Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 6, 2021. It is now read-only.

[Live HTML]: Live Preview can never update if initially launched with syntax error #5338

Open
julieyuan opened this issue Sep 25, 2013 · 19 comments

Comments

@julieyuan
Copy link

Steps:

  1. Launch Brackets and new a html file.
  2. Input some content between tag body: < abc.
  3. Live preview this html file.
  4. Delete the space between < and abc, or just make any change in this file. The tooltip of Live preview icon will show "not updating due to syntax error".
  5. Delete < to make sure that there isn't syntax error in this file.
  6. Edit this file and save it.

Result:
Live preview cannot updating the file at step6. I have to reload the webpage through chrome browser.

Expected:
At step6, Live preview should work well for there isn't any syntax error.

ENV: MAC10.8 and Win8.1 English OS.
Build: 0.32.0-9618

Snapshots:
Please refer to snapshots for details:
Step3:
1
Step4:
2
Step5:
3
Step6:
4

@redmunds
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the detailed recipe. When whitespace occurs following a <, seems like Live Dev should interpret that as content and not a starting tag delimiter.

@dangoor
Copy link
Contributor

dangoor commented Sep 25, 2013

@redmunds I'm not sure that < abc is valid. Also, the problem is reproducible even if you start with <abc. The real problem here is that we serve up invalid HTML from the get go and then expect to be able to update it.

It seems to me that the best solution here is to have a new state in which live development starts in the "invalid" state. Once the document becomes valid for the first time, then it is sent to the browser.

What do you think, @njx?

(marking this medium priority)

@redmunds
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds like there are 2 separate cases.

As for the < abc case, that may be invalid in XHTML, but "valid" is a pretty vague term in HTML :) All browsers seem to render the '<' char as content, and I suspect people expect Brackets to behave as browsers do.

@njx
Copy link

njx commented Sep 25, 2013

I think we need to fix the problem @dangoor pointed out in any case (I had had a vague feeling earlier that there might be a bug here but never actually tested it). But I'm a little confused about how that comes up with these steps, since in the bug case the file doesn't start out invalid, if I'm reading the steps correclty.

Regarding whether we decide to be more lenient about the < abc case, it would probably be a fairly small change to the tokenizer to allow this, but the flipside is that if someone were to type that temporarily by mistake (adding a space after an existing tag open), it could result in a very disruptive DOM diff. That doesn't really matter while we're dealing with static HTML, but it would be more of an issue when we get to dealing with HTML that's modified at runtime. In general, the reason we try to stick with valid HTML is not because we want to strictly enforce it, but because we want to avoid updating while the DOM structure isn't clear.

If this were a common type of invalid HTML that people want to preserve, then I think we should consider allowing it, but I don't have a good sense of that.

@dangoor
Copy link
Contributor

dangoor commented Sep 26, 2013

@njx The file does start out invalid, assuming our tokenizer currently gets stuck in the open tag state for < abc, because the steps say not to turn on live development until after that initial document (with the invalid bit) is typed.

My main concern is less about whether < abc is considered valid and much more about recovering from an invalid state when live dev is started. As @njx says, it's an easy change to the tokenizer for the < behavior.

@njx
Copy link

njx commented Sep 26, 2013

Ah, I missed that. But yes, we definitely need to fix it.

@istudiomobile
Copy link

The same happens to me. While editing html file, delete two rows (list elements) I wasn't using. then live preview stopped 'cause "syntax error", but there´s no syntax error. I've to stop and start over.

Hope this helps. Thank you.

@dangoor
Copy link
Contributor

dangoor commented Sep 26, 2013

@brickyenne Was Live HTML working and then stopped working? If so, that may be a different problem. Brackets should highlight where it thinks there's an error in the file.

If you continue to have problems, if you can share some or all of your HTML file with us (possibly in a new issue on GitHub) that may help.

@istudiomobile
Copy link

Strange thing is there’s no error visible, no pink tag. Just deleted a couple of

  • list ítems and every stopped working. Just pink live editing icon (switches back to orange after saving but page does not gets updated).

    Every now and then receive an alert box saying: Cannot load page. Error in live editing”

    Do you thing I should post this as a bug?

    Thank you.

    Enviado con Correo de Windows

    De: Kevin Dangoor
    Enviado el: ‎jueves‎, ‎26‎ de ‎septiembre‎ de ‎2013 ‎10‎:‎05
    Para: adobe/brackets
    CC: brickyenne

    @brickyenne Was Live HTML working and then stopped working? If so, that may be a different problem. Brackets should highlight where it thinks there's an error in the file.

    If you continue to have problems, if you can share some or all of your HTML file with us (possibly in a new issue on GitHub) that may help.


    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

    @dangoor
    Copy link
    Contributor

    dangoor commented Sep 26, 2013

    @brickyenne From your description, it sounds like you may be encountering this bug, but you may also be encountering something different. I would recommend opening a separate bug just to be sure that we're correctly diagnosing what you're seeing without getting confused with the problem reported here. Please be sure to include the steps you took and when specifically live HTML worked and didn't work for you. (It's not clear to me right now if you had seen any changes come through to the browser). Any example HTML that reproduces the problem will be a big help.

    @ghost ghost assigned dangoor Sep 30, 2013
    @njx
    Copy link

    njx commented Sep 30, 2013

    Medium pri to @dangoor

    @peterflynn
    Copy link
    Member

    Changing title to clarify that the bug only occurs when Live Development is started with a syntax error (was: "[Core][Live HTML]: Live preview cannot continue to update if the orginal html file ever has syntax error.")

    @peterflynn
    Copy link
    Member

    Although @dangoor it seems like there is a secondary bug here: in the first screenshot, the file supposedly has syntax we consider invalid (< abc) and thus Live Preview is broken, but the lightning bolt is still the regular golden color. It should be magenta any time we're unable to push updates, right?

    @redmunds
    Copy link
    Contributor

    redmunds commented Mar 8, 2014

    In the scenario described in #7126, I am able to open a page with invalid syntax, then fix formatting of page, and Live HTML resumes.

    #7126 also describes the problem where icon returns to yellow when there is still a syntax error in page.

    @dangoor dangoor added this to the Brackets 1.0 milestone Mar 17, 2014
    @pthiess
    Copy link
    Contributor

    pthiess commented Apr 14, 2014

    reviewed - 1.0 milestone.

    @njx
    Copy link

    njx commented Apr 14, 2014

    Reviewed, leaving open for 1.0.

    @JeffryBooher JeffryBooher removed the IQE label Oct 27, 2014
    @pthiess pthiess removed this from the Brackets 1.0 (Release 0.45) milestone Oct 27, 2014
    @dangoor dangoor removed their assignment Oct 27, 2014
    @busykai
    Copy link
    Contributor

    busykai commented Dec 12, 2014

    Would we want a behavior that prevented Live Preview from opening if the HTML cannot be understood by instrumentation?

    @redmunds
    Copy link
    Contributor

    I think the desired behavior would be the same as if the user opened a page with valid syntax and then edited page so that syntax was no longer valid. In this case, the first line with a syntax error has a red line number and HTML is not updated until syntax error is fixed. This would be consistent with current behavior.

    One problem with this approach is if the syntax error is on a line that's not in the current view port -- let us know if you can think of a way to inform user of that case.

    @marmistrz
    Copy link

    The problem persists in 1.7.

    Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    10 participants