coherent-direct-image-general}
the complex $Rq_*(E \otimes^\mathbf{L} Lq^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_A}(i))$
is pseudo-coherent on $X$. Hence the assumption tells us the expression
in the displayed formula is a pseudo-coherent object of $D(A)$.
By
Derived Categories of Schemes,
Lemma \ref{perfect-lemma-pseudo-coherent-on-projective-space}
we conclude that $Rq_*(Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)$ is
pseudo-coherent on $\mathbf{P}^n_A$.
By Lemma \ref{lemma-compute-Fourier-Mukai-for-derived-chow}
we have
$$
Rq_*(Lp^*K \otimes^\mathbf{L} E)|_{X \times_A V} =
R(U \to V)_*K|_U
$$
Since $U \to V$ is a closed immersion into an open subscheme of
$\mathbf{P}^n_A$ this means $K|_U$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $A$
by Lemma \ref{lemma-check-relative-pseudo-coherence-on-charts}.
\end{proof}







\section{Descent finiteness properties of complexes}
\label{section-descent-finiteness}

\noindent
This section is the continuation of Derived Categories of Schemes,
Section \ref{perfect-section-descent-finiteness}.

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherent-descends-fppf}
Let $X \to S$ be locally of finite type.
Let $\{f_i : X_i \to X\}$ be an fppf covering of schemes.
Let $E \in D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
if and only if each $Lf_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Assume $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
The morphisms $f_i$ are pseudo-coherent by
Lemma \ref{lemma-flat-finite-presentation-pseudo-coherent}.
Hence $Lf_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
by Lemma \ref{lemma-pull-relative-pseudo-coherent}.

\medskip\noindent
Conversely, assume that $Lf_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
for each $i$. Pick $S = \bigcup U_j$, $W_j \to U_j$,
$W_j = \bigcup W_{j, k}$, $T_{j, k} \to W_{j, k}$, and
morphisms $\alpha_{j, k} : T_{j, k} \to X_{i(j, k)}$ over $S$ as in
Lemma \ref{lemma-dominate-fppf}.
Since the morphism $T_{j, K} \to S$ is flat and of finite presentation,
we see that $\alpha_{j, k}$ is pseudo-coherent by
Lemma \ref{lemma-permanence-pseudo-coherent}.
Hence
$$
L\alpha_{j, k}^*Lf_{i(j, k)}^*E = L(T_{i, k} \to S)^*E
$$
is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ by
Lemma \ref{lemma-pull-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
Now we want to descend this property
through the coverings $\{T_{j, k} \to W_{j, k}\}$,
$W_j = \bigcup W_{j, k}$, $\{W_j \to U_j\}$, and $S = \bigcup U_j$.
Since for Zariski coverings the result is true
(by the definition of $m$-pseudo-coherence relative to $S$),
this means we may assume we have a single surjective
finite locally free morphism $\pi : Y \to X$
such that $L\pi^*E$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $S$.
In this case $R\pi_*L\pi^*E$ is pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
by Lemma \ref{lemma-finite-morphism-relative-pseudo-coherence}
(this is the first time we use that $E$ has quasi-coherent cohomology sheaves).
We have
$R\pi_*L\pi^*E = E \otimes^\mathbf{L}_{\mathcal{O}_X} \pi_*\mathcal{O}_Y$
for example by
Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma
\ref{perfect-lemma-cohomology-base-change}
and locally on $X$ the map $\mathcal{O}_X \to \pi_*\mathcal{O}_Y$
is the inclusion of a direct summand. Hence we conclude by
Lemma \ref{lemma-summands-relative-pseudo-coherent}.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherent-post-compose}
Let $X \to T \to S$ be morphisms of schemes. Assume $T \to S$
is flat and locally of finite presentation and $X \to T$
locally of finite type. Let $E \in D(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
if and only if $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $T$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
Locally on $X$ we can choose a closed immersion $i : X \to \mathbf{A}^n_T$.
Then $\mathbf{A}^n_T \to S$ is flat and locally of finite presentation.
Thus we may
apply Lemma \ref{lemma-composition-relative-pseudo-coherent}
to see the equivalence holds.
\end{proof}

\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherent-descends-fppf-base}
Let $f : X \to S$ be locally of finite type.
Let $\{S_i \to S\}$ be an fppf covering of schemes.
Denote $f_i : X_i \to S_i$ the base change of $f$
and $g_i : X_i \to X$ the projection.
Let $E \in D_\QCoh(\mathcal{O}_X)$. Let $m \in \mathbf{Z}$.
Then $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$
if and only if each $Lg_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S_i$.
\end{lemma}

\begin{proof}
This follows formally from
Lemmas \ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherent-descends-fppf} and
\ref{lemma-relative-pseudo-coherent-post-compose}.
Namely, if $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$,
then $Lg_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ (by the first lemma),
hence $Lg_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S_i$ (by the second).
Conversely, if
$Lg_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S_i$, then
$Lg_i^*E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ (by the second lemma),
hence $E$ is $m$-pseudo-coherent relative to $S$ (by the first lemma).
\end{proof}







\input{chapters}

\bibliography{my}
\bibliographystyle{amsalpha}

\end{document}