Design difference between Source Han Sans SC and Source Han Serif SC

[KazunariTsuboi]

Four characters were found in Source Han Serif SC that have different design with Source Han Sans SC.
They are 䙛(U+465B),⻞(U+2EDE),㨗(U+3A17),渉(U+6E09).

[kenlunde]

For U+465B 䙛, this is a known (by me) issue for the CN glyph of Source Han Sans, and is targeted to be fixed in Version 2.000 by adding a new CN glyph, uni465B-CN.

For U+2EDE, we did something special for Source Han Sans, specifically that we created a CN glyph for U+2967F 𩙿, u2967F-CN, then mapped U+2EDE to it in the CN and, by extension, TW CMap resources. We'll need to do the same for Source Han Serif.

U+3A17 㨗 requires a new CN glyph, uni3A17-CN, to be added. The sole glyph for this character is a JP one.

U+6E09 渉, both Source Han families include a CN glyph, uni6E09-CN, and I'd argue that Source Han Serif is correct, and that the Source Han Sans glyph needs to be fixed.

I will consolidate this issue with the appropriate Source Han Sans and Source Han Serif issues later today, then close it.