Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should rules have an assumption about aria-busy? #2140

Open
WilcoFiers opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2160
Open

Should rules have an assumption about aria-busy? #2140

WilcoFiers opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2160

Comments

@WilcoFiers
Copy link
Member

This comes from an ARIA review

We currently only have one rule that has an exception for aria-busy. I think for that rule it is a reasonable thing to have. I'm less sure about other rules, it seems unlikely that aria-busy is going to resolve issues such as invalid roles, or missing text alternatives. Even if not, should rules have an assumption that content is loaded?
@Jym77
Copy link
Collaborator

Jym77 commented Jan 11, 2024

Decision:
add an Accessibility Support note to every rule using "Accessibility tree" as input aspect, stating that "aria-busy exists but isn't widely supported (JAWS only, currently, it seems), so the rule ignores it".

@Jym77 Jym77 removed the Agenda item label Jan 23, 2024
@carlosapaduarte carlosapaduarte linked a pull request Feb 8, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@WilcoFiers @carlosapaduarte @Jym77