You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Good evening! I have two questions if someone has some time:
1). The "tracc_throughput_mt" benchmark has an option to pass a detector .csv file and a volume finder. I couldn't find those downloaded by the get data shell script. The benchmark runs but produces warnings:
WARNING: No material in detector
WARNING: No entries in volume finder
I just want to make sure that not providing these files doesn't make the runs invalid.
2). If I understand well, traccc uses TBB for threading and there is no multi-node support with MPI or an alternative. Are there any beta versions that do use MPI or another way for multi-node runs?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Good evening! I have two questions if someone has some time:
1). The "tracc_throughput_mt" benchmark has an option to pass a detector .csv file and a volume finder. I couldn't find those downloaded by the get data shell script. The benchmark runs but produces warnings:
WARNING: No material in detector
WARNING: No entries in volume finder
I just want to make sure that not providing these files doesn't make the runs invalid.
2). If I understand well, traccc uses TBB for threading and there is no multi-node support with MPI or an alternative. Are there any beta versions that do use MPI or another way for multi-node runs?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions