Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude Test8167409.sh because hotspot_jre FAILED in Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_linux #2984

Closed
smlambert opened this issue Oct 13, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2988
Assignees

Comments

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor

smlambert commented Oct 13, 2021

Test Info
Test Name: hotspot_jre_0
Test Duration: 9 min 54 sec
Machine: test-docker-ubuntu2004-armv8l-2
TRSS link for the test output: https://trss.adoptium.net/output/test?id=6161bdd4c6182d0217676078

Build Info
Build Name: Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_linux
Jenkins Build start time: Oct 09 2021, 08:17 am
Jenkins Build URL: https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_linux/36/
TRSS link for the build: https://trss.adoptium.net/allTestsInfo?buildId=6161bca9c6182d0217675cee

Java Version
openjdk version "1.8.0_312"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Temurin)(build 1.8.0_312-b06)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Temurin)(build 25.312-b06, mixed mode)

This test has been failed 3 times since Jul 20 2021, 05:40 pm
Java Version when the issue first seen
openjdk version "1.8.0_302"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Temurin)(build 1.8.0_302-b08)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Temurin)(build 25.302-b08, mixed mode)
Jenkins Build URL: https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/job/Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_linux/31/

The test failed on machine test-docker-ubuntu2004-armv8l-2 1 times
The test failed on machine test-alibaba-ubuntu1804-armv8-1 1 times
The test failed on machine test-equinix-ubuntu2004-armv8-0 1 times

Rerun in Grinder

Console output:

[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] STDERR:
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] openjdk version "1.8.0_312"
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Temurin)(build 1.8.0_312-b06)
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Temurin)(build 25.312-b06, mixed mode)
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] /home/jenkins/workspace/Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_linux/aqa-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/hotspot/test/compiler/criticalnatives/argumentcorruption/Test8167409.sh: 47: [: x/bin/gcc: unexpected operator
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] /home/jenkins/workspace/Test_openjdk8_hs_extended.openjdk_aarch64_linux/aqa-tests/openjdk/openjdk-jdk/hotspot/test/compiler/criticalnatives/argumentcorruption/Test8167409.sh: 66: [: aarch64: unexpected operator
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: CriticalJNINatives specified, but not supported in this VM
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Exception: critical native lookup failed
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] 	at CheckLongArgs.check(CheckLongArgs.java:51)
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] 	at CheckLongArgs.test(CheckLongArgs.java:41)
[2021-10-09T12:35:59.677Z] 	at CheckLongArgs.main(CheckLongArgs.java:31)

While it is not a 'fix' for this issue, the immediate action that needs to happen to address this issue is to exclude the failing test case, hotspot/test/compiler/criticalnatives/argumentcorruption/Test8167409.sh on the aarch64 platform. This can be done by adding an exclusion statement in https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/blob/master/openjdk/excludes/ProblemList_openjdk8.txt (likely just after Line 109).

compiler/criticalnatives/argumentcorruption/Test8167409.sh https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/2984 linux-aarch64

@King-kay
Copy link
Contributor

can i take up this issue?

LizyBbethy added a commit to LizyBbethy/aqa-tests that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2021
@LizyBbethy
Copy link
Contributor

LizyBbethy commented Oct 15, 2021

hi @smlambert i am Lizy an outreach intern for dec to march , i have gotten a good grip around .can you assign me this? PR made

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @LizyBbethy - this one is already assigned, once we get a few more good first issues created (this weekend), you can select a different one. :)

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed via #2988

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants