Personal vs Group Identity

[bvssvni]

The idea is that humans have evolved traits of survival, to lend on either their personal or group identity:

1. The sacrifice of personal identity on behalf of a future personal identity
2. The sacrifice of group identity on behalf of a future group identity

When sacrificing personal identity on behalf of a future personal identity, one can think about the personal identity as Seshatic. However, this might require support from the group identity, so the group identity is Platonic.

Likewise, when sacrificing group identity on behalf of a future group identity, one can think about the group identity as Seshatic. This might require support from the personal identity, so the personal identity is Platonic.

So, the languages where personal identity is dual of group identity are interesting.

There are two perspectives, one is Joker X, second is !X X,
where X is the personal identity. Taken together, they form (Joker X) !X X, or,
if the isolated individual and the group individual are contracted: (Joker X) X.

(Joker X) X !X = (X X !X, !X X !X) in OJC
(Joker X) !X X = (X !X, !X X !X) in CJC
(Joker X) !X = (X !X, !X !X) in OJC
(Joker X) !X = (X !X, !X) in CJC

Duals:

!((Joker X) X !X) = (!X ?(X !X), X ?(X !X)) in OJC
!((Joker X) !X X) = (!X ?!X, X ?(X !X)) in CJC
!((Joker X) !X) = (!X ?!X, X ?!X) in OJC
!((Joker X) !X) = (!X ?!X, X) in CJC